Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Windows GUI Microsoft Operating Systems Technology

Windows RT vs. Windows 8 Could Burn Consumers 297

Nerval's Lobster writes "The Surface currently available for pre-order runs Windows RT, a version of the operating system designed to run on ARM architecture. Windows RT looks virtually identical to Windows 8, which, like previous versions of Windows, runs on the x86 architecture that dominates the laptop and desktop market. Microsoft's early marketing materials aren't exactly highlighting that differences between Windows RT and Windows 8 — and as a result, there's a high potential for unsuspecting consumers to end up burned when they buy a Windows RT tablet expecting the complete Windows experience. But Windows RT won't support legacy Windows applications — instead, users will need to hope and pray that developers port those applications to the Windows Store, the only venue for RT-supported apps. Over at The Verge, the intrepid Sean Hollister asked eight Microsoft Store representatives about the differences between Windows 8 and Windows RT, and received several confusing responses. 'To their credit, half of the representatives admitted that Windows RT wasn't as capable as Windows 8,' he wrote. 'The other half not so much. Moreover, those reps who did admit issues seemed dismissive of Windows RT as a whole.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Windows RT vs. Windows 8 Could Burn Consumers

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 19, 2012 @05:34PM (#41710205)
    I never understood the appeal of these interpreted languages. I've always been a fan of native code....if you use cross-platform libraries like Qt or GTK you can build your app for any OS.
  • by Missing.Matter ( 1845576 ) on Friday October 19, 2012 @05:39PM (#41710253)
    This is my expectation as well. My prediction is that because Metro looks so different from traditional Windows, and the form factor is completely different from a desktop, no one will be going in with the expectation that Windows RT tablets should run desktop software. Take a look at what Steve Jobs said about the original iPhone in 2007:

    Now how do we do this? Well, we start with a strong foundation: iPhone runs OSX. Now, why, why would we wanna run such a sophisticated operating system on a mobile device? Well, because it’s got everything we need. It’s got multi-tasking. It’s got the best networking. It already knows how to power manage. We’ve been doing this on mobile computers for years. It’s got awesome security. And the right apps.

    Also on their product page:

    iPhone uses OS X, the world’s most advanced operating system. Which means you have access to the best-ever software on a handheld device”

    They unequivocally stated that iPhone runs OS X, yet hardly anyone reasonably expected desktop OS X software to run on the iPhone. I argue that this is because iOS looks so different from OS X and that the form factor is so much different from a Desktop. Since then, Apple has trained people that on tablets, you get your software from Appstores. I think people will look at Windows tablets and have the same expectation, despite that it's called Windows. Again, how many people expected Windows Mobile or Windows Phone would run desktop Windows applications?

    In fact, what I predict is that Microsoft will have the opposite problem: convincing people that Windows 8 on desktops will run desktop applications. You see that confusion here on Slashdot all the time.

  • by nzac ( 1822298 ) on Friday October 19, 2012 @05:46PM (#41710325)

    I suspect the main reason is even though you may have to get a stopwatch out to tell the difference on a desktop, CLR/.NET does not have native performance which will show when you try to run them on thin (as in mm) devices. Most significantly you probably need to fit twice as much RAM in the case, i would guess memory bandwidth and cache sizes also are not friendly to performance and it would cost users battery time as no one would use the low power APIs.

    The other things i can think of is that they don't want rushed ports to Metro and maybe it was easier to start from scratch.

  • by david.emery ( 127135 ) on Friday October 19, 2012 @05:47PM (#41710331)

    If this article is right and Windows 8 ends up confusing and thereby pissing off consumers, I think this will be a huge win for Apple and Android. When you plopped $1k-$2k for a computer (in the olden days :-) and then added several $50-$150 software packages, the cost to abandon that platform is significant. But when your expenditures are in the $500-$600 range, tablet and apps, it'll be a lot easier to put the tablet up on eBay and go buy an alternative.

    And the associated risks for Microsoft, let's call it the "horns effect*," could be catastrophic. People will say, "I gave Microsoft a chance for this new item, they suck. I'm not throwing more money at them. Look at how much I've spent on Windows computers/applications over the last 10+ years! Fool me twice, shame on me!" This really is a 'bet-the-company' move by Ballmer & Co (and of course we have 12 years of history of Microsoft under Ballmer to project from...)

    * opposite of the "halo effect"

  • It's a trap (Score:5, Interesting)

    by kurt555gs ( 309278 ) <<kurt555gs> <at> <ovi.com>> on Friday October 19, 2012 @06:09PM (#41710529) Homepage

    Windows RT is just there to make things difficult for Android table makers. The "consumers" that buy them are merely colateral damage.

  • by shutdown -p now ( 807394 ) on Friday October 19, 2012 @10:52PM (#41712257) Journal

    People have been downloading software instead of installing it from DVDs for a long time now. I suspect that quite a few people will try to install Steam on it, for example.

"Protozoa are small, and bacteria are small, but viruses are smaller than the both put together."

Working...