Slashdot Log In
Researchers Latch Onto BitTorrent To Spot Connection Problems
Posted by
timothy
on Tuesday November 25, @11:10AM
from the like-a-nice-drink-of-barium dept.
from the like-a-nice-drink-of-barium dept.
alphadogg writes "Northwestern University researchers have developed a system that gives a heads up about traffic problems on the Internet, where there is no central management system. Their Network Early Warning System (NEWS), which latches on to a popular BitTorrent client, is designed to spot problems by encouraging feedback from end users who are experiencing problems. 'You can think of it as crowd sourcing network monitoring,' said associate professor Fabián Bustamante. He has a track record with BitTorrent users, having developed the popular Ono plug-in for speeding up P2P interactions."
Related Stories
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
Fine but you have to use Azureus (Score:4, Funny)
As per the Ono plugin. Not everybody's cup of Java.
Reply to This
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
What's wrong with Azureus? Is there a better open-source client out there that I'm not aware of?
Re: (Score:2)
rtorrent + rtgui?
Re: (Score:2)
Well, if bloat is your issue then I've found the Linux command line client rTorrent [rakshasa.no] to be my personal favorite. When I'm going to be seeding something for the long term (like the new Fedora version that just came out) I'm usually doing so in rTorrent running in a detached screen. That way I don't have to keep my Windows box running 24/7 just to seed something.
As far as GUI clients though I've always been partial to Azureus. To each their own I guess.....
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Azureus was great until they pushed Vuze down. Fuck that shit.
Re: (Score:3)
Azureus was great until they pushed Vuze down.
It takes less than 10 seconds to disable Vuze and verison 2.x is still supported in any event.....
Re:Fine but you have to use Azureus (Score:5, Informative)
You might take a look at the new vuze 4. They've changed things up some to make it more like the 2.X series and it seems to be far more lightweight than the 3 series (Kinda like comparing firefox 2 to firefox 3). I've seen 3.X versions sometimes use over 200MB of RAM. 4.0 currently taking 45MB with 14 seeds up. not exactly utorrent's runs-on-a-486-with-14MB-ram trick, but it works fine for a relatively modern system.
http://azureus.sourceforge.net/upgrade.php [sourceforge.net]
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Fine but you have to use Azureus (Score:5, Insightful)
The problem is that I don't want a content management system at all. All I want is a flexible torrent application with all the advanced configuration etc. I don't want any of that multimedia stuff.
In the same way, I want a media player that plays media. Nothing. Else. Things like rhythmbox and amarok drive me nuts as well... back in windows, the old "classic" winamp was perfect, foobar2000 was perfect, and in linux xmms was perfect.
Lately, it seems that there is a disturbing trend of feature bloat. Every program can do everything. I like lightweight functional applications, and always have.
Torrents are no exception.
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
i blame itunes...
when it hit windows, it became almost a fad to use it, even if one didnt own a ipod.
so to "keep up", more and more players started adding media library features, ripping features and info downloading features.
me, im so "old school" that my concept of "media library" is to pile my files into different dirs, and aim the players playlist at the top dir, then setting playback to random...
that is, unless i just fire up a stream off shoutcast or icecast and leave it at that. right now i seem to h
Re:how about a name or some links smartass? (Score:4, Interesting)
utorrent seems to be one of the most popular.
utorrent isn't open-source. And I'm not brave enough to use a closed-source client from a company that has signed agreements with the RIAA and MPAA, particularly when open-source alternatives are available.
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
According to their FAQ [utorrent.com], utorrent is not open source and likely never will be, which the GGP states as a requirement.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Azureus is OK...for a Java app...but Vuze sucks....
Constantly clicking HELL NO! on the:
"Do you want to update? OK? Oh Come on! do ya do ya? you REALLY wanna update now doncha? Ok?
button(s) every single use is old....
I do not use plug-ins in Torrent Clients, Firefox or anything else because you CONSTANTLY spend time maintaining them: "Client XYZ needs to restart to use the new thingy do you wanna do that thing now later, never, when hell freezes over, or when you are i
To What End? (Score:4, Insightful)
From TFA:
The main goal of this plugin is to reliably find problems in the network and raise alerts about them. As a user, you want to be sure that you are getting the service that you're paying for and be notified quickly about network problems, especially those that can lead to compensation for service interruption.
As a user, so what if I know what the problem with my ISP's network is? I still have to call their crappy support lines, and wait the hours it takes their idiot technicians to fix the fucking problem.
Reply to This
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
You are implying there is a difference.
Re: (Score:2)
At least your ISP fixes things. I was with BT (which I believe is short for Bastard Telecom). They fix nothing. Your call goes to India. A rep there, whom you can barely understand, promises you everything and proceeds to completely ignore anything you say. I gave up after daily, hour-long calls for three wee
Still no cure for spellcheck fails. (Score:2)
Onto? is that like Goto?
Something like this c/would be awesome (Score:4, Interesting)
When the smiling AT&T cable sales people come knocking on my door, I'd like to show them a website or printed graph of how badly their Internet service really sucks. I'm starting to get a couple of options for ISP now, and it would just be so awesome to hold up a graph and smile the entire time I tell them how badly their service/product sucks!
Reply to This
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Yes, but when 37% of their clients show the same poor service it's much more convincing than one person's tale of woes. There are plenty of ways to monitor your own ISP, but when it's not your ISP, where do you go for the information? That's why this would be brilliant.
Wrong question (Score:4, Insightful)
Reply to This
Re: (Score:2)
And a test using TCP tells you about TCP performance, a test using UDP tells you about UDP performance, a test using ftp tells you about ftp performance.
Can't be helped if ISP's happen to intentionally cripple their networks for the protocols I care about.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Well, since BT traffic stresses a network's resources more than any other, and is the subject of aggressive filtering and other control methods, I'd have to say it's as good a baseline as any. It's easy enough to do performance testing in a laboratory where all conditions are controlled, but when you start running packets through dozens of administrative domains each with their own configurations, equipment, etc., what you have is a very organic problem that it nearly impossible to diagnose.
To use the oblig
I've been wanting something like this for ages (Score:4, Interesting)
I've switch service providers several time because of network outages and performance issues. I can't tell you how frustrating it is to be on the phone with tech support, insisting that I need to reboot windows one more time (though it's funny as hell to tell them it's a linux box) and after 45 minutes holding and 4 or 5 technical support reps I finally talk to a tech that admits network issues. It will be nice to see how my current provider compares against the local competition.
But I wonder how much bittorrent "traffic shaping" (blocking) will effect ISP scores?
Reply to This
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
That is a good thing: combining network performance with how much the ISP fucks with your traffic into one easy score.
Bittorrent is a pretty good benchmarking system: it checks upload, download, making tons of connections, bulk data transfer, and is considered by some people to be "evil". That really is a fairly good combination of network parameters.