Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Google Security Technology

Chrome OS Remains Undefeated At Pwnium 3 178

hypnosec writes "Google has announced that its Chrome OS has managed to remain undefeated during the Pwnium 3 event that was held alongside Pwn2Own. Announced by Google on January 28, 2013 the Pwnium 3 event carried a prize money of $3.14 million. Researchers were asked to carry out attacks against a base Samsung Series 5 chromebook running the latest stable version of Chrome OS. It turns out security researchers were not able to come up with winning exploits even after the competition's deadline was extended. Google Chrome Team has revealed that partial exploit entries have been filled in but, no other details have been released."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Chrome OS Remains Undefeated At Pwnium 3

Comments Filter:
  • It's an "OS" (Score:2, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 08, 2013 @08:57PM (#43122781)

    Chrome OS is more barebones than my phone.

  • by SpectreBlofeld ( 886224 ) on Friday March 08, 2013 @09:03PM (#43122815)

    To anyone who wants to play around with it: there are Chromium OS VM builds out there you can play with in VMWare or Virtualbox (legal, it's all opensource).

    I tried it out a few weeks ago. It really *is* just a web browser. I have trouble understanding why someone would spent $1300 for a Pixel unless they planned to install a real OS on it. Yeah, I get that the display is nice, but for that kind of money I should be able to... I dunno... maybe run the aforementioned VMWare, like I do now on the $599 laptop I virtualized Chrome (and Win7 and PC-BSD) on. And played Portal on, etc.

  • by simonbp ( 412489 ) on Friday March 08, 2013 @09:13PM (#43122903) Homepage

    Posting this from my series 5. :)

    It runs Ubuntu/Xubuntu 13.04 quite nicely booting off an SD card. You'd be hard pressed to get a better laptop for the money, and it's massively more useful than any table I've ever used.

  • by Nimey ( 114278 ) on Friday March 08, 2013 @10:02PM (#43123223) Homepage Journal

    Gods yes. My father's Chromebook has probably saved him its price already in visits to the computer shop to get viruses removed.

  • Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Friday March 08, 2013 @10:15PM (#43123291)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by 140Mandak262Jamuna ( 970587 ) on Friday March 08, 2013 @11:46PM (#43123723) Journal
    Quick review: When there is a network connection, it is a solid browser. It synched with my Chrome browser customizations from my previous use of chrome using windows or linux boxes. Including flashblock and adblock.

    But what about off line? Google docs off line lets you edit documents and presentations off line. They sync when you get the connection. When it first came it had no off line edits. Then they have introduced doc and presentations. Spreadsheets would be next I guess. Or may be not. Gmail offline can be customized to keep last so many days worth of email in the local cache. Google calender works off line, ( I think, need to go back and check.).

    Off line music player works, off line video play back works. Source of the media could be the internal drive or any USB drive, including the USB powered hard disks. Kindle off line reader works, three books cached very quickly. Apps exist like "Read this link later" that works off line.

    So off line, you can watch video, listen to music, read books, cached web pages. You will have read/access to all the google drive docs. And write access to docs and presentations. I think for 200$ it is way more than what I expected.

  • by stretch0611 ( 603238 ) on Saturday March 09, 2013 @01:08AM (#43123983) Journal

    Maybe because some of us are still proponents of 'computers', not content-sipping machines. Awareness of computing means more than getting work done or being entertained, it also involves some learning about the nature of how we do these things can and should change over time.

    So my mother who does nothing but play games and email should have a general purpose computer because you think a device should do more than just suck content?

    we should all at least be aware of our ability to govern our processing needs, whether we enjoy the idea or not.

    Yet you just said that everyone needs more than just content machines. My mom is aware of her needs, yet you want to force something more on her...

    I am a developer. Unlike the masses, I need a general purpose computer. There will always be a market for them no matter how much we flood the market will less versatile devices like tablets and smartphones (which is where I believe the market is heading.)

    For personal use, many people do not need a full computer, lets give them something simpler that better fits their needs. Even some business purposes can be done on a tablet now. Why should we force them to buy something more?

    25 years ago would you have suggested that we all continue to use dumb terminals hooked up to mainframes? The modern computer decimated the market for mainframes, supercomputers, and minicomputers. Today, the market share of these large and powerful machines is significantly diminished, yet they still exist for the people have a need for them that a normal computer can not fulfill.

    Plain and simple, not everyone needs a "computer" just because you think that they do. There will be a need for them and computers will not go extinct, but fewer and fewer people (as a percentage) will have that need and smaller devices will displace computers in the market.

I tell them to turn to the study of mathematics, for it is only there that they might escape the lusts of the flesh. -- Thomas Mann, "The Magic Mountain"

Working...