Adorable Little Linux Boxes 138
An anonymous reader wrote in to tell us about an article describing the CerfCube. 192Mhz StrongArm, 32MB RAM, 16MB flash, ethernet, CompactFlash, 3 serial ports and a USB port. Not impressed? Well how about that it's only a 3 inch cube? The box runs Linux and Apache. We did a previous story about it, but this is much more informative about the internals.
Microdrive! (Score:1)
The Compact Flash 2 ports accept the IBM Microdrive. 1GB versions of which are already available.
Cerfcube mailing list (Score:1)
Re:Heat? (Score:1)
Re:It's not really a cube... (Score:2)
It's the licensing issue. If I was selling embedded stuff - I would rather have grabbed Linux then CE - because I can sell much more, and I don't need the licensing or paying Microsoft for each copy. That way I can charge less the customer and probably get a good stand point to sell my products..
I'm sure that someone will make a version of Linux as easy (or easier?) to use then CE - all the players here are commercial players, and one of those will probably make it.
Re:Diskspace? (Score:2)
The IBM Microdrive [ibm.com] is a CF form factor hard drive with sizes from 350MB to 1GB. Maybe that's what you found in your pocket?
Or maybe it was a USB hard drive [everythingusb.com]?
Or maybe, since it has onboard ethernet, you could just have it nfs mount its root directory [linuxdoc.org]?
More Pictures of the Cube (and its guts) (Score:4)
David E. Weekly [weekly.org]
New pick up line ruined. (Score:2)
...
"Oh. It's a Linux Box."
Re:Build Your Own? (Score:1)
--
Re:Stick It Up a Tux (Score:2)
"mounted as /." (Score:1)
I had to read that sentence three times to not parse it as 'mounted as slashdot', 8^)
--
Hmm, this is close to the iPaq and empeg in specs (Score:2)
NeXT Box (Score:1)
The reason it was probaby dropped was because someone figured out that the Cobalt Cube resembles the NeXT box. The NeXT box coming before the Cobalt Cube and Apple having bought out NeXT probably put a crimp in their lawsuit...
Re:Is there an Apple Lawyer in the house? (Score:1)
No, they didn't copyright a simple shape, they copyrighted (or whatever form of protection they used), the shape plus the colorings, etc... There are plenty of ofther form factors for all-in-one computers to follow (go find one of those Mac history sites, and you can see probably 6 or 8 other form factors apple has devised over the years). Nor did they copyright an all in one computer. And as far as i can tell, they've not copyrighted cube shaped computer either. The case may change when someone ships a 7" silver cube which sits atop a 1" clear plexiglass pedistle, but until then...
Re:Not impressed at all (Score:1)
Re:Heat? (Score:1)
--Xantho
Embedded controllers (Score:3)
You're not going to see this in any Slurpee or other embedded type machine. The more complex and interesting machines of this type all use PLC's (Programmable Logic Controllers). Small base model PLC's can be had for $50-$100. You program them in "Ladder Logic", which is amazingly friendly for machine language. They are actually really cool.
For embedded controls like this you don't need fast or powerful. You need rock solid reliability, a lot of tolerance for abuse, and a very simplistic programming language that makes it difficult or impossible to do something stupid. Of course if you want something with more pizzazz, like a graphical screen and touch control, I can see this little Linux device fitting right in.
Chris
What I really want is an in between... (Score:2)
What I really want is an in between system, smaller than a microATX desktop, but not so small as the box in this /. article. Something on the order of size of an old Sun 411 case or a "lunchbox" case at the largest, would be about right. I would be looking for 2 versions, one with and one without harddrive. The harddrive can be a smaller laptop (2.5 inch) type. I also want this to be i386 based, but it doesn't need to be the fastest processor, so the slower and smaller i386 embedded processors will probably do the job.
What I found when I went searching for this a few months ago was several companies making various SBCs, but no one making a complete system based on it. I don't want to get into the hardware building business over this. One problem was that these components were not designed to fit right into a small box with others. In most cases they were not all integrated (e.g. no ethernet ports ... I need 2 since these will be firewalls) and depended on add on slots they had, which if used made for setups that would never fit in a decent box.
The configuration should be simple enough. Based on an embedded chipset and CPU, such as a 200 MHz embedded 486 class CPU, with one or two DIMM slots for RAM, one or two IDE interfaces, one or two serial ports, minimalist VGA video and keyboard (if not console over serial) and maybe even a mouse port. I do need dual ethernet and it needs to be integrated, so whoever builds this is clearly going to have to think "firewall market".
I bet I'll get several people suggesting that I check out this company or that company. I've gotten those many times before and these companies turn out to make SBCs, but none are configured right, and none come fully built in a box with power supply. So if you are temped to make such a suggestion, it probably already has been made. If you do know that they do make this box, then it hasn't been made because I have seen no such company, yet.
If you are interested in starting a businesses building hardware and doing something with SBCs, you might consider this firewall market. But do remember that the higher end "firewall" will also be a web proxy and mail (SMTP+POP3) server as well, and maybe even more than that. It's more of the next evolution of a smaller system box.
Re:MicroATX computers (Score:2)
I already do this with microATX machines. But they are 2 to 3 times more volume (mostly wasted air) than they need to be. This is why I am looking for the next step smaller. Sun used to make the Sparc IPC, IPX, and LX machines about the right size. But I need dual ethernet, IDE, and prefer an Intel CPU (but it doesn't need to be hyper fast ... one of the embedded x86 CPUs would be fine ... 200-300 Mhz is plenty of speed). Since it will be a firewall, fancy video is not needed and serial console would be acceptable (but one serial port for backup dialout modem would be useful, too). To keep the internal geometry in control, it all needs to be integrated on one board without requiring the use of any PCI slot cards to achieve the basic requirements.
Diskspace? (Score:1)
Oh, right. I forgot about that 60Gb flash card I had in my pocket.
Give me a break,
-S
Scott Ruttencutter
Re:Now what? (Score:1)
The words of the prophets were written by the slashdot trolls.
Still rythmically ok, but more true to the spirit of the original lyrics I think.
--
Poliglut [poliglut.com]
Re:It's not really a cube... (Score:4)
And yes, the reference board is for integrating into *other* devices.. Nice nifty setup.. I can think of half a dozen projects right now..
Re:AppleCube,GameCube, CerfCube... (Score:2)
drool... (Score:1)
Re:Then be impressed =) (Score:1)
We do run X windows on the board. It was a lot of "fun". I would like the fantastic people on the Xfree86 project, expecially Keith Packard, and Jim Getty for writing the "Tiny X" server. It is just like normal X Windows(same extensions), but lacks the unimportant features that an embedded device does not need, like laodable modules, or configuration files for different hardware layouts.
All in all, the libraries are ~2mb and the X server is ~700k. Then add all the extras, for another ~1mb.
So, for around 3-5mb, you can run X off the cerfpod.
By taking a position of superiority you show how nearsighted you are. Thus Spake ADRA
Re:Not impressed at all (Score:3)
You can actually hot swap the CF cards on the fly. The static issue is becuase the PCB is exposed, so there is a chance for the individual to touch some component and have it burn out.
The static grounding makes it safe to touch the electronics inside. You don't have to tiptoe around the thing with the fear of frying it.
My words, are my own, thanks.
By taking a position of superiority you show how nearsighted you are. Thus Spake ADRA
A Behind the Scenes Look at Product Development... (Score:1)
Man in Suit: Who will buy this?
Man in Lab Coat: We'll get front page coverage on Slashdot, and countless Linux geeks and wannabe Linux geeks (because it's cool to be a Linux geek and it allows you to make fun of people who use other operating systems that, although they work fine for their purposes, are clearly inferior and evil and STUPID!) will load our page, admire our design, perhaps post a comment or two, and continue about their daily work.
Man in Suit: Who will buy this, again?
Man in Lab Coat: I'm not really sure, as most people who have a need for lower end hardware like this already have old 486's or first-gen Pentiums on their desktop and probably didn't pay much more than $50-$100 for them, but DAMN is this COOL... and besides, we'll get on Slashdot!
Slash based site (Score:1)
Then be impressed =) (Score:1)
computer history (Score:1)
Re:Now what? hehehe (Score:1)
~Sean
Re:Prediction (Score:2)
Re:Unbiased reporting would say CE too... (Score:3)
anything similar for NAS? (Score:2)
I'm looking for a cheap and simple "appliance"-grade storage scheme. An ethernet jack, fixed IP address or DHCP, some Samba and FTP, and a drive bay. Nothing more. No shells, no boot sequence, no integrated USB jacks.
It would seem like this CerfCube and a matching DiskCube device would make a great little pair for simple stuff... of course you wouldn't want to host 10Khits/hour on it, but it could probably run a few fetch-and-store daily operations.
Re:anything similar for NAS? (Score:2)
Responding to self...
Poking around a little, I found this:
Snap Server [snapserver.com] supporting AppleShare, NetWare Bindery, SMB, NT Domain Controller, and remote administration.
Also, less interesting, basically a plain headless PC box with drive bays. Axis Storage Server [axis.com], from the same guys who make the self-contained network-attached web camera.
Not impressed at all (Score:3)
cute & fragile, like a baby lizard (Score:1)
If that's the case, then what good is this in most embedded applications? I think embedded system and I think of a controller for a sorting belt on a warehouse floor or some sort of remote collection device. You need a semi-hardened system for that sort of situation.
Still, it's cute, and I really like the fact that it includes a 10Mbit NIC.
-carl
Ehh, compare to iPaq? (Score:4)
The iPaq 36xx handheld models have about 206MHz StrongARM processor, with 16-64MB Flash and RAM. They have USB, they have everything. The price vary between $300-$600. ...and the size is about 5x3x0.6 inches, which is much less volume than the cube has.
But, of course, the iPaqs come with LoseCE preinstalled, although Linux works too [handhelds.org]. I don't know if Apache has yet been ported, but it might have.
While they are not cute cubes, they fit much better in your pocket.
What I'd like to see is server farms based on tiny ipaq-sized low-power processor cards. Just stuff one 4U box full of those and whheeee....
Kinda reminds you of a borg cube (Score:2)
paperweights (Score:1)
furbies (Score:1)
Re:Diskspace? (Score:2)
=\=\=\=\=\=\=\=\=\=\=\=\=\=\=\=\=\=\=\=
Re:Heat? (Score:1)
Er, make that 10 -- five in the front and five in the back. at that rate, you could end up with almost a quarter of your space taken up with hubs and switches for connectivity.
--
NOT as small as you're lead to think (Score:2)
So much for a 2.2 x 2.4 inch CerfBoard [linuxdevices.com] in a 3x3x3 inch box! Anybody know how big the power supply is? They imply it's huge by not mentioning anything about it's size other than what I quoted above.
*SO* close to off the shelf wearables... (Score:2)
If only there were an easy way to hook a Linux equipped PS2 to a battery supply...
The only "intuitive" interface is the nipple. After that, it's all learned.
Re:Diskspace? (Score:1)
Linux cerfcube specs. karmawhore_count++; (Score:2)
Specifications
CerfBoard-SA 1110 CPU Board
Processor - Intel® StrongARM(TM) 1110 microprocessor @ 133/206 MHz
Memory - 16 MB FLASH (3.3V or 5V); 32 MB SDRAM (100 MHz)
Flash Programming - TAG support through CPU, download through Ethernet
Data Connectivity - 10BaseT Ethernet RJ45 port; USB Type B port, 1 RS232 serial port (2 line) from 10-pin row header
CompactFlash+ header - supports Type I and II cards, including IBM microdrive, CompactFlash memory cards, barcode readers, and wireless modems
I/O- 16 digital lines (all lines have programmable interrupt capability, and the first four have buffered LED indicators)
Size - 2.24" x 2.73" (57mm x 69mm)
Power - 5VDC regulated, 400mA (with no CompactFlash device; peak of 800 - 900 mA (for example, with IBM microdrive)
Software Support Environment
Intrinsyc Standard Linux distribution (Kernel 2.4)
Apache Webserver
Sendmail
Blackdown Java
Perl
SSH
DHCP
Each CerfCube Kit Contains
CerfCube
Cables
Power Supply
Documentation
Other Kits Available
Linux OEM Developers' Kits (ODKs)
CerfPod for Linux ODK - Intel StrongARM(TM) 1110-based PDA reference design with 5.7" LCD and touchscreen
Windows CE ODKs
CerfCube - Windows CE
CerfPod ODK - Windows CE
Intrinsyc Software Development Toolkits
Compatible with Intrinsyc Software Development Toolkits, including deviceCOM for Linux and deviceOPC for Linux
NOTE: ALL SPECIFICATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE.
product website (Score:4)
http://www.intrinsyc.com/products/referenceplatfo
Re:Diskspace? (Score:1)
Adorable little non-Linux boxes (cheaper, though) (Score:2)
I'm a-fixin' to buy me a couple to control some analog video switch gear. I love Linux, but I'm a cheap bastard, too.
*f*
Re:Is there an Apple Lawyer in the house? (Score:1)
Re:Neaty Keeno! (Score:1)
Re:furbies (Score:1)
-Paul
Re:Unbiased reporting would say CE too... (Score:1)
Re:Unbiased reporting would say CE too... (Score:1)
Check the PDF for the stats (Score:2)
Looks good. Could be a fun box to fart around with, but for $400, man, that is a lot of beer money!
I'll be impressed when... (Score:1)
but this is still damn cool. Port Etherial to it, have it dump its results to a networked computer...you have your own personal spypet! Of course, the government probably has had them for years...:c)
Insert witty comment here
Re:Then be impressed =) (Score:1)
Insert witty comment here
the first cube I'd buy (Score:2)
Re:product website (Score:1)
Does the thing have capabilities for adding an EIDE controller to it? If you can, it would mean one of these Bitty Boxes could be used as a full-fledged server.
The possibilities are indeed interesting.
----
http://www.msgeek.org/html/
Re:Build Your Own? (Score:1)
http://www.directron.com/ms6215.html
(not putting a hotlink here so the goat sex traumatized won't have to worry about following it, just copy and paste into a new window)
This has built-in just about everything, but for a teeny web server or NAT box it would work. Actually my plans for this puppy are more ambitious...drop a DVD-ROM into it, shove a huge HD into it, a better sound card and a Hollywood decoder card...voila, instant TIVO box/Super-DVD player.
It's MicroStar...it's made to better standards than those evil PC Chips "Book PC" boxen.
The box is $239. It includes a mobo with built in video, (no shared RAM...4MB VRAM on the mobo) NIC and audio. The audio prolly sucks so I'll use an Ensoniq card I have lying around. It'll take a Celery or a PIII. I suggest Celery due to heat issues. It also takes standard components: standard CD-ROM, standard floppy, no "slim" or "low profile" nonsense.
No, I don't work for Directron.
----
http://www.msgeek.org/html/
It almost seems.. (Score:2)
Re:It's not really a cube... (Score:1)
Let me guess, its a red '88 Monte Carlo in desperate need of some new springs and a reindeer hood ornament complete with light up nose?
Re:Unbiased reporting would say CE too... (Score:1)
Coming here for Microsoft's side of any story is like going to a Baptist Minister for Satan's outlook.
Re:Unbiased reporting would say CE too... (Score:1)
I swear that was a coincidence.
Re:The neat thing (Score:2)
"Yeah, I think I saw the cat playing with it again."
Re:Heat? (Score:2)
.
Re:It's not really a cube... (Score:2)
No one would, but that's the point. Use linux and no one would notice or care. Install a Windows based OS and there would be stickers all over the damn thing. Not to mention the crashes.
you're officially worse than Microsoft.
How is he "officially" worse than Microsoft. Has he been endorsed by a standards body. Is he ANSI Worse or W3C Worse?
Re:Now what? (Score:2)
..snort..snort..
Damn, this is some good shit.
Re:furbies (Score:3)
Heat? (Score:2)
Re:Heat? (Score:1)
But it's a 3" cube. That means you could easilly stuff five of them in the space of two 1.5" full-width racks.
Still not very practical, but you just know it's only a matter of time before some smart-ass does it, for the 15 minutes of fame when he publishes the web photo, if nothing else.
An idea for further development (Score:1)
As a person who uses Linux quite systematically, I don't give a damn whether my computer has inside it an i386, a PPC, an UltraSPARC or an ARM. Much was done to ensure that Linux was platform independent, and as far as I can judge it is.
The PC hardware is burdened by hundreds of legacy solutions, for example the memory model, the peripherial interfaces and the BIOS. A newly designed board will do much better.
So what I would personally like to see is a cheap non-i386 board which has IDE (or at least SCSI) connectors, video out, USB, Ethernet, and possibly an audio system. I do not think it'll require a form factor exceeding that of a set-top box. To sum up, it's like a SUN workstation, just cheaper. I hope that someday I'll be able to see such a system upon my desk.
Re:Build Your Own? (Score:1)
You kinda mentioned why this product is still in some ways better: the size really is incredible. Then there is also the power consumption, which I guess is much smaller with StrongARM than x86. (Although Celerons need less than Durons, for example.)
Re:Heat? (Score:1)
These cubes might be more at home sitting on the kitchen cabinet for surfing while cooking, or something along that line. They are styled to look more like a typical home appliance than anything else.
-premier
Re:It's not really a cube... (Score:1)
Linux is good, but if you honestly think it ought to be the OS of every computer from the largest supercomputer to the tiniest embedded system, you're officially worse than Microsoft.
Why would anyone care what OS the Slurpee dispenser is running?
Re:Not impressed at all (Score:2)
People are way too impressed with this (Score:1)
Call me a flamer if you will, and I'm not necessarily blaming anyone for wanting to check out a cool device, but its upsetting to see the important issues overlooked because people are jerking off to the new Ikea Catalog.
Re:Intoxicated Tux (Score:1)
Somebody mod this guy up (Score:1)
Re:People are way too impressed with this (Score:2)
Re:It's not really a cube... (Score:2)
Neaty Keeno! (Score:2)
-- .sig are belong to us!
All your
Re:Neaty Keeno! (Score:4)
You run in to a gravel hauler.-more-
40 other vehicles plow into you.-more
You have died.
-- .sig are belong to us!
All your
Re:Neaty Keeno! (Score:4)
Form factor (Score:2)
That, and how many of us own a computer that could be mistaken for a Post-It Note holder?
Enter the contest! (Score:2)
"Pussy: You spend 9 months trying to get out of it, and the rest of your life trying to get back in..."
Re:It's not really a cube... (Score:4)
TINI (Score:2)
However, iButton [ibutton.com] produce a java-based embedded computer called TINI [ibutton.com] that sells for $50, including Ethernet, RS232, 1-wire & can buses. A new version is due later this year which has a 10x speed increase, it also integrates all the functions of the device into a single chip, excluding flash.
Re:MicroATX computers (Score:2)
Build Your Own? (Score:4)
The board has audio, video, Ethernet integrated, granted integrated components are often lacking, but this wont affect anything if you use it as a small server or NAT/Firewall box.
This is obviously different to the actual Cube, that being a true embedded system.
There's smaller FlexATX and NLX kit about too. The parts and thermal solutions are scarce though.
Unbiased reporting would say CE too... (Score:2)
The article that you link to doesn't mention CE at all... although I'm definately not a CE fan, it has it's uses, and should have been mentioned in any reasonably non-biased forum.
Pity... as much as we accuse Microsoft of being eletist and anti-competive, things like this don't make the Open Source / Linux movement look any better.
MadCow.
Is there an Apple Lawyer in the house? (Score:2)
Stick It Up a Tux (Score:4)
We could all curl up to a linux box at naptime.
It's easy to write songs, you just sit down and write them.
Re:It's not really a cube... (Score:2)
You or I may not care, but 7-11 sure does. Embedded devices are not usually known for their interfaces. They work hard at small jobs for their whole lives (like my elves (elfs if you're anal)).
Note that the board also supports WinCE. I'd wager that CE was the first OS ported to the device, the ease of setting up a CE system compared to setting up a Linux system is amazing.
Dancin Santa
It's not really a cube... (Score:3)
If this catches on, this is where Linux will see huge (but perhaps invisible) growth.
Dancin Santa
Re:cute & fragile, like a baby lizard (Score:2)
Though, perhaps this is the nefarious side of my brain speaking, this seems like it would be the perfect packet sniffer for a large network. Would you notice a three inch cube hidden in a server rack? Probably not unless you go looking for it.
slashdotted (Score:2)
Reb
Is it blue? (Score:2)
Marketing the CerfCube (Score:2)
CerfCube(TM): Part Computer, Part Hackisack, All Linux
The neat thing (Score:5)
--