Forgot your password?

typodupeerror
GUI Ubuntu Open Source Red Hat Software SuSE Linux

Ubuntu Unity Ported To Fedora Using OpenSUSE 128

Posted by timothy
from the say-that-three-times-fast dept.
sfcrazy writes "The general tendency within the open source community is to a whole new wheel to push your own cart. A majority of open source projects are suffering from duplication. Luckily, we just noticed a great example of such collaboration (or using resources by different competing projects) within the distro community. Ubuntu's popular Unity shell is being ported to Fedora (the distro which leads the development of Gnome shell and its also the breeding ground of many latest technologies which are used by the rest of the GNU/Linux world). Interestingly developers users openSUSE's build service to create this port. openSUSE leads the development of Gnome and KDE along with LibreOffice." Calling Unity "popular" seems like a stretch, but it's certainly where a lot of Ubuntu work has been lavished; the cooperation that open source code fosters at least lets whoever wants to use or develop it do so.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Ubuntu Unity Ported To Fedora Using OpenSUSE

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Great, sort of (Score:4, Interesting)

    by cpu6502 (1960974) on Thursday July 19, 2012 @11:49AM (#40699595)

    First Apple, then Microsoft, and now Canonical seem obsessed with making their desktops "pretty" rather than functional.

    Mozilla also seems to have the same obsession..... just installed Firefox 13 on my brother's laptop, and I swear it looked like Chromium. He asked me to "make it look like it used to look" so I backed it off to Firefox 10 LTS which has the full dropdown menu. Change for the sake of change is usually bad, especially when the users just want it to work.

    Take a look at cars: They've kept the same standard interface for as long as I can remember (back to the 60s at least). The shifter moved from the steering wheel to the floor, but otherwise I could drive an old 60s car or a modern 2013 car without difficulty.

  • Re:Great, sort of (Score:5, Interesting)

    by damien_kane (519267) <damien AT strat DOT net> on Thursday July 19, 2012 @12:14PM (#40699969) Homepage
    Not only that, but the tests themselves were biased.

    Case in point, a "blind" taste-test offered at a local waterpark that I was at as a teenager, with signs all around it clearly defining it as the "Pepsi Challenge"
    This particular taste test was giving out prizes/awards. I had noticed that some people walked away with a bottle of pepsi, and some walked away with a chocolate bar, but nobody got to choose (they were simply being handed the prize).

    I (correctly) assumed that those who chose Pepsi as the favorite received the beverage, and those who chose coke got the snack.
    I prefer Coke, but I was thirsty and I knew which tasted like which. I chose Pepsi, and got a free beverage.
    I told my friends, they attempted, and all got the same result.

    At that point it wasn't a contest of coke vs pepsi, it was a contest of free beverage vs free snack on a hot, sunny day in a waterpark.
  • by k(wi)r(kipedia) (2648849) on Thursday July 19, 2012 @12:24PM (#40700129)
    Come on Unity is much better than Gnome Shell (of course, classic Gnome 2 is better than both). Just one reason why Gnome Shell is bad: you got clickable elements on all four sides of the default (Home) screen. In Unity, only the right side and the top are significant, similar to the Mac and Gnome 2, where the bottom (the dock in the case of the Mac) and top are significant.

Mother is the invention of necessity.

Working...