Slashdot Log In
Jaguar, World's Most Powerful Supercomputer
Posted by
ScuttleMonkey
on Friday November 14, @05:46PM
from the minimum-requirements-for-crysis dept.
from the minimum-requirements-for-crysis dept.
Protoclown writes "The National Center for Computational Sciences (NCCS), located at Oak Ridge National Labs (ORNL) in Tennessee, has upgraded the Jaguar supercomputer to 1.64-petaflops for use by scientists and engineers working in areas such as climate modeling, renewable energy, materials science, fusion and combustion. The current upgrade is the result of an addition of 200 cabinets of the Cray XT5 to the existing 84 cabinets of the XT4 Jaguar system. Jaguar is now the world's most powerful supercomputer available for open scientific research."
Related Stories
[+]
New Top 500 Supercomputer List 99 comments
geaux and other readers let us know that the new Top 500 Supercomputer list is out. The top two both break the Petaflops barrier: LANL's IBM "RoadRunner" and ORNL's Cray XT5 "Jaguar." (Contrary to our discussion a few days back, IBM's last-minute upgrade of RoadRunner salvaged the top spot for Big Blue. Kind of like bidding on eBay.) The top six all run in excess of 400 Teraflops. HP has more systems in the top 500 than IBM, reversing the order of the previous list. Both Intel and AMD issued press releases crowing over their wins, and both are correct — AMD highlights its presence in 7 of the top 10, while Intel boasts that 379 of the top 500 use their chips.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.

Economics? (Score:4, Interesting)
Reply to This
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Accurate economic modeling needs infinite resources, as the existence of the economic modeler needs to be taken into account, and it could be argued that the entire universe would have to be modelled 100% accurately - one atom being in a different place could cause drastically different outcomes years down the line, causing different economic conditions.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Ultimately human behavior is near-continuous series of yes/no decisions. Our brains iterate pretty deeply, but at some level it's ones and zeros. Though we may need more petaflops than angels on the head of a pin before we can scratch that itch. At any rate, the application of such a model will probably always doom it to failure.
How much do we really know about climate? Probably a lot less than we think. Scientists are always so sure they are right. And then a few decades pass and they realize they weren't.
Re:Economics? (Score:4, Interesting)
Scientists are always so sure they are right. And then a few decades pass and they realize they weren't. And then they repeat that same behavior.
Not really. Most scientists know they're always wrong, they just try to be less wrong each time. Hence the scientific method.
There's a brilliant article by Asimov about it, in fact, "The Relativity of Wrong" if you care about it.
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Look at the caption on your graph. Hansen's Scenario A is a high emissions scenario which does not correspond to the emissions which actually occurred. If you want to legitimately test the skill of a climate model, you need to compare apples to apples. In this case, Hansen's Scenario B is the one that most closely corresponded to the real emissions trajectory. (Since Hansen is a climate scientist, not an economist, he gave a range of possible emissions scenarios and did not claim the world would follow
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Pre-marital sex?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Every time you have sex outside marriage, god kills an economist (and a kitten)
Yeah, the supercomputing stuff is nice and all... (Score:3, Insightful)
But I really got it to play Tempest 2000.
Reply to This
Don't buy it (Score:4, Funny)
Reply to This
Kudos to Atari (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
good upgrade path (Score:3, Insightful)
The current upgrade is the result of an addition of 200 cabinets of the Cray XT5 to the existing 84 cabinets of the XT4 Jaguar system.
That sounds like Cray engineered this to aggregate components across product generations. For short product life cycles that seems like a great idea, not throwing out the old system when you get the new one but combining the two systems instead. Though obviously for long product life cycles it would be a losing proposition; The space and power requirements of inefficient older components would be greater than the space and power savings of upgrading to the latest model + the expense of the upgrade.
Reply to This
Re:good upgrade path (Score:4, Insightful)
Reply to This
Parent
Folding@Home Contribution? (Score:3, Insightful)
Reply to This
Love the paint job! (Score:3, Informative)
Check out the gallery if you haven't.
I've always wanted to get some custom graphics like that on my server racks. Maybe a penguin, a butterfly, and a can of Raid. :)
Supercomputers definitely don't look as exciting as they did in the "old days".
Reply to This
Re:How does that work? (Score:5, Informative)
There is a queueing system. If you want to run a job on a machine like this, you log into the control node (which is just a linux box) and submit your job to the queue, including how many CPU's you need for it and how much time you need on them.
A scheduling algorithm then determines when the various jobs waiting in the queue get to run, and sends mail to their owners when they start and stop.
On many machines there is a debug queue with low limits for number of CPU's and runtime, and thus fast turnover; this is used to run little jobs to ensure everything is working right before you submit the big job to the main queue.
Each project has an al
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
There is already a wealth of political will for global warming, whats lacking is evidence ..
There, fixed that for you.
Re:Please no climate modelling! (Score:4, Insightful)
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Who says the climate modeling they are doing is related to global warming?
Even if it is, however, if the modeling increases our knowledge of the subject, it is not a waste of resources for scientists to seek the answers they are looking for.
Re:Please no climate modelling! (Score:5, Funny)
Why do climate modelling?
Obviously climate modelling has to be carried to out to find out what impact running energy-hungry supercomputers has on the environment.
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
It would take them roughly a quarter million years with no breaks of any kind to do what this machine can do in one second.
Re:translation???? (Score:5, Funny)
It's not nearly that bad... more like 3 days. I failed to realize that my 270000 figure was seconds not years.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Silly Me (Score:5, Funny)
Hahah, eat it, 3DO.
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
No. Jaguar. 1995 XK12, Six-Litre.
I'd rather doubt the 1995 XK12, as cool as it was, was any competitor to the Jaguar XJ220 [wikipedia.org].
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Climate change is gradual, but the emissions we put into the atmosphere today will last for centuries. Even if we switched over to all fusion power tomorrow, we'd still see more climate change, and the longer we wait to replace fossil fuels, the more we will see. Realistically, it takes a long time to widely deploy a new energy technology. Fusion isn't even feasible in the lab, let alone ready for deployment, let alone widely deployed.
Also, even if fusion were widely deployed, that doesn't mean we'd nece