Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

Windows Is Dead – Long Live Midori?

Posted by timothy on Wednesday July 30, @01:21PM
from the what-about-midori-linux? dept.
parvenu74 writes "A story from Infoworld is suggesting that the days of Windows are numbered and that Microsoft is preparing a web-based operating system code-named Midori as a successor. Midori is reported to be an offshoot of Microsoft Research's Singularity OS, an all-managed code microkernel OS which leverages a technology called software isolated processes (SIPs) to overcome the traditional inter-thread communications issues of microkernel OSes."

Related Stories

[+] Microsoft Working On "Post-Windows" Cloud Computing OS 207 comments
Barence writes "Microsoft is working on a web-based operating system called Midori, as it looks to life beyond Windows. Midori is expected to be a cloud-computing service, and so not as dependent on hardware as current generations of Windows. It's also expected to run with a virtualization layer between the hardware and the OS, and is expected to be a commercial offshoot of the Singularity research project which Microsoft has been working on since 2003." If this story sounds familiar to you, it probably is.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • Prediction (Score:5, Interesting)

    by kalpol (714519) on Wednesday July 30, @01:23PM (#24404691) Homepage
    web-based == subscription model.
    • Re:Prediction (Score:5, Insightful)

      by TubeSteak (669689) on Wednesday July 30, @01:36PM (#24404969) Journal

      web-based == man in the middle attacks

      Can you imagine a MITM on your OS?
      Bad guys would no longer need physical access to your box,
      Only access to your network.

    • Re:Prediction (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Hatta (162192) on Wednesday July 30, @01:44PM (#24405141) Journal

      How does one have a web-based operating system anyway? If you're running your OS inside a web browser, what is the web browser running on? Is it just turtles all the way down?

      • Re:Prediction (Score:5, Insightful)

        by CastrTroy (595695) on Wednesday July 30, @01:37PM (#24404989) Homepage
        Even if high speed wireless internet access was as wide spread as cellphone access, would that still be enough? There are enough dead zones, that many people would not be able to access their computer at all, which is unacceptable. Also, people seem to forget that the wireless is pretty limited. It works well for now, when people are just downloading email, or browsing a few websites, but I think the amount of bandwidth to run (what would amount to) a remote desktop connection, multiplied by the number of people using windows, would quickly overload any kind of wireless setup we could get. Obviously not everybody would have to use wireless connections, but if everybody who was currently using their desktop on wireless started using a remote desktop on wireless, the system would undergo a lot of strain.
      • Re:Prediction (Score:5, Insightful)

        by snl2587 (1177409) on Wednesday July 30, @01:45PM (#24405155)

        All data and stuff gets placed into Microsoft server and you are using your terminal only to access it - from anywhere that you want.

        I'm sorry: I trust no company with all of my data. That's why I don't use Google docs or Microsoft's current document offering. And now they want to store all of my data? I, for one, will gladly continue using Linux.

      • Re:Prediction (Score:5, Interesting)

        by MightyYar (622222) on Wednesday July 30, @01:48PM (#24405251)

        If the replacement rate for a desktop computer is 3 years, and everyone buys for $250 and Windows for $130 - that's less than $400 over 3 years... or just over $10 monthly.

        If I had a website that offered full MS Office functionality and compatibility for $10/month... wanna bet I'd have some takers? They'd need 366 million customers to equal their current revenue using this model.

        Worldwide, PC sales are supposed to grow to over 250 million/year by 2010, so while their target would be ambitious - it is feasible if they could rope roughly half of new PC buyers into this new model.

  • by Dunbal (464142) on Wednesday July 30, @01:24PM (#24404709)

    Personally I will wait to see what netcraft has to say about that.

  • Thin Client? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Bryansix (761547) on Wednesday July 30, @01:24PM (#24404725) Homepage
    Remind me again how this differs from a Thin Client?
    • by ninjapiratemonkey (968710) on Wednesday July 30, @01:29PM (#24404819)
      Midori is going to be coded to crash at least once every 24 hours to ease regular Windows users into this "new" technology. Other than that, it's the same.
      • Re:Thin Client? (Score:5, Interesting)

        by mlts (1038732) * on Wednesday July 30, @01:46PM (#24405189)

        It seems that every ten years, someone re-invents the thin client.

        First it was dumb terminals connected to a mainframe, then to a serial port box so one can connect to a UNIX box.
        Then came XStations which used various (direct, indirect, broadcast) forms of XDMCP to find a host to download microcode and run apps from.
        Then, it was JavaStations where people talked about fast broadband access to stuff on the ISP's server, and not to worry about all their private documents being stored offsite.

        This just seems like more of the same, perhaps an offshoot of cloud computing. It will work for a couple niches here and there, but as a whole, Net based operating systems will fail, as people want to keep their stuff private on their own systems.

        Same disadvantages apply. Security of stored files for example -- I trust my external TrueCrypt encrypted drive that uses both a long passphrase and a set of keyfiles a lot more to securely store my Word documents than I do some random ISP's computer.

  • by Thelasko (1196535) on Wednesday July 30, @01:26PM (#24404743) Journal
    what am I going to do with all of that fancy hardware I bought to run Vista?
  • by phantomcircuit (938963) on Wednesday July 30, @01:26PM (#24404757) Homepage
    A link to the print version in TFS? This cannot be slashdot... damn DNS must have been poisoned!
  • ... that it doesn't suck! Linux still needs competition to keep us on our toes!

  • Why? (Score:5, Insightful)

    I don't get it, why would I want to trust Microsoft, or anyone, with all my files?

    I think I like the current model, I buy a computer and it is mine, I can put whatever I want on it, and I can use it with or without the internet.

    I guess when my unreliable comcast cable modem drops offline I guess that means a worthless terminal till it comes back up. This is an improvement....how?

  • by 3seas (184403) on Wednesday July 30, @01:29PM (#24404825) Homepage Journal

    Midori Linux from Transmeta - Linus T. [sourceforge.net]

    Guess MS will just have to change the name....

  • by Sockatume (732728) on Wednesday July 30, @01:38PM (#24405017) Homepage
    The Eee and its ilk have shown that people are willing to buy Windowsless boxes, which is an affront to Microsoft's business model. You have to wonder if Midori is a "plan B" to allow them to continue to get revenue from Linux users. Alan, Bob and Clarence may well be willing to pay $10 a month for "Windows access" on their Eees if it lets them use Office, and this way Microsoft have a guaranteed revenue stream whatever OS people actually buy with their machine. Especially if it's agressively marketed and bundled.
  • Not Web Based (Score:5, Informative)

    by ThinkFr33ly (902481) on Wednesday July 30, @01:44PM (#24405131)

    Midori will *not* be "web based", whatever the hell that means.

    Being "internet centric" and connected to "the cloud" is not the same has being web based.

    Midori is being designed in such a way that components of the OS communicate with each other in a location independent manner. API calls to a local machine are no different than API calls to a remote machine. These calls will also be "message based" (there are lots of ways to interpret that) and be transactional in nature.

    Above these kinds of low level things, there will be a much tighter and more integrated connection to the network. Your profile will roam with you no matter where you are using P2P style communications similar to how Live Mesh works, although supported by core OS components instead of via RSS synchronization.

    So if your idea of a "web based" OS is like what I've described above, then yes... it's web based.

    But if you're thinking about a subscription-based model where a user must boot their OS "from the web" like a dumb terminal, then you're way off.

    Lastly, this thing is at least 7 to 10 years off. Windows 7 will ship sometime next year (or perhaps early in 2010), and Midori isn't even out of MS Research yet. If we saw something like this before Windows 8 / 2015, I'd be damn surprised.

  • Don't Kid Yourself (Score:5, Insightful)

    by smackenzie (912024) on Wednesday July 30, @01:48PM (#24405247)
    To believe for a moment that the "days of Windows is numbered" is idiotic. Consider a few points:

    1. The PC continues to be a dominant gaming platform which will never fly with a thin client OS or internet OS.

    2. 9 out of 10 (my guess, might be higher) businesses out there will never consider an OS that is entirely dependent on a working internet connection. (And don't counter with "well, what about web services companies?" I mean top to bottom activities in a single company such as accounting, HR, project management, security services, legal, design, PR, etc.)

    3. There will be a relative correlation between productivity and your internet speed. Not exciting.

    4. Most of us would like to remain reasonably productive in environments where there is no internet connection (planes, trains, parks, beach, over seas, etc.)

    5. People seem to forget that the browsers themselves as well as many of the browser features that they depend on (Flash, Movies, ActiveX, PDF, Java) all depend on some version of an OS with a "more than thin client and more than kernal" layer to begin with...

    Singularity OS is a smart move (managed code, new process security measures). And you'll see a MAJOR uptick in SaaS and "cloud computing" (whatever the hell that means these days) from Microsoft, but we will not be rid of a client OS from Microsoft in this lifetime.
  • Trivia ... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Bob-taro (996889) on Wednesday July 30, @01:49PM (#24405275)

    "Midori" is Japanese for "green". It is also a common female first name.

    I don't know how either would apply to an OS, unless it has some connection to this [wikipedia.org].