Comment Re:Grounding! (Score 2) 72

The article said it was the FTTN cabinets being hit, then a surge travelling up the copper to the end users.

No, the article says:

When lightning strikes the distribution boxes outside the house...

For FTTC that's the DPU in the pit on the footpath that typically services 4 premises (though I understand there are ones that can do up to 16).

So it would seem that inadequate lightning/surge protection is the issue. The NBN Co failed to design and build a robust infrastructure. This is my shocked face.

With you all the way on this. What's more depressing is how many DPUs are replaced annually:

3% of the 437,000 boxes installed at the kerb are replaced every month

So a third of the DPUs are replaced each year, and each of those jobs requires a technician out to replace the DPU and reconnect all the copper lines into it. The cost for the tech and hardware, plus the lost productivity of subscribers, the wasted hours with RSPs chasing NBN for a fix, the extra cost to integrate yet another technology type into NBNco systems - all would far far exceed the savings to be had by not replacing the copper lead-in with fibre and achieving full FTTP.

Now that's a massive waste of $$$.

Labor knew what needed doing:

Do it once, do it right, do it with fibre.

Submission + - SPAM: Facebook Calls Links To Depression Inconclusive. These Researchers Disagree

An anonymous reader writes: At a hearing this March on Capitol Hill, the Republican congresswoman [Cathy McMorris Rodgers] from Washington confronted Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and Google CEO Sundar Pichai with a list of statistics: From 2011 to 2018, rates of teen depression increased by more than 60%, and from 2009 to 2015, emergency room admissions for self-harm among 10- to 14-year-old girls tripled. "It's a battle for their development. It's a battle for their mental health — and ultimately a battle for their safety," McMorris Rodgers told the tech leaders. But when she pointed a question specifically to Zuckerberg, about whether he acknowledged a connection between children's declining mental health and social media platforms, he demurred. "I don't think that the research is conclusive on that," replied Zuckerberg.

It's a position that he and his company, which is working on expanding its offerings to even younger children, have held for years. But mental health researchers whom NPR spoke with disagree. They describe an increasingly clear correlation between poor mental health outcomes and social media use, and they worry that Facebook (which also owns Instagram and WhatsApp) in particular may be muddying the waters on that connection to protect its public image. "The correlational evidence showing that there is a link between social media use and depression is pretty definitive at this point," said Jean Twenge, a psychology professor at San Diego State University. "The largest and most well-conducted studies that we have all show that teens who spend more time on social media are more likely to be depressed or unhappy."

Correlation is not causation, and one area of further study is whether greater social media usage leads to poor mental health outcomes or whether those who are depressed and unhappy are drawn to spend more time on social media. But researchers also worry that not enough government funding is going toward getting objective data to answer these sorts of questions. Facebook also almost certainly knows more than it has publicly revealed about how its products affect people.

Link to Original Source

Comment Re:Still milking Trump (Score 1) 261

As an example, if a particular food additive were shown to be very carcinogenic, we would stop adding it to food.

Yeah, you're right. And we created an entirely new Federal division apart from the FDA to handle that product. In fact, we put a couple of specific "additives" in the ATF.

But that additive may have had some benefits (food looked and tasted better, lasted longer in storage, et cetera).

Yup. According to Greed it had plenty of benefits. Profit and Death to name the two.

Some people might not like the "new" version and since they didn't get cancer would actually *like* to have the carcinogenic additive back.

Well, they certainly *liked* the new version alright. Only problem is, it did give them cancer. Greed just chose to lie to them about it, for Profit's sake. They said it was *good* for you. Even had doctors promoting it. For a half century or two.

But that isn't realistic.

Uh, yeah about that story we told you... - US History, according to Greed N. Corruption

A *better* plan would be to look for an additive that has similar effects (taste, texture, longevity), et cetera but that isn't carcinogenic.

Yeah, you're right. Their *greedy* plan was to instead keep that highly profitable and deadly carcinogenic-laced product legal, while also marketing a practically harmless but just as addictive alternative to offer as an additional revenue stream. Only downside is it wasn't quite as harmless as all the liars said.

Source? See a century of cigarette creation, marketing, domination, corrupt denial, and political pressure. Also, see e-cigs and alcohol.

"There were some advantages to our racist past, so let's go back to it without trying to address the racism" is the equivalent of wanting to put carcinogens back in food or lead back in gas or a host of other ridiculous things. That's what we're getting out of Republicans right now

So, greedy rich lawmakers who don't start out that way but certainly end their career ever the masterful insider tradist, emulate exactly what their corrupt capitalist system does on the regular, and we're supposed to act surprised? Monsanto spewed poisons into ditches for decades, and we reward them later with the title of Seed Czar? I still go into buildings made out of asbestos today that Greed demanded we don't raze. Tell me again how we've h-eealed Greed from the highly profitable ridiculous things? The planet either caught COVID-xx for the fuckteenth time from Mother Nature trying to fight off a human infection, or we got it from the extra smart folks in a lab. That's what we're getting out of humans right now, so please don't assume this is some pathetic political statement. We as a species, suck.

Let's go back to coal mining even though it doesn't really benefit the local communities, the miners get black lung, and burning it dumps insane amount of mercury into the air. Really? The only person who would think that makes sense is somebody so desperate for a job that they are willing to get black lung and breathe mercury to feed their family. Let's come up with something better.

Something better? You mean like human internet content moderator at Mega-Social-Tube-Corp? Such a great way to "break" into the tech industry today. Where the 21st Century teenyworker with big social media insta-dreams finds the mental wear and tear of 3 decades worth of traditional employment compressed into a psychological black hole of a job where your idea of a resignation letter is seeing if you can disembowel and hang yourself by your own entrails, masterfully avoiding death long enough to flip off your 4-hour old boss, while ironically livestreaming.

Feed Techdirt: Time Magazine Lauds Clearview AI Despite Its Sketchy Facial Recognition Tech (techdirt.com)

Time Magazine released its inaugural list of the 100 Most Influential Companies, featuring an array of large and small corporations that “are helping to chart an essential path forward.” Disturbingly, among its choices of “disruptors” is Clearview AI, the controversial facial recognition start-up known for illicitly scraping Americans’ images and demographic information from social media and selling the data to law enforcement. By celebrating a company that engages in illegal mass surveillance, Time is complicit in the degradation of our privacy and our civil liberties.

Even cursory scrutiny by Time would have uncovered Clearview AI’s disreputable practices. Perhaps Time was satisfied with the vague explanation from Clearview AI’s CEO, Hoan Ton-That, that the company is “working with law enforcement to balance privacy and security.” But it’s hard to understand why, after substantial reporting by other members of the media, Time chose to accept Ton-That’s word when there is conclusive evidence that Clearview AI continues to violate civil liberties by supplying law enforcement agencies, private banks and sports teams with billions of illegally collected images.

Widespread concern about facial recognition technology’s threats to civil liberties and its propensity for inaccuracy and racial bias fueled the public outcry that ensued after the New York Times first broke news about Clearview AI. Amid calls from civil rights advocates for lawmakers to ban the use of facial recognition technology, members of Congress questioned Clearview AI about its technology and its potential for abuse against First Amendment-protected activity. Since then, a growing list of U.S. cities have banned police use of the technology.

Despite the bans and lawsuits, both locally and internationally, against Clearview AI, the company’s indiscriminate collection of Americans’ personal data without specific links to criminality continues unabated. Clearview AI’s troubling history and ongoing illegal activity should have dissuaded Time from elevating it in the public sphere. Yet the outlet only vaguely summarizes serious concerns about Clearview AI in its profile, mentioning briefly that “civil rights advocates fear abuses” of its technology despite reports of both the company and its clients misleading the public. Without evidence, Time also credits Clearview AI for assisting in the arrest of individuals connected to the breach of the U.S. Capitol earlier this year, while sweeping aside Clearview AI’s ties to misinformation.

Clearview AI’s secretive practices that Time lauds as “influential” and “disruptive” represent a dangerous disregard for our social norms and expectations of privacy. We have come to expect to certain tradeoffs with technology providers: we share some demographic information in exchange for the ease, convenience and connectivity their products bring to our daily lives. However, any marginal benefits of Clearview AI do not hold up against its significant potential for harm, and Time should have acknowledged that. The company’s technology paves the way to a dystopian future devoid of privacy and anonymity, both online and offline. Clearview AI is creating an environment where anyone - an ICE agent, a stalker or an individual bad actor within government – can take a photo of an individual anywhere and automatically pull up that person’s Instagram, TikTok, blog, or other personal information without their knowledge or consent.

It is a future civil society advocates have long warned about and will continue to fight against. Time should acknowledge these warnings in its report, especially since its readers are among Clearview AI’s targets. As an iconic publication that has been a part of America’s media and social landscape for almost 100 years, Time has effectively chronicled the struggle for civil liberties over the decades. It is a disgrace that when it came to covering today’s most influential companies, Time instead chose to endorse a company that is distinguished only for its unrelenting commitment to destroying those same liberties.

Freddy Martinez is a policy analyst at Open The Government.


Comment Re:Sort of (Score 1) 48

I thought VB for DOS was cool! You could make non-GUI GUI's using console characters. It could be handy for prototypes or tech interfaces to configgy stuff so that it's intuitive & familiar but doesn't have to look pretty. That's how you keep PHB's from poking around.

It might even be a way to prototype the state-ful GUI markup standard I keep asking the industry to invent so we don't have to keep living with crappy convoluted JS/DOM/CSS to get rich GUI's that don't fark up.

GUI's wouldn't be hard-wired to OS's or programming languages anymore, as any language or OS could issue and receive GUI markup to and from the GUI browser (or GUI browser pluggin to HTML browsers). And it's not Java Applets 2.0, which tried to be an entire OS. The GUI standard would be UI focused. Biz logic would typically be managed by the server. Oracle Forms kind of had a GUI browser, although it was proprietary.

Comment Google's Surface (Score 1) 21

That videoconferencing tech looks incredible, and I'm sure it looks amazing.

Like the original table-sized Microsoft's surface though, have to question the utility of it, how many people will actually use one.

I guess maybe over time the tech will be shrunk enough to be used by more people, but even smaller it just seems impractical compared to seeing someone on a screen, or overlaid on a headset visor.

Comment Re:Dead on Arrival (Score 1) 24

Actually, the current generation of cable tech has SDV: Switched Digital Viewing. The idea is to let you select a channel, then stream it as the only channel on your wire so the rest is left to the Internet. Of course, five or six channels fit because of other TVs and neighbors. Basically, TV has the same wire usage as a full-motion Internet stream under this.

Feed Google News Sci Tech: Apple Music Lossless: What Devices are Supported? - MacRumors (google.com)

Windows

Microsoft Says Windows 10X Isn't Happening (zdnet.com) 48

Microsoft today acknowledged that the company isn't going to release its Windows 10X operating system variant, as reported more than a week ago. Mary Jo Foley, writing at ZDNet: Don't be surprised if you missed the acknowledgement, as Microsoft buried it in its blog post about the rollout of the Windows 10 21H1 feature update -- which it published at the start of the Google I/O keynote. Toward the end of the post, under the "Our customer first focus" subheading, officials said Windows 10X wouldn't be coming to market in 2021, after all. Instead, Microsoft will be integrating some of the 10X "foundational" technologies into other parts of Windows and other products. Windows 10X was supposed to be Microsoft's answer to Chrome OS -- a simpler Windows 10 variant that was slated to debut first on PCs for education and the first line-worker market.

Comment Schrodinger's Apple (Score 1) 116

I'll just start with this - https://tech.slashdot.org/stor...

Then I'll add this https://www.theverge.com/2021/...

Android - 3 billion Apple 1 billion

So in some sort of Bizzaro world, the smallest player has the monopoly.

I think this is a case where you really don't want to kill the little guy, and you really don't want to enact legislation to kill the little guy by threat of force.

Because that 3 billion device market being able to do that is actually enabling the monopoly and giving the monopolist the tool to do it.

Be careful what you wish for Apple haters - you just might get it.

Comment Re:Next Up... (Score 1) 298

All these high temperature superconductors are usually under extreme pressure - think diamond anvils not gas bottle type pressures. Other considerations still apply like sensitivity to magnetic field, which may require some cooling to make it capable of carrying power. All this and the battery itself is still resistive so a superconducting cable wouldn't help much.

Funny enough superconducting magnetic energy storage is already much less energy dense than lithium ion. A quick calc shows a tesla powerwall has an energy density of ~30 T, which is not at all trivial to make with superconducting magnet tech (10-20 is the present state of the art). Batteries appear to be the future even if we developed high mag RT superconductors.

Google

Google's Project Starline Videoconference Tech Wants To Turn You Into a Hologram (wired.com) 21

Google on Tuesday unveiled a prototype machine for face-to-face meetings named Project Starline. From a report: The phrase "video booth" really is the simplest way to describe Starline in its current form: It's a large booth, like the kind you'd find in a diner, just way more technologically complex. I had the chance to test-drive it in early May. After an initial conversation with Bavor outside of Google's campus in Mountain View, California, I was led inside the almost empty building and escorted to a private office. There was the Starline booth, part wood-paneled and partly encased in gray fabric, with a built-in bench on one side and a 65-inch display on the other. I was instructed to sit opposite the display. There were lights, cameras, and not a whole lot of action until a product manager sat down across from me. From a very specific angle, he looked as though he was sitting across from me. But he was on a different floor of the building, piping into our meeting through Starline.

This is Google's idea for the future of videoconferencing, a giddy vision that only a small group of Googlers have had access to, and one that has apparently gotten a thumbs-up from chief executive Sundar Pichai. You couldn't be blamed for thinking that Starline must have been developed during the pandemic, while desk workers were umm-ing and muting and unmuting their way through an endless stream of Meets and Zooms. But Clay Bavor, Googler who heads up the company's augmented- and virtual-reality efforts, says there wasn't really any aha moment that led to Project Starline. In fact, it's been in the works for over five years. [...] The imagery is remarkable, and the visuals are complemented by spatial audio. What I'm actually looking at is a 65-inch light field display. The Project Starline booths are equipped with more than a dozen different depth sensors and cameras. (Google is cagey when I ask for specifics on the equipment.) These sensors capture photorealistic, three-dimensional imagery; the system then compresses and transmits the data to each light field display, on both ends of the video conversation, with seemingly little latency. Google applies some of its own special effects, adjusting lighting and shadows. The result is hyper-real representations of your colleagues on video calls.

Google

Chrome Now Uses Duplex To Fix Your Stolen Passwords (techcrunch.com) 28

Google announced a new feature for its Chrome browser today that alerts you when one of your passwords has been compromised and then helps you automatically change your password with the help of... wait for it ... Google's Duplex technology. From a report: This new feature will start to roll out slowly to Chrome users on Android in the U.S. soon (with other countries following later), assuming they use Chrome's password-syncing feature. It's worth noting that this won't work for every site just yet. As a Google spokesperson told us, "the feature will initially work on a small number of apps and websites, including Twitter, but will expand to additional sites in the future."

Now you may remember Duplex as the somewhat controversial service that can call businesses for you to make hairdresser appointments or check opening times. Google introduced Duplex at its 2018 I/O developer conference and launched it to a wider audience in 2019. Since then, the team has chipped away at bringing Duplex to more tasks and brought it the web, too. Now it's coming to Chrome to change your compromised passwords for you.

Feed Google News Sci Tech: The Morning After: Apple Music adds lossless streaming to its entire catalog - Engadget (google.com)

Comment Re: Any good MGM movies lately ? (Score 1) 66

I think there's a peculiar effect that comes from being a "founder" CEO. They built the company from the ground up, which probably fosters a sense of omnipotence. The next generation of CEOs are either people that came up through the company, or are brought in from the outside, so there isn't nearly that sense of entitlement or need for worship that you find among the founders. I wouldn't call it a rule, since there are probably no lack of examples of founders who didn't get (or expect) endless adulation. I think the other thing to keep in mind with tech companies is that a lot of the founder CEOs were actually at least somewhat technically adept. Gates did write the first MS-BASIC interpreter way back in the day in 8080 assembly, which certainly gave him something of an edge when talking with his engineers, whereas a standard MBA may not have that level of technical ability.

Love him or hate him, Jobs was a visionary, a kind of Alexander the Great of the tech world. He made no end of mistakes, which is to be expected, but he also had a lot to do with Apple's offerings up until his death. It made him at times, by all accounts, an impossible man to deal with, and yet he was one of the founders of the company, left it to develop a pretty damned impressive platform (NexT), and then returned to Apple with a whole host of ideas on how to refloat Apple's flagging fortunes. And, of course, while the iPhone was effectively a second generation smartphone, Jobs and his team were bright enough to see where Blackberry went right, and where it went wrong, and basically stole RIM's lunch (which is the real lesson here, it's rarely the innovators who win the race, it's the guys who are right behind them who let the leader make the mistakes and then come out with the next generation product who ultimately get to the finish line).

Comment Please stop (Score 1) 261

The actual tech angle on some of these article postings is getting super thin. I get that tweaking the nipples of MAGA people was super-fun at one point, but it's getting to the point that it's more sad than entertaining. It's also ensured that the comments are now filled with tons of 8kun-quality garbage. It's not helping, it's just giving all this yet one more place to thrive.

Comment Re:Is this Apple-dot ? (Score 1) 189

What do you want more politics stories, or some story on how some unknown company does such and such (in no way related to science and technology)

I know Apple is the New Microsoft for Slashdot, where it cannot do any right, and any decision it takes is suspect. However Apple has long release schedules, compared to say a Dell, which would slap on a new chip when it gets it hands on it, (often at a determent towards good engineering). So news like this means for people who actually like Apple Computers, they have information in which they can decide to wait a few months to get the new system, or see if Apple is having any good deals on its current models.

Apple is a big tech company, so they should have some presence on Slashdot, even if you don't like Apple and refuse to buy their products, their decisions and changes in directions often has a wider impact than just their products.

My Samsung Phone, has no replaceable battery or a headphone jack, it uses a full oled display, with a dot or notch cut out for the front facing camera... So Apples decisions even ones that we on Slashdot hate, often will make it to other products as well. So keeping an eye on Apple is important.

Feed Google News Sci Tech: Apple's App Store chief kicks off iPhone maker's defense at Epic Games trial - Reuters (google.com)

Feed Google News Sci Tech: Stock Futures Gain, Led by Tech - The Wall Street Journal (google.com)

Movies

Amazon Said To Make $9 Billion Offer for MGM (variety.com) 66

Amazon is weeks into negotiations on a deal to acquire MGM for about $9 billion, industry sources tell Variety. From the report: Chatter that Amazon (and other tech giants) have been sniffing around MGM has circulated for some time. But sources indicated that Amazon's interest in acquiring the studio has taken on a new tenor beyond the usual rumor mill. The deal is said to be being orchestrated by Mike Hopkins, senior VP of Amazon Studios and Prime Video, directly with MGM board chairman Kevin Ulrich, whose Anchorage Capital is a major MGM shareholder. MGM had already effectively nailed up a "for sale" sign: Variety confirmed in December that the company was looking for a buyer.

Feed Google News Sci Tech: Hacker gangs show few signs of slowing after pipeline attack - NBC News (google.com)

Comment Re:Average credit card processing fees: 1.3% to 3. (Score 1, Interesting) 101

30% is in way to much for things that apple is not hosting or running.

The $99/year dev fee should cover alot and if apple really wants to keep in house only in app subs and buys should be 5% max.

Apple does a lot. They're hosting your app. They're handling payments, including foreign currency. They're handling taxes. They're handling the legal issues. They're handling the user licenses (you bought it, you can download it again on your account). They're handling the security of all of that.

And they're also doing basic tech support, and handling things like refunds.

Sure, a normal developer can do all that, but I'm sure 30% is probably a worthwhile cut to not get phone calls on "how do I install your app?" a million times a day, plus emails on the same matter plus refunds.

I'm sure most developers would rather work on their app than spend their days just dealing with customers. Or having to hire someone to deal with them. I'm sure there will be companies that work can be pushed off to, but it's a lot of management just to handle a 99 cent app. Heck, even one customer asking for basic tech support will probably eat the 30 cent Apple cut in operational costs alone.

And credit cards are 1-5% plus a per-transaction fee of around 30 cents. It's why they're not ideal for microtransactions - charging 5 cents for something via credit card is a losing proposition as you're going to be in the hole for that.

Comment Re:This perp was toast at "Mail a check" (Score 1) 67

Yet the estimates are in the hundreds of millions each and every year to online scams.

This is peanuts.

I'll repeat my point: The original claim that "Ransomware couldn't and didn't work without cryptocurrencies" is bunk.

Nope, it's not. You can't have scalable ransomware operation without crypto. You can have one-off heists with lots of preparation, but they won't pay for themselves. And with Nigerian Prince scams all you need is a bunch of peasants with laptops, who write scam emails. With ransomware you need to have highly competent tech people, who can legitimately earn at least tens of thousands dollars each year.

Feed Google News Sci Tech: Parler available for download in the Apple App Store after ban - Vox.com (google.com)

Slashdot Top Deals