If you watch all the video, it's not at all "Laughably bad", not in the slightest, in fact, considering the very confusing, busy city streets with other traffic misbehaving, it was remarkably good. Also, the (irritatingly impatient) YouTube submitter fast forwarded the video whenever it was working well and which obviously placed emphasis on the areas where it was weak.
A reasoned evaluation would be:
Very cautious regards pedestrians (waited patiently for crossing pedestrians on a left turn - which irrit
You must have watched a different video. I saw a car driven like there was a drunk 12-year-old behind the wheel. The headline was literally correct - I did actually laugh at this load of junk failing to navigate an extremely simple road system on a clear day with lots of room and visibility.
Nope - headline plain wrong (Score:1, Interesting)
If you watch all the video, it's not at all "Laughably bad", not in the slightest, in fact, considering the very confusing, busy city streets with other traffic misbehaving, it was remarkably good. Also, the (irritatingly impatient) YouTube submitter fast forwarded the video whenever it was working well and which obviously placed emphasis on the areas where it was weak.
A reasoned evaluation would be:
Re:Nope - headline plain wrong (Score:2)
You must have watched a different video. I saw a car driven like there was a drunk 12-year-old behind the wheel. The headline was literally correct - I did actually laugh at this load of junk failing to navigate an extremely simple road system on a clear day with lots of room and visibility.