The Web We Lost 255
An anonymous reader writes "Anil Dash has an insightful post about cutting through the social media hype to see all of the social functionality we've lost on the web over the past decade. 'We've lost key features that we used to rely on, and worse, we've abandoned core values that used to be fundamental to the web world. To the credit of today's social networks, they've brought in hundreds of millions of new participants to these networks, and they've certainly made a small number of people rich. But they haven't shown the web itself the respect and care it deserves, as a medium which has enabled them to succeed. And they've now narrowed the possibilities of the web for an entire generation of users who don't realize how much more innovative and meaningful their experience could be. ... We get bulls*** turf battles like Tumblr not being able to find your Twitter friends or Facebook not letting Instagram photos show up on Twitter because of giant companies pursuing their agendas instead of collaborating in a way that would serve users. And we get a generation of entrepreneurs encouraged to make more narrow-minded, web-hostile products like these because it continues to make a small number of wealthy people even more wealthy, instead of letting lots of people build innovative new opportunities for themselves on top of the web itself.'"
Re:Uh...it's still there, you know (Score:5, Funny)
There's So Much We Lost (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Uh...it's still there, you know (Score:5, Funny)
Amazingly, it's still around. It's at bbs.iscabbs.com now, I believe. Visiting it is like going back in time to 1995. The same exact people are having the same exact arguments that they were 15-20 years ago. I think it's some form of Hell for all involved.
Re:Uh...it's still there, you know (Score:4, Funny)
And the blink tag is gone!
I consider the widespread loss of support for <blink> a serious bug that reduces the functionality of the entire web. This may, I understand, be a minority opinion.