Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Military

Skunk Works Reveals Proposed SR-71 Successor: the Hypersonic SR-72 216

cold fjord writes "Aviation Week reports, 'Ever since Lockheed's unsurpassed SR-71 Blackbird was retired ... almost two decades ago, the perennial question has been: Will it ever be succeeded by a new-generation, higher-speed aircraft and, if so, when? That is, until now. After years of silence on the subject, Lockheed Martin's Skunk Works has revealed exclusively to AW&ST details of long-running plans for what it describes as an affordable hypersonic intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) and strike platform that could enter development in demonstrator form as soon as 2018. Dubbed the SR-72, the twin-engine aircraft is designed for a Mach 6 cruise, around twice the speed of its forebear, and will have the optional capability to strike targets. Guided by the U.S. Air Force's long-term hypersonic road map, the SR-72 is designed to fill what are perceived by defense planners as growing gaps in coverage of fast-reaction intelligence by the plethora of satellites, subsonic manned and unmanned platforms meant to replace the SR-71.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Skunk Works Reveals Proposed SR-71 Successor: the Hypersonic SR-72

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Finally (Score:5, Informative)

    by SirGarlon ( 845873 ) on Friday November 01, 2013 @04:01PM (#45304081)
    The U-2 spy plane is still flying [wikipedia.org] and it can carry a 5,000-pound [archive.org] payload of surveillance equipment. So there is plenty of air surveillance; you just didn't know about it.
  • by jandrese ( 485 ) <kensama@vt.edu> on Friday November 01, 2013 @05:21PM (#45305283) Homepage Journal
    The SR-71 wasn't maneuver limited by the pilot, but by the airframe. The turning radius on the SR-71 was the size of some states!

    That said, I wouldn't put too much stock in the artists rendition. That looks an awful lot like the cover of Popular Mechanics, and I wouldn't be surprised if it was made in a similar way (mostly with bullshit).
  • Re:Affordable? (Score:5, Informative)

    by timeOday ( 582209 ) on Friday November 01, 2013 @10:49PM (#45308341)
    I'm more impressed that all of WWII cost the US only 300 BN. That's $3.7T in today's dollars, which happens to be equal to the cost of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars put together:

    The most recent major report on these costs come from Brown University in the form of the Costs of War project, which said the total for wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan is at least $3.2-4 trillion.

    Of course the cost of WWII to the US was very small compared to the costs to nations where it was actually fought.

After an instrument has been assembled, extra components will be found on the bench.

Working...