Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Biotech

+ - Computers are better than humans at genomics?->

Submitted by Shipud
Shipud (685171) writes "Sequencing the genome of an organism is not the end of a discovery process; rather, it is a beginning. It's the equivalent of discovering a book whose words (genes) are there, but their meaning is yet unknown. Biocurators are the people who annotate genes — find out what they do — through literature search and the supervised use of computational techniques. A recent study published in PLoS Computational Biology shows that biocurators probably perform no better than fully automated computational methods used to annotate genes. It is not clear whether this is because the software is of high quality, or both curators and software need to improve their performance. The author of this blog post uses the concept of the uncanny valley to explain this recent discovery and what it means to both life science and artificial intelligence."
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Computers are better than humans at genomics?

Comments Filter:

Per buck you get more computing action with the small computer. -- R.W. Hamming

Working...