Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

The Most Annoying Software Out There

Posted by timothy on Tuesday May 20, @11:39AM
from the to-kick-while-down dept.
superglaze writes "ZDNet UK has a very entertaining round-up of the most annoying software out there, and everything from RealPlayer and Adobe Reader to Java and Norton Antivirus gets a kicking. 'The internet has brought us many joys. It's rewritten the rules of business and pleasure. And pain. For it allows what may have seemed like bright ideas at the time ('let's use it to make sure our customers have the latest software', for example) to turn into a stinking pit of misery — usually, but by no means always, after marketing gets its fangs in.'"

Related Stories

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • by elrous0 (869638) * on Tuesday May 20, @11:40AM (#23476448)
    Print Version [zdnet.co.uk] (unless you want to click through about 10 pages)

    And I agree with most of these, particularly Apple. I recently spent several hours trying to remove Quicktime from my system and replace it with Quicktime alternative. I had to go in and hand edit the registry. The damn program was incidious about wriggling it's way back into my system tray and running processes if every single reference to it wasn't removed from the registry. That will be the last piece of Apple software I ever install on my system.

    • Worse than that, actually. If you try to delete qttray.exe, the quicklauncher app that sits in the task tray and eats up memory for no other reason than giving QT a minor boost on startup, the quicktime application will detect this on system reboot (because it is registered as a startup application) and recreate the qttray.exe executable file from a stored version somewhere in its own bowels.

      That's right. If you delete qttray, Quicktime opens its maw and barfs up a new version of it. Then it turns it on and puts it back in the task tray.
    • by zappepcs (820751) on Tuesday May 20, @11:58AM (#23476772) Journal
      Welcome elrous0, to the 'what were they thinking? anti-software fan club'

      Here we will help you commiserate as you belch out the pains brought to you by software that is premised on the thought that ALL users would surely want this software until the day they die.

      With the mentality (and social skills) of clippy, these coders work double time to ensure that your experience with their software will be never ending. What could possibly be worse than malware you might ask. How about software that has an uninstall feature but won't do so?

      I'm wagging my finger at you AOL, Apple, MS... you, antivirus guy in the back snickering, you can STFU too.

      We're glad to have you as a member, and look forward to your votes in the awards ceremonies next year. Note that Internet infamy is your for the taking if your right up for nominees is both exacting and excoriating.

      I'm still investigating, but the OOo quickstart on XP may get a nomination. HP printer driver division has a place on my list too.

      Anyway, mill around, meet the other members, enjoy....
    • by RetroGeek (206522) on Tuesday May 20, @12:02PM (#23476876) Homepage

      I recently spent several hours trying to remove Quicktime from my system and replace it with Quicktime alternative. I had to go in and hand edit the registry.

      You should try to remove Norton virus checker. It has pieces of itself everywhere, and it over writes Windows system files with its own.

      So you get a brand new machine, and during the first login, the Norton installer runs. You have NO choice in this. Some deal was reached between the machine distributor and Norton, and that is just the way it is.

      If you make a mistake, the entire Windows system goes sideways. We alway do an image FIRST, then try to remove it. That way if something blows up you have a fallback. Then we make an image for the rest of the same type of machine, and we re-image every new one that comes in the door.

      Hey Norton: go stuff it!
  • Norton Products... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by DaRat (678130) * on Tuesday May 20, @11:41AM (#23476476)

    The worst has to be the Norton XXXX products. I installed Norton 360 v2 on my laptop as an "upgrade" to Norton AntiVirus 2007, and I think that intentionally installing a few viruses and malware would have resulted in better overall system performance.

    Symantec tech support was, of course, useless:
    "Sir, you have a virus or malware."
    "Yes, I know: the malware is called Norton 360 since my problems didn't appear until I installed your product. What I want to know is how to stop Norton 360 from using 100% of both cores and incessently accessing the DVD drive for no apparent reason."
    "Sir, you need to run a scan for virus and malware."

    At least I got the damn thing uninstalled and got a refund. Never again...

  • by Toreo asesino (951231) on Tuesday May 20, @11:46AM (#23476542) Journal
    I've noticed recently it's wanted to update itself about once every two weeks, which would be fine if it was a FireFox type update - nice and clean, restart app & done, but instead the update mechanism is something like the following:

    Click on "omg! Update me!" big window.
    Browse through newly openeded browser window.
    No, just the free one, no shitty MP3's thanks.
    Download. Click install.
    No ffs, don't take control over all my media types.
    No, keep your shitty ad-ware.
    Die Winamp agent; if you're not the default for everything it's for a reason.
    Yeah, same settings as last time (it's an update ffs).
    Oh right, you changed a bunch of setting anyway, thanks.

    There's just a tonne of questions that are so unnecessary for a minor update, which seem to come thick & fast these days. Thanks a bunch AOL; you've created the least smooth updating process i've seen in a while.
  • Bloody Adobe Reader (Score:5, Interesting)

    by tempest69 (572798) on Tuesday May 20, @11:51AM (#23476634) Journal
    I have no clue as to why this program takes upwards of a minute to read a simple pdf file that is mostly text. It really boggles my mind as to what the computer could be doing with that time/cycles.. Where as foxit can load the same pdf in a blink of an eye.. but microsoft loves to revert the extentions to adobe, unless I march through a convoluted maze to revert it back. never let your well-meaning friend install adobe on your box, it's a nightmare to remove.


    Storm

  • by hyperz69 (1226464) on Tuesday May 20, @11:52AM (#23476654)
    I think they could have just said VISTA... Done! Though seriously this app misses, a few apps. Mainly... GOOGLE BAR? Dear god, does every application on the planet now try to install google bar? Completely removing it requires a virgin, 2 brillo pads, a priest, plus 6 gallons of goats blood.
  • What? (Score:5, Funny)

    by Daimanta (1140543) on Tuesday May 20, @11:52AM (#23476656)
    No Microsoft Bob?
  • I'm almost to the point where I want to remove Quicktime from all of my machines, because I'm so tired of being asked to "upgrade" to Safari and iTunes.
  • by Roger W Moore (538166) on Tuesday May 20, @11:53AM (#23476696)
    Since they were including companies as well as just software I hereby nominate ZDNet for most annoying website. Why can't they stick the 11 short paragraphs making up the article on ONE PAGE!
  • My vote: HP (Score:5, Informative)

    by truthsearch (249536) on Tuesday May 20, @11:54AM (#23476706) Homepage Journal
    We have one of those all-in-one HP printers at my office, where we're all on Macs. When we first got the printer I installed the disk with the Mac drivers. It also installed a bunch of utilities. Playing around with these utilities I found a tedious maze of buttons and windows. I couldn't even find the most obvious features, like where to see a scanned document.

    But I also noticed my computer was running slower, even when no HP utilities were being used. So I looked at the Activity Monitor and found the HP background applications were permanently taking up 10% CPU, even if nothing was ever printed or scanned. So I removed all of the HP utilities and drivers and found a driver built into OS X which was for almost the same model number. I have no problems at all printing and my CPU is back to normal utilization.

    Not only do these HP utilities suck, but they're annoying when you're not even using them.
  • Update apps... (Score:5, Insightful)

    Update apps are a pain in the backside, but they are a symptom of the way windows and osx are designed...

    There's no question that your system should be aware of what software is installed, and what the latest version is, and make the user aware too and give them the option to install the updates.

    On linux you rarely, if ever, get problems like this because the updates are handled centrally.

    The problem with windows and osx, is that there is no central way for third party apps to register to the automatic update mechanism, the supplied update functions are only for the original vendor's apps, not third parties, meaning every third party has their own update service wasting memory and informing/annoying you in different ways.

    The linux approach is orders of magnitude better, centralised package repositories, a centralised method of informing the user, you can choose how to be informed of updates, and you won't be hassle any other way. To further help matters, the package manager knows of packages you don't have installed too, giving you single click access to the latest versions of a whole host of additional applications.
  • ARGHSFARGH! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Aquaseafoam (1271478) on Tuesday May 20, @11:57AM (#23476766)
    The most annoying thing for me? The stupid little bubble that pops up to inform me that wireless networks are in range, even when I am running through a wired connection. The only way I've found to really get rid of this is to disable the connection, a hassle for whenever I try and go anywhere. Of course, this particular annoyance only really hits me nowadays when I need to boot into my small windows partition. Ubuntu FTW.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 20, @11:58AM (#23476788)
    I've appreciated that Adobe has provided Reader for Linux for quite some time now. Until I tried their latest a number of months ago (version 8? or 9?).

    It insisted upon putting a bunch of worthless crap in my ~/.kde and ~/.local directories, overriding my MIME types and replacing KDE's PDF icons (which looked consistent with all the other KDE icons) with its own icons, which clearly were out of place.

    Of course, it also decided to set itself as the preferred reader for PDFs, contrary to my preference. It would have been annoying, but bearable, had it asked me about this before it made invasive changes, but simply running the program was enough to wreak havoc.

    So fuck you Adobe, I'll continue to use kpdf, which doesn't feel the need to take over my desktop. As an added bonus, kpdf doesn't have a million worthless plugins that slow down application startup, either.
  • by rocketjam (696072) on Tuesday May 20, @12:02PM (#23476880) Homepage

    What about "top ten slideshows" on big media websites that present their "top ten" on eleven or twelve separate pages, each filled with more ads and other distractions than the actual "content" you've been directed to via Slashdot?

    Yeah, I know they're not "applications" but, the annoyance factor is right up there.

  • Sometimes it's the exclusive distribution method or the update method that truly irks.

    Google's Sketch-up Pro is available only by download. Not a problem in the US, but on a remote US base in Afghanistan? A CD/DVD option would have been most helpful.

    As already pointed out above, updaters can be a significant issue even if the software itself is acceptable. The status quo should be maintained for settings, file associations and preferences, TYVM.

    Advertise on the web and through the quality of your product, not via the update process.

    • Adobe Reader - Using open source PDF reader "Evince Document Viewer" instead. Result? Software does not annoy.

      For Linux, Agreed. But when is Evince going to work in Windows ? Oh. Never ?? So what choice does a person using windows have ?

      Apple iTunes - Using open source music program "Amarok". Result? Software does not annoy (and works much better than iTunes as well).

      For Linux, Agreed. But when is Amarok going to work in Windows or with people's iPods? Oh. Never ?? So what alternateive choice does a person using windows have ?

      Windows Update - Using Genuine Linux Distro "Ubuntu". Result? No licensing restrictions, no DRM, no repeated system restarts, no service packs to fix the previous service pack, that fixed the previous service pack, that fixed months old critical bugs.

      No repeated system restarts, but none ? What about when your kernel is updated ? What about VMWare needing to be recompiled once you HAVE rebooted ?

      RealPlayer - Avoiding RealPlayer like the plague it is (using "Amarok" for the same functionality, if not the same file format). Result? No privacy leaks, no ads, no reporting back to Real on what I listen to or where I visit on the web.

      See above comments for Amarok.

      Java - Using Sun's Java without the Yahoo toolbar. Result? Java is reasonably well behaved. Looking forward to truly open-sourced Java in the near future.
      True.

      Yahoo - Use Yahoo's maps to check up on Google results. Use Yahoo throw-away email when I need to be a little bit stealthy. Otherwise avoid Yahoo.com like the plague it is. Result? Happy camper.
      You are kidding right ? What do you do when you have a company that USES Yahoo for its "approved" IM provider ?

      Norton Antivirus - Using upgraded OS "Linux" so that viruses are not a problem. Result? Viruses? I don't have no stinking viruses!

      True. However if you do filesharing with Windows, you should consider something like Avast which has a free Windows AND Linux version.

    • "Stop using Windows" isn't a bugfix.
    • I don't like your flash solution, so here is mine: Firefox + Flash Block [mozilla.org].


      I get all the benefits of no flash, but can still watch youtube and all the rest if I change my mind with no hassle.

        • by Uncle Focker (1277658) on Tuesday May 20, @12:04PM (#23476918)

          In this very article, when I click the red arrows to go to the next page, they go backwards.
          They don't for me and I've just tested it on 5 different boxes running Linux.

          Plus the images? don't show up at all.
          Are you running no script or something else that could be blocking them? They show up just fine again here.

          Firefox is shit in linux.
          You keep stating this and then giving examples that I can't reproduce on any available machine.

          I have been using it for years and it sucks.
          Bullshit. If you had such severe problems as you claim you'd have stopped using it unless you're just an idiot. Since you're just trolling, though, it matters not. Get some better material next time.