Forgot your password?

typodupeerror
The Military United States

Sidestepping Tactical Nuclear Weapons Limits With Strategic Bombs 138

Posted by Unknown Lamer
from the comes-in-five-flavors dept.
Lasrick writes "Benjamin Loehrke describes the rather odd definitions of what is a 'tactical' nuclear weapon and what isn't. 'There is enough ambiguity surrounding the capabilities of tactical and strategic nuclear weapons to render the term "tactical" all but useless for arms control purposes. As the United States and Russia pursue new arms control treaties, they should drop the tactical distinction and limit the total number of all nuclear weapons — strategic, tactical, or other.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Sidestepping Tactical Nuclear Weapons Limits With Strategic Bombs

Comments Filter:

What the world *really* needs is a good Automatic Bicycle Sharpener.

Working...