Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Japan Robotics Technology

Where Were the Robots In Fukushima Crisis? 130

mdsolar writes "When the huge Fukushima nuclear disaster first started, many on Slashdot were calling for robots to come to the rescue. This is the story of why our overlords were caught napping. Not to worry though, ¥1 billion has been allocated to correct the robot problem. They will be properly welcomed."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Where Were the Robots In Fukushima Crisis?

Comments Filter:
  • No incentive (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Hentes ( 2461350 ) on Sunday January 08, 2012 @10:36AM (#38629070)

    With nuclear accidents being extremely rare there is no point in designing robots specifically for them. Those models would most likely become obsolete without ever being used.

  • It is simple (Score:2, Insightful)

    by peragrin ( 659227 ) on Sunday January 08, 2012 @10:37AM (#38629076)

    Pride prevented them from acknowledging their weaknesses and thus prevented them from building robots that could go into the bad places that humans have made.

    it is pretty typical japanese ignore a potential situation until you are shamed into no longer ignoring it. It is one of the few things that japan does that they are ashamed of but because they are shamed they won't fix it.

    American's are alway cleaning up the mess made by others. hopefully one day someone will clean up after us American's

  • Re:No incentive (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Capitaine ( 2026730 ) on Sunday January 08, 2012 @10:43AM (#38629112)
    Nuclear disasters are not the only use case of such robots. Fire-fighting, post-earthquake/terror attack assistance etc. apart from the shielding, not much changes. An Asimo or any other humanoïd robot doesn't help much in those cases. They are good for shows or interaction with human but not for operation in hard terrains.
  • by assertation ( 1255714 ) on Sunday January 08, 2012 @11:25AM (#38629324)

    The most important questions go beyond the robots:

    Why did they use a design that was pronounced risky by Rand McNally BEFORE the plant was built?

    Why did they build it in an earthquake zone and in a zone vulnerable to tsunamis?

    I bet a lot of of Japanese business men would love for the focus to stay on some technical failures with the robots.

  • by 0WaitState ( 231806 ) on Sunday January 08, 2012 @05:24PM (#38631946)

    Where were the robots? They were in the same place as the dosimeters, hazmat suits, geiger counters, breathing apparatus, standby generators, dual remote electrical hookups (Japan has two electrical standards), stocks of boron, reactor model upgrades, structure vents, and so on. In other words, nowhere. All preparation for emergencies was skipped. No doubt a couple decades of management bonuses were paid for keeping costs down.

    This is why nuclear power is unsafe. Because you can't trust humans to run systems where a cost cut today doesn't blow up for 10-20 years. This kind of crap happens in all industries, it's just that in the nuclear industry the "oops" consequences are devastating.

interlard - vt., to intersperse; diversify -- Webster's New World Dictionary Of The American Language

Working...