Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Google Android Privacy Software Spam

Google Clamps Down On Spam, Intrusive Ads In Apps 122

An anonymous reader tips news that Google has sent out a letter to app developers explaining policy changes for any new apps published on the Google Play store. In-app purchases must now use Google Play's payment system unless it's for goods or services used outside the app itself. They've added language to dissuade developers from making their apps look like other apps, or like they come from other developers. But more significantly, Google has explained in detail what qualifies as spam: repetitive content, misleading product descriptions, gaming the rating system, affiliate traffic apps, or apps that send communications without user consent. Also, advertisements within apps must now follow the same rules as the app itself, and they can't be intrusive: Ads can't install things like shortcuts or icons without consent, they must notify the user of settings changes, they can't simulate notifications, and they can't request personal information to grant full app function.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Google Clamps Down On Spam, Intrusive Ads In Apps

Comments Filter:
  • by DickBreath ( 207180 ) on Wednesday August 01, 2012 @05:06PM (#40848245) Homepage
    Similar to Apple, Google should introduce a program for developers who wish to pay to have their app certified. The app would earn some kind of certification that Google has inspected the app, it meets various technical (not necessarily style) guidelines. Then the app is displayed in the store with a branded trademarked logo indicating it is certified.

    Google could also have multiple levels of certification like Silver, Gold, Rhodium, etc.

    ----
    we will meet in Red 3 at the hour of scampering
  • Re:Don't look now... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by queazocotal ( 915608 ) on Wednesday August 01, 2012 @10:11PM (#40851329)

    Of the top 6 calculator apps, 5 require full access to the internet.

    They make no mention of why they wish full access to the internet in their description.

    Speaking personally, I would greatly prefer it if it was required for developers to provide a brief justification for every single capability they use.
    And that these capabilities are actually required for the apps function, as outlined on the brief description.

    A way to search for apps without certain capabilities as default would be good too.

They are relatively good but absolutely terrible. -- Alan Kay, commenting on Apollos

Working...