Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

NSF Researcher Suspended For Mining Bitcoin

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 09, 2014 @10:19PM (#47199859)

    well, most likely the computers werent being used for anything else at the time. he was probably only running it in spare time.

    Using close to 100% of processing resources would definitely increase overall power consumption for the computers in question. This would result in increased overall cost of operation.

  • by MiniMike (234881) on Monday June 09, 2014 @10:26PM (#47199895)

    Many of those systems have no (or minimal) idle time. Also, this misuse caused them to consume more power, and increased the wear on the systems components. There was a real impact from this. The $150k indicates a lot of cpu time was consumed for this, but TFA doesn't indicate how much- certainly more than would have been 'spare time'.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 09, 2014 @10:45PM (#47199995)

    Where is it written that a "supercomputer" must be efficient and cheap to run?

    FWIW, at this point, any "general use" computer is not efficient to mine bitcoin - it only makes sense to use custom-designed ASICs. Unless you get free power, then use as many CPUs and GPUs as you want, but even the cost of the hardware components is going to be pricey compared to your return.

Practical people would be more practical if they would take a little more time for dreaming. -- J. P. McEvoy