NYC's 250,000 Street Lights To Be Replaced With LEDs By 2017 372
An anonymous reader writes "New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg announced that the city's 250,000 street light fixtures, which currently use incandescent bulbs, will be replaced with LEDs by 2017. It's part of a plan to reduce the city government's emissions by 30%. The LEDs have a lifespan of 20 years, more than three times that of the current incandescent bulbs, and Bloomberg says it will save $6 million in energy and $8 million in maintenance every year. It will be the largest LED retrofit in the country. 'The first of three phases to replace the standard "cobra-head" high-pressure sodium street lights, which will upgrade 80,000 at a time across the five boroughs, is expected to be completed in December 2015 with the final phase expected to be completed by 2017. Following the replacement of roadway lighting, decorative fixtures in the city's business and commercial districts will be addressed.'"
High-pressure sodium isn't "incandescent" (Score:1, Informative)
It's a luminous vapor, rather than light from a heated solid filament. It's already much more efficient than incandescent bulbs to produce the same amount of light.
Re:I wish they'd do it here. (Score:5, Informative)
We have had them in my crappy city in the UK for a couple of years now. They put out better light than the old orange bulbs and seem brighter. The orange colour of the old bulbs is actually known to inhibit night vision, so white LEDs are safer.
20 year lifespan (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Costs (Score:5, Informative)
Nope, its actually cheaper to replace them in large blocks than to replace them one at a time. Old tech told me once that when they maintained the long tubes at the factory high up. Once a few went it was only a matter of about a year or two before the rest of the them did and it was more disruptive, time consuming, and costly to replace them one at a time than to do it all at once. So, I've followed this process for most of my larger lighting projects. If you are going to replace one brake light replace them all. If you are going to replace one headlight replace them both.
Also, the nice thing about LED lighting is that the way it fails is it just doesn't produce as much light as it once did. So in 20 years if they want to put off the costs for another couple of years, it's entirely possible to do so.
Re:I wish they'd do it here. (Score:4, Informative)
Part of my town (the main streets) have LED street lights, and we have no problem with snow or ice. BTW, LED's are in the neighborhood of 20-30% efficient, so they don't run ice cold (pun intended). It may seem so though if you've only touched indicator LED's (flashing lights on equipment).
Re:I wish they'd do it here. (Score:4, Informative)
I wonder how many smaller cities have already done this?
I think that it's not uncommon (though traffic signals usually go first, since LEDs have been cheap and good at red, green, and amber for longer than they've been either cheap or good for white, and bulbs-behind-filters have always had even more miserable efficiency than bulbs in general).
LEDs are still pretty expensive, and white ones (because they are usually blue ones pumping a phosphor layer) are still less efficient than one might like; but one big advantage is lifespan.
A replacement lightbulb doesn't cost much; but sending out guys in bucket trucks to deal with dead ones adds up.
Re:I wish they'd do it here. (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Stick with sodium (Score:5, Informative)
What about amateur astronomers?
Amateur astronomers actually make a *lot* of the discoveries and do a lot of the photography.
Re:20 year lifespan (Score:4, Informative)
There is no ballast in an LED light.
Fluorescent and sodium vapor lights have ballasts, not LEDs.
All of the traffic lights in my area were switched to LEDs many years ago. I have never seen a single light that wasn't working properly.
Re:20 year lifespan (Score:5, Informative)
LED lighting systems don't have ballasts. True, LEDs require power conditioning (for these applications, it's some sort of switched mode AC/DC converter with constant current output), but those kinds of circuits are highly efficient and robust. LEDs experience essentially zero degradation from being turned on and off repeatedly. All those blinky lights on the front panels of computers, all the flashing indicators on routers and switches, those are all LEDs.
You are probably thinking of fluorescent lamps (tubes and CFLs), for which frequent on/off cycling is indeed a good way to make them die soon. No one makes fluorescent traffic lights precisely for this reason.
Re:incandescent != sodium (Score:5, Informative)
I did a quick Google to satisfy my curiosity and found a few things:
- While high pressure sodium gives off more lumens per watt, LED has better effective illumination (in part due to how our eyes can detect different wavelengths)
- LEDs are more directional, eliminating up to 40% of light loss due to reflectors
- In the end, an LED might only need to give off 20 or 30% as much light to still illuminate the same area effectively
Source: http://www.al-e.com/led-vs-sodium-lamps [al-e.com]
Re:Many of those bulbs due for replacement anyway (Score:4, Informative)
Of course, LED's often win out in real-world comparisons, because all the lumens are more efficiently directed where they need to go. Still, to get that much brightness, it's going to cost quite a lot of money.
Re:I wish they'd do it here. (Score:5, Informative)
I'm not sure where you're getting the "expects redder colors" part from. The Purkinje effect simply describes the fact that we're more sensitive to blue light at lower intensities—we see it better. This is purely physical, and due to the assymmetry in the response curve of all of our photoreceptors [wikipedia.org]. While most direct light sources activate the cone receptors, this bias is sufficient to make us think of our monochromatic rod cell night vision as slightly bluish, which is why nighttime scenes are depicted as being blue in art, even though you're literally only seeing something grey. Rod cells have such a wide response range in the blue portion of the spectrum (not shown on graph) that some people can see very violetish frequencies with them, causing eyestrain as we get indecisive about how to dilate the pupil.
Sodium lamps are extremely monochromatic; they only put out a very small range around 600 nm [wikimedia.org] because of the chemical reaction that they operate on. Any white bulb either incandescent or LED, even ones with a bluish tint, will illuminate red signs much better than a traditional sodium-vapour lamp.
Re:I wish they'd do it here. (Score:5, Informative)
Bullshit [wikipedia.org]. Street lighting has been found to reduce pedestrian crashes by approximately 50%.
peed bumps increase traffic crashes and reduce safety
Double bullshit [portlandoregon.gov]. Overall, the treated streets experienced a 39 percent decrease in crashes per year after speed bumps are installed. The 39 percent decrease on speed bump streets is a statistically significant difference (t = 2.8) from 1.39 to 0.85 crashes/year, meaning crashes most likely do decrease on speed bump streets due to bump installation. As well as [stackexchange.com] this gem which asks a different question but which provides the same evidence against your "common sense".
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)