Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

+ - First Evidence That Google's Quantum Computer May Not Be Quantum After All->

Submitted by KentuckyFC
KentuckyFC (1144503) writes "In May last year, Google and NASA paid a reported $15 million for a quantum computer from the controversial Canadian start up D-Wave Systems. One question mark over the device is whether it really is quantum or just a conventional computer in disguise. That's harder to answer than it sounds, not least because any direct measurement of a quantum state destroys it. So physicists have to take an indirect approach. They assume the computer is a black box in which they can input data and receive an output. Given this input and output, the question is whether this computing behaviour can be best reproduced by a classical or a quantum algorithm. Last summer, an international team of scientists compared a number of classical algorithms against an algorithm that relies on a process called quantum annealing. Their conclusion was that quantum annealing best reproduces the D-Wave computer's behaviour, a result that was a huge boon for the company. Now a group from UC Berkeley and IBM's Watson Research Lab says it has a found a classical algorithm that explains the results just as well, or even better, than quantum annealing. In other words, the results from the D-Wave machine could just as easily be explained if it was entirely classical. That comes on the back of mounting evidence that the D-Wave computer may not cut the quantum mustard in other ways too. Could it be that Google and NASA have forked out millions for a classical calculator? Just possibly, yes."
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

First Evidence That Google's Quantum Computer May Not Be Quantum After All

Comments Filter:

Aren't you glad you're not getting all the government you pay for now?

Working...