Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Google Android Open Source Transportation

Google Launches Android Automotive Consortium 117

Posted by samzenpus
from the search-and-drive dept.
DeviceGuru writes "Google announced an initiative with Audi, GM, Honda, Hyundai, and Nvidia aimed at fostering and standardizing Android in-vehicle infotainment (IVI) systems. The Open Automotive Alliance (OAA) is dedicated to a common platform that will drive innovation, and make technology in the car safer and more intuitive for everyone, says the group. The OAA is further committed to bringing the Android platform to cars starting in 2014. In its FAQ, the OAA suggests that this is not a full-blown Android in-vehicle infotainment (IVI) system, but rather a standardized integration stack between automotive systems and mobile Android devices. However, the OAA FAQ also discloses broader ambitions for 2015 and beyond: 'We're also developing new Android platform features that will enable the car itself to become a connected Android device.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Google Launches Android Automotive Consortium

Comments Filter:
  • Naturally (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 06, 2014 @02:17PM (#45879957)

    Google wants Android in the dash of cars so they can track you. "Hey, you just passed one of our ... um, I mean, you just passed a Carl's Jr. - aren't you hungry?"

    I guess self driving cars aren't enough for Google. They want to be in the driver's seat of dashboard technology too.

  • by gstoddart (321705) on Monday January 06, 2014 @02:41PM (#45880187) Homepage

    Yup, I definitely agree with this.

    My wife's last car had in-dash GPS. Unfortunately, when we asked about getting an update to the maps, it would have cost about $900 for the new DVD.

    When you can replace the damned thing for less than $150 for a dedicated unit, what's the point in having it?

    By the time you get technology in a car, it's 5 years old ... and by the time the car is 5 years old, the in-dash technology is usually so outdated as to be useless.

    The auto-makers are all scrambling to get this stuff into their cars because it's the new hotness. But by the time they've built and deployed it, it's old and busted. You end up paying several times what you could buy a device for at any electronics store, for a device which is mostly obsolete by the time you even have it.

    My 6 year old Tom Tom, I still get map updates for.

    And, really, as people are slowly learning that distracted driving is really dangerous, adding all of these "in-vehicle-infotainment" is just more crap and distraction. You want to entertain your kids in your car? Buy 'em a $200 tablet.

  • by gstoddart (321705) on Monday January 06, 2014 @03:03PM (#45880433) Homepage

    Joking aside i do remember a time when many people would simply trade up every year or so, and once the car was not new, the dealers really could have cared less.

    Now there's an understatement -- the dealers were ecstatic to have people doing that.

    You buy a new car, and it massively depreciates as you drive it off the lot. Then two years later you come in, provide them with new inventory to sell, and then sell you another car at full price.

    For car dealers, that's pretty much the pipe-dream. Because you're essentially paying over and over again.

    I've known people who traded in a car every 1-2 years -- and I've mostly been of the opinion they're subsidizing the dealers at their own expense.

    I've always referred to the depreciation of a new car and buying another one before you've amortized the first as a "stupidity tax". Unless you're so well off you can afford to be giving up that much on depreciation and not care, you're probably getting screwed in the long run.

Save energy: Drive a smaller shell.

Working...