Japan Restarts Two of Its 50 Nuclear Reactors 224
Darth_brooks writes "Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda ordered the restart of two idle nuclear reactors Saturday, amid split public response. The Japanese government is trying to fill a summer power shortfall. According to the article, the two reactors supply power to the Kansai region near Osaka, where local officials were predicting a 15% shortfall in power capacity during July and August."
Re:That's good news (Score:5, Informative)
not actually that unpopular locally (Score:5, Informative)
While restarting any nuclear reactors is currently quite unpopular in Japan nationally, the decision to restart this particular plant's two reactors was actually made with local input and approval. Local councils aren't normally required to approve such matters, but due to the current controversy, Japan's government de-facto made restart contingent on approval from the local government. After several months of safety studies and deliberation, the municipal council voted 11-1 in favor of restarting the reactors [japantimes.co.jp] in mid-May, which gave the national government some cover to go ahead with it.
Re:That's good news (Score:2, Informative)
Actually, that's not a problem, they use an HVDC line between the two grids.
Re:That's good news (Score:5, Informative)
You know, do at least *some* research before stating bullshit.
It is a HUGE PROBLEM. Any interconnect is very limited in size. If a significant portion of one grid is impacted, you can't easily move power from one grid to another. This is exactly the situation in Japan.
Re:That's good news (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Shortages are a solved problem. (Score:4, Informative)
In alternative, they can simply turn on a couple of the 50 power generators they have just sitting there, that never exhibit a single problem in their entire existence.
I wonder what's the best option.
Re:That's good news (Score:4, Informative)
Some older electronics with PSUs that use mains frequency transformers and whose design was close to the edge may have problems as may some stuff that uses mains as a time reference but mostly electronics should be fine.
Clocks (whether electronic or mechanical) that derive their timebase from the mains would be a nuisance but ultimately if it was the main issue I think they would have forced a transition through by now.
Afaict the real problem is the big stuff, big motors and generators are usually at least somewhat locked to grid frequency and a 10% change in operating speed is probablly not acceptable. Transformers can also be problematic as a lower frequency can cause core saturation leading to overheating. Replacing that stuff would be seriously expensive.
Re:Nuclear disaster nearly shut down Tokyo (Score:4, Informative)
Source: NY Times article [nytimes.com] on top-level report reviewing the disaster.
Re:Yep... (Score:4, Informative)
Supplying coal is one problem, dumping the toxic remains is another. Coal power plants are a disaster as bad as fukushima even when nothing goes wrong.
Re:That's good news (Score:4, Informative)
after they lost the Fukushima Daiichi and Daini reactors
The Fukushima Daini reactor was not lost, and didn't even sustain damage. It shut down automatically during the earthquake, and was not restarted due to the unfounded fear/danger/hype that began about nuclear power.