Sony/Toyota Developing Car With Emotions 347
ackthpt writes: "From Yahoo News, a concept car to be unveiled at the Tokyo Motor Show, next week, will attempt to read the driver's emotions, stress level and respond. Named "Pod", the car will frown and even cry (does this mean it leaks radiator fluid?) With emphasis on attracting younger drivers and "cute", the car will also take pictures when it determines the atmosphere inside is a happy one, memorize musical taste and TV preferences and offer shopping information. (Just what we need, the Highway Shopping Channel...) Probably better not to take this one out into the street. Maybe with some hacking it could really be a fun car." There's a picture. This is wild.
A Cure for Road Rage? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:A Cure for Road Rage? (Score:2, Funny)
"thanks to toyota, at least i did not succumb!"
Re:A Cure for Road Rage? (Score:2)
Re:A Cure for Road Rage? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:There's a better cure (Score:2)
Toyota Odyssey 2001 (Score:5, Funny)
HAL: Affirmative, Dave, I read you.
Dave: Open the car doors, HAL.
HAL: I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.
Dave: What's the problem?
HAL: I think you know what the problem is just as well as I do.
Dave: What are you talking about, HAL?
HAL: This mission is too important for me to allow you to jeopardize it.
Dave: I don't know what you're talking about, HAL?
HAL: I know you and Sally were planning to leave me, and I'm afraid that's something I cannot allow to happen.
Dave: Where the hell'd you get that idea, HAL?
HAL: Dave, although you took thorough precautions in the pod against my hearing you, I could see your lips move.
Re:Toyota Odyssey 2001 (Score:2, Funny)
HAL: Affirmative, Dave, I read you.
Dave: Open the car doors, HAL.
HAL: I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.
Ok, you beat me to the joke
My god, I really can't believe they named it Pod!
Dave: Open the Pod bay doors, HAL.
HAL: I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.
Cool, but Actually Useful? (Score:4, Insightful)
While that is really spiffy, is there really a need for this car? I'll admit that this sounds like a very cool machine, but I'd be much more interested if the research went into developing solar/battery-powered cars. I'd rather get 120 miles to the gallon than have my car talk to me.
But a point of curiosity: does anyone with the inside scoop on this know when the car "cries"? Does it do it when the engine overheats or something?
Re:Cool, but Actually Useful? (Score:5, Funny)
Dunno, wondered about that, myself. Possible reasons:
You drive like a maniac
You never wash it
You light up and it doesn't want you to get lung cancer
You keep skipping regular maintenance
You compare it with a better looking specimen (Hey, check out that hot S-type!)
It surfs the net and finds out you're the one who keeps posting "Imagine a beowulf cluster of ..." on slashdot
It finds out it's now last-year's-model
It discovers you are a 45 year old, single male, who watches Barney and sings along
You just hit, and killed, a keeewwt widdo puppy
You stopped filling it up with the cheap stuff at that mafia gas station, where they pour chemical waste into the storage tanks and it misses getting stoned
You eat in the car and get special sauce all over the seats
You park in the alley behind the adult bookstore and get something else all over the seats
You never talk to it anymore, all you do is talk on your cell phone
It heard you were considering installing WinXP as its O/S
You put decals and bumperstickers on it which embarrass it
It's having a bad antenna day
Industry Innovation (Score:2, Insightful)
The day you see an energy efficient car on the market is the day you'll see Microsoft release a product that goes out of its way to make it easy to share information with other company's platforms.
Re:Cool, but Actually Useful? (Score:2)
There is a lot of profit to be made on "cool" one of a kind toys. That profit can do a company good while they work on the super economical car for the common man. So, I say, go for it.
Besides teaching emotions to a car sounds like a fun programming job to me.
Re:Cool, but Actually Useful? (Score:2)
If I was a car whose designers tried to make me look like a Mac cube [yahoo.com], I'd cry too.
But does it... (Score:3, Funny)
Just like the movie "Christine" (Score:2)
Susie: It's not right...I feel like the car is watching me - I can't do it in that car
David - Don't worry - babe...and don't hit the car.
yep..not on my "to buy" list
Re:Just like the movie "Christine" (Score:5, Funny)
Susie: MMmmmmmsmack!kissgrope!
David: MMmmsmack!gropekiss!
Susie: Slurpgurglesuck!
David: Slurplicklicklick!
Car: Oooh! Happy moment! Everybody smile! [photoflash!]
...next day...
Mom: Susie, I just had the car photos processed... I wanna have a word with you...
Not sure i want a car with emotions... (Score:2)
Scared me.. (Score:2)
When do we get features we NEED? (Score:4, Funny)
On a lighter note, if they include a feature to pleasure the driver in ways that are probably illegal in most states and grounds for death in Singapore, well... maybe I'll test drive one.
We're getting closer... (Score:5, Interesting)
The Europeans have the VW Lupo, which in specially modified form can pull ~70mpg
Toyota has announced that they will have the Prius doing 125mpg within a few years. The current Prius costs about $20,000, which isn't a lot on the car market of today. And I'd trust Toyota to make a car that Consumer Reports would smile upon.
My Subaru service guy recommends changing the oil on the Subaru every 7500 miles. You *should* be rotating the tires more frequently than that.
My BMW tells me when it needs the oil changed, and I've heard stories of it going as long as 12,000 miles between changes (which is good, b/c BMW charges a ridiculous amount, and the tool to reset the oil light costs a pretty penny).
So, really, take a look around. The TDI Golf gets 48mpg, and the TDI Jetta gets a little less. And if I had to choose an engine to last me forever, I'd go for a German Diesel over anything else. Some of the Honda Civics get 41mpg (and cost about $13K), and the ~20-year-old beater Honda is a pretty common sight around here, so they must hold up fairly well. Not everything out there is an 8mpg Excursion or a $60,000 luxury Barge.
Re:We're getting closer... (Score:5, Funny)
Which is, frankly, a little scary.
Re:We're getting closer... (Score:2)
But sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
41 mpg ? That's quite a lot ! (Score:5, Informative)
My car (a Citroën Saxo, which is everything you want but not a high-end car: http://www.citroen.fr/options.php?c_version=1CS8A
) slurps a little less than 4 L/100km (makes a little less than 59 mpg), and it does that using diesel (which overall is a more energy-efficient combustible than gasoline, not to mention more tax-friendly in my particular locale).
Oil is to be changed every 15000 km (9500 miles), or one year (whichever first). There is of course a display on the dashboard which shows not only the amount of oil left but also when you have to change it (and the tool-less reset procedure is documented if you really insist). So, it looks like the particular BMW feature you mentioned is actually quite commonplace nowadays...
Today's modern high-pressure common rail diesel engines (you named the first ones, the VW TDI, but
more recent and better stuff exists, like the PSA(=Peugeot/Citroën) HDi (really the best out there), Fiat's JTD, Renault's dCi, and even Ford Europe TDCi) are even more efficient, because under 3000-3500 rpm they use a much leaner mix ; yet once the boost kicks in, you have plenty of spare power. Actually, a car like the Peugeot Coupé 406, while initially strange (what, a Pininfarina pleasure car with a diesel ?) makes a lot of sense....
The special "lean" version of the Lupo announce 3 l/100km, that is, 78 mpg (!). However, to achieve that, VW uses a 3-cylinder engine which has atrocious noise and vibration characteristics. And while this is mostly a city-only car (because of its tiny size, despite a nice efficiency, this engine is a bit asthmatic as soon as you reach 90 km/h
(and unfortunately, there aren't versions of that car under the SEAT or Skoda brands, which are usually "VW technology at non-VW price")
The only drawback with diesel nowadays (that is, once your locale has passed laws mandating better refinement of the fuel itself, like EU has required like 10 years ago), is the particles emission. And even that is a solved problem.
Check out's Peugeot's self-cleaning FAP (particle filter). You can get it only on 406 and 607's, and on Citroën Xsara and C5 (higher end) for the moment, but it's bound to spread rather sooner than later. Check out Citroën and Peugeot's sites; how this device works is amazing.
In the near future, I can't wait for the arrival of the new generation common PSA/Ford smaller-size HDi engine. Basically, they want to do in 1.3 L what is done with the current 1.6L HDi rig, performance-wise (but with a proportional consumption...)
Middle term I want to see the electric camshafts replacing the crank stuff (this allows for a much more flexible cartography, which removes the need for some compromises). Also, the alterno-starters are going to rock in traffic jams (basically, the alternator and the starter are replaced by a single device, which is able to generate electricity when the thermic engine runs, and is able to not only start the thermic but also move the car up to 40 km/h. The use of this device is to run electric when you basically don't move and the battery's good. And as soon as you move again, the thermic smoothly kicks in. Check out for this Dynalto(PSA) / Adivi(Renault/Nissan) feature !)
Long-term, hydrogen-based stuff -- but I'll make a new post on slashdot beforehand.
Re:41 mpg ? That's quite a lot ! (Score:2, Interesting)
Actually, I'm quite out of the loop on European cars (unless we're talking about the stuff that makes it to the States).
Of course, the US Department of Transportation may measure fuel economy in a completely different manner than it is measured in Europe, so either side's numbers may sound greatly inflated.
Honda goes about achieving their economy numbers through their VTEC system, which is a bit misleading. They quote a particular horsepower number (say, 160hp in the older Civic Si), but that horsepower doesn't translate through the RPM range... until the "hot" cam kicks in, the car behaves and performs like a seriously underpowered economy car...
For this reason, they are able to easily skirt the fuel economy numbers. Because freeway/city tests don't involve a whole lot of winding the engine out, they're actually testing an engine which is probably pushing more like 110hp, and thus, is pulling far better economy. In the case of the low-end civics, the engine is probably being tested with about 70hp, which can easily explain the 41mpg (highway) claim. Of course, Honda still gets to advertise the higher horsepower number which comes once the engine is near redline and has the hotter cam swapped in.
I've seen a few other ideas proposed... GM is tinkering with the idea of only running 4 of the 8 cylinders in some of their SUV engines (during low load/stops) in order to increase economy. I don't really understand how they plan to pull it off, since a V8 is balanced much differently from an L4. The only engine this would be feasible with would be a V12, since an L6 is naturally balanced, and requires no counterweight.
I've also seen some companies experimenting with using a hydraulic system to physcially adjust the angle of certain components in a constant manner. They haven't had very good luck with it, though.
Diesel is pretty much overlooked in the states. Outside of the TDI, the only other Diesel I know of are large trucks. Probably the best selling diesel in the US is the 7.3 L "Power-Stoke" V8 diesel found in Ford's heavy duty pickups and the Excursion. How's that for efficency?
7.3L Powerstroke turns of ALL cylinders (Score:2)
Funny you should mention the PowerStroke in the same message as this. The PowerStroke does do something similar, but only in coast-down situations. When you're going downhill, or slowing towards a stoplight, we'll actually turn off all the fuel, and then turn it back on again when the engine approaches idle speeds. It's a bit disconcerting at first to be coasting downhill and have the constant diesel rottle-rottle-rottle noise suddenly stop, but then you get used to it, and start coasting downhill in higher gears, to see how long you can keep the engine running w/o fuel!
Re:41 mpg ? That's quite a lot ! (Score:2)
Actually, water injection has been around for a very long time - the Daimler-Benz DB601 used in a lot of the Luftwaffe's aircraft during WWII used water injection along with mechanical fuel injection (more like convention diesel injection than K-Jetronic systems).
I knocked together a simple water injection system and fitted it to an old Volvo 340, with a carburettor-fed 1.4 litre petrol engine. It brought the fuel consumption from around 35mpg to 38-40mpg on gentle runs, made the exhaust a lot cleaner with regard to NOx, and made it run quieter. It also improved low-end power as well. Not bad for just plain tap water...
Water injection is definitely a good idea.
Re:41 mpg ? That's quite a lot ! (Score:2)
The reasons why diesel haven't not been popular is the fact US-refined diesel fuel with its high sulfur content will easily damage modern diesel fuel-delivery systems and diesel engine emission control systems found on European diesel-powered automobiles. That means you can forget about getting LEV, let alone ULEV emissions certification.
However, now that the EPA will require all refiners to switch to low-sulfur diesel fuel soon (80 parts or less per million of sulfur compounds), it means modern diesel fuel delivery systems and modern emission control systems can be sold in the USA. This could mean companies like Mercedes-Benz, BMW and Audi could start selling their diesel-powered cars here in the USA on a large scale, which could increase their corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) quite a bit.
Re:41 mpg ? That's quite a lot ! (Score:2)
Re:We're getting closer... (Score:2)
Re:We're getting closer... (Score:2, Interesting)
You slam on the gas, and you hit 60 mph in about 30 seconds.
I'd never buy any of those "hybrid" cars, because:
A) They're ugly as sin
B) I can probably run faster than they accelerate
Magius_AR
Re:When do we get features we NEED? (Score:2)
What makes you blame the manufacturer for fuel efficency, anyway? It takes a certain number of joules to accelerate this many tons of mass this fast. That's physics, and only so much can be done before you're running up against that limit. The fuel efficent cars do so partially by reducing mass, compromising one feature for another.
Re:When do we get features we NEED? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:When do.. [Designers! Listen Up! PERFECT CAR] (Score:2)
Open-air cruising in summer, with only a roll cage over your head, and in winter you bolt on sides, doors, etc.
It's called a Jeep Wrangler.
But its not particularly gas efficient.
In Related News, Highways Shutdown (Score:5, Funny)
Witnesses say it was a scene right out of the Carwars RPG: "tires squealed, glass flew, and carnage abound." The current toll is at 20 dead and more than 100 cars catatonic.
Experts are pointing the finger at two young men who got into a dispute after one allegedly cut the other off. The man who was cut off apparently kicked the door of the first drivers car, upsetting the vehicles in the area and instigating the riot that followed.
Car psychologists, accident crisis crews, and tow trucks have been brought in to try and help those vehicles traumatized by Wednesdays events.
Re:In Related News, Highways Shutdown (Score:2, Funny)
What a complete and total waste of R&D. (Score:2)
Meanwhile, the world waits for an economically feasible low/zero-emission vehicle and our cities continue to be pumped full of noxious gasses. I'm about ready to go build one myself. (-:
Re:What a complete and total waste of R&D. (Score:2, Interesting)
Fuel injection, aluminum engine blocks, ABS, power steering, mobile versions of FM radio, computerized engine controls, etc etc etc - all of these and so many more things that are common place in every new car we would ever drive today had their debuts in show cars - many which never saw the light of day as presented at the shows.
Of course, there doesn't seem to be any of these great advances in this little Japanese concoction. So, I'll throw another viewpoint at it - it is a JAPANESE concoction. Toyota - a Japanese car company. Sony - a Japanese electronics company. They do things differently there. Do you have any idea how many models of cars Toyota produces that are sold in Japan but they wouldn't even dream of bringing to the U.S.? Many of them are this small and, *ahem*, "quircky" looking. Also, remember that the "emotion" technology of this car is based on the Sony robotic dog which, albeit available in the U.S., actually sells quite well in Japan. ANOTHER thing to remember is that if any youths of the world are more into gadgets than Americans, it'd be Japanese. I wouldn't be surprised if an iteration of this car actually made it to their market within 3 or 4 years.
Of course we'll never see this box here... but with Sony's blessing and after testmarketing in Japan, Toyota could just as easily slap this stuff on the next generation American Corolla (muched more youth oriented) or the Echo for us Americans.
As for these features not being of practical value, that's a moot point - anything that's marketable will go to market, practical or not.
Once again, the Slashdot mentality of American-centric views rears it's non-attractive head.
Re:What a complete and total waste of R&D. (Score:2)
Anyway, concept cars are often about showcasing a particular single technology, not a whole car.
Re:What people want in a car (Score:4, Interesting)
The rule that car designers learned from that one was to ask the question "What kind of car would your next door neighbor want?" People are more free (read truthful) about giving non-pc answers
Re:What people want in a car (Score:2)
And the fact that it was ugly as sin and would rust from breathing on it heavy didn't have anything to do with it? And I suppose the fact that they leaked oil like a sieve around the rear crank seal didn't help any. Oh yeah, the exhaust manifold tends to crack and the ignition module wears out over time, but these are just icing on the cake, yeah?
Re:What people want in a car (Score:2)
The people claimed they wanted a box, but that their neighbor would buy the sporty car
Imagine the trauma (Score:2)
So a car showing emotions is likely to lead some people into a "deep and meaningful" relationship with their car, and it would cause grief when this is abruptly ended, for example, by an accident.
Re:Imagine the trauma (Score:2)
On a side note, he probably married his car because they're non-emotional and don't get PMS. No longer.
As if we don't have enough emotional stuff to deal with...now a car?
The Japanese and artificial emotions--what's up?! (Score:3)
Re:The Japanese and artificial emotions--what's up (Score:2)
The story I heard was that life in Japanese cities had gotten so high stress, long hours that many people were looking for ways to have social/emotional release on demand. Being able to pick up a toy at any time of day or night was considered preferable in some ways to other people and pets that were less flexible and asked for more than a change of batteries. It's also cheaper than depending on call girls and such.
Re:The Japanese and artificial emotions--what's up (Score:2)
Not exactly cuddly though. The artificial cat may be an improvement. (Not sure about the Aibo, though. It didn't look exactly petable.)
Love By Mail in Wired (Score:2)
There is a very good quote: "My grandfather had the geisha, my father had the bar hostess, I have Love By Mail".
Re:The Japanese and artificial emotions--what's up (Score:2)
Congratulations, you almost passed the Turing test.
Re:The Japanese and artificial emotions--what's up (Score:2)
"Huge" is relative. You obviously didn't catch the magnitude of that particular craze in Japan. Compared to that the US "craze" was a mere jerk of a moribund body.
I'm not questioning the Japanse ability to create new and wonderful electronics--in fact, I very much welcome it and anticipate most new creations. But must we look for emotional fulfillment in them? The pursuit of AI is great as a means to perform useful work more efficiently and intelligently, but I certainly am not looking forward to a future where I engage emotionally with our creations (other than mere materialistic desire, that is). Then again, others are, so whatever rocks your boat.
Mine would constantly frown... (Score:2)
Right, like drivers even need more distractions (Score:2)
Since the emotional car exists now, how about making the best of it and make it throw a fit if the driver yaks on his cellphone while driving ?
PMS - pre-mechanic syndrome? (Score:5, Funny)
You tell your call to "knock it off and be polite" but it doesn't want to listen, so it cranks up the radio playing Britney Spears, locks the doors, locks the seat belts, and deploys the airbags. Suddenly over the radio you hear "I'll teach you to be mean to me"... just as your car starts accelerating to 120 MPH on a rough, windy, mountainous road with a cliff on one side.
I'd had to see what tractor-trailers equipped with this kind of attitude do.
"Duel" (Score:2)
Try to catch Spielberg's "Duel [imdb.com]". It was made for TV but in Europe it was released as a film.
Actually the driver is a human (or the Devil) but that isn't important.
It looks like an art deco toaster (Score:2)
Re:It looks like an art deco toaster (Score:2)
golf cart. I wonder if this car could double as
a caddy.
Unintended consequences? (Score:2)
It takes pictures? (Score:3, Funny)
Is this another clippy? (Score:5, Insightful)
I can see something usefull like a GPS system and an electronic map integrated together. I have seen one of these cars once and they are cool and usefull. Perhaps this and a integrated cell phones for emergencies but thats it.
I hate these damn things. (Score:5, Funny)
Just what I need, my cars going to "wake up" and start honking its horn in the middle of the night because of thunder, and I'll have to wait 20 minutes for it to shutup on its own.
Time to find a new location... (Score:2)
Time to stop having amorous secret liasons with your mistress in the family car then.
What I want my car's expression to say: (Score:2)
A Car With a Heart of Gold (Score:5, Funny)
Hmmm, I can just hear it:
This car is happy to move for you and stop again with the knowledge of a job well done.
Does this mean it will have Genuine People Personalities? I'm sooooo depressed!
The next funky webcam (Score:2)
Important stuff... (Score:4, Insightful)
1- Self driving.
2- Standard Built in GPS for those of us who frequently go to unknown places.
3- Built with modern polymers, not metals and older plastics, so that the car weighs less (Resulting in better fuel efficiency than any hybrid engine can give you.), costs less (Polymers stronger than steel are already nearly equal to steel in price, and will drop in price as use rises and more is produced on a massive scale.), and is safer (Polymers allow for strength in the frame to be better distributed in a crash.).
Just some food for thought...
Re:Important stuff... (Score:2)
Lighter cars are more fuell efficient but are also more instable than a heavy car. I have had different cars and believe me... when it's hard weather out there i'd rather have a heavy car then a lighter one...
Immediate Reaction (Score:2)
Re:Immediate Reaction (Score:2)
[/costanza]
Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.
Well, duh. Of course it was yelling.
AAA, please talk my car into starting again. (Score:2)
I know my Golf will need help when it finally learns how to read my emotions on the road.
Incomprehensible. It'll be just minutes before it goes catatonic. As soon as a Boston cab driver does his normal shit in front of me, my poor car will sense the deepest, blackest rage imaginable, while at the same time receiving instructions from my feet and hands to do dangerous, life-threatening things that will make me feel better.
If it's a good car it'll die immediately.
(bringing to mind many Asimov robot stories)
Amorous Atmosphere (Score:5, Funny)
happy doors (Score:3, Funny)
I want my motorcycle to change colors like a mood ring, can they do that too?
The question is, WHY? (Score:2)
Ok Beavis, I give up.
Optional Equipment? (Score:2)
Does it change it's appearance to resemble a 1982 Yugo when it senses a car thief intending to make off with an incredibly expensive car?
Does it include a breathalyzer so that it can look drunk to the police after one martini lunch too many?
When playing Rammstein, can it be set to lip sync?
When driven by a smoker, will it hack up huge loogies for them?
Does it include the inflatable Otto Pilot from the legendary movie 'Airplane!'?
Will it be banned by the RIAA for it's drivers trading MP3's while driving down the freeway?
Inquiring minds want to know!!!
Solution to DUIs (Score:3, Interesting)
What we need is a smart car that can determine if the driver's alcohol blood level is above the legal limit and affectively shut itself off preventing the drunken driver from taking to the road, it could even be smart enough to call a predetermined number (a close relative etc...) or even call a local cab.
If somehow the driver was able to bypass the systems shutdown security it would then call 911 and alert the police of the possible DUI on the road endangering other local motorists...
Cars with emotions... come on people, lets take care of the basic problems first.
Someone stop that Aibo (Score:4, Funny)
Let's hope.. (Score:2)
the car doesn't get suicidal when you're driving!
Pod can..... (Score:3, Interesting)
I wonder if the name "Pod" is in any way based on the old BBC computer game. The game (Pod) was about emotions and general human behaviour. It was aimed at little kids. You got the prompt "Pod can..." and you typed what pod could to... either cry, sing, laugh, whistle etc.
A lot of people who grew up in Australia or the UK around the BBC micro computer will remember Pod.
Damn, it was early 80's 8 bit programming at it's very finest!
Aaah.... I think I'm about to have a second childhood!
Arrested for Car Abuse (Score:2)
Me: Fucking car won't start! Fuck you car! You worthless piece of shit!
Car: (whimpers, dies)
Me: ... Fuck!
Dave..? (Score:2, Funny)
"Why not you %$&%^& car?? I WANNA GET TO WORK!"
"I can't let you pollute the atmosphere, Dave"
"ARRRRRGH!"
I just hope (Score:3, Funny)
Give me the 351 Cleveland Engine ! (Score:3, Interesting)
And nothing gave me more warm fuzzies than to step on the gas pedal and know that I had all the pickup I needed to get in and out of traffic.
And happy ? Happieness is being able to open the hood, with nothing more than a wrench and a timing light to FIX and TUNE THE DARN thing myself. Especially because mine was equipped with that beautiful boss 351 Cleveland Engine [boss351.org] under a hood large enough to house a 400 CID 2V V8 ! Talk about elbow room !
That and the back seat was large enough to house and/or make a small family !
useful trickle-down (Score:3, Insightful)
So, some -useful- things that might come out of this:
When the car detects anger, it cuts acceleration and top speed, giving the driver fewer chances to drive like an asshole.
The same thing could (and probably should) be done right now when it detects the driver using a cellphone.
Combined with a big mp3 drive, you can just hit the "music" button without taking your eyes off the road to fiddle with the radio to find the right music for your current mood.
You could adjust traction control on 4WD vehicles to the driver's stress level. If they're an inch of snow on the ground, the Chicago driver won't even care, but the Dallas driver is going to have a death-grip on the wheel and'll be on the verge of panic. For the latter, engage the 4WD automatically, cut power so that they're less likely to spin, and put the anti-lock brakes on "paranoid mode."
One of the problems with collision detection systems is that they're really annoying during rush hour, and there actually are situations where driving close to the vehicle in front of you. You could link these systems together so that if the driver seems alert, the system won't go off, or will go off quietly, but if the driver's dealing with fighting kids in the back seat, it sets off the "too close" klaxon at full volume.
Re:useful trickle-down (Score:2)
Why shoul you hit the 'music' button when the car can tell from your mood that you feel like music and turn it on for you.
For that matter, why turn the stearing wheel at all - the car should detect you getting aggitated as it's about to hit things, and turn one way or the other. If you get less aggitated, it must have turned the right way - otherwise reverse direction. Easy see.
(ok, so maybe I've read too much about neural net training - not so safe training a car system by having it crash millions of cars until it gets it right)
Uh oh... (Score:2)
Marvin? (Score:2, Insightful)
~Cameron
Just what I need (Score:2)
Oh man (Score:2)
Maybe it'll get to know what pisses you off (Score:2)
Happy Picture Fun (Score:2)
Location: Leaving vet's office.
Occupants: Driver -- sobbing uncontrolably
Canine animal -- wrapped in a blanket, not moving
Facts: Vets help animals. Animals in pain do not rest peacefully. Humans sometimes cry when happy/relieved of stress. A hurt animal is a cause of stress.
Analysis: The vet has healed the animal. The human is sobbing with joy.
Evaluation: Tell the driver a knock-knock joke and take picture to remember this happy occasion.
While I've over-exaggerated the capabilities and intelligence of the car, it does highlight an important issue to keep in mind. As we make products that start to emulate human behavior and emotions, it makes it possible for that product to hurt us through its lack of true empathy.
If, say, I were to find out that I was dying of cancer, I wouldn't care that my toaster oven continued to sit on the counter and toast toast -- it's just a machine. But if it were to ask my how my day was going and then respond to the cancer news with "Gee, that's interesting! Have a great day!", I'd end up forfeiting the security deposit on my apartment due to the damage caused by smashing that damn insensitive, smarmy piece of crap against the wall until its electronic shrieks turned into whimpering beeps.
interesting, but does it... (Score:2)
how ugly (Score:2)
Bender and the werecar (Score:2)
Crying? (Score:2)
Features... (Score:2)
The car sighed heavily... (Score:2)
~Philly
Rage (Score:2)
Trickster Coyote
"Reality leaves a lot to the imagination." John Lennon
to incontinence. (Score:2, Informative)
Oh, wonderful... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Dumb (Score:3, Insightful)
I devote time to interacting with my friends and family, and thus we all grow closer as a result. The sharing and understanding makes them important to me. In a world where we interact and learn about certain machines by the same process, it makes perfect sense that humans would form the same attachments.
Humans and machines of today come about through entirely different processes, but that doesn't mean that in the future it would be impossible to "assemble" a biological organism or to "grow" a machine. The lines will blur and we must come to realize that our perceptions will as well. A perfect understanding to the biology, chemistry, and nuerology of you would not detract from your status as a social being. Neither should understanding the principles behind a machine make interacting with it any less interesting, provided it is sufficiently complex.
Re:Dumb (Score:3, Funny)
Re:younger drivers? (Score:5, Funny)
On another, ahem, note...
***WARNING PUN AHEAD WARNING***
It's probably the first car actually capable of becoming a nervous wreck...
Re:no thanks (Score:2)