KDE 1.94 "Kandidat" released 104
The folks at KDE e-mailed with the news KDE 1.94 "Kandidat" has been
released. It's the fifth and final beta preview of Kopernicus - which is supposed to ship in the last part of 2000. They also asked folks to use HTTP instead of FTP when downloading it. You can grab it here or read the release for different package formats.
RedHat packages ? (Score:1)
What's wrong with Red Hat? (Score:1)
I'm not impressed.
Re:RedHat packages ? (Score:1)
To uninstall:
Yes, the source takes forever to compile. On my K6-2/500 with 256 megs of RAM, it takes nearly an entire day for just QT and the base KDE packages. Bring on the debs!
Re:aRts/aRtsd (Score:1)
Arts is now in the kdelibs packages, and provides the engine for the soundserver and several players in Kde 2. There is also an Artsbuilder which is a very advanced realtime sound synthesis machine. Artsbuilder needs a little more work yet, but looks good so far. In theory arts can be used for all types of multimedia, not just sound, but so far the emphasis is on sound.
Please note that several of the other music players that come with Kde 2 don't use arts or only use it to stream the sound from the mpeg library, etc. You get two different midi players (one based on Timidity and another on libkmid) and an mp3 player, kaiman (which uses gqmpeg skins), with Kde 2. Also the usual sound mixer, cd player, and sample player apps and sound for window events if you want that.
This may sound confusing, but while arts in in the kde libs now, it doesn't require kde, and has a C api as well as C++. As a sound system it is already used in several different players done by third parties with plugins. However, to build arts seperate from Kde might require some knowledge of the GNU configure utilities. I'm sure that arts can be lifted out of Kde if you know how.
So, when you install the kde 2 betas, or build them, you also get arts. If you are going to the arts web page to get arts independetly of kde, I don't know. It may be out of date because all that is now in kde, and you can get plenty of documentation about arts in the Kde packages. Email the author, Stefan Westerfeld (not sure about spelling) from the arts web page for more information.
Status (aRts/aRtsd) here (Score:1)
Re:Does it work on Alpha, this time?? (Score:2)
Re:It sucks (Score:1)
btw, in case someone tries to tell me to compile it... ya, you sit through compiling it. If the RPM's weren't meant to work, they shouldn't have been on the site.
*/
I did install from source, and I did wait. It's sweet. It's stable. It rocks. The RPMs were made on a somewhat nonstandard install. It's a beta. Get over it.
try the .tar.bz2 source packages (Score:1)
As for RPMs...hell, it's not done yet. Let RH help after KDE is stable (which it's damn close; I installed from source on a Mandrake system, and it rocks
Re:It sucks (Score:1)
Why would this happen? Because RPMs ain't magic. They're cpio archives with some extra crap thrown in. When they work, they're great. When they don't, they're not so great. What causes RPMs to, well, not be so great? The RPMs don't just magically build, they have to be built by people using the software. I've read into building them and, damn, I'd rather not.
The beauty of a system like Linux and the beauty of KDEs source being open is that you can take the source and compile it. That's what you'll have to do if you want to run KDE2 *now.* The KDE2 RPMs I tried were FUBAR. When I compiled from source, everything worked great. The panel works fine, the standard utils work fine, the KOffice stuff works fine...you get the picture.
So, for now, you'll need the source. Wait until someone with a fairly stock RH system builds you some RPMs. And don't blame it on KDE...you sound like a GNOME FUDmonger.
DIE GNOME FUDMONGER (Score:1)
CVS is a way for developers to share code and develop for a common codebase. The CVS version of many projects isn't guaranteed to work. There may be some new code in there that someone wants to try out. Maybe it works; maybe it doesn't. But it stays there. Why? To give others the chance to *fix* it. Did you try to help fix the problem? No? Why, then, did you bother with the CVS? Why not the snapshots? Why not just stick with 1.x?
Personally, I find KDE2 to be quite a bit more developed than GNOME. The GNOME folks are going to have an uphill battle to compete with KDE2. They're going to have to lean on Eazel (a commercial venture, for chrissake) to give them something as good as Konqueror...and even then, it relies on a Bonoboized Mozilla. Ugh.
Miguel, stop posting anonymously.
Re:Why HTTP instead of FTP? (Score:2)
Re:RedHat packages ? (Score:1)
But it's also true, I think, that these package management systems are more complex and thus more failure prone than compiling from source. But it's great when they do work.
yes, but... (Score:1)
Hmm, this is true, but I suspect the KDE authors were not aware of the Konnotation.
Re:Why HTTP instead of FTP? (Score:3)
If you're just downloading something, there are some distinct advantages to HTTP, mainly relating to setup/teardown:
Once you get past setup/teardown, though, both HTTP and FTP are essentially shoving raw bytes down the pipe as fast as they can.
Re:Why HTTP instead of FTP? (Score:2)
Re:konqueror! (Score:2)
Re:Debs! (Score:2)
Re:RedHat packages ? (Score:2)
FreeBSD - bundled QT has no gif support? (Score:1)
Re:FreeBSD - bundled QT has no gif support? (Easy) (Score:1)
I went to freshports.org and downloaded the qt-2.2 port. I uncompressed it into the appropriate directory (/usr/ports/x11-toolkits) and edited the Makefile to include -gif as a configure option.
This is now compiling on my machine, and should give me GIF support. I guess I answered my own question. Hope this helps someone.
Ben
Re:RedHat packages ? (Score:2)
Hrmpf. Packaging standards, anyone?
Re:Why HTTP instead of FTP? (Score:2)
Re:What's wrong with Red Hat? (Score:1)
Redhat makes its money on support. Or rather they make there money gambling that people who buy support will pay for more than they need. No support questions they make lots of money. Support questions trained monkies can anwser by reading up in a database they can make money. And then they can anwser support questions with "we dont support that", there realy happy.
No while RH isnt going out of there way to screw up KDE, and they proably will include it in 7, they secretely, deep down, want it to die so they wont have to support it. They've made there decision that GNOME is going to get there $$ support, and it dose.
But clearly its in there best intrests to concesiouly lag behind on KDE updated so that RH/KDE users get frustrated and move to GNOME, so there trained monkies have a better chance of getting them off the phone quicker.
Re:smooth... (Score:1)
Re:konqueror! (Score:1)
I'm still downloading the new beta, but as of the previous beta, Konqueror is very nice, but not QUITE a replacement for Netscape Navigator yet.
As of Beta 4, I still don't seem to have Java or Javascript working in Konqueror, and it doesn't yet support https:// connections. Cosmetically, it also still seems to have some minor problems with some forms and centering ("www.google.com" is a simple example - the form entry bar should be centered, but ends up over to the left).
On the other hand, it definitely renders pages faster than Navigator does, and is, on the whole, extremely nice. I am now able to use it for many (but not all) of the pages I regularly browse. Netscape plugins seem to work okay (at least, Flash does).
I'm looking forward to being able to get rid of the last closed program I regularly use (Netscape Navigator) Any Day Now. (KMail has already enabled me to go from "communicator" to the lighter "navigator" package for Netscape. Thanks, KDE team!)
Joe Sixpack is dead!
Compiler version important? (Score:1)
The Background: I'm running a system based originally on Slackware 7.0 (with many updates - call it "Slackware 7.05" if you want), with, up until today, the original compiler (egcs 1.1.2) that came with 7.0. Trying to compile KDELIBS-1.94 bombed out in the KIO section...
To make a long story short (and to help cover up the fact that I didn't write down the error messages), apparently a utility called kcopidl (or was it mcopidl? ARGH! I knew I should have written it down...), which compiled earlier in the kdelibs package and was needed for compiling the rest of the package, was segfaulting. Fortunately, I'd already downloaded the slackware packages for gcc 2.95.2 from the contrib directory, and I uninstalled egcs and installed gcc 2.95.2. It compiles now.
Man, all those words just to say 'I had trouble compiling, too, until I updated to the current compiler'. Guess it's been a long week...
Joe Sixpack is dead!
Re:Why HTTP instead of FTP? (Score:2)
------------------
Re:Kandidat? WTF? (Score:2)
Remember many of KDE's developers are European, but, more to the point, 'Kandidat' follows the general predilection of the KDE project to name everything something that starts with a 'K' even if it's a misspelling (Konquerer) or just a 'K' stuck in front of a word in the tradition of 'xblah' (KOffice).
--Parity
Re:Qt 2.2.0 vs gcc 2.95.2 (Score:2)
--Parity
smooth... (Score:1)
Of course, since they requested everyone to use HTTP, Hemos cleverly used an FTP link on the /. front page instead. Boy, do I pity their server right about now :)
Re:smooth... (Score:1)
Only by comparison to my previous post...
Re:smooth... (Score:2)
It's official: I'm a moron. Time for some more coffee...
Re:smooth... (Score:2)
----
Re:It sucks (Score:2)
The RPMs I found were for Mandrake (lucky for me, since that;s what I use)
Mandrake puts KDE in the "right" place (/opt/kde)
Red Hat for some stupid reason puts kde elsewhere. This has been a sore point for users of KDE on Red Hat for awhile.
I'm downloading now to install on my Thinkpad. If it's nice, I'll put it on my work machine.
-geekd
Re:It sucks (Score:2)
it DOES SUCK.
at least with the RPMs provided, it sucks ass. Many many things don't work. Many apps will not launch.
is sucks.
can I say that again? it sucks.
Maybe if I get motivated, tonight I will download the source and try to compile it myself.
-geekd
Re:Diff packages from 1.93 version? (Score:1)
Re:Reason to keep KDE Around... (Score:2)
Lots of people. And that's one reason why GNOME is becoming the "official" desktop and KDE isn't. C++ libs just don't jive with C programs. Especially for libraries, C is the lowest common denominator, and you CAN write GTK+ applications in C++, but you CAN'T write KDE/Qt applications in C.
JPop == Cheezy^3 (Score:1)
Nasty.
Re:FreeBSD - bundled QT has no gif support? (Easy) (Score:1)
Re:konqueror! (Score:2)
As of Beta 4, I still don't seem to have Java or Javascript working in Konqueror
Hurm. Try going to "Settings | Configure | Browser" and turn on Java and JavaScript.
I personally think it should be turned on by default. (And I'm using the 3rd beta, and it's working fine. For later releases, I assume it's still working and disabled by default. YMMV).
--
Evan
Why HTTP instead of FTP? (Score:2)
Anyhow, congrats to KDE team for getting one step closer to the release. Your users everywhere thank you for the hard work!
Sumo? (Score:1)
I'm tired of having to download PIECES of either
one. I want something like the xemacs "sumo"
package archive, so I can just grab it and know
that I've got everything. Sure, leave the little
tarballs for folks running over a 2400 baud
connection, but I WANT IT ALL!!!
aRts/aRtsd (Score:1)
Re:RedHat packages ? (Score:1)
---
Diff packages from 1.93 version? (Score:1)
did anybody have the diff from the previous version? It is a pain downloading 20Mb everytime.
THX
Max
Re:Kan you say "Kommunist"? (Score:1)
Re:Kandidat? WTF? (Score:1)
--
Re:ftp instead of http.. (Score:1)
(i wonder how many people got this)
Re: Shut up dad. (Score:1)
Cuz I'm Doug, and I'm outta heeeeaaar.
_______________
you may quote me
It sucks (Score:1)
Let me get this straight... This is the 5th BETA, and the next release will be the official one, right? Folks, if that's true, I'm afraid the public is going to be disappointed. I mean, goodness!
I downloaded all the packages listed. Installed them all. Started up KDE and was prepared to be impressed...
Hmm, that bottom bar is a bit big. That's ok, just right click and change it to "Tiny". What's this? The Main Menu and the desktop chooser buttons suddenly become question mark documents? ok.. bug, I guess.
Well, I heard that Koffice was cool. I'll try that. Click KWord. Nothing happens. Click it again. Nothing happens. Same with KSpread and KPresenter. Hmm, don't tell me the install went wrong. I used the official BETA RPM's on their site. I know, I could've compiled, but I shouldn't have to.
Well, how about Konquerer at least? Hmm.. same thing as Koffice. One last try... Click the File Manager link in the menu. Comes up at least, with the name Konquerer in the header, but all I see is gray with a Help button in the menu.
Well, now I guess it's time to dust off the good ol' rpm -e.
btw, in case someone tries to tell me to compile it... ya, you sit through compiling it. If the RPM's weren't meant to work, they shouldn't have been on the site.
_______________
you may quote me
Re:It sucks (Score:1)
Why exactly is it that the RPM's were built on a "nonstardard install"? Isn't the point of an RPM to be a package installed on a particular distribution? In other words, I downloaded the mandrake RPM's because I'm running mandrake on this machine. The RPM should be for use on a standard distribution.
Now, if this is BETA software, why would they put the package together in a nonstandard way? It seems to me that they're asking for problems. And it also seems they don't realize that those who try their RPM's aren't going to go through the trouble of using the final release if the RPM's didn't work. Wouldn't you agree?
I mean, I was using the thing 10 minutes and found 5 huge problems. If this was the latest Windows BETA everyone would jump on top of it, but because it's KDE it's somehow ok? Come on!
While I know compiling is always the best choice, in my case, it wasn't realistic. RPM's were the next best choice. Unfortunately, according to you, someone had the genius to make them in a "nonstandard" way. And well, that's their mistake.
I didn't like KDE two years ago, I should've known I'd have problems with it today.
_______________
you may quote me
Re:It sucks (Score:1)
What I'd really be interested in is why a personal experience qualifies as flaimbait.
Oh well, maybe Meta Moderation will come to the rescue.
_______________
you may quote me
Qt 2.2.0 vs gcc 2.95.2 (Score:1)
The right solution, of course, would be to fix gcc. Unfortunately, the next official gcc release is still a few months away (AFAIK), so it would have to be compiled against a (possibly patched) snapshot. Can't see a binary like this going into debian, especially since gcc development snapshots don't neccessarily produce efficient (or even working) code.
Does anyone see a way out of this dilemma, except for sitting in the corner and continuing to whine?
Re:Qt 2.2.0 vs gcc 2.95.2 (Score:1)
Still, it's a good idea. moc and ld probably won't play nicely here, but I only need it to build a few object files anyway, linking can be done later.
Re:Sumo? (Score:2)
Re:Bleeding edge RedHat packages ? (Score:1)
Johan
Re:Packages (Score:1)
Johan
cvsup sucks (Score:1)
I don't because last time I tried I discovered my incredbile distaste for cvsup, which (correct me if I'm wrong) is an ugly gui application. With regular cvs I could write a little script and update my sources at a regular interval. With cvsup that functionality is gone.
Off Topic I am. Ranting I will. Yes. Woooooh. (Score:1)
If only that were true. JPop is still way better than wussy American Pop or boring American dance (eight notes, over and over, and no electric guitar - *yawn*).
Oh, since people like talking to moderators, I will too: I have a +1 bonus, and I didn't use it. Consider this post already modded down. Please and thank you.
Re:Their choice of names? (Score:1)
Re:konqueror! (Score:1)
helix-gnome? (Score:1)
if it works for you, the helix-gnome install process is a joyous wonder to behold, and easy to boot. it is especially great over a fast network connection, but you can even do it over a modem over several nights-- the installer program stores the packages you select somewhere in /tmp until it
has all of the ones you selected. once you finally
get all the packages, then it installs fine.
helix-gnome is pretty cool if you ask me.
Re:helix-gnome? (Score:1)
Re:JPop == Cheezy^3 (Score:1)
Re:RedHat packages ? (Score:1)
They appear to be updated today, but they're still marked as 1.93.
And for the http people: http://people.redhat.com/bero/experimental/ [redhat.com]
Re:RedHat packages ? (Score:1)
From bero's web page: "Some experimental packages for Red Hat Linux 6.2..."
Re:RedHat packages ? (Score:2)
Below is a link to a redhat employee's ftp space. He makes unofficial rpms of the latest kde betas. Currently there's 1.93. Hopefully he should have 1.94 up soon (1-2 weeks, from the 1.93 dates).
ftp://people.redhat.com/bero/RPMS/ [redhat.com]
Re:Their choice of names? (Score:1)
The Klu Klux Klan devised this naming system, which should be obvious from the name above.
Obviously, African-Americans prefer Gnome.
I don't know if midgets do or not though.
I think African-American midgets probably just use Windowmaker.
Re:yes, but... (Score:1)
And why is my post a troll now, I thought it was funny.
Re:smooth... (Score:1)
Re:What's wrong with Red Hat? (Score:1)
Re:Their choice of names? (Score:1)
Re:Sumo? (Score:1)
-iceburn- Sitting quietly, doing nothing. Spring comes, and the grass grows by itself.
Re:Kandidat? WTF? (Score:1)
Re:How long is a "part"? (Score:1)
Which probably means sometimes between October, 1st and november, 15th.
Re:konqueror! (Score:1)
konqueror! (Score:3)
Re:Diff packages from 1.93 version? (Score:4)
Re:What's wrong with Red Hat? (Score:1)
Re:Debs! (Score:1)
Re:Why HTTP instead of FTP? (Score:1)
Re:aRts/aRtsd (Score:2)
The arts web site does have a small note that basically says 'arts is in KDE 2.0', and leaves it at that.
I'd like to know if it is compatable with ESD-aware apps, since there seem to be quite a few of those.
KDE to ??BECOME?? more popular than gnome??? (Score:1)
Right now, KDE is mostly used in europe and asia(japan). In the US, gnome is more popular than KDE, simply because Redhat is one of the few distributions who install Gnome as default, and it is the most used distribution in the states. But the US isn't the entire world you know...
I live in Belgium, and I am a member of tina [tina-linux.org], a local Linux and other alternative OS's users group
I can tell you KDE is far more used than Gnome. The few who have Redhad installed, run Gnome, most of the rest just tried it, but stayed with KDE. I switch windomanagers a lot, I tried Gnome, but found it sometimes confising (and at that time unstable). I just couldn't get a more recent verion of gnome working on my slackware, so I stick with KDE. I just hope it is really much faster and more memory efficient than 1.x, now most applications don't use corba anymore, because that was KDE's weak spot, and that's why I still run windowmaker a lot.
GOOD WORK KDE TEAM, KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK
containing... (Score:1)
Re:DIE GNOME FUDMONGER - Last post... (Score:1)
Re:Why HTTP instead of FTP? (Score:1)
Re:Sumo? (Score:1)
Re:konqueror! (Score:1)
Re:How long is a "part"? (Score:1)
Re:RedHat packages ? (Score:1)
Axel
Re:How long is a "part"? (Score:1)
Lim[t->(end of the year)] (Mean(expected time E of release)/(End of the year - t)) = 0
Or maybe I'm spending a little bit too much time studying for my algorithms class. ok bye.
Axel
I like ftp the best (Score:1)
Re:JPop == Cheezy^3 (Score:1)
Re:konqueror! (Score:1)
Re:smooth... (Score:1)
Re:yes, but... (Score:1)
Yeah, it is that bad. PC is still on rampage.
Re:Why HTTP instead of FTP? (Score:1)
Re:User Agent Spoofing, Finally! (Score:2)
Debs! (Score:2)
deb ftp://kde.tdyc.com/pub/kde/debian unstable kde2
Do an apt-get update, then apt-get install task-kde and you're ready to go.
Enjoy. I've been running the kooldown release awile now, so far I like it. Startup is a bit slower than GNOME though. Wonder if that's changed in the latest version...
Re:RedHat packages ? (Score:3)
I personally use stow [gnu.org] to manage software that isn't part of the distribution. When compiling, --prefix=/usr/local/stow/package-name then build as normal. When it's done, cd to