Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Operating Systems Cloud Google Patents Technology

Google Granted Cloud OS Patent 143

An anonymous reader writes "This week, Google was given approval of a network OS patent that it applied for back in 2009. The design of the OS is built for 'providing an operating system over a network to a local device' to provision new versions of operating systems onto hardware devices. Filed in March 2009, the idea for Chrome OS was protected by Google early in the development process of the OS, but it was hardly new and unique, given the general description of its features in the patent itself. It is the best sign yet that Google is working toward seamless hardware and software experiences."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Google Granted Cloud OS Patent

Comments Filter:
  • specific claim (Score:4, Interesting)

    by AdamWill ( 604569 ) on Friday August 10, 2012 @03:25PM (#40950101) Homepage

    "1. A system for providing an operating system over a network to a local device, comprising: a base image server configured to transmit a base image of the operating system; a preferences image server configured to transmit at least one preferences image; and an image loader configured to combine the base image and the at least one preferences image into a combined image at the local device in order to provide a full version of the operating system on the local device and automatically remove the full version of the operating system from the local device when logging off or exiting the full version of the operating system on the local device."

    If this ever gets used in a court case, I predict a world of fun in defining exactly what a 'preferences image' is.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 10, 2012 @03:25PM (#40950103)

    Yes and no. Software patents are a weapon. Depending on who wields the weapon, it can be disastrous. Legally, software patents can be used defensively or offensively. I'd say the offensive users are worse than the defensive users. Overall the system is broken, but how "bad" it is that some company got a software patent -- well, that time will tell.

  • Re:specific claim (Score:4, Interesting)

    by rgbrenner ( 317308 ) on Friday August 10, 2012 @03:57PM (#40950509)

    Did any of your examples do the following (all of which it must do to be prior art):

    Keep ALL OS and preference changes in sync with the server (so that when the local device is rebooted, OS and preference changes are restored). Note the patent also includes a remotely-mounted disk image for the user's files -- so that is not what it is talking about here.

    An image loader than downloads the OS and preference images and combines them to create the full version of the OS

    When the changes are synced with the server, the changes are compressed, encrypted, and transmitted incrementally.

Living on Earth may be expensive, but it includes an annual free trip around the Sun.

Working...