Slashdot Log In
Aussie Reserve Bank Eyeing eBay's PayPal Policy
Posted by
timothy
on Tue Apr 22, 2008 09:54 AM
from the jealous-eye dept.
from the jealous-eye dept.
Bulldust writes "Regular readers will recollect the recent story that eBay is forcing Australian users over to PayPal or COD as the only forms of payment in June 2008: eBay Australia Makes PayPal Mandatory. It now appears that the Australian Reserve Bank will consider throwing its weight behind users, should the eBay policy be deemed to breach trade practice and competition laws."
Related Stories
[+]
eBay Australia Makes PayPal Mandatory 390 comments
An anonymous reader writes "Australian press are reporting that eBay is using Australia as a guinea pig to trial a new policy where all other modes of payment are barred except for PayPal. If successful, eBay will roll it out to other markets."
[+]
News: eBay's Plan to Force PayPal Rejected Down Under 108 comments
Jm_aus writes "eBay's plan to force all users to use PayPal only has been rejected by Australia's competition regulator, the ACCC. This followed 650 submissions from eBay users as well as from Australian banks, other payment services, the Australian Reserve Bank, and (anonymously) Google, which aired a lot of dirty laundry about PayPal's unresponsiveness and failure to sign up to the local banking code of conduct. Apparently the public benefits from eBay's 'Bad Buyer Experience' elimination program are likely to be 'minimal.' There is a period for appeals."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.

Ooops (Score:2)
Re:Ooops (Score:5, Insightful)
No, Ebay and PayPal like to paint themselves as being in a position where they benefit from the regulations they find convenient, and they're exempt from the ones they find inconvenient.
PayPal regularly says they're not a bank and not subject to the rules on banking, and EBay routinely says "we're just a facilitator".
They seem to actually conduct their business as if they are exempt from such forms of regulation. This could be the first time someone has corrected them and pointed out that they aren't the ones that choose which regulations apply.
Cheers
Parent
Re:Ooops (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, you can't believe how much I want that to be true. That would be just too funny.
I honestly have no idea if you're
Very small rocks? (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
They forgot nothing at all. They actually submitted notice to the ACCC specifically asking for permission to be excluded from regulations that would stop this sort of thing, as it's "more secure" for the end user, and thus ultimately in the end users be
why all the greed (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:why all the greed (Score:4, Informative)
The culture and economic system demand the greed, remember Ebay is public company owned by shareholders, whose sole purpose is growth of profits.
As for people. People want power, when people say they want to be "rich", it's not that they want to just be rich (10 million or so) they want as much wealth as possible. Being 'rich' is relative to the richest, what they mean is "I want to be among the richest".
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
And you say that p
Re: (Score:2)
Lesson: If you want to keep your company focused on helping people, doing things right, and making a reasonabl
Re: (Score:2)
so the wheel turns again... (Score:3, Interesting)
1. new website offers cool technology
2. people browse over, see it, like it, use it
3. it becomes a "defacto" standard and charges more money
4. because there is perceived to be a market, and people are frustrated with the charges from the original an alternative website is launched
5. as alternative website gains more custom it becomes a more viable alternative, more people hear about it, more people leave original site
6. the tipping point when the hassle of changing to the alternative is less then the annoyance of the charges charged by current website begins to slid in favor of the alternative
7. the original collapses like a flan in a cupboard and people move en masse to the alternative
8. realizing what an ass hat it has been the original makes desperate offers and price cuts to regain favor, hoping it has not pissed off its clientèle too much.
9. the alternative service decides that now it is the "defacto" standard, it can raise prices..
hell we've all seen it again, and again.
any bets on what the alternative will be?
Re: (Score:2)
google (Score:2)
This has implications for ebay in the US (Score:3, Interesting)
What they refuse to acknowledge is that paypal offers no protection to sellers. Stolen credit cards and reversed-charges are still a potential for any transaction done via paypal. Until ebay gives me as a seller the option to wait 35 business days to ship an items paid for via paypal, there is no seller protection.
Re: (Score:2)
"Although a chargeback may appear similar to a PayPal claim, itâ(TM)s actually a process that is granted to a cardholder by their credit card company and initiated outside of PayPal. In a dispute over a chargeback, the d
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Ummmm
Re: (Score:2)
That said, AUSTRALIA is not in the least bit communist. We are, however, voting strongly for more worker and consumer rights th
Re: (Score:2)
How's Rudd working out, now you've had him a bit? While he seemed to be a really big improvement over Howard at first (of cou
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Rudd is still having his "honeymoon period" in government. This has been extended by the ineptness of the Opposition and some toadying on behalf of the media. He has said a lot about what his government will do and has not made a complete fool of himself o