A Robot To Follow "Mother" And Another To Block Her 109
fireflash writes: "Some folks at MIT have had a bit of fun with robots. 'Mr. Mallard' and 'Roboguard' are robots that follow a homing beacon and guard hallways, respectively. Wouldn't you like to be followed around by a mess of wires and boards whilst attempting to pass through a hallway guarded by another? Sounds like the ultimate in home security to me :-)."
Um... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Um... (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Um... (Score:1)
Re:Um... (Score:1)
Maybe even armed
Yeah, but... (Score:3, Insightful)
Right... (Score:1)
Mirror (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Mirror (Score:2, Insightful)
We've changed some of the links in the
main page, and updated it a bit to
point out things like the 173 megabyte
download. If you use the google mirror,
it will actually hurt our servers more
than it will help. Ironic, that.
-Dave
Finally! (Score:5, Funny)
(or insert 'Berserk' or 'Robotron/Llamatron' to your heart's desire... :-)
Re:Finally! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Finally! (Score:3, Informative)
Hpux [liv.ac.uk]
Re:Finally! (Score:1)
Re:Finally! (Score:2)
Too bad the game blows.
Re:Finally! (Score:2, Informative)
# make install clean
Or you can play the text version (it's part of the base BSD games):
% cd
%
Or you can install the gnome versions (not recommended unless you already have gnome installed, no point installing all of gnome for a couple of lousy games after all):
# cd
# make install clean
This should be enough robot on robot action for anybody.
even cooler robots (Score:4, Interesting)
Talking to ME? (Score:2)
out on passers-by. The robot would sense a person, turn its
face towards them and ask
them to stop and answer a
question.
Wonder how they did that, focus on the person being adressed. From my experience, as long as the face on the TV screen looks into the camera,
it appears to be looking stratight at you, even i you stand to the very side of the screen.
So, it'll be like in the old days, when I had a cross-eyed professor. Whenever he asked a question to the audience, he got more than one answer.
Re:Talking to ME? (Score:1)
Yep (Score:2)
I'll grab my old "Neural Network That Recognizes Digits" university project ...
This way i will create a robot that reads digits and then draws them by running a path in the shape of that digit (i only have to program 10 paths).
Next i'll post in Slashdot (naturally such post will be accepted) ...
From that to World Domination it will be just a small step!!!
Re:Yep (Score:1)
one of many others i am sure (Score:1)
but this project is incorporating wireless ethernet system into it...
I hope they are programmed to obey Asimov's laws. (Score:1)
I imagine if these things could be made much smaller, and consume less power, then they could be ideal to use as battlefield spies. Simply strap a cheap webcam on the top, add a cheap PC and an 802.11b network card and away you go!
Re:I hope they are programmed to obey Asimov's law (Score:5, Funny)
The zeroth law does allow them to kill people to save other people, but for modern battles you're gonna have to teach them religon to get them to kill some people.
"The entertainment of the many outweighs the safty of the few, or the one"
M@
Re:I hope they are programmed to obey Asimov's law (Score:1)
Re:I hope they are programmed to obey Asimov's law (Score:1)
Re:I hope they are programmed to obey Asimov's law (Score:1)
Re:I hope they are programmed to obey Asimov's law (Score:1)
Don't you know weaving poses many threats of harm?
This [lomb.cgil.it] goes into great detail on the risks. Here's a snippet:
To sum up the main risk factors:
a) noise;
b) posture;
c) stress;
d) eye strain;
e)chemicals;
f) accidents.
Re:I hope they are programmed to obey Asimov's law (Score:1)
This was precisely what Asimov illustrated in the difference between the Spacer and Settler cultures. The Spacers' entire lives were perfused with Three-Law robots, making them an excessively conservative, even stagnant, culture; the Settlers used no artificial sentience (but did use lesser AI technologies like fuzzy logic and expert systems), and outgrew and out-teched the Spacers by leaps and bounds because of their willingness and ability to take risks.
Re:I hope they are programmed to obey Asimov's law (Score:2)
Re:I hope they are programmed to obey Asimov's law (Score:2, Insightful)
But, what will this prove? Sure, we could kill a few more bad guys... But If the cause isn't worth dieing for, is it really worth killing for? Will this help make the world a better place, or will this just provide a way for the few to control the many?
--ST
Re:I hope they are programmed to obey Asimov's law (Score:1)
the risk will be reduced, but will still be there.
besides, the ultimate goal has never been to kill people, but to remove their ability to resist you and/or achieve their nefarious goals.
Re:I hope they are programmed to obey Asimov's law (Score:1)
robot? (Score:2)
The predator is just a large and sophisticated remote control plane.
Obligatory Simpsons Ref (Score:1)
Frankly, I say screw the DoD. I want a legion of killbots to do my dark and nefarious bidding. And frankly, bringing this back on-topic, I'm pretty sure that if the robot ran amok and started killing human beings, all we'd have to do is disassemble him and give his pieces to a five-year-old. The kid will convert the parts into a cute little Lego house, and that's that.
Of course, if the Lego house ran amok and started killing people, then I'd start to get worried...
Next up, pusher and shover robots. (Score:3, Funny)
The shover robot pushes people around, and the pusher robot shoves bread down their throats.
Are there stairs in your house? [somethingawful.com]Re:Next up, pusher and shover robots. (Score:1)
Big File Warning (Score:3, Informative)
shut up man
Re:Big File Warning (Score:1)
I think we should set up temporary meriors for big files that will be /.'ed. Name it something like:
[SLASHDOT_the date_story]filename.
Robot babysitters? (Score:2, Funny)
Robot babysitters instead of censor-ware? (Score:1)
Much better than that so-called Censor-ware
perhaps they know a little about robotics (Score:1)
large files, etc (Score:2)
This is a typical oversight when designing stuff mostly for internal consumption. They obviously were not planning for people to try to see the file via a dialup or something.
This fits in with the dot-bomb executives who wanted their website optimized for 1280 x 1024 or something, which is what they had in their office. Which was more clueless since those dotbomb websites were designed for public use.
Mr Mallard is a good idea (Score:1)
make 'em fight (Score:4, Funny)
then put the other one who's only job it is to guard the door... well, right be the door.
then program them to scream when parts of them fall off.
and give them lasers.
everybody love lasters. just like that tv show.
Felinity. (Score:1)
Erm... no. Cats, dude. They sound like robot cats.
"Get him, my robots!" (Score:2)
Kickbot, a robot you can kick (Score:2, Interesting)
So if you guys like Nick, Jaeyon, Godfrey and Magda's robots, you should check out Kickbot, a robot Chris and I made for the same class that was designed to be kicked. (These were for Rodney Brooks' Embodied Intelligence class)
check out this link for details Kickbot Homepage [mit.edu]
And if Chris' connection gets slashdotted the final paper with all of the cool pictures can be seen at Paper Mirror PDF (1.4MB) [mit.edu]
Nice! (Score:1)
That brought up a Star Wars memory. (Score:1)
(hallway patrol droid stops, does a reverse 180, and scoots away squeaking.)
Yes, but... (Score:1)
Space Robot Bonanza [somethingawful.com]
Slashdotted yet again (Score:1)
Fridge guard (Score:2, Funny)
no robots! (Score:2, Funny)
He is malfunctioning!
Do you have stairs in your house?
- kengineer
Big Deal.... (Score:1)
=tkk
Mr Mallard XL (Score:1)
Or perhaps it could be designed as a beer barrel, with the logics and sensors in a half-sphere on top...
it could have three wheels.. and roll around following me on my hovering desert barge..
Just a thought.
Roboguard, slasdotting, comments from inside (Score:3, Informative)
Not really anything new here... (Score:1)
The Learning Company did this in the 80's (Score:2, Interesting)
The game was way cool, but too hard for the casual gamer. I understand the game was even used in electronics classes to teach digital logic.
Here [aol.com] [members.aol.com] is a site where you can see screenshots or download copies of the Apple II and DOS version.
I recall that the DOS version only worked on 8086/286 machines with color monitor and joystick.
Is there SERIOUS research at the MIT Media Lab? (Score:2)
Instead of researching the difficult and unglamorous stuff which will result in the next wave of technological progress, they're playing with parrots, training their dogs over the internet, and making cutesy robots which have no use beyond getting Omni magazine and dumbed-down "isn't-science-neat"-type shows to give them publicity. Maybe this results in grants... but I can't imagine MIT alums would be so dumb as to think this is the sort of work that deserves their funding. But I worry that I am overestimating their wisdom, probably because of the mystique of MIT. The Media Lab is now the "Let the Media Stroke our Egos" lab.
Now think how you would react if you read that work like this had instead been done at SUNY Bingamton or some other or the University of Kentucky (two decent schools). Like every other sane person, you would think they're just wanking. The only reason why we don't think that of the Media Lab is because we think "oh, it's MIT, so there must be something important behind this that they don't explain in their media relations." I hate to tell you this, but there isn't.
Mind you, I'm not saying we shouldn't allow these self-righteous wankers to do their work. Self-righteous wanking is something I think should and must live on in academia. What I oppose is treating these wankers as anything but what they are, as though they had a halo around them.
spork
Re:Is there SERIOUS research at the MIT Media Lab? (Score:2)
Um...did you even read the blurb?...much less go to the actual page. There is nothing even remotely releated to the Media Lab here.
Re:Is there SERIOUS research at the MIT Media Lab? (Score:2)
I'll believe you if you have evidence that it's NOT them, but that would be sad, because I don't want to believe that the rest of MIT sold out to the media.
LegOS (Score:1)
Sorry, LEGO, my bad! Please don't sue me.
a request for sanity (Score:1)
the page in question describes two final projects for an introductory mit graduate class on robotics (i was the ta). while the students in question did very well, their robots aren't "research" any more than a napkin sketch of some fruit is "art". don't worry -- you'll still be able to get in your door when you get home.
and, just for the record, they're not at the media lab. damn negroponte and his imperialist media empire!
Class project... (Score:3, Insightful)
If this is Slashdot-worthy, then there are nearly thousands of Slashdot-worthy pages in the MIT domain alone.
For starters, every other final project for the Embodied Intelligence class for every term recently. That should be around 200 Slashdot pages right there...