Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Why "Vista" Nick White Left Microsoft

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Friday April 04, @05:29PM
from the spinning-the-spin-control dept.
An anonymous reader writes "Earlier this week Nick White, Product Manager for Windows Vista and blogger at WindowsVistaBlog, announced that he was leaving Microsoft. Geek.com previously interviewed Nick about what SP1 for Vista was all about, so they sat down with him yesterday to get the details behind his departure, his proudest moments at Microsoft, a few regrettable moments, and more."

Related Stories

[+] IT: What Vista SP1 Means To You 340 comments
An anonymous reader writes "Geek.com has an interview with Nick White, Microsoft's Vista Product Manager, covering the upcoming release of Vista SP1. The interview goes over some of the new features, how the change will affect admins, and how Microsoft decides if a change should be rolled out as an update or as part of the service pack. One of the most interesting questions asks whether people should feel that they have to wait until SP1 to upgrade to the operating system, a common practice with Windows users. White writes off this practice as no longer being necessary and notes how Windows Update has lessened the importance of the release of a service pack. Just the same, a News.com article explores the possibility that this update will finally begin driving users to Vista."
Why "Vista" Nick White Left Microsoft More | Login | Reply
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Please Log In to ContinueClose 25 Comments More | Login | Reply /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • by kipman725 (1248126) on Friday April 04, @05:36PM (#22968274)
    For those not into RTFA here is a summary: Proudest moment: Dodging the chair as I ran out the door Details Behind departure: DEVELOPERS, DEVELOPERS, DEVELOPERS... need more be said?
    • by GWLlosa (800011) on Friday April 04, @05:44PM (#22968346)
      Except for the fact that neither of the things you mentioned were so much as alluded to in the article, that's an awesome summary :)

      It's actually just about how he likes to blog, he's generally positive on Microsoft, claiming that they allowed him complete freedom to write whatever he wanted to in his blog. His reason for leaving was basically that he thought the new job with some start up was a 'big opportunity' for him.
  • by 26199 (577806) * on Friday April 04, @05:46PM (#22968374) Homepage
    So he sounds like a reasonable guy, and from what he says he was allowed to be honest and make his own decisions.

    Unfortunately it's one of the laws of PR that a dishonest PR person can claim to be honest just as easily as an honest one.

    Ah well. I have faith in humanity! I believe him.
  • The new gig is not about me blogging, itâ(TM)s about helping bloggers do what they do best â" shape opinion through the sharing of information â" hand in hand with helping companies understand the role they can play in that conversation.


    Mmmmm, the lovely taste of vomit. I never knew 'shaping opionion' by 'sharing information' was what 'bloggers do best'. That statement is even more ironic considering only a few paragraphs earlier he said:

    Listen to your readers â" theyâ(TM)re the reason you get a paycheck. Case in point[blah blah blah](


    I won't argue with whether Vista is good or bad, because what galls me about this interview is not the debate over Vista but the man's presumptions about his audience and the supposed purpose of marketing being to '[change] the prevailing âoewisdomâ around [the product], one user at a time[...]'. And one does this by 'to explain things in terms that didnâ(TM)t sound like spin but rather presented the facts without being leading, and in a manner that respected our readersâ(TM) intelligence.'

    Because, 'I learned that companies ignore or attempt to manipulate public opinion around their products and services at their peril.' And we know Microsoft (or any other corporate "blogger" (I'm sorry, let's call him what he is: Shill) would never do such a thing - right? I mean, Lord help the company that tries to 'manipulate public opinion' with lies - whoops, I mean market-speak.

    Asshole.
  • And we care why? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by LostCluster (625375) * on Friday April 04, @05:47PM (#22968382) Homepage
    Marketing writer leaves Microsoft... and this becomes a /. story?
  • spin spin spin (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Bored MPA (1202335) on Friday April 04, @05:49PM (#22968392)
    name recognition, name recognition,
    rolodex, rolodex,

    blah. why are there even MORE stories about this on slashdot. it was obviously hype to benefit nick, benefit his new employer, and then play down the MS leaving angle to make somewhat/all nice with his old employer. everybody wins. even slashdot. go go gadget newscycle.

    everybody except me, im the idiot taking the time to click the link and write this little rant. and you're the idiots taking the time to mod me -1 troll and +5 underrated.

      *headdesk*

  • by Opportunist (166417) on Friday April 04, @06:00PM (#22968492)
    Considering it's MS, my guess is, he knew too much.

    How you interpret that now is up to you, I think both ways could be true.
  • by ahabswhale (1189519) on Friday April 04, @06:01PM (#22968502)
    I read the whole article and nothing was actually revealing probably because he failed to say anything negative whatsoever about his former company (and everyone has something negative to say about their employer), yet he offers no real reason why he left but it's supposedly an interview about his leaving Microsoft... Sorry for the run-on sentence.
  • My take (Score:5, Informative)

    by Archangel Michael (180766) on Friday April 04, @06:35PM (#22968706) Journal
    Marketing Droid speaks Marketing Noise, to people who really don't care.

    "Did you ever post something that Microsoft wished you hadnâ(TM)t?

    The first post I put up was on the use of BitTorrents to distribute Beta 2, and I gave it a rather sensationalistic title. It got senior managementâ(TM)s attention, and from there we had a blank check to engage anyone we needed in order to get the story in time for it to be relevant to our readers. So while it was perhaps a risky route to go in the short-term, it was that story that ensured our blog was apportioned the resources necessary to get the job done right. In short, Iâ(TM)d do it again and in the same way (only Iâ(TM)d blame it all on my managers :) )."

    If you read this, he never answer the freakin question, as asked! In fact, he said he'd do it again. I don't know if that was sarcasm, which doesn't work well in written form, or what.

    Why can't people ever answer the question? Seriously. Crap crap crap. I just wasted 5 minutes
  • by San-LC (1104027) on Friday April 04, @06:48PM (#22968788)
    The real reason why Nick White left is because too many people kept calling him "Vista" Nick White, and as soon as the ladies correlated that, like Vista, Nick White underperformed and was overhyped, they left him like a chubby kid at fat camp.
  • Someone who has held a position like that is unlikely to fight back and burn bridges by slagging off Microsoft. In fact you would think he still worked there given the positive spin his article provides.

    There's no way he'd ruin his career by giving us any dirt on Microsoft and Vista, future employers wouldn't like that. He's probably signed an NDA anyway.
  • by JebusIsLord (566856) on Friday April 04, @07:45PM (#22969218) Homepage
    This quote, at the end caught my attention:

    Q: "Are you going to be blogging for BuzzCorps?"

    A: "The new gig is not about me blogging, it's about helping bloggers do what they do best - shape opinion through the sharing of information"

    So he's moved on to a far more luctrative career in training astroturfers. Great.
    • And Vista(TM) which I use every day makes me more productive(TM). It must be all the forest creatures who fly in to help with the housework.
    • Re:Propaganda (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Technician (215283) on Friday April 04, @07:36PM (#22969172)
      I can't believe the propaganda is so blatant!

      I'm glad you brought that up.

      Here is an example;
      "Frankly, I think Windows Vista has gotten a bum rap, as I use it every day - even after having left MS - and I would have a hard time using anything else and still be as productive."

      He gave the reason I gave up on Vista. I couldn't get anything done. In a meeting I tried to show a DVD. It started OK but stopped to ask if I wanted to upgrade my AV. The stupid computer asked me to upgrade now, even though we were doing a presentation and had no network connections at the time. I wounder if it would have crashed if I told it to upgrade.

      We wrote documents and tried to send them to the laser instead of the default inkjet printer. Couldn't find any way to do it without changing the default printer. Later a Google search told me to use the big round logo. It's really a button. Who would of guessed?

      The Ubuntu install went fine. I was able to log into my network, attach to printers, edit documents, burn CD's, edit photos, scan documents, etc. on the default setup. Vista was full of shareware requesting upgrades for everything. Almost nothing worked. It couldn't log into my servers, I couldn't select printers without a Google search, and movies stopped after playing for 15 minutes for a stupid dialog box.

      With lots of training and system customization, I might be able to become productive on Vista, but the first attempts very poor.
      • Re:Propaganda (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 04, @08:26PM (#22969430)
        Hmm, let's think about this:

        - The DVD playback software doesn't sound a Vista component itself, although it's hard to tell from your description.

        - "stopped to ask if I wanted to upgrade my AV" - Anti-Virus? That sounds like a 3rd party component rather than a piece of Vista.

        - The "big round logo" is a part of Office 2007, which is not part of Vista. It looks exactly the same on XP.

        - The "Shareware requesting updates" are not part of Vista and were installed by your computer manufacturer.

        Sounds like you got a crappy OEM machine and none of these are really Vista issues ...

        • Re:Propaganda (Score:5, Insightful)

          by Technician (215283) on Friday April 04, @09:17PM (#22969692)
          too bad you posted AC. Most of your points are correct.

          My point is a new Visya machine out of the box from most retailers is not production worthy. It needed an Office Application. Office 2007 has it's own issues. Sorry I mentioned it. My Linux machine came with an office application installed and it worked, was intuitive and the minor bugs were easy to figure out. The biggest annoyance was the default printer paper setting of A4 instead of Letter. It did not require a Google search to fix.

          The stopped to ask, I do blame on Vista. When updates are available in Ubuntu for a background task, it simply winks the toolbar item, not stop the foreground task like it did in Vista. This is a Vista fault. I've seen the same task done much better elsewhere.

          The Shareware requesting updates being installed by the computer manufacture is a problem with Vista. They should not need the DeCrapifier right out of the box to fix a new machine.

          The fix is here;
          http://www.pcdecrapifier.com/home [pcdecrapifier.com]

              • Re:Propaganda (Score:4, Informative)

                by jimicus (737525) on Saturday April 05, @01:04PM (#22973698) Homepage

                Erm... It's the way most people get a copy of Vista. The license permits this crap... So out of the box, it arrives very badly broken. This is Vista's fault. That crap should be on an included CD just in case you are interested in any special offers....
                I would point out that a few years ago Microsoft got a minor rap across the knuckles for refusing to allow OEMs to install non-Microsoft software.