Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Privacy Transportation Security Your Rights Online

Aviation Security Debate: Bruce Schneier V. Kip Hawley (Former TSA Boss) 291

Fluffeh writes "A nice summary at TechDirt brings word that Bruce Schneier has been debating Kip Hawley, former boss of the TSA, over at the Economist. Bruce has been providing facts, analysis and some amazing statistics throughout the debate, and it makes for very educational reading. Because of the format, the former TSA administrator is compelled to respond. Quoting: 'He wants us to trust that a 400-ml bottle of liquid is dangerous, but transferring it to four 100-ml bottles magically makes it safe. He wants us to trust that the butter knives given to first-class passengers are nevertheless too dangerous to be taken through a security checkpoint. He wants us to trust that there's a reason to confiscate a cupcake (Las Vegas), a 3-inch plastic toy gun (London Gatwick), a purse with an embroidered gun on it (Norfolk, VA), a T-shirt with a picture of a gun on it (London Heathrow) and a plastic lightsaber that's really a flashlight with a long cone on top (Dallas/Fort Worth).""
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Aviation Security Debate: Bruce Schneier V. Kip Hawley (Former TSA Boss)

Comments Filter:
  • On the other hand (Score:5, Insightful)

    by overshoot ( 39700 ) on Friday March 30, 2012 @06:42PM (#39529695)

    There's no limit to the amoung of thermite you can carry on, and no limit to the amount of calcium carbide.

    Just to name two.

  • by DCFusor ( 1763438 ) on Friday March 30, 2012 @06:43PM (#39529711) Homepage
    For congress, and they were, as usual, too spineless to tell the TSA to take a hike. After all, it's congress who spent all that money to line Chertoff's pockets (guess who makes the useless scanners now), and they didn't want to look bad for it - hearings are just photo-ops for the next election, to give the appearance of "doing something" when of course, the only thing going on is bribes and blackmail. Ever notice how DHS gets every excessive dime they ask for? Well, I know if I had warrantess wiretaps and all that kind of thing, the first thing I'd do is get the dirt on congress for future blackmail. This would occur to any bureaucrat in a few seconds. So you have to assume that's why these agencies never get seriously questioned about their ridiculous antics and waste, eh?
  • by girlintraining ( 1395911 ) on Friday March 30, 2012 @06:46PM (#39529741)

    They're in the business of making passengers feel safe. Passengers like that. They'll gladly suffer through free prostate exams if it means they can sit comfortably on the flight, believing they won't be one of the next set of 9/11 martyrs.

    And it's a popular product: Look at how many people fly. If people didn't like the product, they wouldn't buy it. So whenever someone says "Ah! They're taking away their civil liberties!" ... Well, yes, but that's no worse than you forcing your own beliefs on them that they shouldn't be able to buy free prostate exams.

    At the end of the day, you can only be responsible for your own behavior: These people aren't being forced to board a plane at gunpoint. They wllingly accept what the TSA is doing, regardless of whether or not it is necessary.

    If you want the situation to change: Don't fly. Let the airplanes rust in their hangars. Let the corporations go bankrupt one by one. The TSA is only allowed to live by the patronage of the passengers. No passengers = No TSA.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 30, 2012 @06:49PM (#39529785)

    It's clearly ineffective, but never mind that: we don't have the money for it. In case we haven't noticed, we're spending 1 point some odd TRILLION more every year than we take in.

    Unfortunately, like most large bureaucracies, the TSA is self sustaining. It work hard to justify itself, despite never having caught a single terrorist in its entire existence. Replicate that to hundreds of other useless federal agencies, and you have a government that far overstepped the bounds of what it's supposed to be for, and now exists to give jobs to the phone sanitizers (RIP, DA) of our country.

    Yet Americans will cheerfully keep voting for Republicrats, no matter what they do, so I guess the TSA is what we deserve. You get the government you deserve, they always say.

  • by icebraining ( 1313345 ) on Friday March 30, 2012 @06:52PM (#39529797) Homepage

    Of course, that assumes the TSA will remain restricted to airplanes...

  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 30, 2012 @06:54PM (#39529815)

    "Willingly" is a pretty tough argument to make.

    If I have to fly to a wedding or for business, I have no choice. Many destinations are reachable by air only, or would involve something like a 48 hour round trip drive.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 30, 2012 @06:56PM (#39529841)

    They are creating fear in order to gain more power. People are willing to give-up their rights to any politician claiming to protect them.

    Fear is the mindkiller.

  • The lab called (Score:5, Insightful)

    by overshoot ( 39700 ) on Friday March 30, 2012 @07:26PM (#39530185)
    Your sarcasmometer is overdue for calibration.
  • by CrackedButter ( 646746 ) on Friday March 30, 2012 @07:27PM (#39530199) Homepage Journal

    The USA has been on my no-fly list since I was disgusted by the government's lies over Iraq.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 30, 2012 @07:35PM (#39530283)

    You make a decent attempt at a sensible explanation. Unfortunately, you're wrong.

    I know something about this incident. It was quite simple. The security guard was pissed off - he had been in an argument with his boss earlier - and was looking to take it out on someone. He picked a teenager with a T shirt which had a picture of 'Optimus Prime' on it, and told him to take it off, simply because it looked flashy to him. There was not even any concern about the fact that all 'Transformer' robots hold a gun initially. The issue about the gun was raised later because the family made a fuss, and they were looking for a retrospective excuse. Of course, at that stage, all the guards stuck together and ordered the family off...

    The point here is that, in the West, we have appointed people to 'look after us' and 'tell us what to do' in every conceivable activity in life. And a large portion of the people who apply for these jobs are assertive bullies. You can see it everywhere - people telling us what to eat, how much we should exercise, what kind of sex is legal... And when they run out of sensible things to tell us, they just start to make it up...

  • by dfenstrate ( 202098 ) <dfenstrate@gmaiEULERl.com minus math_god> on Friday March 30, 2012 @07:37PM (#39530309)

    Of course, that assumes the TSA will remain restricted to airplanes...

    I present to you the TSA VIPR [wikipedia.org] program.

    Note how it consists of some Mall Ninja acronym/name, like the murderous "Fast and the Furious" program put on by the justice department and ATF clowns.

    The reason I suggest it might not be too late is because they pissed off Amtrak by molesting train passengers (leaving the train, no less), and were banned from Amtrak property for a while (still?).

    So, at least a government-sponsored entity is willing to tell these jack-booted thugs to go pound sand.

  • by PopeRatzo ( 965947 ) on Friday March 30, 2012 @07:50PM (#39530447) Journal

    The point here is that, in the West, we have appointed people to 'look after us' and 'tell us what to do' in every conceivable activity in life.

    Yet somehow, I manage to make it through every day with nobody but my wife telling me what to do.

    If you think we're over-policed and over-regulated that's fine, but the notion that we've got someone "telling us what to do" in "every conceivable activity in life" is the kind of ridiculous hyperbole that would qualify you for a job as a right-wing AM radio host.

    Can you say, "This government has taken away all our freedoms!" for me? And also, "They took our jobs!"?

  • by hawguy ( 1600213 ) on Friday March 30, 2012 @07:54PM (#39530475)

    I cannot speak for others, but I have stopped flying.

    If it means I get an empty middle seat between me and that fat lady with the perfume, I sincerely thank you.

    It is my fond hope that your decision not to fly is taken up by a wide majority of Americans.

    Be careful what you wish for...empty seats are only temporary... If demand decreases, airlines will cut back on scheduled flights (or plane size (or both)) to eliminate as many empty seats as possible.

    Unlike a hotel that has a reason to keep occupancy below 100%, an airline is happiest when occupancy is at 100% (and the only way to get there is to sell 105% (or more) of the seats)

  • by hawguy ( 1600213 ) on Friday March 30, 2012 @08:01PM (#39530533)

    The TSA guy said that by preventing terrorists from using complicated liquid explosives, they have to move to more exotic explosives. Ignoring the very porous security perimeter of an airport (many tons of airline parts and supplies are trucked in every day, there's no way to inspect everything), what's going to keep a dedicated terrorist from using old fashioned C4 explosive hidden in an obvious body cavity. I've seen enough internet porn to know that with proper training and motivation, a quite sizeable chunk of explosives could be hidden within the body. With surgical help and no desire to stay alive for more than 12 hours, I suspect that even larger portions of explosives could be hidden within the body.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 30, 2012 @08:04PM (#39530561)

    Congress is NOT SPINELESS!! And neither is the president..

    They are corrupt. It's a big difference. But regardless of what they are, they are a perfect reflection of the voting public.

  • by Chris Burke ( 6130 ) on Friday March 30, 2012 @08:26PM (#39530743) Homepage

    They'll gladly suffer through free prostate exams if it means they can sit comfortably on the flight, believing they won't be one of the next set of 9/11 martyrs.

    No, we suffer through it because we want to be able to visit our families and not spend most of what little vacation time we have travelling.

    Obviously if my dislike of TSA policies doesn't overcome my love of my family, there must not be a real issue to begin with. That's logic.

    Well, yes, but that's no worse than you forcing your own beliefs on them that they shouldn't be able to buy free prostate exams.

    You mean my belief that we could have airline flights -- the thing everyone actually wants -- without the prostate exams?

    Oh, and on the subject of prostate exams: they aren't that far yet. But after making you take off your shoes after the Shoe Bomber, and making you get your crotch photographed after the Underpants Bomber... You just wait until the Butthole Bomber shows up. Then it'll be put-up or shut-up time.

  • by tragedy ( 27079 ) on Friday March 30, 2012 @08:43PM (#39530845)

    I don't mind seeing bomb-sniffing dogs in major rail stations, because that makes some sense.

    It makes sense only in that someone might try to bomb all those people concentrated together in the rail station, but no more sense than in any other place where there are a bunch of people standing around. Preventing bomb attacks on trains (or buses, or any other form of ground transport) by inspecting passengers makes no sense whatsoever. Things that travel on the ground don't need to be attacked from within by passengers. Someone who wants to bomb a train doesn't need to sneak a bomb onto it, they just need to walk up to the tracks when the train is coming and drop the bomb on the tracks. Or they can skip the bomb and derail the train by attacking the tracks with hand tools, etc. If they want to hijack a train to hold everyone hostage, they can force it to stop and board it. Same things apply to buses. Anyone can drive up in front of a bus and drop a bomb from a car, or run the bus off the road with a larger vehicle, or point a gun at the driver and force them to pull over, then board it, etc. Screening passengers makes zero sense in those situations.

    For planes, at least it makes some sense. Planes are fast. It's not exactly trivial to catch up to them in mid-air to board or attack them. The pilots can't just pull over and stop anywhere, either. To hijack a plane without being on it when it takes off, you have to have a pretty impressive plane yourself. Hijacking a plane in mid-air from the outside doesn't make any sense anyway since, if you had the resources to do it in the first place, the only thing you'd need would be the passengers and, unless there were specific passengers you were after, you could just start your own airline, load up your own plane, then kidnap those people in mid-air. So, for planes, at least there's some security excuse for screening passengers like that. For ground transportation, it's just stupid.

  • by ATMAvatar ( 648864 ) on Friday March 30, 2012 @09:04PM (#39530983) Journal
    Interestingly, that would mean that the TSA has indirectly caused more deaths since 9/11 than the terrorists caused during 9/11.
  • by shutdown -p now ( 807394 ) on Friday March 30, 2012 @09:07PM (#39531005) Journal

    They're in the business of making passengers feel safe. Passengers like that.

    Did you RTFA? 87% of the readers agreed to the motion, which was "This house believes that changes made to airport security since 9/11 have done more harm than good". That's not geeks, that's you average Americans.

  • Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Friday March 30, 2012 @09:22PM (#39531083)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by 10101001 10101001 ( 732688 ) on Saturday March 31, 2012 @01:19AM (#39532209) Journal

    I like to think of it this way. America likes to think of itself like it's Charlie Brown*. In reality it's Peppermint Patty**.

    *As much as Charlie Brown is treated as a punching bag and is self-deprecating, it appears the world is set against him. He is the underdog who is too worried at times about going too far and hence is wishy-washy, but in a crisis he'll rise up as the natural leader and do the right thing.

    **Peppermint Patty is obnoxious, self-centered, and quick to lay blame upon others. Yea, everyone is in love with you, even when they don't even know you exist or love someone else. Golly, you're bossing people around all the time towards your own ends, but why does it seem like some people think you finally deciding to hold yourself back a bit is too little, too late? Oh, sure, you can be the leader, but if things get tough, you want to push the actual responsibility, concerns, etc on someone else. Or you can just ignore that there's any sort of connection between your orders and the implication that they'd actually deal with a problem by actually effecting it in a positive way.

    PS - Yea, yea, I've watched too many Peanut specials. I still like them though. I just don't like the idea of living them.

  • by AK Marc ( 707885 ) on Saturday March 31, 2012 @03:07AM (#39532517)
    If I were a terrorist, I'd set a bomb off in security (one of the large, dense open ones, like Denver). Then, one week later, set off a bomb at crowded check-in lines. Then 6 days later, check a bag through and set that off on a 15 minute timer ( no casualties, but will shut down most airports as they can't move baggage without the machinery that would be damaged by it). Then, 4 days after that, set off a car bomb in 5 airports at once in the drop-off or pick-up areas.

    That should just about shut down all large airports in the US, and those that jump when they think the US might ask them at some point in the future to jump (UK/OZ, I'm looking at you). Modify the plan as reactions happen (i.e. delay the schedule if all airports are shut down). That would bankrupt all US airlines other than Southwest and Alaska, unless the government moves itself closer to bankruptcy with bailouts.

    The US is pretty delicate, more delicate than Americans would acknowledge, and so it would work because they wouldn't see the results from it coming.
  • Don't be a dumbass (Score:4, Insightful)

    by tlambert ( 566799 ) on Saturday March 31, 2012 @03:10AM (#39532525)

    normally would not use the term "dumbass"..

    The amount of economic damage from one talcum powder bomb in a chip fab says you are looking at the wrong metrics for what terrorism hopes to accomplish.

    -- Terry

  • by Vlad_the_Inhaler ( 32958 ) on Saturday March 31, 2012 @04:32AM (#39532777)

    Who said the virgins had to be female?

  • by PCM2 ( 4486 ) on Saturday March 31, 2012 @01:41PM (#39535261) Homepage

    Too soon.

    Over a decade later is too soon? OK, I guess I'll switch to Pearl Harbor jokes.

  • by Man On Pink Corner ( 1089867 ) on Saturday March 31, 2012 @09:29PM (#39538015)

    Yep. If they had reason to believe someone had released mercury in a cargo hold, the outcome would be like the old practical joke where someone releases two pigs in their high school building late at night, with "#1" spray-painted on one of them and "#3" on the other.

    They will never find pig #2, but they will take the whole school apart with a screwdriver looking for it.

    That's basically the TSA's entire organizational charter: "Find Pig #2."

I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.

Working...