Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

AMD's New Card Supports Linux From the Get-Go

Posted by timothy on Thu Jun 19, 2008 06:45 PM
from the no-present-like-the-time dept.
Michael writes "Back in September AMD had announced a new ATI Linux driver as well as opening up their GPU specifications, and today they have taken an additional step to better support the Linux OS. With the just-announced Radeon HD 4850 RV770 they have provided same-day Linux support, and the Linux driver is now shipping alongside the Windows driver on their product CDs. In addition, they are encouraging their AIB partners to showcase Tux on the product packaging as a sign of Linux support. Last but certainly not least, AMD is committed from top-to-bottom product support on Linux and they will be introducing high-end features in their Linux driver such as MultiGPU CrossFire technology. Phoronix has a run-down on AMD's evolutionary leap in Linux support along with information on the open-source support for the RV770 GPU."

Related Stories

[+] Linux: AMD Launches New ATI Linux Driver 262 comments
Michael Larabel writes "AMD has issued a press release announcing 'significant graphics performance and compatibility enhancements' on Linux. AMD will be delivering new ATI Linux drivers this year that offer ATI Radeon HD 2000 series support, AIGLX support (Beryl and Compiz), and major performance improvements. At Phoronix we have been testing these new drivers internally for the past few weeks and have a number of articles looking at this new driver. The ATI 8.41 Linux driver delivers Linux gaming improvements from the R300/400 series and the R500 series. The inaugural Radeon HD 2900XT series support also can be found in the new ATI Linux driver with 'the best price/performance ratio of any high-end graphics card under Linux.' While this new driver cannot be downloaded yet, in their press release AMD also alludes to accelerating efforts with the open-source community."
[+] Linux: AMD To Open ATI Specs 426 comments
Several readers tipped us the followup of yesterday's AMD/ATI news, the new development hinted at by Phoronix: AMD has announced they are releasing the specs for all new Radeon chipsets, and will be working with the open source community to develop a fully functional 2D and 3D graphics driver. An anonymous reader opines: "AMD appears to be following in Intel's footsteps with upcoming releases. If AMD is successful NVidia will have real competition in the GNU/Linux gaming arena. While past support by ATI was unsatisfactory the new AMD buyout appears to be having some effect."
[+] Linux: AMD's OverDrive and CrossFire Come To Linux 48 comments
twljagflba writes "Since last year AMD has made ATI increasingly Linux friendly by releasing 3D programming guides and helping out the open-source community. At the same time they have been continuing to develop their binary Catalyst driver for the Linux platform and most recently they delivered same-day support for their new graphics cards. Today though they have released the Catalyst 8.8 Linux driver that adds two very important features: CrossFire and OverDrive support for Linux. Linux users are now able to use CrossFire to split the rendering workload between multiple GPUs and they're also able to overclock their graphics cards now using the binary-only driver. Phoronix has a complete run-down on both features — including benchmarks — in their AMD OverDrive on Linux and ATI Radeon CrossFire On Linux articles. Other features were also introduced in this update such as Linux 2.6.26 kernel support, Adaptive Anti-Aliasing, and other fixes."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login
Loading... please wait.
  • But.... (Score:5, Funny)

    by sdsucks (1161899) on Thursday June 19, @06:48PM (#23866167)
    I wasn't even aware they supported windows? At least that has been my experience with their horrible drivers.
    • Re:But.... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by negRo_slim (636783) on Thursday June 19, @06:57PM (#23866311) Homepage

      I wasn't even aware they supported windows? At least that has been my experience with their horrible drivers.
      Odd I've found Catalyst releases to be the better of the two heavy weights. Not great since they've both aimed to become more than the simple dialog boxes needed. Especially on older hardware... You can hard boil an egg by the time Nvidia control panel launches on my girlfriends 750mhz duron w/ a nvidia 6600. Funny that, the driver options run slower then any currently installed program on it!
    • by EmbeddedJanitor (597831) on Thursday June 19, @07:03PM (#23866389)
      There's likely to be quite a lot of shared code between their Linux and Windows drivers.

      People debugging their Linux rivers will often also be helping to debug their Windows drivers too!

      Hw vendors should really use OSS more to help them get more eyeballs on the code.

  • high-def features? (Score:5, Informative)

    by TheGratefulNet (143330) on Thursday June 19, @07:01PM (#23866363)
    will there REALLY be accel HD video support?

    hell, even on windows xp nvidia (piss be upon them) has not released accelerated video drivers for their year-old 8series cards!

    I was one of the suckers who bought an 8-series thinking the 'hardware accel' onboard would finally solve my HD playback tearing issues. nvidia is infamous for video stutter and tearing unless you use 'magical commercial' dvd playback programs. the regular free ones don't seem to have the magic and the magic is NOT in the xp driver, that's for sure. and there's no way in hell I'm going to convert to vista just to get their new driver support. so basically, I have a 'fast frame buffer' in the 8series card but there's a whole lot of hardware that is sitting idle due to their 'push' to vista and how they want to force the DRM of vista on people.

    ATI was worse; but maybe things have changed? I simply want to have glitch-free playback of HD sources on some kind of video card and NOT be locked into vista or commercial players.

    but for now, I've settled on the popcorn hour [popcornhour.com] box. it Just Plain Works(tm), is fanless and does NOT care about which OS you use to serve networked files to it.
  • i heart this (Score:5, Insightful)

    by QX-Mat (460729) on Thursday June 19, @07:03PM (#23866393)
    i don't run a linux system at home. I'm a gamer during the evenings, and an OpenGL programmer and law student during the day time. There has simply been no need for me to. Since term ended I decided to give my beloved KDE ago and try out KDE 4.0 using Kubuntu via the Wubi installer. Fantastic package... it all went swimmingly well

    Until... The proprietary nvidia driver decided its automatic screen mode (res and refresh rate) was best, and ignored any attempt to add a modeline to xorg.conf. I had to (gasp) look at the back of my monitor and add the v and h frequencies myself. Sadly the nvidia driver simply ignores my monitors EDID.

    I've been a long long proponent of "if it works" proprietary drivers in the kernel, such as nvidia's, providing they are robust and either equally or a more significantly more beneficial component to the system than others more important. But that was back when I accepted the fact there was an amount of tinkering to be done, or there was an amount of work to be done to glue things together. As the linux "system" becomes better at handling things automatically, the flaws in proprietary drivers are becoming less forgiveable because they are a bottleneck. When proprietary pieces of technology can't be glued together because they're at fault, I begin see the issues. In my case the nvidia driver finally became a more significant hindrance to my system, than a graphically accelerated benefit when correctly configured.

    It's finally the time to say the bottleneck in Linux on the desktop is edging towards drivers, so very slowly.

    Matt
  • Phoronix already got the Radeon HD 4850 working with the open-source "Radeon" driver too: http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=12503 [phoronix.com]
  • by bogaboga (793279) on Thursday June 19, @07:21PM (#23866631)
    While I applaud AMD with this development, I am still waiting for a [fully] supported TV card on the Linux platform. That is 100% supported.

    Hauppauge cards are supported to some extent but getting their remote controls to work is a pain in the butt, even on MythTV based distros!

    In fact, getting the remote control to work is more of an exercise in frustration than anything else.

  • by Tumbleweed (3706) * on Thursday June 19, @07:41PM (#23866845) Homepage
    Tux Racer is going to kick so much ass on the new AMD/ATI 4870 card with these new drivers!
  • After AMD bought ATI (Score:5, Interesting)

    by C_Kode (102755) on Thursday June 19, @07:45PM (#23866881) Homepage Journal
    After AMD bought ATI and make claims that they were going to go full bore and fully support Linux I said. "When I see it, I will believe it."

    Well, today I make the shift from Nvidia to ATI. I stuck with Nvidia because I had didn't have much trouble getting OpenGL apps to work in Linux and I hear horror stories about ATI and Linux.
  • by Culture20 (968837) on Thursday June 19, @08:00PM (#23867003)
    Now I have to eat my hat.
  • by overtly_demure (1024363) on Thursday June 19, @08:07PM (#23867061) Journal
    By this time in 2010 or so there will be a flood of El Cheapo GNU/Linux boxes, laptops, mini-notebooks, handhelds, appliances, vibrators, toasters, shoe horns, you name it.

    AMD wants in on that stuff.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 19, @08:11PM (#23867093)
    You need to support it with your buying decisions.

    AMD is without equal in the x86 space right now in terms of openness. They release specs, and they write and release code. All the Family 10 support in coreboot (a.k.a. Linuxbios) was written by AMD employees. We saw this open approach earlier with the K8, then Hypertransport, then the Geode CPUs used in the One Laptop Per Child, now we see the same trend in graphics. AMD is on a roll right now with openness.

    I just, yesterday, downloaded the "BIOS programmers guide" for the AMD FAM10. This is the kind of information that few vendors release.

    If you care about having this kind of access to hardware specs, you need to vote -- with your purchasing $$$. AMD has taken a huge gamble on openness. Keep that in mind next time you need a machine.

    Ron Minnich (who forgot his password)
    • by Facetious (710885) on Thursday June 19, @06:52PM (#23866239) Journal
      Well, at least 42.
    • Re:linux games (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Darkness404 (1287218) on Thursday June 19, @07:00PM (#23866341)
      But there are a lot more then games in Linux that needs good 3-D drivers, compiz-fusion to name one. Granted it might be nearly useless when it comes to productivity, but it is one major thing to convince people to use Linux rather then Windows and if you can demonstrate it easier with a Ubuntu live-CD rather then an install, more people will use Linux.
      • Re:linux games (Score:5, Insightful)

        by InlawBiker (1124825) on Thursday June 19, @08:04PM (#23867029)
        I disagree that Compiz is nearly useless. It's very easy to switch desktops and find other windows while developing. It's almost as useful as a 2nd monitor.

        In fact, Linux support is my #1 deciding factor in deciding on a laptop or video card. Like a lot of others I dual-boot, XP for gaming, Ubuntu for all else. Since nvidia & ATI are nearly equal, dollar for dollar, for gaming then Compiz support becomes the default deciding factor.

        ATI supporting Linux opens up a whole world of, for instance, new laptop choices. The cheap embedded GPUs in the laptops will run Compiz without sweating.
    • by Max Littlemore (1001285) on Thursday June 19, @07:05PM (#23866415)

      For me, compiz fusion has become really useful. My widescreen notebook has limited vertical screen real estate, so the ability to get rid of the bottom bar and use window scaling to find running apps is great. The ability to fade windows and look underneath them is also great. Up until recently, I have bought nVidia, because while the drivers are non free blobs, they have tended to just work. Now that's changing and this additional step in promoting Linux support means that the next graphics I buy will ATI.

      I don't really play games except occasionally and the games that are available for Linux are more than enough. It's the advertised support for desktop effects and apps like blender that has me sold, but maybe the fact that they are pushing for Tux to be included on the box means that the mindshare has increased to the point where more games will follow.

    • Re:linux games (Score:5, Interesting)

      by NoobixCube (1133473) on Thursday June 19, @07:06PM (#23866431)
      Quake 4, Doom 3, Quakewars:ET, just to name a few. In recent years (particularly from id), we've seen huge increases in developers supporting Linux natively, or at least with a WINE wrapper, the way EA does it. Now with more than half of the video card market supporting Linux, developers won't be so hesitant to make a native Linux client for their games. Plus there's those Linux users who need a decent video card to use Blender. Now they're not restricted to nVidia cards.
    • Re:Demand? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by lolocaust (871165) <sage> on Thursday June 19, @06:56PM (#23866303) Homepage Journal
      Most of us dual-boot, especially for games. For everything else, there's Linux and it's good to know that driver support isn't half arsed for once (barring the fact that it's probably the binary only driver on the CD).
          • Re:Demand? (Score:5, Informative)

            by bluefoxlucid (723572) on Thursday June 19, @07:47PM (#23866887) Journal
            Shared video memory harasses the memory bus and has a huge impact on general performance. Linear reads are nice, until every few cache lines you have to wait for a fresh row precharge and a card toying with a new chunk of video memory, then do another precharge and CAS to get back on track. Back to random memory reads.

            NUMA architecture-- Intel doesn't do it-- really, REALLY helps with this on all but one of the CPUs in the machine.
    • Demand? Yes. (Score:5, Interesting)

      by TransEurope (889206) <eniac@NOspam.uni-koblenz.de> on Thursday June 19, @07:15PM (#23866557)
      My choice in the last 5 years were cards by Nvidia only. The reasons are obvisouly. Their drivers work (on Linux).
      I also prefer cards without active cooling and ATI ist known for many cards with passive cooling which consume low power.
      So, if the drivers they made are pretty good, especially the OpenGL implementation (i write simple OpenGL programs and i use Blender),
      they could be a very good choice for me. But after years of bad experiences with ATI on my Linux-powered notebooks,
      i'm sceptic and wait until the responses to their drivers are positive.
      I don't want slow, errorneous and CPU-intensive 3D-support through DRI again.
    • Re:losing strategy (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Vectronic (1221470) on Thursday June 19, @07:01PM (#23866361)
      You're wrong, unless of course your into the whole buy now wait 2 weeks, sell for 101%...

      Gaming is HUGE, Linux is gaining every day, as far as I see it they can't go wrong here, because its not like its Linux only, it still supports Windows, they probably hired one or 2 people to code the Linux drivers... so what, no real loss there, and if they created their own little open-source driver thing it would be no loss at all really, and I think its fairly safe to say that Linux isn't going anywhere, and will be increasing the market share consistently for years to come...

      They are creating the demand (in part) now we just have to wait for the supply (the game devs)...
    • Re:But is this open? (Score:5, Informative)

      by LWATCDR (28044) on Thursday June 19, @07:52PM (#23866929) Homepage Journal
      Yadda yadda yadda...
      Please stop playing the FOSS zealot if you don't know what your talking about.
      ATI HAS released the specs to their cards unlike nVidia. The new card already runs with the FOSS driver. The FOSS driver is improving daily.
    • Re:But is this open? (Score:5, Informative)

      by oddfox (685475) on Thursday June 19, @08:07PM (#23867059) Homepage

      Dude, the card already works with the open-source xf86-driver-ati thanks to the code-sharing and documentation provided by ATI. Pretty soon the R6xx series (The generation I've got) will have 3D hardware acceleration as the R5xx series has now. It's not perfect and complete support, but it's getting there and progress has been excellent. If you really want to support a company that's supporting Linux, you would buy an ATI (Or Intel?) card. NVidia sure as hell isn't talking about any F/OSS drivers.