Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Military Technology

Military Electronics That Shatter Into Dust On Command 221

First time accepted submitter MAE Keller writes "Two U.S. companies are joining a military research program to develop sensitive electronic components able to self-destruct on command to keep them out of the hands of potential adversaries who would attempt to counterfeit them for their own use. From the article: 'Last Friday DARPA awarded a $2.1 million contract to PARC, and a $3.5 million contract to IBM for the VAPR program, which seeks to develop transient electronics that can physically disappear in a controlled, triggerable manner.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Military Electronics That Shatter Into Dust On Command

Comments Filter:
  • Re:OPFOR (Score:3, Interesting)

    by gstoddart ( 321705 ) on Thursday February 06, 2014 @04:37PM (#46177879) Homepage

    My thoughts exactly ... knowing how to make military hardware keel over on command is going to be a very valuable thing.

  • by Goaway ( 82658 ) on Thursday February 06, 2014 @04:47PM (#46178013) Homepage

    No way to see replies to your comments, no way to link to your comments to check by hand. Discussion is impossible.

  • Re:Kill Beta! (Score:2, Interesting)

    by d34thm0nk3y ( 653414 ) on Thursday February 06, 2014 @04:48PM (#46178035)

    Here is Plain-Old-Text version so you can copy/paste this youselves:

    Please post this to new articles if it hasn't been posted yet.

    On February 5, 2014, Slashdot announced through a javascript popup that they are starting to "move in to" the new Slashdot Beta design.

    Slashdot Beta is a trend-following attempt to give Slashdot a fresh look, an approach that has led to less space for text and an abandonment of the traditional Slashdot look. Much worse than that, Slashdot Beta fundamentally breaks the classic Slashdot discussion and moderation system.

    If you haven't seen Slashdot Beta already, open this [slashdot.org] in a new tab. After seeing that, click here [slashdot.org] to return to classic Slashdot.

     
    We should boycott stories and only discuss the abomination that is Slashdot Beta until Dice abandons the project.

    We should boycott slashdot entirely during the week of Feb 10 to Feb 17 as part of the wider slashcott [slashdot.org]

    Moderators - only spend mod points on comments that discuss Beta

    Commentors - only discuss the Beta - Vote up the Fuck Beta stories

    Keep this up for a few days and we may finally get the PHBs attention.

    Discussion of Beta [slashdot.org]

    Discussion of where to go if Beta goes live [slashdot.org]

    Alternative Slashdot [altslashdot.org]

  • by arth1 ( 260657 ) on Thursday February 06, 2014 @04:50PM (#46178053) Homepage Journal

    I prefer the beta, it's clean and works just fine. Seriously, what is it that's making it so horrible for you?

    Threaded conversations where you can choose ahead of time to see all replies. But you likely won't see this reply, if you use beta.

  • by JustinOpinion ( 1246824 ) on Thursday February 06, 2014 @05:02PM (#46178187)
    What really scares me is the thought that the editors haven't really even noticed.

    One of the things that has always surprised me (even bothered me a bit) about Slashdot is that the people running the site do not appear to actually use the site. The editors don't routinely participate in discussions. We occasionally see a comment from an editor, but they are certainly not among the top commenters. (Even CmdrTaco's comment history was surprisingly thin...) These are people who are paid to be involved with the site. I know they have other duties, and perhaps being an employee makes participating in the community less fun. But on the other hand, if your job is to manage an online community, I would expect to see more involvement.

    I sometimes wonder whether the editors actually read through Slashdot comments at all, or whether they just queue up some stories and then work on something else.

    I'm guessing that by now they've noticed the firestorm of hate, since it's being injected into the comments, firehose/story-submissions, polls, via email, etc. But even so, I feel that ultimately the disconnect between what the Slashdot community wants, and what the powers-that-be are planning to provide, is that the people running Slashdot are not Slashdot users (much less contributors). So they do not even realize why we hate the beta so much. To an outsider, one commenting system and another might seem pretty much the same. It might seem like we're complaining over minutia. But to someone who is trying to participate in the fast-paced and highly technical discussions that erupt on Slashdot, the commenting system is paramount. Ruin it, and you've killed the site.

Never test for an error condition you don't know how to handle. -- Steinbach

Working...