Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Google Communications Privacy The Internet Your Rights Online

Why Google Is Disabling Kids' Gmail Accounts 228

theodp writes "The Washington Post's Elizabeth Flock managed to hold Google's feet to the fire and get an explanation of sorts for why it's making kids cry by disabling their Gmail accounts after years of use. Giving 12-year-olds access to Gmail — unless they are using Google Apps for Education accounts through their school — is proving to be as formidable a task for Google as making renewable energy cheaper than coal. But what about that viral 'Dear Sophie' commercial, asked Flock, in which a father creates a Gmail account for his baby daughter and uses it to send her photos, videos, and messages that chronicle her growing up? 'The implied understanding,' replied a Google spokesman, 'is that the girl in the story does not have access to the account, but that she will have access to it "someday."'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Why Google Is Disabling Kids' Gmail Accounts

Comments Filter:
  • by JoeMerchant ( 803320 ) on Sunday December 18, 2011 @04:54PM (#38418888)

    Like every 9 year old on MySpace ever did... just put in the wrong birthyear and everything stays cool.

  • by Anthony Mouse ( 1927662 ) on Sunday December 18, 2011 @04:59PM (#38418910)

    I was wondering, do you think it would be more efficient if you could come in and tell us when something is not Google's fault? I'm just saying, it would probably save you some time, since the list of things that you think are their fault is clearly much longer.

  • by Ron Bennett ( 14590 ) on Sunday December 18, 2011 @05:01PM (#38418916) Homepage

    Seems a good lesson that often in life one must tell lies of varying degrees. Fibbing about age is one of those.

    Many websites and services (email, web hosting / blog sites, facebook, etc) have age stipulations ranging from 13 to 21, which effectively makes much of the web useless to young people unless they lie.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 18, 2011 @05:16PM (#38419004)

    You Do. Not. Need. A. Copy. Of. My. Passport.

    Actually.. legally.. they do. If you want access to that account again, you can either verify that her parent has authorized the kid to be scaped and indexed and acknowledge that your kid can receive the accompanying advertising, or you can create another anonymous account to have similar advertising, scraping, analyzing done to her anyway. In one case, she gets her account back; in the other case, Google gets their data anyway.

    As much as I'm for privacy, it's not like providing a copy of your passport is providing anything that Google doesn't have on you anyway. They don't even need _your_ google account to link it to, do they (not sure)? They just, legally, need to be sure that a parent/guardian has allowed Google to analyze their kid. US laws, if not your country's laws.

    So perhaps you should explain to your daughter one of two things:
    1. Your resentment of someone verifying that you are you, and you have control over your kid
    2. US laws designed to protect the privacy of kids, and how they're hurting her. Perhaps you can go into how your own country's privacy laws work.

  • by AngryDeuce ( 2205124 ) on Sunday December 18, 2011 @05:17PM (#38419016)

    Seems to me that Google should startup a 'Google Kids' to handle things like this in compliance with COPPA. Once the child reaches 12, they can convert it over to a regular Gmail account.

    Parents can administrate, while at the same time teaching their kids how to behave on the internet, teachers can email assignments, etc. As long as control rests solely with the parent, I see no issue with something like that.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 18, 2011 @05:21PM (#38419046)

    Probably not. Unless he's living under totalitarian rule (China, Saudi Arabia, etc.), chances are he's used to more sensible legislation regarding the internet.

  • by Runaway1956 ( 1322357 ) on Sunday December 18, 2011 @05:33PM (#38419110) Homepage Journal

    Actually - COPPA needs to die. Parents are supposed to be a child's first line of defense. Then the courts. Simply mandating that kids can't access and/or must be monitored by a provider such as Google is simply asinine. As a parent, and as a grandparent, I'd cheefully counsel my kids how to circumvent COPPA bullshit.

    "See the box, where they ask how old you are? What's the minimum age? Alright, Honey, just add 3 or 6 to that minimum age, so your "birth year" is going to be 19xx, alright? Yeah, I know you're not 20 yet, but THEY don't know that!"

  • by Trepidity ( 597 ) <[gro.hsikcah] [ta] [todhsals-muiriled]> on Sunday December 18, 2011 @05:35PM (#38419122)

    Yeah, I would be more ok with Google just saying "this isn't a service for children" if they didn't also make TV ads about children having Google accounts. Pick one or the other!

  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 18, 2011 @05:46PM (#38419198)

    Just wait until they sue the kids for violating the law meant to protect them, under the exact same law.

    And then have 'em tried as adults, just for good measure.

    Don't forget to tell your 13-year old kids it's illegal to make n00d self-shots in the mirror with their iPhones. They will be in possession of extremely illegal content one minute after their 14th birthday, be tried as adults and registered as sex offenders for life.

    Remember: all the things we used to do when we were young are now illegal. All.

  • by 100_Monkeys_Typing ( 662396 ) on Sunday December 18, 2011 @05:47PM (#38419204)
    It seems like a lot of people are unhappy with Google's FREE service. If you don't like how Google is running THEIR business, start your own or find one that is age appropriate for kids. I fail to understand why people get mad when they can't get exactly what they want from a company that is offering their services for no additional charge to the user. If the users were paying something, ie AOL, then i would understand.
  • by cheekyjohnson ( 1873388 ) on Sunday December 18, 2011 @06:01PM (#38419284)

    "Free" doesn't mean "exempt from criticism." That said, they're also free to not listen to you.

    And I think this is really the fault of idiotic "think of the children" laws.

  • by acoster ( 812556 ) <acosterNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Sunday December 18, 2011 @06:48PM (#38419622)

    Well, they don't think they have jurisdiction over foreign individuals. But they do have jurisdiction over the company holding the data - and quite possibly over the physical server itself (if it is in an american data centre).

  • by MrMista_B ( 891430 ) on Sunday December 18, 2011 @06:49PM (#38419624)

    Free does not mean 'immune from criticism'.

    Why do you imply that it does?

  • by shutdown -p now ( 807394 ) on Sunday December 18, 2011 @08:22PM (#38420168) Journal

    As an atheist, I wholeheartedly support this idea. If all kids were forced to read the entire Bible before they turn 13, and pass the exam on textual knowledge - why, that would probably do more to reduce the influence of Christianity than efforts of all the various skeptic and secular humanist groups in the country. ~

  • by Joe U ( 443617 ) on Sunday December 18, 2011 @10:05PM (#38420716) Homepage Journal

    Windows Live/Hotmail allows and encourages child accounts.

    That leads me to a few ideas as to why Google won't comply with COPPA. The most likely one being that they just can't turn the marketing machine off.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 18, 2011 @11:43PM (#38421158)
    How is it even a "fault"? Google provides email service FOR FREE. They can do whatever the hell they want with it at any time with or without notification.

    If people don't like it, they can go pay for email somewhere else. The sense of entitlement going on here is ridiculous.
  • by WNight ( 23683 ) on Monday December 19, 2011 @03:18AM (#38422058) Homepage

    The bible makes sense? Sure it does. And so does the Koran, so they say. In fact, pretty much any ridiculous belief has a ton of supporters.

    Never anyone reputable though. I mean, look at the people who say that - idiots who say things like " ... science falsely called, and ...".

    I know you get brownie points for trying to convince people of the existence of the sky fairy, and most-importantly you feel like it validates your belief, but it's crap. The book, the teachings, and the institutionalized ignorance required for faith.

    Because of the nature of ego I'm sure this post will just drive you to your chosen delusion with more fervor but hopefully it helps someone on the fence decide to investigate more, and with non-cult sources, before ruining their life with it.

To do nothing is to be nothing.

Working...