Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Security Stats Windows Worms IT Technology

How Windows Gets Infected With Malware 373

Orome1 writes "Since Up to 85 % of all virus infections occur as a result of drive-by attacks automated via commercial exploit kits, CSIS has actively collected real time data from them for a period of three months. The purpose of their study is to reveal precisely how Microsoft Windows machines are infected with malware and which browsers, versions of Windows and third party software that are at risk. They monitored more than 50 different exploit kits on 44 unique servers / IP addresses. The statistical material covers all in all more than half a million user exposures out of which as many as 31.3 % were infected with the virus/malware due to missing security updates."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

How Windows Gets Infected With Malware

Comments Filter:
  • by 140Mandak262Jamuna ( 970587 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2011 @11:07AM (#37612612) Journal
    Salient point is that, fully updated and patched installs let 70% of the infections through.
  • by LordLimecat ( 1103839 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2011 @11:23AM (#37612814)

    Even more salient is that only 13% of the successful infections relied on software that was Windows only (10% were IE exploits, 3% were Windows Help exploits).

    All you folks encourgaging your friends and families to buy Macs for the specific reason of their security are in for a world of hurt in a few years when Mac hits ~30+% market share. Kits are already starting to appear.

  • by houstonbofh ( 602064 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2011 @11:44AM (#37613106)

    I also think Linux is bad for the average user, because while it is more secure than Windows by default, if you muck with it you can cause vastly more damage to the system if you are in the "just enough knowledge to be dangerous" camp. Ubuntu goes a long way towards this, but it needs an even friendlier interface (IMHO) for system setup and config. We won't get that till an OEM adopts it seriously for end user platforms.

    I have set up a laptop for 2 different client's wives with Ubuntu. Both were non-computer experts, and kept getting every infection known to man. After setting them up (Over 2 years ago) I never say those laptops again. I still see the clients, but they say the laptops are running perfect. Lost a lot of business there, and from happy clients. :) Ooops...

  • by Riceballsan ( 816702 ) on Wednesday October 05, 2011 @03:14PM (#37616066)
    Installing a modern linux OS, is generally easier then windows, even for someone who has never used linux before.

    typical linux install, insert CD, boot computer, click the install linux button (by default it will ask to downlaod the updates, and does so in this step), hit next, accept the defaults. computer boots back up, ready to go with a word processor, firefox and almost everything they need ready to go.

    windows 7. insert install CD, hit next, accept the defaults, computer boots back up, look for manufacturs CD to install any missing drivers, find printer drivers, find Office CD or go to webpage to download open or libre office, install antivirus, agree to windows updates, reboot, install more updates, reboot. Done.

    There are a few exceptions to the list, and it's not uncommon for windows to have all of the drivers ready for you, But oddly in all installs of linux I have done recently, everything I have ever thrown at it has been automatically detected and ready to go on reboot, and I do admit the antivirus would be necessary if linux were to ever fall into the common for average users to get category.

Always draw your curves, then plot your reading.

Working...