Your Online Marketplace for Classified Jet Parts 191
jonerik writes: "Reuters is reporting that the U.S. Air Force is less than pleased about the recent posting of a number of sensitive jet communications components on eBay, including parts for the SR-71 spy plane, the F-16 fighter, the KC-10 tanker, and the giant C-5 transport. According to the article, the parts had sat in a warehouse for 12 years after being lost in shipping when the dealer, Norb Novocin, bought the lot for $244 in an unclaimed property sale. Novocin ended up selling four of the items to bidders in a recent auction, including an X-Band Weather Radar Modulator for $500 and a high-frequency radio circuit card for $32. The Air Force is looking into the incident and Novocin is cooperating."
this is good (Score:2, Funny)
What, No F-4 Parts? (Score:1)
Terrorists. (Score:1)
Re:Terrorists. (Score:2)
Re:Terrorists. (Score:2)
The magazine pointed out that rogue nations such as Iran routinely seek replacement parts for their U.S.-manufactured military planes.
Re:Terrorists. (Score:2)
Pathetic... (Score:2)
What a bunch of idiots!
Re:Pathetic... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Pathetic... (Score:1)
Novocin: I have some airplane parts
Depot: Your point?
Novocin: Do you want them?
Depot: What, of course I don't want your parts.
novocin: Well, what am I supposed to do with them?
Depot: Well you could try to sell them someplace else, I don't want to buy them
Novocin: Who else would want these things
Depot: I don't care, why don't you put them on eBay or something
Then I could see why the guys at the depot told him to sell them. However if the Novocin guy said"I just purchased a bunch of classified parts from a shipping company." Then it is completely the Depot's fault.
Re:Pathetic... (Score:1)
Re:Pathetic... (Score:2)
Re:Pathetic... (Score:2, Interesting)
Also, did the packaging indicate that they needed to be destroyed or did it just have a big red "D" which he would not know the meaning of?
Re:Pathetic... (Score:3, Informative)
Here's the Newsweek article [msnbc.com] mentioned in the Reuters story. I think the shipper [aatransferinc.com] who was supposed to take the stuff from Dover to Warner Robins is at fault.
The Defense Reutilization and Marketing Service [dla.mil] holds public auctions, but they exclude items with demil code [dla.mil] "D".
Well (Score:1)
Re:Pathetic... (Score:1)
bkr
At Least.... (Score:1, Funny)
Lost in a warehouse? (Score:3, Funny)
The Air Farce, lost in space...
Fly Navy...
Re:Lost in a warehouse? (Score:1)
The guys at the depot must have been "Top Men"
is there anything (Score:4, Insightful)
There is (Score:1)
Re:is there anything (Score:1)
The plot was that originally the nuke was from India or Pakistan, who lost it off a plane that crashed. They couldn't look for it because they weren't letting on they had nuclear capabilities. The bomb was then reworked by some Soviet-era scientist working for one of the Evil-Doer Countries.
Way Offtopic - Sum of all fears (Score:1)
If I recall. It has been a while since I read the book.
Re:is there anything (Score:2)
Ah yes, another gem of a post from someone who forgot to take their logic pills this morning. By the same flawgic, if you didn't want your wallet taken you shouldn't have left it in the theater in the first place, right?
Re:is there anything (Score:2)
As for the original poster, I disagree with the idea that he should be able to sell military technology on e-bay. What if was a missle that he was trying to sell? What if a foreign radical wants to study use data gleaned from these parts to be able to detect and shoot down our soldiers in the spy planes? No person outside of the US and affiliated military could possibly have any legitimate use for these parts.
I believe the government should compensate him for the cost of the auction, research time and maybe a little "finder's fee" then take their parts back. The parts are kept secret for a reason, you know.
Re:is there anything (Score:2)
SPOILER ALERT
The movie showed an aircraft carrier in the Northern Sea (or thereabouts) getting hit by multiple Russian bombers with no warning and no air defense except for its own AEGIS cannons.
Reality is that there are always 2 or more jets and usually an AWACS plane in the air to provide air defense and early warning. Carriers are big. Carriers are slow. Carriers are expensive. And pilots need the training anyway, in all conditions.
On top of that this was shortly after a nuclear explosion inside of the continental US. SOP dictates that US forces would instantly go to highest readiness after such an incident - which would mean that carrier would have at last a full flight wing in the air, as well as being dead center of its carrier group. Any hostile trying to take out the carrier would have to go through a ring of aircraft - including AWACS with downward looking radar that doesn't really care if you're skimming the wave tops - followed by a ring of destroyers and cruisers. All fully armed with sea-to-air missiles and AEGIS anti-missile guns. Carrier groups are very expensive to operate. They're also pretty well impenetrable unless you use a nuke or somehow sneak a submarine in through thermal layers (and generally carrier groups have friendly hunter-killer subs nearby to prevent just that).
Re:is there anything (Score:4, Interesting)
That's a pretty good summary of a basic fleet air defense. I think it's worth mentioning how the Soviet's actually planned to get through all that defense though.
The strategy is called a rollback. Basically, if you fire a lot missiles at an air defense system, each one will be intercepted a little closer to the target than the one before it. Slowly, the defenses are rolled back until missiles start getting through.
There's no way to stop a rollback. All Aegis or a good CWIS do is increase the number of missles required to roll the defenses back, or decrease the intercept range reduction from each missile. At some point, obviously, it would get too expensive (each cruise missile costs nearly 1mil) to fire that many - but it is always possible.
Other factors are fighter cover. The phoenix was designed to kill the bombers before they could launch (each backfire bomber destroyed = 3 cruise missiles). Submarines are a big factor. A submarine strike against one or two of the air defense cruisers (not the carrier itself) coordinated with the air strike is very effective.
Of course, the carrier group has its own subs to hunt the enemy subs. And the bombers can bring fighters to cover them. Offensive and defensive measures swing back and forth like that.
On top of that is the tactical use of all these weapons. When playing Harpoon, I used to like to feign an attack from one direction with a barrage launched by, say an Oscar submarine. Then I'd give the carrier taskforce just enough time to redeploy a couple of cruisers to that side and I'd hit them from the other side with a combined attack by bombers and subs.
If you're willing to spend the cash, it's really not all that hard to kill a single carrier. Of course, the bombers themselves need a large airbase - and that will be destroyed by the airforce right away... I could go on but you get the idea.
Re:is there anything (Score:2)
Not necessarily true. Identify where the missiles are coming from and bomb it, or send fighters down a parallel path to the missiles to hook in and kill the launching airplanes or stop part of the missiles _early_. The problem is, likely the theater commanders have to call Washington for permission to bomb, and it takes too long. There was a time when you also had to worry about whether our planes could penetrate to where they needed to be to cut off the flow (short of asking for an ICBM launch), but I doubt that's an issue anywhere now - if the commander has permission to risk a few aircrews before his entire fleet is at risk!
Re:is there anything (Score:2)
Yes definitely. But you know, if it goes as planned the aircraft are already on their way home by the time the first of the missiles are spotted. They're all launched at pretty much the same time, and remember these are large cruise missiles [fas.org] we're talking about here.
Re:is there anything (Score:4, Informative)
Zathrus my boy, you're spouting acronyms without knowing what the hell you're talking about. A few of your errors:
1. An AWACS is an Air Force aircraft, built on a modified Boeing 707 airframe. There's no way that it would ever land on a carrier. You should have referenced the E-2 Hawkeye.
2. Carriers are one of the fastest surface vessels in the US Navy. The predominate term in the drag equation is the length of the waterline. Further, since most of our CVs are nuclear power, the CV doesn't burn excessive amounts of fuel when it goes fast.
3. Neither you or I know what's in the SOP, as the interesting bits are classified. It is a fair bet that every US ship would go to condition III (wartime cruising) after a WMD is detonated in the US.
4. AEGIS cannon?!?!? There's no such critter. See http://www.chinfo.navy.mil/navpalib/factfile/weapo ns/wepaegis.html . My guess is that you meant CIWS (Close In Weapons System, the R2D2-looking Phalanx.)
5. As a deception, sometimes the oiler is in the center of the formation.
6. It may be difficult to penetrate the defenses of the battle group, but not impossible.
7. Boats do not cruise "through thermal layers" -- they are above or below the layer, as the situation dictates.
Re:is there anything (Score:2)
1 - got it... same general purpose though, correct?
2 - Yes, I know how fast they are. But a ship running 60 knots full-out is still slow compared to an aircraft or a missile. By at least an order of magnitude.
3 - No, we don't, but if going to full alert isn't SOP then someone in the brass needs to have their ass canned. As a point of reference (which I meant to include but didn't), I do believe all our military assets went to full alert after the September 11th attacks. This scenario is considerably worse.
4 - You are correct again. The movie shows the carrier using such a system to take out roughly 2/3's of the incoming missiles.
5-6 - Nod.
7 - I meant the submarine going below the layer to infiltrate the battle group, and then going up to fire (if necessary - or just firing from beneath it if possible).
You are very correct in that I had a good bit of the terminology wrong on the details, and your evenhanded corrections ARE appreciated... but it's still considerably more accuate than what the movie depicted (gee - the US just got nuked, so we'll have a helicopter, a few F-15s, and a Hawkeye sitting idle on the flight deck in storage mode, not even being prepped for flight ops).
Re:is there anything (Score:2)
Do nuke carriers still carry some fuel oil so they can refuel their escorts in an emergency? As far as I know, fleet oilers can keep up in a normal cruise, but get left far behind when the warships crank up the shaft RPM's.
Re:is there anything (Score:2)
Oilers are replaceable. Carriers aren't. Of course, considering the appetite of the destroyers for fuel oil as well as the air wing's consumption of JP-5, losing an oiler too soon might mean aborting the plan until a new oiler arrives.
In WWII, sometimes oilers were mistaken for carriers. At the battle of the Coral Sea, not only did a scout plane report an oiler as a carrier, but about 100 Japanese airplanes bombed and torpedoed it, apparently without noticing the mistake, because their commander claimed one "carrier". (It was going home with empty tanks, and it actually didn't sink until the Navy took the crew off and scuttled it.) I doubt that anyone would make that mistake at close range with a modern carrier, but if you were shooting cruise missiles from 200 miles, one great big long ship gives the same radar reflection as another...
X Band Weather Modulator? (Score:1)
Here's one of the finished auctions.. (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Here's one of the finished auctions.. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Here's one of the finished auctions.. (Score:2)
As a side note, this sports entertainment place I frequent has a picture of Osama on the pee mat....I guess someone decided he could turn a profit and make every red-blooded American man pleased with himself for contributing to his country's honor...
Re:Here's one of the finished auctions.. (Score:1)
Very good point. Perhaps he used his email address, obinladen@taliban.org
Irony (Score:2)
So, if I have some quasi-classified aircraft parts I need to send from point A to point B, how would I get them there -- and if they were 'lost' on the way, would I just write them off?
The Air Force is upset that the parts were offered for sale and then subsequently sold? Sounds like a comedy of errors....Here's The Actual EBay Pages... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Here's The Actual EBay Pages... (Score:2, Insightful)
SR-71 C-9 Circuit for HF Radio AN/ARC-190 yqz $32.24 tj913
KC-10 C-5 X-Band Radar Modlatr AN/APS-133 yqz $586.98 fedx2
Secure Digital VHF Panel Assy AN/ARC-106 yqz $67.80 strale64
F-16 C-130 AN/ARC-186 Radio Rear Assy yqz $28.52 k4bdj@sensible.net
Re:Here's The Actual EBay Pages... (Score:2, Interesting)
Visit one other web site and I find that k4bdj is:
MC LENDON, DAVID K, K4BDJ
2510 SEVEN ISLANDS RD
BUCKHEAD, GA 30625
Ah, now I remember why I don't use my ham callsign online.
Re:Here's The Actual EBay Pages... (Score:1)
Maybe he should have posted about the sales on here, he would have taken loads of bids then!
Re:Here's The Actual EBay Pages... (Score:2)
Re:Here's The Actual EBay Pages... (Score:2)
Re:Here's The Actual EBay Pages... (Score:2)
Selling and buying parts (Score:1)
Might not be true (Score:3, Interesting)
When they did tell the New York mayor he wasnt pleased at all.
Re:Might not be true (Score:1)
Reporter missed the point. (Score:3, Funny)
ah yes, those international criminal "auctions" (Score:2)
This falls in line with some research that I have done, involving the exploits of one british operative 00 (double-oh) 7 (seven).
It seems he sabotaged an international arms auction. Afterwards he helped sink a "stealth boat". I wonder if this "antiques" dealer was at just such an auction...
supped up sesna (Score:1)
Conspiracy afoot (Score:2)
Just kidding, but with all the other goofy stuff that flies around out there, why not?
What's next? (Score:3, Funny)
How long before they get to sell an alzheimer-suffering ex-president on EBay?
Re:What's next? (Score:1, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Question for the Seller. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds like a good idea (Score:2, Interesting)
20/20 Stort from years back (Score:2, Interesting)
That still Cracks me up.
What's the fuss? (Score:3, Funny)
I know things are tight at the defense defense department these days, what with only billions of dollars to waste instead of billions and billions and billions
Actually, I wonder if the reason the DoD can't seem to pass an independent audit [washtimes.com], and in fact can only account for about a third of their budget [cdi.org], is that they're already blowing all their dough buying antique lamp shades on eBay.
The gov't should have just outbid everyone else (Score:1)
What's next? (Score:1)
Canada's record not so good either (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Canada's record not so good either (Score:1)
It's a wonder they were able to destroy the Baldwin's compound with such ease.
Next
Re:Canada's record not so good either (Score:2)
Flea Markets (Score:4, Informative)
There is also this list of electronics flea markets [mit.edu] for the North East
I imagine there are a few someplace near silicon valley as well as CalTech, etc.
;-)
Re:Flea Markets (Score:2)
> I imagine there are a few someplace near silicon
> valley as well as CalTech, etc.
Hell no. Not at Caltech. Every night moles scour the piles of discarded equipment outside Jorgensen and Steele (our CS / EE) buildings and claim it for Caltech. It then goes for decoration, inceneration, or other mischief.
We're not about to part with our cool stuff.
Re:Flea Markets (Score:2, Funny)
Q: Does the hydrogen bomb really exist?
A: No. If it did, it would be on sale on Odessa flea market.
:)
No product support from US Goverment? (Score:2, Insightful)
The magazine pointed out that rogue nations such as Iran routinely seek replacement parts for their U.S.-manufactured military planes.
I just find it funny.. the US must have sold them the planes in the first place.. and now that Iran falls into an area under the Axis Of Evil moniker, its suddenly a serious problem that they try and obtain parts? Perhaps you should have thought of that...
Re:No product support from US Goverment? (Score:1)
Re:No product support from US Goverment? (Score:2)
I just find it funny.. the US must have sold them the planes in the first place.. and now that Iran falls into an area under the Axis Of Evil moniker, its suddenly a serious problem that they try and obtain parts? Perhaps you should have thought of that...
I hate to have to bring up actual history, but you do realize there was some revolution thingy between us selling the planes to the Iran and them currently seeking parts for them?
No shit - look it up. Or maybe the 1979 Iranian Embassy Hostage Crisis [bartleby.com] rings a bell? You know, 1.5 years of American hostages, rescue mission gone horribly awry?
Re:No product support from US Goverment? (Score:1)
Re:No product support from US Goverment? (Score:2)
Well, Iraq got along without any revolutions. First they were the good guys and got a lot of nice toys (first gulf war), then - omygod - they suddendly were very bad boys and invaded Kuwait.
The enemy of my enemy is only my friend as long as he doesn't turn around and beat up my other friends.
If the US only allied ourselves with good guys, it would be us and Canada. And, quite frankly, that's only assuming Canada would have us.
Re:No product support from US Goverment? (Score:2)
Ok, one is always smarter afterwards, but also in this case it might have been somewhat ironic that the US were outfitting the Iraqis to fight the Mullahs in Iran while almost in parallel arming muslim extremists in neighbouring Afghanistan to fight the Soviet Union.
In both cases, the goal was achieved:
Was it worth the cost? So far, yes, but personally I think the US would be a lot better off sinking 20 years of money into nuclear plants and electric infrastructure and letting the middle east go to hell on their own. Fighting for oil is necessary today (what do you think powers Slashdot and your PC?) but that's a dead-end game eventually, and the winners will be the ones willing to make the jump (while the losers will be oil-based welfare states with population explosion and repressive social and political structures. Again, let's get out before they explode).
Re:No product support from US Goverment? (Score:2)
Oil isn't really used any more in the U.S. for Electricity generation.
You are correct! I was suprised to note that:
(DOE [doe.gov])Still, the transportation industry is heavily dependent on petroleum, and if we switched from petroleum to hydrogen-based or electric, we would need to bump the power generation correspondingly - which still means nukes, because all of the others above are limited.
Re:No product support from US Goverment? (Score:2)
Then there was a revolution. Iran's standing government was overthrown, and replaced by one that was hostile to the US. A hostile administration in possession of all that advanced technology is hardly a good situation, but not really the US government's fault. "Oh, we should have seen the Iranian revolution coming. Oops!" Get real.
Re:No product support from US Goverment? (Score:2)
Other than that, what you said.
Address for SR-71 part auction (Score:1)
Picture is not exciting. Just a circuit board.
Cooperation (Score:4, Funny)
Air Force: "You should be seeing a squadron of B-2 Spirits flying over your corporate headquarters in about ten minutes."
Novocin: "Um, yeah, so whaddya wanna know?"
Not a surprise (Score:4, Interesting)
Top Secret? Not really... (Score:2)
It's not like anybody who wanted to know about this stuff, what with so many of our FBI and CIA agents selling information to anybody who had the $$$$.
Hasn't anyone noticed how similar the Soviet Space Shuttle looked to ours?
Re:Who modded this up? (Score:2)
As far as modding it up, I actually bother to log-in and post intelligently from time to time.
What bothers me the most (Score:4, Informative)
Re:What bothers me the most (Score:2)
Sign of the times.. (Score:4, Funny)
(shameless plug..)
I remember, back during the Cold War, we didn't have the internet,
we had to sell these things at secret meetings with the "attaché for tourism" from the embassy of some shady nation..
You had to get plane tickets to all these wierd,
exotic locations like Geneva and the Caribbian, to meet these jerks. (They never even said thanks)
Nowadays, I don't even have to leave my nice CIA office, and I always get the best price for my contraband! Ebay is great!
(/shameless plug)
Classified parts.. (Score:2, Funny)
Stuff>> Parts>> Govt.>> Weapons>> Missiles>> Classified>> Anti-Radar>> Anti-Tank for "Hellfire" and I got NADA... But I did find a nice AIM-4D Falcon [whattheheck.com] that the Koreans are offloading...
This is ridiculous! I had no problems picking up a sightly used Sun [whattheheck.com], 81" of snow [whattheheck.com], a Russian test space shuttle [whattheheck.com] and the Ark of the Covenant [whattheheck.com] (presumably being sold by one Dr. Jones)...
I'm looking at a slightly used V-22 Osprey (no reserve!) on www.ebayplanesthatcrashoften.com, but even though it has no reserve, it's starting bid is $945M....
I guess I'm just a dick. [whattheheck.com]
Too bad (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Too bad (Score:2)
Don't forget the toilet paper. Can't have our boys getting chafed you know. Sure as hell don't want 'em getting splinters from the TP like the $ENEMY_ARMY_OF_THE_DAY does.
Damn! (Score:1)
When I first read that, I was thinking of Marvin the Martian's Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator. I've always wanted one of those, but I keep getting outbid by some wasckaly wabbit.
Marvin The Martian (Score:1)
*end marvin the martian voice*
Is E-bay Cheaper (Score:2)
That's where the investigation should focus.
Damn (Score:1)
Shoulda made more money... (Score:1)
Ebay is great for plutonium/uranium too (Score:2, Funny)
You [ebay.com] need [ebay.com] some [ebay.com] uranium? [ebay.com]
I sure wish I had ebay when I was a kid...
Re:Ebay is great for plutonium/uranium too (Score:2)
Link to e-bay items... (Score:1, Interesting)
Enjoy pictures and descriptions of the items in question:
Military sales at ebay [ebay.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re:C'mon....the stuff is 12 years old! (Score:2)
My understanding of past situations of this sort is that the military is concerned about the release of technology that might be obsolescent by our standards and those of our allies, but is still more advanced than what our enemies (or potential enemies) have access to. A 15-year-old communications circuit might not sound like such a big deal to us, but if you're the Chinese military and are typically working with technology that's 20 years behind what the Americans are using, it might be a very big deal indeed.
Don't blame the surplus sales staff... (Score:2, Insightful)
Add that to the fact that these miscellaneous boxes of stuff were lost in a warehouse to begin with, and, well, what do you expect? The real guilty parties were the ones who didn't track down the original boxes when they were lost. After all, they could easily have fallen in to the wrong hands back then.