If you watch all the video, it's not at all "Laughably bad", not in the slightest, in fact, considering the very confusing, busy city streets with other traffic misbehaving, it was remarkably good. Also, the (irritatingly impatient) YouTube submitter fast forwarded the video whenever it was working well and which obviously placed emphasis on the areas where it was weak.
A reasoned evaluation would be:
Very cautious regards pedestrians (waited patiently for crossing pedestrians on a left turn - which irrit
The reason you can't see the incoming cars in that last bit is because the video's camera is facing out the front windshield. The people in the car see, and discuss, cases like that well before those cars have to brake! You should discourse that your "more reasoned" is really more motivated reasoning.
Nope - headline plain wrong (Score:1, Interesting)
If you watch all the video, it's not at all "Laughably bad", not in the slightest, in fact, considering the very confusing, busy city streets with other traffic misbehaving, it was remarkably good. Also, the (irritatingly impatient) YouTube submitter fast forwarded the video whenever it was working well and which obviously placed emphasis on the areas where it was weak.
A reasoned evaluation would be:
Re:Nope - headline plain wrong (Score:2)
The reason you can't see the incoming cars in that last bit is because the video's camera is facing out the front windshield. The people in the car see, and discuss, cases like that well before those cars have to brake! You should discourse that your "more reasoned" is really more motivated reasoning.