Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Operating Systems Windows Microsoft Hardware

XP's End Will Do More For PC Sales Than Win 8, Says HP Exec 438

dcblogs writes "Hewlett-Packard executives say that the coming demise of Windows XP next year may do what Windows 8 could not, and that's boost PC sales significantly. 'We think this will bring a big opportunity for HP,' said Enrique Lore, senior vice president and general manager of HP's business PCs. Lore was asked, in a later interview, whether the demand for XP replacement systems could help sales more than Windows 8. His response was unequivocal: 'Yes, significantly more, especially on the commercial side,' he said. Lore said 40% to 50% of business users remain on XP systems."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

XP's End Will Do More For PC Sales Than Win 8, Says HP Exec

Comments Filter:
  • by Atomic Fro ( 150394 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @01:37PM (#43975873)

    For the business users still running XP, I don't see them flocking to buy new Windows 8 hardware. They are still on XP because either the software they run won't run on anything else, or they are small businesses that don't have an IT budget. As long as the hardware and software works, they aren't going to go out and buy new systems.

  • by jxander ( 2605655 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @01:38PM (#43975887)

    "Pulling the rug out from under 40-50% of our clients should really shake things up and boost sales"

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @01:40PM (#43975925)

    There is some credibility to that theory. After all, if you have to install an entirely new system anyway, it makes it easier to jump to a different OS family. especially if it has a similar UI. I hardly think the majority of businesses switching will do this, but I'm sure at least some of them will, and Linux numbers will reflect it. Hell, if you're so focusesd on saving money or maintaining stability that you've used XP for this long, something like Debian GNU/Linux might be perfect for you.

  • Wishful Thinking (Score:5, Insightful)

    by rudy_wayne ( 414635 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @01:42PM (#43975945)

    Just because XP reaches its official "end of life" doesn't mean that people will throw out their computer and go buy a new one. For most people- and businesses too - as long as existing units still get the job done there is no compelling reason to buy a new computer. The fact that Win 8 is crap is also a factor.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @01:43PM (#43975961)
    You're forgetting about that whole Windows software compatibility thing.
  • #define Win7 XP (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @01:47PM (#43976031)

    Win7 is the new XP.

  • Wrong question (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Jawnn ( 445279 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @01:49PM (#43976065)
    The better question is how many people did not buy a new PC precisely because Windows 8?
  • by lister king of smeg ( 2481612 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @01:51PM (#43976101)

    just because microsoft wont support it does not mean the antivirus vendors won't i can see them making lots of money off of xp support.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @01:52PM (#43976123)

    Many large institutions cannot legally continue using an out of support operating system.

  • by Opportunist ( 166417 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @01:55PM (#43976161)

    I'd rather guess it will work miracles in Apple sales.

    Take my dad. He's ... well, let's say not too tech savvy. But then again, all he wants is some email, some web research for his hobbies, organize his pictures and writing documents. Open office took care of the latter and for the rest, there's an iBook.

    It's easy, it's simple and it's something he can use without my aid (which is equally important to him as it is to me, he's a bit of a control freak).

    So unless MS relents and lets people get some boxes with Win7, I kinda doubt that many will opt for Win8 and rather, if they have to learn a completely alien interface anyway, go for an Apple.

  • by linebackn ( 131821 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @01:55PM (#43976165)

    Until the first big virus hits that exploits a security hole that won't be fixed. When you realize you machines that can't be patched and will continuously be infected you may think differently about corporate security.

    At which time you discover that continuously re-cleaning the machines is STILL easier and less work and money than replacing the poorly written proprietary corporate dreck resembling a Rube Goldberg machine that only runs under Windows XP.

  • by HaZardman27 ( 1521119 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @02:04PM (#43976293)
    Do you really think the average MS Word user is going to deal with markup to create documents in LaTeX?
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @02:05PM (#43976307)

    I'd rather guess it will work miracles in Apple sales.

    Take my dad. He's ... well, let's say not too tech savvy. But then again, all he wants is some email, some web research for his hobbies, organize his pictures and writing documents.

    Ubuntu Linux is a cheaper alternative to Apple OS/X covering every use-case you've stated as relevant to your father. Then again maybe a Google ChromeBook would be the ideal solution for him if he prefers "the cloud".

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @02:19PM (#43976479)

    Sounds like he'd be looking for ChromeBook. It's a lot easier to use than Apple OS.

  • Re:well... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by H0p313ss ( 811249 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @02:22PM (#43976519)

    Given the XP holdouts clearly don't like Microsoft's current offerings, and Mac is growing faster in percentage terms, and Linux appears to be finally getting somewhere - i don't think these XP holdouts will be migrating to another Windows box any time soon.

    If the XP holdouts still prefer XP to Win7, they certainly are not going to gravitate to Mac or Linux. (Well some will, but the bulk are just too afraid of change to do anything that drastic.)

  • by gulikoza ( 1087283 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @02:33PM (#43976667) Homepage
    So what? I still have SP2 machines working just fine. It prints receipts to the customers the same as the first day it was installed. Never patched it. The users working on it are limited and IE is prohibited with the GPO (employees have better work than surf on Facebook). LAN obviously is firewalled, not that this machine (and others similar) need to access the 'net. The only problem would be, if there was a domain wide virus that somebody would bring in with a laptop. However, that hasn't happened in the past 10 year. In my experience 95% of the "viruses" are crap people install themselves ("DHL sent me this packet, but I can't open the confirmation on my e-mail" "Are you expecting to receive something?" "No...why?"). No patches help that, unless it would patch the user, but then I'd be out of work... I have Win 98 as a retro machine here...connected to the Internet, running latest w9x supported firefox (3.6 I belive?), no AV (it's just p3-600). It won't get automagically infected as soon as it's turned on...why would it be?
  • by Mike Frett ( 2811077 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @02:41PM (#43976741)

    Maybe it's time to buy Software Suits that are Cross-Platform eh. It's a Company's own fault for locking themselves in to one OS.

  • by KiloByte ( 825081 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @02:44PM (#43976777)

    Please enlighten me, how exactly does Microsoft's security support matter? No on even remotely sane uses a version of Internet Explorer that works on XP, and all other browsers will keep security support for foreseable future. The only element that's not trivial to seamlessly replace is SMB, and that's relevant for the local network only.

    Other vital protocols:
    * DNS: when the shit hits the fan, clueful admins for some and "Security Suites" for the rest will install a reasonable resolver and tell Windows to query 127.0.0.1
    * sNTP: kill Windows Time Service; if you want replacement (I'm afraid most won't), you know what to install instead
    * ARP: this is harder, but a low-level firewall can detect and block packets that would kill Windows

    So folks will just continue the current state, slowly replacing Microsoft software. And in enterprise, block all SMB traffic other than to/from the domain controller and file servers, none of which need to run XP, or Windows for that matter.

  • by King_TJ ( 85913 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @02:50PM (#43976841) Journal

    If a big virus hits that exploits a security hole that's unpatched, SOMEONE will offer a patch. I'm 99.999% certain. Why? Because regardless of Microsoft's wishes for XP to just go away, there are still too many people using it every single day (many of whom aren't even computer savvy enough to be able to tell you for sure which version of Windows they're actually using). A serious virus infection would #1, make Microsoft look really bad if they take a stance of "Too bad... we can't fix it.", and #2 would likely put entire networks at risk with the infected files getting copied onto shared drives on servers, uploaded to cloud shared storage locations, and more. It's quite possible such an infection would need an unpatched XP machine to secretly get installed in the first place, but newer OS's would have problems too if the users open attached files sent from the originally infected XP boxes.

    If Microsoft stubbornly refused, some 3rd. party computer security firm would seize on the opportunity to get 15 minutes of fame with a free patch they'd circulate.

  • by LordLimecat ( 1103839 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @02:53PM (#43976871)

    Because there are actually things that Word / Excel / Powerpoint are better at than Libre office, and few examples of the reverse.

    Also, because there is still some degree of continuity within Office 2000-2013 whereby you can move between versions with substantially less headache than moving from Office 2003 to LibreOffice-- even with the Ribbon to deal with.

    After writing a single term paper and trying to unravel the thought process behind footnotes / endnotes in LibreOffice, I found myself pining for Word.

  • by PRMan ( 959735 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @02:55PM (#43976895)

    if they have to learn a completely alien interface anyway, go for an Apple.

    Microsoft screwed up here. If you're the incumbent with over 90% market share, never EVER push your customer into having to make a decision to do anything other than the status quo. Windows 8 should have been Windows 7 with the "Metro Marketplace" add-on for free. Then, nobody would have had any reason to hate it. Everyone would have just upgraded like cattle going through a gate.

  • by drinkypoo ( 153816 ) <drink@hyperlogos.org> on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @03:01PM (#43976955) Homepage Journal

    Whatever you call it, people were excited about Windows XP because of what it brought to the consumer desktop, and people actually upgraded to it on purpose. Same for Win2k vs. Windows NT on the corporate side. Which upgrades since have not been dreaded? Windows 7, which is just Windows Vista Unfucked Edition. How about on the server side? I haven't had to go there in a while, thankfully. Regardless, only a few delusional cases clung to Windows 3.1, or Windows 95, but Windows XP is fairly compelling even today with its low resource requirements and unparalleled compatibility.

  • by LordLimecat ( 1103839 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2013 @03:02PM (#43976963)

    One of the chief marks of being a geek is that, knowing what is possible and having a mind for connecting things together, one tends to understate obstacles and complexity.

    So, a geek who understands that they can probably get a piece of software to work on Linux tends to miss that it may involve hours of work and break on the next upgrade, and that it probably will work badly with the USB scanner, and with a workflow which involves another piece of software, and that the entire thing is to complicated for most users.

    The reality is that moving your whole computing life to Linux is more complicated than just "pop the disk in". When I moved from XP to Ubuntu 7.04, I had to get wine up and running for WoW. I had to switch a bunch of config files to make it use OpenGL. I had to adjust a bunch of settings to turn off poorly supported features. Then WoW worked. Next I had to get Barry-Utils to make my blackberry work. Then I had to get a custom mouse driver for my G9 to work. Then I had to fiddle around with Ventrilo to sort of kind of get it working (it immediately broke on upgrade to a new release).

    Most things required a lot more tinkering once I upgraded again, particularly in the sound arena. Ventrilo never worked again after an upgrade, and is considered non-working on Ubuntu.

  • Long-time Linux user here. I gotta disagree. MS Office is tangibly better in a lot of ways (mostly the ones that the GP posted as a sibling to this post) than LibreOffice.

    You would do the free software community a service by not trumping up free software and simply describing it as it is. LibreOffice has a lot of use cases, but Office is still a very well put together set of productivity apps.

1 + 1 = 3, for large values of 1.

Working...