Slashdot Log In
Explosion At ThePlanet Datacenter Drops 9,000 Servers
Posted by
kdawson
on Sunday June 01, @02:07PM
from the could-happen-to-anyone dept.
from the could-happen-to-anyone dept.
An anonymous reader writes "Customers hosting with ThePlanet, a major Texas hosting provider, are going through some tough times. Yesterday evening at 5:45 pm local time an electrical short caused a fire and explosion in the power room, knocking out walls and taking the entire facility offline. No one was hurt and no servers were damaged. Estimates suggest 9,000 servers are offline, affecting 7,500 customers, with ETAs for repair of at least 24 hours from onset. While they claim redundant power, because of the nature of the problem they had to go completely dark. This goes to show that no matter how much planning you do, Murphy's Law still applies." Here's a Coral CDN link to ThePlanet's forum where staff are posting updates on the outage. At this writing almost 2,400 people are trying to read it.
Related Stories
Firehose:TP Datacenter Explosion - 9,000 Servers Offline by Anonymous Coward
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.

9 Volts of Love (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
It must have been HACKERS (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Kudo to their support team (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Re:Kudo to their support team (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Kudo to their support team (Score:5, Informative)
Reply to This
Parent
explosion? (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Re:explosion? (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Printer ignition source (Score:5, Funny)
lp0 printer on fire!
Reply to This
Parent
trying to read it (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Re:trying to read it (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Recovery costs (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Re:Recovery costs (Score:5, Insightful)
Also, only the electrical equipment (and structural stuff) was damaged - networking and customer servers are intact (but without power, obviously).
Reply to This
Parent
This is BAD KARMA!! (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Helpful Slashdot! (Score:5, Funny)
and as of this posting, make that 152,476.
Reply to This
Coral cached LOFI status page (Score:5, Informative)
Kudos to them for their timely updates as to system status. Having their status page listed on /. doesn't help them much, but I
was encouraged to see a Coral Cache link to their status page. In that light, here's:
a link to the Coral Cache lofiversion of their status page:
Reply to This
Monty Python (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Re:More planning could have prevented this (Score:5, Informative)
Further, the 9,000 servers were physically, geographically, isolated enough from the power supply (which is what exploded) to be protected. We know this to be the case because we read the article and headline and understood them and they indicate that the 9,000 servers were not blown up.
To put it another way, only the power supply was damaged by the explosion, the servers were not. Probably there was no way to isolate the power from its own explosion. The servers, however, we protected.
So, in summary, the 9,000 servers were not blown up. Only the power.
The power is off due to the explosion but there servers themselves are A-OK.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:More planning could have prevented this (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:More planning could have prevented this (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Correction (Score:5, Informative)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:More planning could have prevented this (Score:5, Informative)
Another issue is the complexity of a full blown 2N power system is likely to cause more outages due to human error during routine maintenance over an N+1 system. Complete 2N power systems from grid and backup sources all the way to the servers with no single point of failure (transformers, wiring, switching, PDUs, UPSs, etc.) are enormously complex and expensive, so it's not "the only thing that makes sense". I assure you issuing a one-day pro-rated credit to all your customers is cheaper.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Server/customer ratio? (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Server/customer ratio? (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Photos or informaton on building? (Score:5, Informative)
I'm a mechanical/electrical engineer by training, and what you're saying makes no sense to us. Mistakes are made in the laboratory, where things are allowed to blow up and start fires. Once you hit the real world the considerations are *very different*. While it's possible that this fire could be caused by something entirely unforeseeable (unlikely given our experience in this field), it's also possible that this was due to improperly designed systems.
I don't suppose you'd be singing the same tune if this was a bridge collapse that killed hundreds. There's a reason why engineering costs a lot, and that's directly correlated to how little failure we can tolerate.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Explosion? (Score:5, Informative)
Reply to This
Parent