Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Google Government United States

Google, FTC Settle Antitrust Case 59

itwbennett writes "According to an ITworld report, 'Google has agreed to change some of its business practices, including allowing competitors access to some standardized technologies, to resolve a U.S. Federal Trade Commission antitrust complaint against the company.' This includes 'allow[ing] competitors access to standards-essential patents the company acquired along with its purchase of Motorola Mobility.' Also among the business practices Google has agreed to stop is 'scraping Web content from rivals and allegedly passing it off as its own, said FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz.'" SlashCloud has some more details, including links to the agreement itself and Google's soft-pedaling description of "voluntary product changes."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Google, FTC Settle Antitrust Case

Comments Filter:
  • by MozeeToby ( 1163751 ) on Thursday January 03, 2013 @04:22PM (#42466185)

    You think Google lost here? The FTC has been trying for half a decade to bring an anti-trust case against Google, and at the end of it Google has agreed (not even been ordered) to change a few business practices. Google won. And quite frankly, the fact that this is the best the FTC could do against them would indicate that the FTC simply didn't have a case.

  • Re:Seriously... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by MozeeToby ( 1163751 ) on Thursday January 03, 2013 @04:29PM (#42466303)

    This is "settle" in the layman's terms as opposed to legal terms. Technically, the case against Google hadn't even been brought yet. The FTC is walking away because they know they don't have a case because, quite fankly, a lot of the complaints were ridiculous. Oh, youtube is the first result? What a freaking surprise, it's the largest video site on the net by an order of magnitude. Not to mention that Google services often aren't the top result in searches for those services. There are legitimate issues with some of their API's and some of their ad selling, but nothing that comes close to warranting the kind of expenses that a federal anti-trust case would generate (both for Google and the FTC).

  • by Bengie ( 1121981 ) on Thursday January 03, 2013 @05:02PM (#42466907)
    You mean how Google is required by law to comply when ordered by a judge or that Google is one of the few corps that actively try to not only notify the end user that the government is requesting data on them, but Google has actually used its own time and money to fight judges who attempted to seal requests, keeping Google from notifying the end user of such requests.

    Yeah, bad bad Google. Not to say they're flawless, but they're not conspiring.

    My Grammar teacher would have killed me for that run-on.
  • MS Gambit failed (Score:4, Insightful)

    by poetmatt ( 793785 ) on Thursday January 03, 2013 @05:09PM (#42467031) Journal

The Tao is like a glob pattern: used but never used up. It is like the extern void: filled with infinite possibilities.

Working...