Interview with Christopher Blizzard 93
Ur@eus writes "We have just put up an interview with Christopher Blizzard of
Red Hat Labs and Mozilla. The interview gives insights into many things regarding Mozilla, Linux and Blizzard's participation. The interview can be found at Linuxpower." Yes, yes... He's a Slashdot Author, too, but it's a pretty good interview. Check it out.
Dear Mr. Blizzard.... (Score:4)
And finally:
The site is /.'d! (Score:1)
Warning: Too many connections in functions.php on line 58
ERROR: db_connect - Unable to connect to SQL server
If you think this is in error, please email bugs@linuxpower.org giving the above error and the what you did to cause it
© Copyright of all documents belonging to this site by linuxpower.org and linuxpower.com © 1998-2000.
For more information please look at our disclaimer page.
Only Developers as users? (Score:3)
I was supprised to see his answer to this question. I thought Mozilla was meant to be an open source browser for everyone. I realize anyone who wants to can use it, but I didn't think it was targeted at developers. Personally, I plan on using it as my browser just as a matter of principle. I mean, I just like the idea of using Mozilla. Although, depending on how good it is, Netscape 6.0 may change my mind, I'll have to wait and see.
Re:another one? (Score:3)
Another problem is that if I do look at the list of potential questions, I find that far more questions already got moderated up to 5 than any interviewee will ever have time to answer. So we get tens of questions at level 5, only about 7 or so make it through the final selection (based on what criterion actually?). All this again makes me wonder why I should bother spending my moderation points on helping to select questions.
Seems like the /. interviewing process is a bit flawed, IMHO. At the very least it suffers from fixed the upper limit on moderation points per post that serves us rather well in the normal discussions.
--
Non-Netscape developers (Score:2)
I think this project is going to pull a lot of people into its developement once people are using it a lot.
/.-ed, any mirrors? (Score:1)
Warning: Too many connections in functions.php on line 58
ERROR: db_connect - Unable to connect to SQL server
If you think this is in error, please email bugs@linuxpower.org
giving the above error and the what you did to cause it
© Copyright of all documents belonging to this site by linuxpower.org and linuxpower.com © 1998-2000.
For more legal information please look at our disclaimer page.
Re:The site is /.'d! (Score:3)
Anyway, worse comes to worse, come back and try again in an hour or so and hopefully the effect will subside somewhat.
--
Jeremy Katz
Re:/.-ed, any mirrors? (Score:1)
Coming Attractions (Score:5)
In this controversial film (currently being protested by the Anti-Troll Defamation League), two trolls whose Slashdot accounts have been temporarily disabled discover a loophole that will enable them to return to the site -- but which will unmake the universe in the process. Can CmdrTaco patch the code before it's too late?
"HOT GRITS CLUB"
In the near future, angry young men turn to pouring hot grits down their pants to escape from their meaningless, materialistic lives. Remember, the first rule about Hot Grits Club is that you don't talk about Hot Grits Club.
"/DEV/NULLINATOR 2: JUDGMENT DAY"
When the DVDCCA sends cyborgs back in time to kill young Jon Johansen before he can create DeCSS, it's up to Arnold Schwarznegger to save Johansen, stop the DVDCCA, and coin as many cultural catchphrases as possible.
"THERE'S SOMETHING ABOUT NATALIE"
A romantic comedy in which two guys chase after every Slashdot reader's dream girl. Features an exciting encounter between Natalie Portman and Medusa.
"THE HOLLAND WITCH PROJECT"
In October of 1994, three Slashdot editors disappeared into the library in Holland, Michigan, while writing a Slashdot exposé. A year later their story was found."
"THE SIXTH POST"
"I see trolls." Bruce Willis plays a psychologist working with a small boy who sees Slashdot posts no one else does. (Watch for the shocking plot twist, in which it is revealed that the boy is reading at -1.)
"MOZILLA 2000"
Feature bloat causes Mozilla to grow beyond its creators' control and escape to wreck havoc on Tokyo's computers. A special effects extravaganza ensues -- but will audiences return after 1998's flop "Geeko vs. Mecha-Go!Zilla"?
"TRANSMETA CRUSOE"
Linus Torvalds is shipwrecked on a distant isle and must survive with only a Rio, the Linux kernel, and an AIBO. An adaption of the classic novel.
"THE X-WINDOWS-FILES: FIGHT THE FUTURE"
Hemos and CmdrTaco investigate the conspiracies surrounding the development of X-Windows. Based on the hit TV series.
isnt the title redundant? =) (Score:2)
Re:The site is /.'d! (Score:1)
The Microsoft® Windows® 2000 operating system is the ideal platform for the next generation of business computing and addresses the full range of customers' computing needs, from laptops and desktops to high-end clustered servers. The operating system helps organizations Internet-enable their business with a reliable, manageable infrastructure that is optimized for existing and emerging hardware.
Windows 2000 Professional is the operating system for desktops and notebooks for all sizes of business. Windows 2000 Server is an entry-level solution for running more reliable and manageable file, print, intranet, communications and infrastructure services. Windows 2000 Advanced Server includes additional functionality to enhance availability and scalability of e-commerce and line-of-business applications.
Re:The site is /.'d! (Score:1)
Consider it a badge of honor.   Many sites now brag about being
Re:Only Developers as users? (Score:2)
~luge(posted from mozilla build 2000030709)
Re:Non-Netscape developers (Score:1)
my two cents-
~luge(posted with mozilla build 2000030709)
Mozilla as propaganda (Score:3)
As an oft-cited piece of open source software, Mozilla gets considerable attention from the press, both technological and mainstream. Yet, in most pieces, the word "failure" appears, far more than in works on Linux or Apache.
Is Mozilla then a good representative of the OSS world? The Mozilla team is primarily Netscape engineers rather than the Internet users, as was initially imagined. So do we want to be associated with it? No major OSS project takes such consistent thrashings, and I wonder how well it reflects on the other projects.
-- the obvious AC
Re:Coming Attractions (Score:1)
~luge
Why does Netscape on Linux Crash? (Score:1)
Mozilla doesent crash as much, but has no features. How is linux going to take over the world if browser is the future, and the browser sucks? No Java support?
WTFIGO?
Mozilla X frontends (Score:2)
Re:Mozilla as propaganda (Score:4)
I think you just targeted part of the problem in your statement, ie., the fact that quite a few "insiders" were doing this rather than the OSS community in general.
One of the biggest impetuses that brings much of the OS Software to its highest quality is, as ESR has eloquently put it (paraphrase) - it's the programmer's desire to "scratch an itch".   If you don't have that desire from inside yourself, then it's just a job but not your job.
In all fairness to the Netscape people, they were designated as the "poster company" for Open Source and alot of us trying to push it in our jobs point to Netscape's decision.   In addition, the Mozilla group made a decison to start from scratch with the code, and they've basically built a "new" (in quotes) browser from the ground up.
One might want to compare them with a Sun, who has taken over the maintenance of StarOffice, to maybe see a different perspective on how a major company handles the Open Source phenomena.   Maybe Sun is not a good example for the moment, but time will tell on how they deal with their new product.
Re:Coming Attractions (Score:1)
What does it take to survive slashdot? (Score:1)
What does it take for a server not to get slashdotted?
I hope it doesn't require a 12 CPU server cluster with each machine having half a gig of RAM.
Are there any folks out there that have survived being slashdotted with only slowdowns (and serve dynamic pages)?
Re:The site is /.'d! (Score:1)
thanks.
-l
Re:The site is /.'d! (Score:1)
I'm always amazed at the logs I get just when I post a link on slashdot. We're a bunch of trained monkeys!
Oh well, your site goes down, but you get more corrupt on the Slashdot Purity Test. It all works out in the end...
later,
Peter
---
pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate [152.7.41.11].
Just so ya know (Score:1)
[ c h a d o k e r e ] [dhs.org]
Re:Red Hat/Cygnus office in Toronto?!?! (Score:1)
People (Score:2)
[ c h a d o k e r e ] [dhs.org]
Re:What does it take to survive slashdot? (Score:1)
Re:Why does Netscape on Linux Crash? (Score:1)
what helps me the most is: 1) turn off java and java script, 2) try not to open new windows and then close them again. just open however many you use on different desktops and don't close any. the less you close, the higher the probability that it will survive. 3) don't use a wrapper script. execute the netscape binary directly.
-l
Suggestion - What to do with slashdotted sites... (Score:4)
So why not ask some OSS (and other small) sites whether they'd allow their pages to be copied on Slashdot. This would benefit both those sites and Slashdot readers. If something of the like is not done, it would mean that eventually slashdot could only link to major sites, which would restrict a lot (in terms of point of view) the information available to slashdot readers.
Re:Coming Attractions (Score:2)
Re:its coming out (Score:1)
Re:Red Hat/Cygnus office in Toronto?!?! (Score:1)
Re:Mozilla X frontends (Score:2)
(Not a troll, not flamebait. Just pointing poor Andrew to the right direction.)
Mozilla size (Score:1)
First off, congrats on a great project. I'm in charge of learning about mozilla for a set-top box and I've been digging in to it hardcore for a while now. For a project of it's size it is remarkably clean. I'm very impressed with the overall high quality of things.
Any estimates on a minimal system to run mozilla?
it looks like 32M is possible, 16M looks out of the question. So much of the function is coupled into javascript and XUL that it doesn't look very easy to take things out. (or worth while, since the function will generally need to come from somewhere...)
Thanks for your work, and I'm very impressed with the product and it's evolution.
Re:Only Developers as users? (Score:2)
This is not a criticism, by any means. As a
Mozilla is a case in point in that it is painfully obvious that the project could use more community assistance (I'll be the first to raise my hand as a hypocrite here). Despite its technical elegance and exemplary standards adherence, this is honestly a browser still tragically not ready for prime time.
For this reason it is still a developer's app, no where near idiot-proof enough for general consumption. For the good of this community, it bears upon all of us not to forget that the vast majority of computer users:
-- do not share our fascination with these machines, and
-- lack even a fraction of the computer-manipulation skills that most
So, be humble, patient, and work to make all things Cliff Claven-friendly. =)
jMC
Re:The site is /.'d! (Score:1)
href="http://lancebert.linuxpower.org/">http://la
It could be worse, everyone could be going to that site with all the "forward/delayed post" stuff. hey. password protect devel, or restrict DNS dumps... if you care
Re:Red Hat/Cygnus office in Toronto?!?! (Score:2)
No, 2: Bloor-Danforth, and Yonge-University.
The Scarborough RT ain't a subway, it's LRT like Calgary and Edmonton.
Pope
i care because you do... (Score:1)
when people say they don't care, it eases the pressure of actually having to care.
i myself, don't want to care in the egotistical way ("why IS it THAT important?").
example: Hitler CARED enough about the Germans that he decided to handle their problem for them: to kill all Jews. now that's compassion--you care enough for your "brethren" that you alleviate their problems in life--by causing more "problems."
maybe he shouldn't have cared so much.
Re Re:Her Ass is an Entropic Universe (Score:1)
Re:Only Developers as users? (Score:1)
Netscape had stated from early on that Mozilla.org's product would be source code and it's customers would be hackers, including Netscape hackers. Unfortunately, most people seem to forget that, especially when milestone builds are released.
Personally, I'll be surprised if Netscape Navigator is at all similar to the current Mozilla builds, but, of course, only Netscape knows for sure.
I think the point is that other organizations, including Netscape/AOL, can use Mozilla.org to package their own Browser based on the Mozilla source code, as well as incorperate Mozilla into existing and future products.
Re:its coming out (Score:1)
There is just a garbage collector that takes care of you.
EC
Ada is better than Pascal (Score:1)
http://www.adapower.com/ gives you more information.
It is what I have learned with, and is a good choice.
EC
Re:Coming Attractions (Score:1)
___
Re:Red Hat/Cygnus office in Toronto?!?! (Score:1)
Lovely place, though. Very nice, green feel to it; even close to the centre. I'd love to live there.
Oh, come on; ligthen up. At least I didn't claim to be an expert on urban structure the way some people onIts alive, just getting /. 'ed (Score:1)
Re:/.-ed, any mirrors? (Score:1)
I'm told the box should be getting a hardware upgrade shortly from one of the admins. Unfortunately, the site is still feeling the
Re:Suggestion - What to do with slashdotted sites. (Score:3)
I was searching on google the other day... and one of the handier features that I noticed when I was trying to extract some information from a dead site was the fact that they store a cache for most of the sites that they list, and they make that available to the searchers.
Now I noticed that they said that they remove cached pages for people who request, but I get the general feeling that they didn't (and probably couldn't have) asked for permission before posting on their webpage from the cache. So if they can do that without violating copyright laws (which for all I know, they may very well be) why can't slashdot? I don't really see the distinction.
--
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Mozilla X frontends (Score:1)
Re:As a webmaster I must say... (Score:1)
That's the "Dr. Adder" (KW Jeter) crowd.
Cool book, btw.
Bandwidth is what it takes (Score:2)
Oh yes, and the page being served was dynamically generated from an XML database. Even so, at the peak of the slashdotting, load never went over 1. That is what happens when the web server is in C rather than some hoggish scripting language.
Re:another one? (Score:2)
Re:Why does Netscape on Linux Crash? (Score:2)
Re:Only Developers as users? (Score:1)
Re:Only Developers as users? (Score:1)
bugzilla
gecko
xul
also considering that the above elements of mozilla are just a few of their major developements and that they are all highly modular, in addition to being open sourced, it becomes apparent why the target is aimed at developers. a side-effect of the above elements is an incredibly robust, consistent, and all-around very cool web browser for the end-user.
COM on non-MS platforms? (Score:2)
This statement caught my attention:
This interests me, not because I give a shit about micros~1, but because D?COM is one of things standing in the way of full compatibility between IIS and the like and real webservers. If there was COM on other platforms, then all those IIS applications could be picked up and moved, whole hog, to other systems. This is interesting to me. Plus, I feel that a cross-platform version of almost anything is preferable to a single-platform stranglehold, even if I personally will never use it.
Cthulhu for President! [cthulhu.org]
Re:Why does Netscape on Linux Crash? (Score:1)
That is absolutely not true. I'm running the glibc2 version of 4.72 on 2.2.12, and it crashes almost daily. Granted, most of the crashes are due to java problems, but there is a web page that simply by resizing the window, I can make ns crash every single time, and no, it doesn't have any java parts.
NEVERMIND! (Score:1)