Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Mozilla The Internet

Mozilla Milestone 15 243

Posted by CmdrTaco from the download-compile-repeat dept.
[TWD]insomnia writes "Mozilla M15 is out on their FTP site. It seems already a bit faster than M14 and Netscape 6 PR1. " Not in woody yet (blatant hint ;)
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Mozilla Milestone 15 More

Mozilla Milestone 15

Comments Filter:

  • Re:What a crappy browser (Score:1)

    by Anonymous Coward
    Quite an OS you got there, if simply trying out a program can permanently damage it. You should try out new stuff with a restricted user account instead of as root.

  • Re:no "what's new" in README... (Score:1)

    by Anonymous Coward
    2)when opening a new window, got to the current site not the home page Opening a new window is just like starting it up, so if you tell it to open the last page when it starts, it will do so with each new window..

  • Re:Mozilla Dinosaur icon is THIEVERY (Score:1)

    by Anonymous Coward
    How many ferrets out there do you see as corporate mascots? Huh?

    www.ferretsoft.com

    A consumer isn't going to confuse a web browser with a fictional character in a movie. It sounds to me that you have a beef with Americans, not Mozilla.

    And who said all of the developers are American? How many electronic product designs (intellectual property) have the Japanese ripped off from the Americans? Huh?

    If Tojo, Inc had any grounds to sue AOL/Netscape on, you can bet they would have already.

  • Re:no "what's new" in README... (Score:1)

    by Anonymous Coward
    I'm windering the same thing. There are several features that I miss in Netscape 6 that are included in IE.
    Here are some suggestions:

    1)address completion/menu

    Kind of a personal preference thing. I'm with you on the menu, but I hate address completion.

    2)when opening a new window, got to the current site not the home page

    Preferences.

    1)make it possible to turn of cookies except from sites the user can list

    It already does this.

    2)the color scheme is ugly

    You can change it. If you don't want to come up with your own skin, some very nice ones are already available (no URL's handy, sorry).

    3)somehow make it load up faster

    I imagine that once the debugging code is taken out, it will load up an order of magnitude faster (at least).

  • Re:pgcc (Score:1)

    by Anonymous Coward
    If you're that obsessed with speed, use lynx.
    Beatch.

  • Re:Review of Netscape 6 (Score:1)

    by Anonymous Coward
    One of the most boring and useless arguements is that so-and-so is "biased" and therefore nothing they say is worthwhile. Argue on the merits of the article, not it's parent company affiliation. WinMag is respectable enough to take seriously.

  • AOLzilla and Slashdot Reaction (Score:1)

    by Anonymous Coward
    Folks, it's time for a reality check and a little honesty with youselves about Mozilla and Netscape 6.

    Mozilla is a disaster. It's ugly, slow and far too buggy to be released to anyone but developers, and the Mozilla team knows that. The bugs and missing features are well known - they don't require more reports from users to identify.

    You can say the politically correct thing, or you can face reality. While the Mozilla project is independent of AOL in one sense, in another it's not. The product that most users expect and have been exposed to so far is a web browser - nothing more, nothing less. As a web browser it sucks. Forget about the "Gecko" rendering engine being superior and consider overall performance in which the Mozilla ui is the slowest I've ever used or seen and the most likely to crash.

    I agree that in terms of "clean code" and more extensible code Mozilla is a great improvement over Netscape 4.x, and in terms of web standards it puts MSIE 5 to shame. That's not the point - these standards mean nothing to users, only to nerds and other developers.

    While the development of the engine may need some independence from AOL and AOL allows that - because developers are happier and more productive when they have that freedom, AOL has no serious plans to challenge Microsoft in the browser market with Netscape 6. If they had such plans, we would now have a more usable browser and AOL would be making efforts to incorporate such a browser into its AOL client for Windows. AOL intends to maintain its agreement with Microsoft to use only the MSIE browser in its client for Windows users.

    AOL does have plans to use the Mozilla engine in set-top devices and hand-helds and all kinds of appliances, but not in a client for desktop systems. That's Microsoft's turf. Folks, this is AOL - the same AOL you make fun of and despise for meeting the needs of AOLamers, as you call them, who use Windows. The AOL-Microsoft combination works well for millions (tens of millions) of users and they see little need to change that.

    AOL will continue to make token Beta releases of its Netscape 6 browser for a while but will in the end just take it off life support. As for a broswer for Linux - Unix users, what is relesed will always be second rate and not as good as the version for Windows, which isn't saying much.

    Perhaps the Gnome team can eventually take the Mozilla engine and build a decent browser for unix with an interface that works, but they are showing little interest in doing that. Why they haven't does puzzle me a lot.

    I do know that the Kde browser is damned good and the upcoming Konquer is looking superb. This is a native unix product, designed by people who acutally use unix and not by a Windows oriented commercial entity like AOL-Netscape. I never cease to be amazed by the way knee-jerk zealots will praise out of one side of their mouths the great "open source" project that AOL-Mozilla is and out of the other mock and ridicule Joe and Jane user who are quite satisfied with AOL on the Windows platform, while pretending to ignore or write off as "peripheral" a truly native, open-source project like Kde. You will be in for a reality check once again with the beta release of Kde 2.0 next month - maybe six weeks. This far surpasses anything I've yet seen on a desktop anywhere, including Os2 Warp. Look out!

  • Debian Reference (Re:woody?) (Score:2)

    by Anonymous Coward
    It's the codename for the unstable version of Debian.

  • Re:Review of Netscape 6 (Score:2)

    by Anonymous Coward
    It's interesting to note that the site you refer to is associated with Winmag.com. So, they probably do have a pro-microsoft bias (just like I'm biased against MS). Although the article does seem to take a fair tone.

    Anyway, I agree. Prerelease software is not ready for prime time. Joe Idiot PC-owner should not be downloading and using this version. That's exactly what Netscape's site told me before I downloaded it. I don't think that it's fair to compare a product which is in the first of several beta releases with a final release. Just because there are bugs in the beta version doesn't mean that Mozilla is doomed. It doesn't mean that it will be the Next Big Thing, but I wouldn't panic either. My experience with Mozilla is that each milestone is much more stable and usable than the preceeding one. I am very confident that the Mozilla folks will release a final, stable product. Whether or not that product will be what I want (i.e. a good web browser) or something else (a tool for developing cross platform UIs in JS and XML) remains to be seen. Personally, I'd find it pretty ironic if Mozilla's greatest contribution was XUL instead of the browser itself. And that may very well be the case. We shouldn't have to wait long to see how the browser turns out, but seeing if XUL amounts to anything outside of Mozilla may have to wait a bit longer.

    -Doug

  • Re:no "what's new" in README... (Score:4)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 18, 2000 @06:15PM (#1124903)
    I see a better way then. Have what it opens to be fully configurable (you choose default: homepage, blankpage, or currentpage), but also allow the new window to inherit the history one step behind (at your discretion [this is configurable too]). Best of both worlds. Any other reasons?
  • Well it's been almost 3 hours and it's still running! :-) Certainly much better than previous Ms.

    4. Middle-click on a link does not yet open a new window. I use that extensively in NS 4.x. Where is it?

    Works for me. And I remember looking at the bug list, and that they had fixed that "bug".

    D'oh! You're right. I tried it again and it does indeed work. Cool!

    As for the rest of your problems, some of them I've seen bug reports on, but some I haven't. But hte best thing for anyone with problems to do is to go
    to bugzilla.mozilla.org and report the bug there. Complaining on Slashdot will get you nothing, even if it does feel good to vent.

    Yeah... I think I'll do exactly that after I've been using it a little longer. Thanks!

  • > Netscape blows.

    Yeah it does, but at least it's open source now. And you can use it on an operating system that doesn't have to be rebooted every 38 seconds, has a hideous registry system, and the most horrible GUI on the face of the earth!
  • Surfing around relentlessly. Linux version of course. Not a single crash yet, and they fixed the bad HTTP authentication password bug that plagued M14. Good job! Everything seem to render well also.

    But there are still a few minor details. I can surf with it now, but fixing these would make it infinitely nicer. And I probably won't rpm -e netscape until they're fixed.

    1. The Alt-arrow keys for page forward/backward don't seem to work
    2. When pressing BACK, it ALWAYS reloads the previous page from the network. That's ridiculous, and slow. Yes, I do have cache turned on and a directory set.
    3. When opening link in new window (via the pop up window) and then closing that window, the up/down arrow keys do NOT work on the original page you were at until you click on a link to move to another page. The scrollbar works fine.
    4. Middle-click on a link does not yet open a new window. I use that extensively in NS 4.x. Where is it?
    5. Sometimes silly things don't work like when I click the "Pricewatch" link on Slashdot's slash box. Hmmm.

    Nevertheless, this is the first milestone I may actually use for a signifcant portion of my browsing. Good work!

  • Mozilla is much more than skinnable (Score:3)

    by Cardinal ( 311 ) on Tuesday April 18, 2000 @05:35PM (#1124907)
    > why don't they make the GUI skinnable?

    I believe what you're after is ChromeZone [mozillazine.org].

    Mozilla is much more than just skinnable. Read up on XUL [mozilla.org] for more information.
  • Have you tried using a 128-bit version of Netscape/Mozilla? We have some NT web-based resources at work that are only accessible with either IE or a 128-bit version of Netscape.

  • You mean throwing out the old crufty architecture and rewriting from scratch isn't "something new and different?" Think about it. A beta of a product that's an incremental change from the older version of the product is going to tend to be less buggy than a "beta" of a total rewrite. The fewer changes that are made, the fewer *new* things that can go wrong.

    AFAIK, I don't think that Mozilla's even gotten to beta yet, at least not as far as Mozilla's developers are concerned.

  • Unfortunately the bug I'm waiting on [mozilla.org] seems to be lost in the wilderness, with nobody really knowing how to fix it. The problem is NTLM authentication, some proprietary means which Microsoft's Proxy Server uses to identify clients. I gather that Netscape never supported this, nor does Mozilla (does anything other than IE?), so I can't test it out with my neat work net connection.

    Great to see that despite antitrust trials and whatnot, Microsoft can still spanner Mozilla's works for myself and anyone else in the same situation.

    Oh well, downloading M15 to at least view a few local pages (hey I found one bug that way, which was fixed in a couple of hours, big kudos to the Mozilla team..)

  • PR1 is a daily build of M14, with a lot of crap thrown in by AOL. Stick with milestones, unless you really *need* instant messenger, an "N" in the throbberinstead of the M/lizard, and all the other junk.

  • You ave used te devil's letter ('H') in your post. Please refrain from using tis letter in te future. A corrected version of your post follows:

    Te callous attitude sown by Americans towards intellectual property is outrageous. Do you onestly believe tat everyting on te web is just free for te taking?

    Look at te Mozilla dinosaur icon -- it looks identical to Gojira (aka Godzilla). TIS IS PLAGIARISM. Gojira (aka Godzilla) existed DECADES before te Internet was ever created, let alone te Mozilla project. And don't tell me tis is just a coincidence; te name "Mozilla" is obviously intended to sound like "Godzilla". Copyrigt and trademark law prevents te use of similar names and logos wen tey are likely to confuse consumers. Well, if I was a consumer, I'd be damned confused -- a browser named "Mozilla" wit a dinosaur mascot sure sounds like it's endorsed by Tojo, Inc. Tis is not true.

    Wy tis as not been acted on is a mystery to me. Te "Mozilla" dinosaur clearly violates Tojo, Inc's copyrigt on Gojira (aka Godzilla. C'mon, guys, ow about coosing someting a little more original -- like, say, a ferret? ow many ferrets out tere do you see as corporate mascots? u?

    Tis post will act as an unofficial petition to te Mozilla developers to select a new mascot tat does not resemble Gojira (aka Godzilla). Simply reply to tis message if you want to add your name to te list.


    --Pil (I figured turnabout was fair play.)
  • >I understand that this is still a preview, but no-one should release
    >software this broken to anyone except developers. Many end users have
    >tried Preview 6 and they are never coming back. Its not just bad for
    >developers - for a large number of users this will be their first,
    >and sadly their last, foray into Open Source software.

    And who really cares all that much? "Open Source software" as you use the term never really had any intention to attract these kind of people/end users. In fact, one could say it's driven in part by an real desire to get away from them and people like you.
  • >Get over it already. Japan is famous for stealing great ideas and even
    >inventions from the West and commercializing them, so what's the big
    >deal with the US borrowing some stupid dinosaur icon from Japan? BIG
    >DEAL.

    And with the new Japanese 'Zilla moive coming out (it's going to be a guy in a rubber suit, yeah!) think of all the extra attention Mozilla would recieve.
  • >One of the most boring and useless arguements is that so-and-so is
    >"biased" and therefore nothing they say is worthwhile. Argue on the
    >merits of the article, not it's parent company affiliation. WinMag is
    >respectable enough to take seriously.

    Respected by who? Windows users? That's pretty much the only bunch who take anything these Windows-focused rags have to say seriously. They are also the only ones dumb enough to buy them. I rather doubt a Mac or Unix user will find anything of real value in a Windows publication.
  • >All this discussion on whether Winmag would be biased against NS 6 is
    >ridiculous because they gave it a glowing review. The article
    >discussed the preview release at length, calling it a "revolution" and
    >lauding both its features and Netscape's desicion to use an
    >open-source design model.

    Bah. Talk to OS/2 and Amiga users before you call this a favorable review of NS6. This is exactly the kind of stunt pro-microsoft mags like Winmag pulled with both OS/2 and the Amiga and Atari ST computers. They damned them with faint praise and awarded the Microsoft product their "Editor Choice" (or whatever the particular mag called it) Award. Draw your own conclusions from this.
  • Well, so Tojo Inc. invented dinosaurs, right? Oh well, and these fossils were actually secretly planted over there by workers of Tojo Inc. just to promote the trademark and now archeological museums should pay Tojo, Inc. for it too?
  • Check the default prefs.js - it's an option you can enable. It's just enabled by default on Unix.
  • Aren't trade marks only relevant if both products are in the same market? If Microsoft's next piece of software had the same name as model of milking machinery, wouldn't that be okay under the law? They don't dilute each other's brand name as they're not competing in the same market.

    A media dinosaur that appeared in many badly dubbed Japanese films versus the mascot of a web browser... I'm a consumer and I'm not confused. Maybe there are problems with it in other countries, but not here... perhaps it should carry a different name there (it wouldn't be the first product to have different name in a different country). Does Tojo, Inc sell software? I haven't heard of them before (maybe I'm ignorant). I don't think they're a household name around here and thus there is no confusion.

    Wasn't "Mozilla" loosely based on "Mosaic Killer", the other main browser that was around when Netscape started? Irony of that is that I believe Internet Explorer is based on Mosaic, or technology licensed from the NCSA. Perhaps when they hit on the name Mozilla they decided a dinosaur would be cool, cashing in on the geekiness of Godzilla over here.
  • If I look at a page side-by-side in N6 and N4.5, N6 wastes *so* much screen space, with those big ugly buttons (sorry) and the sidebar you can't get rid of

    Can't get rid of the sidebar, huh? What's wrong with just unselecting "Sidebar" from the "View" menu? It's the first thing I did when I got M14. Works fine for me. BTW, this is with the Win32 version I have in front of me. From memory, the Unix version is all but identical. As for the buttons being too large, just download (or write) a different theme.

  • the command-line switch you seek is ./mozilla -chrome chrome:///content

    The problem with this (as I've been finding out) is that you currently need to quit the browser and restart it with different arguments to change the chrome. Since I'm stuck with having to use the Win32 version at work, that's a real pain. Yes, I suppose I could launch it from a DOS box, but that's more effort that I want to expend. Maybe I'm just too lazy...

  • OK, so I'm biting an amusing troll...

    Mozilla was the original name of the Netscape web browser before Netscape became a household name. It was chosen to be a "Mosaic Killer" - hence, Mozilla. Netscape's HTTP header still calls the browser Mozilla.

    The full story, and other amusing Netscape trivia, can be found on jwz's site [jwz.org].

  • (ob-see-kwi-us) adj. excessively or sickeningly respectful.

    There isn't anything to be gained by ripping apart Mozilla. It's the most high profile closed-to-open source project there is, and it's a poster boy for open source, like it or not. But for what passes as a pack of hungry wolves on most every subject here on /., Mozilla brings out the damndest bunch of apologist weenies I've ever seen.

    Mozilla is big, behind schedule, unstable, and now developed by mostly AOL employees (sorry guys, but face the facts). Sounds like Windows almost, doesn't it? Yet everybody is so willing to prop this baby up and say it will. Well, cut the future tense crap.

    Honesty. Do you use Mozilla for your daily browser under Linux? Have you contributed patches? If not, stop making excuses.

    What the Mozilla project needs is a healthy dose of reality.

  • A bug has been posted - please add your comments (Score:3)

    by linuxci ( 3530 ) on Wednesday April 19, 2000 @03:20AM (#1124926)
    There was a bug reported about this yesterday (about a nightly build rather than M15 but it seems the same problem).


    It would help the Mozilla team find the cause of the bug (they can't reproduce it on their setup) if you could add additional information about the setup of your machine (i.e. what graphics cards you have installed, etc) - also mention that you're using M15 rather than a nightly build.


    The link for the bug is http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_ bug.cgi?id=36239 [mozilla.org] please register a bugzilla account and add your comments.
    --
    Make use of your spare CPU time!

  • And don't forget the fact that they threw out good usability/UI design principles out the door.

    I have hope, but I'm not holding my breath. When someone is beta, you can't really judge it too much - but you can judge the priorities the developers hold, and those working on Mozilla have got it WAY off. I'd much rather they had just given up on the Mac than embarassed themselves with the non-native UI.

    - Jeff A. Campbell
    - VelociNews (http://www.velocinews.com [velocinews.com])
  • If you moderated this as redundant and just noticed a karma hit, it's because I just metamoderated it as unfair.
    At the time this was posted only one other post had inquired as to the menaing of "woody", post #7, and only 5 minutes earlier.
    #7 could easily not have been up yet when this person loaded the page and I don't they should take a karma hit for it.
    Especially since there were so many other replies posted to this story that are much more deserving candidates for downward moderation.
  • Actually, yes they are already in beta. The first beta was forked to make Netscape 6 PR1, the second beta is upcoming.

  • xmlterm included (Score:3)

    by galore ( 6403 ) <ian AT labfire DOT com> on Tuesday April 18, 2000 @04:55PM (#1124935)
    cool, xmlterm is finally included. xmlterm seems like a really neat project, check it out at http://www.xmlterm.org/. i wish there was a way to build it though without having to build the whole mozilla source tree. rpms are available at the website, but they didn't work too well with m14. this build seems to have a good bit of functionality though. keep up the good work.

  • This Sucks! (Score:3)

    by GypC ( 7592 ) on Tuesday April 18, 2000 @11:25PM (#1124937) Homepage Journal

    Whine whine, bitch bitch and bitch. Bitch bitch, whine whine, bitch.

    Moan and piss. Piss and moan.

    Bitch and complain and whine. I want my money back. Why don't you just use IE5 like a normal person you retard? Freak! (Points finger and makes Body Snatchers alert sound.)

    What's taking so long? Complain. Moan and whine. Why doesn't ActiveX work? Piss and bitch.

    Why can't I convince you all to just use IE5? It really really is better! Really.

    Goddammit just use IE5! I told you to use IE5! You assholes! Use IE5!

    Bitch bitch, moan and complain.

    Oops. Sorry I have to stop now. I just installed a bugfix to IE5 and I have to reboot. Don't you just love to reboot? I do. I gives me time to run to the kitchen and grab a snack.

    "Free your mind and your ass will follow"

  • Re:no "what's new" in README... (Score:3)

    by orabidoo ( 9806 ) on Tuesday April 18, 2000 @09:58PM (#1124939) Homepage
    I'd cringe if my browser went to the same page when I open a new window. 99% of the times I open a new window to go somewhere else while leaving the other page open; I have netscape configured not to load anything initially, so I get a new *empty* window where I can type or paste an URL or go to a bookmark. if your "home portal" takes your precious time, turn the damn thing off! you can always click on "home" when you want to go there.
  • Hmmm, I showed around M14 at the office, and the most common comment from the WinUsers was that the UI (or 'skin') was too simple. No dropdowns on the back and forward buttons, no customizable toolbar, right-clicking doesn't work much of the time and so on. Not to mention my dreams of "Disable/Enable JavaScript" buttons and the like. (I have to admit I am a horrible user -- I have 3x the normal buttons my MS Word toolbars and like it that way.)

    If the current, simple skin is too complex to be rendered quickly, how are you going to build up the UI? I know that the panels are a solution for certain things like Radio and so on, but there's lots of room for featuritus on the skin itself.

    There's already talk in the Mac community to write a native container to host the Mozilla rendering engine. (Well, you guys have got the menubar in the wrong place on a platform of very anal users, what do you expect?). I'm wondering if the native container approach is being seriously considered for the major platforms (Windows, Mac, X11), and 'skins' be left as a feature to be exercised by third parties.
    --
  • One of the changes in M15 that I am happy to see, is the ability to block images from arbitrary sites directly from the browser.

    All you have to do is right-click on an image, select "Block Image from Loading" (which apparently should read 'Block all images from the site this image came from') and reload. It works great for for blocking banner ads from adforce, doubleclick, etc!

    You can edit the list of blocked sites in preferences:advanced:cookies and images. Hopefully there will be a way to automatically import a bunch of junkbuster-like rules in future versions.

    One off-topic criticism- Checkboxes on Mozilla look (in their unchecked state) like they are depressed buttons, which is confusing.

    Be Well,
    -OT
  • Wheel works fine for me! I just followed the instructions on a "How do you get the mouse wheel to work in Netscape?" page I found via a websearch a while back, didn't do anything different while trying out Mozilla...

    For me, I think, Moz's finally reached the point of usability? Why? The click on link with middle button to open in a new window shortcut finally works! That feature is the one I've been waiting for--it's the one I've missed using every other Moz build, and every other browser on every other platform. I'm happy now.

  • I don't know about 1 and 2 but for the rest, these are already implemented.


  • Re:Ideas (Score:4)

    by Raven667 ( 14867 ) on Tuesday April 18, 2000 @05:47PM (#1124955) Homepage
    IIRC from the last thread when NS PR1 came out it was stated that DHTML is different because in Mozilla it is based strictly on the W3C standard while NS 4.x and IE have made their proprietary extentions and only have part of the DHTML standard supported. Mozilla is more standards compliant, on all fronts, but this breaks backwards compatability on many pages, the upside is that once they are coded around the actual standard (who woulda' thunk?) this kind of thing won't happen again.

  • Posting with it now... (Score:3)

    by Teferi ( 16171 ) <teferi&wmute,net> on Tuesday April 18, 2000 @04:55PM (#1124960) Homepage
    It's a _big_ improvement over M14 - sidebar MUCH improved, scrolling is smoother, disk cache works, and - my favorite - they added XMLTerm, a terminal emulator in XML. It's a bit slow, but boy, is it fun.


    "If ignorance is bliss, may I never be happy.
  • Hmm, maybe if I download the source and compile M15 with pgcc (with '-march=pentiumpro -mcpu=pentiumpro -Os', or maybe -O9 instead of -Os) it could be as fast as it's supposed to.

    Anyways, congrats to the people at mozilla.org, and I hope it's as stable as IE right now (that's right, this is being written in Windows since I can't handle Netscape 4 bringing down X with it all the time)

    Maybe this weekend I'll install it (after taking the pointless standardized tests the state's making me take)
  • Yes, it's unstable and slow. But imho, it shows real promise. All the important things are working. I've got good hopes on this being best browser out there, at least as soon as I manage to get only bookmarks and html rendering and am able to kick all the rest out, but that's possible I think, I read something about that anyway.... Have to look into that some day soon...
  • Exactly. As is the same with /. Yet, browsers are expected to grok this utter shit.

    Here we all are, hooting and cheering that we finally have a Standards Complying browser.. Well guess what, people don't write code to those same Standards. Some WYSIWYG editors don't make 100% compliant code.

    And yet, it's still expected to display all these things. Should we really expect Mozilla to render bad HTML? I'm amazed it does. Building a web browser is a fairly thankless job. Here's to hoping with better browsers, people will take incentive to write better code.
  • Where are the crypto enabled builds? Or they already crypto enabled? Why arn't all nightlies enabled yet? When I mean enabled I mean containing the hooks, I release you still have to download the crypto seperatly.
  • The UI, if it's built all with browser components, is VERY complex, but it doesn't have all the features we've come to expect, so in a way, it is simplistic (ie, forcing you to use the menus and buttons instead of shortcuts, etc.)

    And in many ways, it's too complex. If I look at a page side-by-side in N6 and N4.5, N6 wastes *so* much screen space, with those big ugly buttons (sorry) and the sidebar you can't get rid of, and the extra bar at the bottom.

    That and that N6 uses weird spacing compared to N4.5, such that many pages I viewed seemed to have 1.5 lines between text instead of one. And N6 uses huge fonts in some cases.

    www.arstechnica.com - looks like it's in 640x480 it's so huge
    www.anandtech.com - the search boxes/etc are screwed up

    Those are just the two most obvious examples.

    If N6 could be made to look exactly like N4.5 with the exception of a new logo in the corner, and to render pages nearly identically, I'd switch, *now*.

    btw, the java at the Soda constructor site and a few others refused to work, but it was turned on, and it worked in 4.5, so I dunno what's up.

    I reported this and a few other actual bugs, what I'm talking about here for the most part is features that I don't like, not 'bugs'...

  • Mozilla and SGI (Score:3)

    by ChrisDolan ( 24101 ) <chris+slashdot@@@chrisdolan...net> on Tuesday April 18, 2000 @06:30PM (#1124974) Homepage
    The mozilla port to SGI is still very broken (and has been for more than six months since the SGI maintainer took off). That's disappointing since my box at work is an O2. But get this: I just downloaded the Linux M15 and ran it on a linux box displayed remotely on my SGI. Mozilla remote is FASTER than Netscape 4.7 running locally. Sheesh. Mozilla seems very nice despite the minor cosmetic bugs. If the SGI port worked minimally, I would join in the hacking effort.

    It appears that the main problems with the SGI port are in the assembly code in the xpcom module. That, of course, is the heart of the port. I've seen posts on the Mozilla newsgroups from SGI management saying that they would like to make the SGI mozilla port a priority, but it seems that hasn't happened. Personally, I'm undecided about whether I'd rather see SGI programmers working on Netscape or on XFS for Linux, etc. I'm probably going to switching to a Linux box in the near future anyway. So the big question is whether less common boxes like SGIs will eventually join the future of software like Mozilla or if they will become like the Amiga or the NeXT: Loved by those who like their unique software but loathed by those who have gotten used to software on other boxes.
  • So what's the story on BeZilla? I haven't heard anything about it in awhile, and I just started using BeOS again. NetPositive is alright, but it doesn't render a whole lot of pages correctly, and I can't *stand* Opera.
  • Damn straight! My mouse wheel STILL doesn't work

    Are you running imwheel? If so, try not running it - the mouse wheel works in enough Linux programs now that it's not necessary anymore. It works fine in most GTK programs (since it's supported natively by the toolkit) and works great in Mozilla. But it won't work in Mozilla if you have imwheel running.
  • Can someone please tell me how to make a GNOME launcher for Mozilla?

    Easy - create a shell script that contains:

    #!/bin/bash
    cd /path/to/mozilla/package && ./run-mozilla.sh

    Now point the gnome launcher to the shell script (don't forget to "chmod +x" the shell script first)
  • Why doesn't middle button to open a new line work in Win32???

    I don't get it. That great feature exists on Unix Netscape but not on any of the Win32 Netscapes. Why can't someone add it!!
  • I wasn't aware of this atrocity! If I had a few days/hours/weeks I would surely implement this feature. It is VITAL for organizations transitioning to Win2k to support the notions of User Home directories and user registry entries. Then again, this is also something that the original Netscape sucked on too.

    Maybe some industrious hacker will fix this soon...
  • I can't find it in my prefs.js

    Whats the line I should add to enable middle button clicking to open new windows?
  • Damn straight! My mouse wheel STILL doesn't work. (Works everywhere else, just not in Mozilla. (Yes it an MS-mouse.)) The mail client in NS6p1 is excrutiatingly sluggish. The widgets lack consistent rightclickability. (I still think rolling their own widgets was a bad call.)
    Hell, they've had 2 years to make their HTML render engine, said it was the best thing on the block, and I still find major bugs in it. (namely text overlaying graphics and tables that get duplicated).

    I REALLY want an opensource browser, but this is just becoming a debacle.
  • this is under NT. :(

    Average uptime 2 days 14 hours 49 minutes. :/
  • You misunderstand. It saves the settings to the local disk. Storing it at AOL/netscape/etc would not only be insecure, but slow, busy (millions of users) and redundant.

  • Re:no "what's new" in README... (Score:3)

    by thal ( 33211 ) on Tuesday April 18, 2000 @05:42PM (#1124998) Homepage
    I personally _hate_ how IE goes to the current page when you open up a new window. What if you currently happen to be on the result page of submitting an credit card order or something? There are some sites, such as moviefone.com, which will sit there for up to 2 minutes waiting to contact the theater you're buying a ticket for and finally will add to the page that the order has been finalized. While presumably an already loaded result page will simply be passed over to the new window without reloading, what would happen in the case of pages similar to this moviefone.com page where the page is not yet complete? I know it's possible for this to work safely, but I don't necessarily trust that it will be implement correctly, and I don't really see the point. Why would you want two copies of the same page, anyway? Opening links in a new window performs this function better.

    Then again, I hate when a web browser goes to any page at all by default. I've always used "start with a blank page" in Netscape and Mozilla. I'm a bit annoyed when programs do things for me automatically that usually aren't correct. For the same reason, I don't like automatic name completion.

    If anything, these should be configurable, _easily_ (yeah, yeah, "go edit the source you lazy ass!").

  • Hey! Taco! (Score:3)

    by SMN ( 33356 ) on Tuesday April 18, 2000 @06:22PM (#1124999)
    Not in woody yet (blatant hint ;)

    hey, just because mozilla isn't stable enough to handle all those popups while you're looking for porn doesn't mean all the rest of us need to hear it!

    (it's funny - laugh. please. no, not the "troll" moderation. PLEASE!)

  • If you want some different icons try over at The Chromezone [mozillazine.org]. Actually they haven't updated the page in a while, but the newer icons are up at my page [4mg.com].

  • Re:Been using it for well over an hour (Score:3)

    by m3000 ( 46427 ) on Tuesday April 18, 2000 @05:45PM (#1125009)
    4. Middle-click on a link does not yet open a new window. I use that extensively in NS 4.x. Where is it?

    Works for me. And I remember looking at the bug list, and that they had fixed that "bug".

    2. When pressing BACK, it ALWAYS reloads the previous page from the network. That's ridiculous, and slow. Yes, I do have cache turned on and a directory set.

    They're working on it right now. Sounds like this bug [mozilla.org].

    As for the rest of your problems, some of them I've seen bug reports on, but some I haven't. But hte best thing for anyone with problems to do is to go to bugzilla.mozilla.org [mozilla.org] and report the bug there. Complaining on Slashdot will get you nothing, even if it does feel good to vent.

    Oh, and I"ve been using "Mozilla" (Netscape 5 Beta) as my main browser ever since N5 was released. That version was the first one that had fewer crashes than Netscape 4.7, so I finally switched over.
  • "The point of good compilers is world domination. The point of not-so-good compilers is to serve quality coffee at an affordable price. Any questions? - phi1"

    Ok, I /have/ to know where that quote is from!
  • Perhaps the Gnome team can eventually take the Mozilla engine and build a decent browser for unix with an interface that works, but they are showing little interest in doing that. Why they haven't does puzzle me a lot.
    They've already done it - see last weeks Gnome summary [gnome.org] or Blizzard's home page [advogato.org].

    Basically, Nautilus (the Eazle file manager) will now embed the Bonobo mozilla component. In one step Nautilus has leaprogged Konquerer and Opera in standards-compliant web browsing, and provided a native GTK-zilla without any of that skin bloat.

    Of course we'll have to wait a few months for a Nautilus beta. But I guess it'll take that long to fix the memory leaks in Mozilla.

  • is decent printing. Right now you cannot even print off email! I probaly print a couple emails a day. I _need_ to be able to print. For some reason the bug to fix printing has been pushed back to M20! How can you expect anyone to be able to 'full-time' test a webbrowser/mail client that cannot print? Even pages without frames get completely mangled. *sigh*
  • The state of the sidebar isn't stored in prefs, its stored in your profile's localstore.rdf file.

    Open the file in a text editor, (its 'localstore.rdf' in your profile folder)
    and find the lines:

    182

    The value within 'width' may not be the same as mine (this is the pixel width of the sidebar box). Add the line true between the tags. Make sure mozilla is not running while you do this as it writes to this file on shut down.

    I don't know why your sidebar settings aren't being saved automatically... but maybe doing it manually like this might help.

  • d'oh. the code snippet was:

    <RDF:Description about="chrome://navigator/content/navigator.xul#si debar-box">
    <width>182</width>
    </RDF:Description>

    and the line you should add is:

    <hidden>true</hidden>
  • The current skin is far from being 'too simple' from a code point of view (regardless of whatever it looks like at the user level)

    Here are some of the different types of buttons we have style rules for:

    button32 - large round toolbar buttons in navigator
    button28 - round toolbar buttons for action items in second tier apps
    other28 - round toolbar buttons for less important items in second tier apps
    push - 3D outset dialog buttons
    dialog - padded/default buttons for dialogs
    toolbar-flat - personal toolbar and taskbar buttons
    and there are several more I forget the classnames for - the 'search' button, the editor toolbar button styles, etc.

    Now compound this with styles for other widgets, masses of formatting and padding styles, and you end up with a heck of a lot of style rules!

    With a 4.x style skin, the browser window would have only one kind of button - the kind with the outset border with the black outline. (look at a 4.x window on windows, that's the only button type there is...) The other type would be dialog buttons. Two kinds. One kind of menu, one kind of tree widget, etc

    => smaller number of rules, faster traversal.

    The native container approach is not being considered by Netscape's contributors, however there has been interest in the past among others. With a compelling embedding story, this should be possible - look at the 'web browsers' that have grown around IE's Trident.
  • Skinnability is one of the high priorities for Netscape 6 PR2, and is my highest priority work assignment at present.

    Here's what we are doing:

    1) making the FE skinnable by scrubbing the XUL code that describes it
    2) creating a skin switching UI for the preferences window
    3) creating skin download and installation mechanisms
    4) creating new skins!

    We need to get 1 nailed before we can do 4, although 2 and 3 are currently also in progress. Stay tuned...

    Ben Goodger
    mozilla.org UI lead
  • This is something we would dearly like to support - customizable menus, toolbars etc. Mozilla Classic on Windows had draggable toolbar buttons, you could drag navigation buttons and bookmarks on personal toolbars into different toolbars and locations. In Mozilla Classic, this was all done using RDF. Theoretically this is possible today in Seamonkey using RDF, however you would want Balls of Steel to attempt it, and the solution would probably be annoyingly complex. Whenever he gets time (probably not for version 1.0) David Hyatt (hyatt@netscape.com) mentioned that he could implement dynamic XUL overlays (overlays that persist state, such as item order etc) which would make this sort of thing much easier to set up.

  • Re:Mozilla Recognition (Score:3)

    by benmg ( 69572 ) on Tuesday April 18, 2000 @05:48PM (#1125031) Homepage
    and its a /beta/. people installing this who are not prepared for nigh on anything to happen to their systems DESERVE WHAT THEY GET.

    I've lost a 2 year mailbox to mozilla, but I'm an active developer so I don't care, I know that if we don't test and fix bugs, we get nowhere - we may as well give up and go home.

    remember the IE4 betas? they were pieces of shit. One of them nearly took down my system. Did people claim MS was doomed and that their final release would suck?

    MS did something dramatic with IE4 - even the final version of that browser wasn't perfect, but they'd built themselves a solid platform for ease of upgrade in future versions (5.0, 5.5 - both of which were very stable in beta). Mozilla and Netscape are at the IE4 stage - do something incredibly different.

  • default theme is complex style-wise (Score:5)

    by benmg ( 69572 ) on Tuesday April 18, 2000 @05:09PM (#1125032) Homepage
    You're right, some of the other application packages available that use Mozilla XPToolkit technology are faster (e.g. Aphrodite, Sullivan etc) because their style sheets are significantly simpler.

    One of the problems with the current skin is that it is huge, style wise - many rules for the different components of the UI (grey menubar menus, blue personal toolbar menus, different types of buttons etc), all of which are read into one large soup of style rules, which must be traversed (looking for matches) when resolving style for elements as the content is built (or is changed). This style resolution is a contributor to some of the UI sluggishness you may have seen.

    Once the foundations of skinnability are in place (which is one of my current tasks), we will work to produce a simpler skin that should see some subtle but noticable performance improvements!

    Thanks,

    Ben Goodger
    mozilla.org UI lead
  • Any new wiz-bang features released here? Any more huge packages lumped on?
  • This time, I've got the ftp site in my bookmarks :P While this downloads, I, as many of you I'm sure, are worried that it's still going to be very buggy. Here's hoping that the mean uptime is good and high - I'd be willing to sacrifice speed/some features for stability.
  • Have what it opens to be fully configurable (you choose default: homepage, blankpage, or currentpage), but also allow the new window to inherit the history one step behind (at your discretion [this is configurable too]). Best of both worlds.

    I like that. Moderate parent up as "insightful", please.

    I'm not sure exactly what you mean by "one step behind", but the way I'd do it is the first alt-left (or click on the back button) would take you from your start page to the site you were just at.

    --

  • The Alt-arrow keys for page forward/backward don't seem to work

    bug 26373 [mozilla.org] covers that

    (keyboard shortcuts should be a high priority, but so should a lot of other things, and there's only so much time in a day.)

    --

  • Why mozilla is so slow (Score:4)

    by jesser ( 77961 ) on Tuesday April 18, 2000 @05:48PM (#1125046) Homepage Journal
    Netscape 6 is described [netscape.com] by Netscape as offering "innovative functionality in these key areas", including "Small download size and speed." I guess some of the "small speed" code might have leaked into the open-source version [mozilla.org] as well.

    --

  • Re:Auto-completion and a bit more... (Score:5)

    by jesser ( 77961 ) on Tuesday April 18, 2000 @06:10PM (#1125047) Homepage Journal
    It displays shit correctly, to the spec

    Not really. It's intended to display to the spec (just like any other browser) but still messes up quite often. Most of www.gmx.de [www.gmx.de] gets cut off [mozilla.org], articles linked to from slashdot get jumbled [mozilla.org], etc. Yes, it's open source, so these bugs get fixed in a reasonable amount of time, but mozilla isn't anywhere near being able to claim standards compliance.

    Following the specs to the letter isn't such a great idea anyway, even when they're not contradicting each other and themselves. According to Ian Hickson, image alt text [mozilla.org] is supposed to be displayed as normal text, with nothing distinguishing it from page text, unless the page specifies how broken images are supposed to be displayed. And, oh, the spec for how to say how broken images are displayed will be in the NEXT version [mozilla.org] of CSS for website developers who don't want to use mozilla-specific code. Very few webpages with broken or slashdotted images look good in mozilla as a result, and layout is completely messed up even when width= and height= are specified.

    It's like one dynamic living document... I love it.

    Yeah, it's cool, as long as you have a dual 1Ghz box. (I'm sure it will start getting faster quickly once the features solidify a little more.)

    It's a platform, not a program.

    So why does the security still suck? (see my sig)

    --

  • There should be a way to disable the onLoad and onUnload functions or at the very least be able to prevent them from opening new windows. The most annoying thing about some websites is not being able to view them without them spawning countless child windows.
  • On Windows: Step 1) Get the skin off the net from: http://www.mozillazine.org/chromezone

    Step 2) Upzip the skin into a new folder in your d:\M15\chrome folder and name the folder the same as the skin.

    EXAMPLE: I have 1 skin in D:\M15\chrome\aphrodite\ and another skin in: D:\M15\chrome\hoopyfrood\

    Step 3) Create a text file in d:M15 with a .BAT extention on it and put the following in that text file:

    mozilla.exe -chrome chrome://NAME OF YOUR SKIN FOLDER/content/

    Step 4)If you find yourself frustrated with all of this windows madness, look into installing Linux.
    ___

  • M15 a review (Score:5)

    by Money__ ( 87045 ) on Tuesday April 18, 2000 @06:02PM (#1125063)
    About the box:
    PIII 450 128M Voodoo3AGP running (woefully) Win98.
    About the ball:
    Mozilla M15 (from:ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/r eleases/m15/ [mozilla.org]) Build 2000041805 a 5339K download without the talkback client.

    Impressions:
    [1] Downloading the program is fast. Getting a browser, mail and news in under 6M (1254 files), is impressive.

    [2] click Mozilla.exe --> open browser == 11 seconds. Cool.

    [3] Moving my mouse along the pull down menus, considerable lag when I hover over bookmarks (prolly from the 985 bookmarks:).

    [4] Pulled down QA and loded the smoke tests. all OK.

    [5] Loaded the aphrodite skin. The GO button is a few pixels to low on the tool bar but, It all works well.

    [6] Loaded the Sullivan skin. The back ground color looks like something changed. M15 has a darker grey than the background on the buttons.

    [7] Loaded xml.com [xml.com] Alert: "the connection was refused when attempting to contact adforce.imgis.com". There's a dialog for every time an image doesn't load. had to press OK 8 times.

    [8] Fast...ohmygod fast. Loaded the Jargon file v4.2.0 Jargon.html file from my local drive (2.16M) and saw it on the screen in less than 2 seconds!

    [9] Clean interface, standards compliant, and ohmygod fast.

    [10] My best regards to the entire Mozilla team and to all that help them with this wonderfull platform. Your quality work shows in all that you do. To those of you who have been waiting for a working browser before you start your mozilla development project . . .come and get it! !
    ___

  • Review of Netscape 6 (Score:4)

    by Tim Behrendsen ( 89573 ) on Tuesday April 18, 2000 @04:57PM (#1125065)

    TechWeb has a review [techweb.com] of Netscape 6, preview 1. It's not very flattering. Some quotes:

    "Netscape 6 PR1 is far from ready for prime time, however. It's not even close-- yet."

    "If things remain the same, AOL might succeed at doing to Netscape Navigator and the ever-popular Lizard (Mozilla) what Microsoft (stock: MSFT) and its Internet Explorer were never able to do -- kill it."

    Harsh words -- but in line with many people's experiences that have posted here on Slashdot in the past.

    It will be interesting to see if they can get the problems worked out and make it a competitive browser.


    --

  • It will be better at web-FTP than IE5 for windows, which was the MOST IRRITATING thing I have ever seen. (it turned it into a file folder, but drag and drop didn't work, so you needed to Right Click, Copy To Folder, then do some GODFORSAKEN SHIT to get it to save... that option went off REAL FAST)

    All you have to do is double click on the file and it'll ask you whether you want to download the file. Counter-intuitive, but not as bad as you made it out to be.

    ====

  • Re:Where are the Alt ui's (Score:3)

    by puetzk ( 98046 ) on Tuesday April 18, 2000 @05:45PM (#1125077) Homepage
    different chromes are on http://www.mozillazine.org/chromezone

    the command-line switch you seek is
    ./mozilla -chrome chrome:///content

    chrome support is a bit technical right now, but I think the prefs dialong will have a GUI picker in the near future. In the meantime there are directions for the interested in the chromezone.
  • The next release of Debian, the Linux distro with a motto of 'We may not be cutting edge, but dammit, we're stable, and people like us.' ;)
  • Even better... Opera Preview Release 3 is out. Light, tight and better then before

  • Mirror (Score:3)

    by ebola-zaire ( 122422 ) on Tuesday April 18, 2000 @05:22PM (#1125091) Homepage
    I have a fast mirror site here: ftp://ftp.c-60.org/pub/mozilla/ [c-60.org]

  • Soopah froody! (Score:4)

    by Jikes ( 123986 ) on Tuesday April 18, 2000 @04:54PM (#1125092)
    I am playing with Linux nightly build. It is newer and buggier than M15, which is likely rolled off into another line a week or two before.

    The speed is definately picking up... I remember waiting for form pulldowns to draw... It's very close to the same league as NS4.7, and it's doing a SHITLOAD more.

    The KILLER APP is the UI overhaul themes... I played with a few last night... If you DONT LIKE MOZILLA NOW, WAIT FOR THE NEW THEMES... A lot of the sluggishness is due to the sidebars and the moving crap and shit... Stuff like the ANDREW theme or whatever the fuck it's called makes things SIGNIFICANTLY faster...

    I know because i tried them. =P

    It displays most pages right.

    It never knows when to stop moving the throbber.

    And if you jack up the DPI setting in preferences, you can actually read the fonts.

    No java in the nightlies, oh well.

    It works much better than before, has replaced NS4.7 for me, remembers preferences well, behaves well, and is ACTUALLY GETTING FASTER... I can see what this will become and I seriously like it.

    (faster as in, it is usable on my 400/128 assuming the X server is given a relatively high priority)

    Oh yeah, the little turquoise pulldown next to the address bar with the down arrow is really damn sweet... mozilla has POTENTIAL... I like it.

  • Auto-completion and a bit more... (Score:5)

    by Jikes ( 123986 ) on Tuesday April 18, 2000 @05:27PM (#1125093)
    I believe the code for automatic address-completion went in a couple days ago. It's probably not turned on or something.

    Mozzy has password remembering already set up. It works okay. The mailer is radically better than previously. Javascript works. Most webpages work pretty well.

    It will be better at web-FTP than IE5 for windows, which was the MOST IRRITATING thing I have ever seen. (it turned it into a file folder, but drag and drop didn't work, so you needed to Right Click, Copy To Folder, then do some GODFORSAKEN SHIT to get it to save... that option went off REAL FAST)

    Mozilla knows how to download shit and save and open local files now.

    Mozzy starts up without dying now. The initial load is very sluggish, like everything else. If it is in cache, it starts up very very quickly.

    The biggest gripe is focus issues... They're still fruity and it is far too easy for focus to go into the void, leaving you with a useless shell.

    The extras and the obscene flexibility of the UI definition language will make this a seriously cool thing... If you can't imagine how cool something this flexible will be, then that's sad.

    It's like one dynamic living document... I love it.

    So the colors suck. Deal. You can change them later. A theme manager will likely be set up in a few more months..

    It displays shit correctly, to the spec... There are workarounds for shitty HTML like slashdots...

    It remembers your homepage, it remembers all sorts of shit now. Except that goddamn default toolbar. Oh well.

    Most of what sucks about mozilla is being fixed or can be changed by you... That's what i like about it. And it is free after all.

    And stop bitching about the extra features... The editor and the mail program and all that shit are basically hyper-dynamic webpages. The size is probably going to be like 10MB compressed for EVERYTHING that mozzy does when it gets to netscape release... that includes all SORTS of shit plus new java.

    /me shrugs... It's really not that bad folks. And it will continue to get better as long as AOL keeps dumping enormous amounts of money into the project.... And we all start learning how to design better (faster/more effective) user interfaces for mozilla faster...

    It's a platform, not a program.

  • You can cook up your own skin. www.mozilla.org/chromezone has some cool looking ones, including "Navigator Classic" for "I like the old look" crowd. As for those of you who want your favorite hotkeys, they're been turned off for now. As for me, I just want the memory leak pluged. Nothing big ;-)
  • it is even easier to type this directly in the properties dialog of the launcher;

    cd /path/to/mozilla/package; ./run-mozilla.sh

  • Oh, bah! I use the middle button to paste URLs into Netscape 4.7 on Linux. It goes immediately to the page rather than having to insert the text into the URL control and then editing out the old text. And since the page is a much larger target it's quick and easy. I sure hope that this "feature" can be configured away.

    Anomalous: inconsistent with or deviating from what is usual, normal, or expected
  • Why would you want two copies of the same page, anyway? Opening links in a new window performs this function better.

    1) branch navigation with that page in history
    2) go up a level on that site without leaving the old location
    3) open a new window without having it spend precious time to contact my home portal and trying to download it before I stop it (funny, but Explorer will lose 1 to 2 seconds on this, and that matters for me).

    Karma Police, arrest this man, he talks in maths
    He buzzes like a fridge, he's like a detuned radio

  • Except for carelessly designed pages, hyperlinks are obvious from context, link color or a combination of both. Including the underline as part of the attribute of hypertext should be allowed by the user to be set in the preferences.

    Underlined text is more difficult to read and is ugly.

    The reason underlined text is used at all is because of typewriters. I'll explain.

    Before (and since) the advent of the old-fashioned mechanical typewriter, emphasis in text was achieved through italics or bold or a combination of the two. Underlining was eschewed by professionals for the reasons cited above. How, then, was someone to emphasize text with a typewriter with no italics or bold available? Underlining, of course!

    Then the GUI word processors appeared and an entire generation of typographically-challenged folk retained the underline from their typewriter days instead of restricting their emphasis of text to the bold and italic modes that were suddenly available.

    The default settings of Netscape's Navigator (and the earlier Mosiac) had underline text for links, but the preferences allowed them to be turned off, which, of course, I immediately took advantage of.

    The Mozilla builds I've seen so far have not provided this option. Is anybody listening out there? Please put the option to turn off underlining in the preferences.

    Thanx.

  • I'm windering the same thing. There are several features that I miss in Netscape 6 that are included in IE. Here are some suggestions:

    1)address completion/menu

    2)when opening a new window, got to the current site not the home page

    A few other suggestions:

    1)make it possible to turn of cookies except from sites the user can list

    2)the color scheme is ugly

    3)somehow make it load up faster

    Of course, Mozilla does add certain features that make it bearable despite the frequent errors. Overall, it's a good example of what open source can offer.

  • I'm using Netscape 6 and after turning off the sidebar, it never comes up again. Which version of Mozilla are you using? If it's an older version, try upgrading. If it's M15, then you should report the bug.
  • All this discussion on whether Winmag would be biased against NS 6 is ridiculous because they gave it a glowing review [winmag.com]. The article discussed the preview release at length, calling it a "revolution" and lauding both its features and Netscape's desicion to use an open-source design model. In particular, they frame it as being a real competitor for IE. In fact, it's one of the most positive review of NS6 that I've read. Anyone saying the Winmag is biased against NS should read this before sounding like an idiot.

    The bus came by and I got on
    That's when it all began
    There was cowboy Neal
    At the wheel
    Of a bus to never-ever land

  • M15 (Score:2)

    by meff ( 170550 )
    This release is just mostly bugfixes and speeding it up.. Mozilla is looking really nice..

    BTW, use its FullCircle Feature!! It'll help the developers improve it quicker and more thorough..

    -meff

  • Mozilla Dinosaur icon is THIEVERY (Score:4)

    by Yu Suzuki ( 170586 ) on Tuesday April 18, 2000 @04:56PM (#1125129) Homepage
    The callous attitude shown by Americans towards intellectual property is outrageous. Do you honestly believe that everything on the web is just free for the taking?

    Look at the Mozilla dinosaur icon -- it looks identical to Gojira (aka Godzilla). THIS IS PLAGIARISM. Gojira (aka Godzilla) existed DECADES before the Internet was ever created, let alone the Mozilla project. And don't tell me this is just a coincidence; the name "Mozilla" is obviously intended to sound like "Godzilla". Copyright and trademark law prevents the use of similar names and logos when they are likely to confuse consumers. Well, if I was a consumer, I'd be damned confused -- a browser named "Mozilla" with a dinosaur mascot sure sounds like it's endorsed by Tojo, Inc. This is not true.

    Why this has not been acted on is a mystery to me. The "Mozilla" dinosaur clearly violates Tojo, Inc's copyright on Gojira (aka Godzilla. C'mon, guys, how about choosing something a little more original -- like, say, a ferret? How many ferrets out there do you see as corporate mascots? Huh?

    This post will act as an unofficial petition to the Mozilla developers to select a new mascot that does not resemble Gojira (aka Godzilla). Simply reply to this message if you want to add your name to the list.

    Yu Suzuki

  • Why does this poor person keep getting moderated down? Negative moderation should be reserved for trollz, such as myself.

    Here's something to get your started:
    MODERATORS TOSS MY SALAD WITH JELLY AND SYRUP!!!
    THEY LIKE THE TASTE AND THE TEXTURE!!!
    MMM...MMM...GOOD!!!

    Moderate that, beeeyotches!
    --

Slashdot Top Deals

"Pok pok pok, P'kok!" -- Superchicken

Close