Slashdot Log In
2008 Google Summer of Code Highlights
Posted by
timothy
on Saturday May 17, @03:41PM
from the sweet-anticipation dept.
from the sweet-anticipation dept.
andrewmin writes "SoC 2008 has begun, and with 175 organizations and 1125 students it looks better than ever before. Here's a quick run-down of a few programs that, if they are finished, will definitely be making their way onto your machine."
Related Stories
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.

E17? (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Re:E17? (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:E17? (Score:5, Insightful)
Oh, and before I get that troll who says that this is the problem with open source, I would like to point out that the "hobby" development is not typical of open source software; most people who work on OSS get paid to do it (for example, by redhat, novell, mysql, sun, ibm, trolltech [now owned by nokia] etc.)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:E17? (Score:5, Funny)
It is this very attachment and craving that keeps you from attaining it.
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
7 slots for DragonFlyBSD (Score:4, Informative)
DragonFly Projects
Enhance dma
* Max Lindner, mentored by Matthias Schmidt
* See EnhanceDmaGSoC for more information
Port DragonFly to the AMD64 architecture
* Jordan Gordeev, mentored by Thomas E. Spanjaard
* See AMD64GSoC for more information.
RFC3542 support
* Dashu Huang, mentored by Hasso Tepper
* The standard application program interface (API) for TCP/IP applications is the "sockets" interface. Although this API was developed for Unix in the early 1980s, it has also been implemented on DragonFly BSD with support for IPv6 applications. Today, to fit new demands, the API standard that support IPv6 applications has experience some changes from RFC2292 to RFC3542. However, the DragonFly BSD operating system now only support RFC2292, and it don't support RFC3542 advanced sockets API, to make it catch up the change, we need to make it support RFC3542. To make DragonFly BSD support RFC3542. My work will research the codes of current IPv6 stack in DragonFly BSD and understand how it works. At the same time, I should understand some related RFC, and how other BSD's such as FreeBSD, openBSD, merged RFC3542. Through this way, I can figure out which part of the old IPv6 stack should be improved. Finally,I will update the old IPv6 stack to make it support RFC3542.
Extend Multi-Processing (MP) support
* Robert Luciani, mentored by Simon Schubert
* Back in 2003 when DragonFly was born, the first subsystem to be implemented was the LWKT. The reduction in complexity achieved by using message passing (as opposed to a shared memory environment using locks) was undeniable. What was also "unlocked" though, was the potential for near linear performance scaling on multiple CPU systems. Unfortunately many kernel systems, such as the network stack, need to be modified to take advantage of this potential, since they are still encumbered by a legacy "Big Giant Lock". In this project I will remove the MP lock in important areas of the kernel that have a direct affect on the performance of popular programs such as PostgreSQL.
Proportional share userland scheduling algorithm
* Mayur Narayan Bhosle, mentored by Jeffrey Hsu
* Proportional share algorithms like lottery scheduling, Stride scheduling algorithm guarantee proportional share of resources like (CPU) to a processes as per their requirement stated specified during the start. The traditional schedulers achieve fairness or resource allocation by adjusting priority, but the effect is observed over a long term. But instead in case of proportional share schedulers we observe the fairness of allocation over a bounded period of time when we adjust the requirement of resources dynamically.
Anticipatory disk I/O scheduler
* Nirmal Thacker, mentored by Simon Schubert
* This project aims at developing an Anticipatory Disk I/O scheduler for DragonFlyBSD. An Anticipatory Disk I/O scheduler will ensure that an anticipation heuristic will nullify all possible deceptive idleness between consecutive disk accesses and at the same time try to maintain an overall good throughput. In the DragonFly BSD operating system it must also take into consideration the MP- safety factors.
LiveCD with a DragonFly-specific X desktop
* Louisa Luciani, mentored by Sascha Wildner
* In this project I will integrate more functionality into the nrelease build system. The build will generate a persistent liveCD with Dragonfly specific features. It will be customized for recovery, demonstration and testing and include a good default installation.
Links
* http://code.google.com/soc/2008/ [google.com]
Reply to This
Re:7 slots for DragonFlyBSD (Score:4, Informative)
http://www.ibeentoubuntu.com/2008/04/where-do-we-go-from-here-now-that-gnome.html [ibeentoubuntu.com]
Reply to This
Parent
coral cache link (Score:3, Informative)
Reply to This
stop hating on mplayer (Score:5, Interesting)
I also dont understand the need for a frontend to aptitude, apt + front end is just as powerful, its only dependency resolution that hasn't been well implemented in other front ends.
Reply to This
definitely be making their way onto your machine (Score:4, Insightful)
Reply to This
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Me and GRUB have never gotten along, but maybe me and GRUB2 will...
Aside from that, that li
Re:Get GRUB2 production ready first... (Score:5, Insightful)
Many GRUB developers are working diligently toward a production ready version of GRUB 2. I am a new contributor to the GRUB project and the reason I chose this feature to implement is because it meshes with my areas of expertise and interest. Also, I feel that making GRUB 2 usable by everyone (let's face it, right now that means it has to be supported by Ubuntu) is a very important goal. In order for Ubuntu to adopt GRUB 2, it will have to not only be functionally complete, but they will want it to look nice too, as the rest of the OS will.
No argument that it will be great to have GRUB 2 production ready. I am looking forward to it, and I hope I can contribute to other features after I complete the graphical menu system.
Colin
Reply to This
Parent
Re:definitely be making their way onto your machin (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Parent
Server dying (Score:3, Informative)
-FST (anonymous to prevent karma whoring)
Reply to This
Pidgin projects are cool (Score:4, Interesting)
Reply to This
Re:Pidgin projects are cool (Score:4, Interesting)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Pidgin projects are cool (Score:5, Insightful)
I imagine support for all closed, legacy formats is a pretty low priority. Why prioritize reverse engineering and optimizing less used features of an intentionally obfuscated format championed by someone trying to prevent the type of interoperability that is Pidgin's goal? Isn't it better for them to optimize file transfer over XMMP or the video and voice capabilities? I mean, if you want to transfer files with other users, there are plenty of other protocols that do work and where the Pidgin team doesn't have to work so hard only to have it intentionally broken by Microsoft at a later date. It is an inefficient use of their resources compared to working on core features using open protocols where they don't have to put in all that extra effort to overcome MS's antics.
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
from the aptitude-gtk guy (Score:5, Informative)
If you've used both Synaptic and Aptitude, you should have seen some differences
The dependency resolution is one point, but it's not only that. The whole navigation in Aptitude is just much more efficient. Ever used Synaptic in a mixed-distribution install ? Say you want to install another version of a package and it has some different dependencies. Good luck navigating them in Synaptic. It's really not designed with that in mind.
You can see the full application here [milliways.fr] and my development blog here [milliways.fr]
I warmly welcome any input on my project!
Reply to This
at less than 2% (Score:5, Informative)
Captain obvious points out that highlighting even just one project for half of the participating orgs would be about 88 projects and would still represent less than 8%. There's also no guarantee that the student will be successful on their project. About one in five students failed last year, so nothing is guaranteed regardless.
My point? There is a LOT of cool stuff being worked on. Check the projects out for yourself at http://code.google.com/soc/2008/ [google.com]
They're all listed. Show your support, get involved, help them succeed if you really care.
Reply to This
Re:GRUB GUI? (Score:5, Funny)
Must... resist... urge... to make... Windows BSOD.... joke... aaaaaaargh!
Reply to This
Parent
Re:GRUB GUI? (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:GRUB GUI? (Score:5, Interesting)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:GRUB GUI? (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Multithreading way more important. (Score:4, Informative)
Reply to This
Parent