Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Google Your Rights Online

No "Ungoogleable" In Swedish Lexicon, Thanks to Google 207

jfruh writes "The Swedish Language Council is a semi-official, government funded body that regulates, cultivates, and tracks changes to the Swedish language. Every year it releases a list of new words that have crept into Swedish, and one of 2012's entries was 'ogooglebar' — 'ungoogleable,' meaning something that can't be found with a search engine. After Google demanded that the definition be changed and the Council add a disclaimer about Google's trademark, the Council has instead decided to remove the word from the list altogether."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

No "Ungoogleable" In Swedish Lexicon, Thanks to Google

Comments Filter:
  • Unbingable (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 26, 2013 @12:08PM (#43281807)

    Google suggested unbingable as a replacement.

  • For those Curious (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 26, 2013 @12:10PM (#43281831)

    For those curious to why Google raised a ruckus about this, there is a concept that once a word has become used in the more generic sense that the term may be used by other companies and the original company may lose their trademark rights . Xerox went through this in the 80's when Xerox was synonymous with photocopying... I remember my mom "Xeroxing" on the office machine even though it wasn't a Xerox. Xerox went through a significant ad campaign to get folks to change their behavior.

    -- MyLongNickName

  • by LongearedBat ( 1665481 ) on Tuesday March 26, 2013 @12:20PM (#43281953)
    Bara för det, kommer jag göra mitt allra bästa att generalisera skiten ur ert lilla "varumärke", din jävel.
  • Re:Good? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 26, 2013 @12:22PM (#43281993)

    If you don't want "newfangled words" than shouldn't you be writing like this?

    I see, you are already writing in 2048's reformed English.

  • by J'raxis ( 248192 ) on Tuesday March 26, 2013 @12:28PM (#43282063) Homepage

    In ancient Rome, there was a government official responsible for determining whether or not this particular year would have a "leap month" (mensis intercalaris), rather than it being based on a mathematical formula as it is nowadays. Naturally, a certain degree of power came with this ability; if a contract or a political office expired later in the year, by inserting (or not inserting) the intercalary month after February, one could effectively extend or cut short the term of those contracts or offices.

    And of course, men of power or influence were eventually able to bribe, or coerce, the calendar officials into doing just that for them. Yes, the government actually had the power to tell you what time it was---and, what a surprise, this power was soon corrupted.

    Maybe it's time people who speak Swedish start ignoring the Swedish language "police" and their obviously-bought (or coerced) decisions on what makes up the "real" Swedish lexicon.

  • Re:A paradox? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by cpt kangarooski ( 3773 ) on Tuesday March 26, 2013 @04:32PM (#43285001) Homepage

    ASPIRIN is a special case. It became generic in the US due to the mark holder being Bayer, a German company, and us being a little upset about WWI. They also lost the HEROIN trademark that way.

For God's sake, stop researching for a while and begin to think!

Working...