Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Movies The Internet

Joss Whedon Releases New Film On Demand 137

Rambo Tribble (1273454) writes "Popular director Joss Whedon has taken the film world by surprise by releasing his latest offering, 'In Your Eyes', available for download on the same day it premiered at the Tribeca Film Festival. The new release comes from Whedon's own "micro studio", Bellwether Pictures, and is featured on Vimeo as a $5 rental, (free trailer). Whedon mused, 'It's exciting for us because we get to explore yet another new form of distribution — and we get $5.' Mr. Whedon has a history of pushing the delivery envelope, as with Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog, in 2008."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Joss Whedon Releases New Film On Demand

Comments Filter:
  • Quality? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by mythosaz ( 572040 ) on Monday April 21, 2014 @01:18PM (#46807005)

    Can anyone comment about the quality of this film? Is this Cinema quality? Direct-to-Video? SciFi channel? YouTube?

    While watching SHIELD the other week, they transitioned seamlessly to a Captain America commercial -- and I wondered if I was still watching SHIELD until 5 seconds later, a actual car crash stunt happened, and I knew the budget for the 30-second commercial was higher than the entire episode of SHIELD that I had been watching.

    I'll gladly pay $5 to watch a new movie in this "new model" of distribution.

    ....but I won't pay $5 to watch something that should have been released to YouTube.

  • Louis CK (Score:4, Insightful)

    by future assassin ( 639396 ) on Monday April 21, 2014 @01:21PM (#46807045)

    Louis CK did pretty good with his pay what you want experiment and his own production. If could get a download that plays on any video player tha say day or even month after it came out of the movies I'd be all over it. The last time I went to the movies was to see The Road after spending nearly $50 between me and my son on tickets and popcorn I said fuck it this is enough and haven't been back. At $5 per movie Id' be buying prrtty much any good movies that comes out. Hell even for the price of the ticket $10+ tax each person I'd could buy 4 movies and enjoy them at home.

  • by NotDrWho ( 3543773 ) on Monday April 21, 2014 @01:33PM (#46807153)

    Not so bad if that's your fetish. But it just drives me nuts. I prefer my heroines to be at least somewhat grounded in reality. Personally, I always thought the best sci-fi heroine was Ellen Ripley. She had real strength of heart. There was no need to write her as some kind of superman ninja who could alter the laws of physics to beat down everyone and everything around her.

    Writing your heroine as a guy with tits isn't "empowering." It's just fucking lazy.

  • Well... no. (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Slartibartfast ( 3395 ) * <ken@[ ]s.org ['jot' in gap]> on Monday April 21, 2014 @01:38PM (#46807205) Homepage Journal

    The *EQUIPMENT* has come huge lengths. You do, however, lack the writers, acting talent, stage hands, etc., etc., etc. If you give me eggs and cheese, I give you cheesy eggs. A French chef gives you a souffle. Having the ingredients is only the first step.

  • Rent vs own (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Bram Stolk ( 24781 ) on Monday April 21, 2014 @01:42PM (#46807255) Homepage

    I do not like renting, I prefer to own.
    Just put it up on AppleTV so it conveniently becomes part of my iTunes lib.
    Also I don't have patience for sloppy flash based players.

  • by MetalliQaZ ( 539913 ) on Monday April 21, 2014 @03:17PM (#46808285)

    Dear Mr. Whedon,

    Please justify the $5 cost to rent your film. I can rent your latest superhero blockbuster over the weekend for $2 from Redbox. I can own Louis CK's latest show forever for $5. Why is your content so much more expensive?

    Thanks,
    a fan

1 + 1 = 3, for large values of 1.

Working...