Gnome 2.0 RC2 Asks For Abuse 214
A nameless reader submits: "The GNOME Desktop 2.0 release candidate 2 has been released! Gnome 2.0 should be coming out soon! The release notes have some good information."
In the long run, every program becomes rococco, and then rubble. -- Alan Perlis
Crime? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Crime? (Score:1)
Re:Crime? (Score:1)
Asking for it (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Crime? (Score:2)
Possibly, but it might just be Gnome tossing that you're thinking of.
Does anyone know... (Score:1)
Re:Does anyone know... (Score:5, Informative)
I don't have any inside information, but if you look here [gnome.org] you can see that they've added an unscheduled release candidate and they had planned two weeks between the last release candidate and going gold.
Assuming we don't get another release candidate (which I think is a good bet - I'm running the nightlies and they feel solid) that places 2.0 around July 7.
No, I think I liked it better the first time. (Score:2)
Moderators of the above comment (+1 style): YHBT. YHL. HTH. HAND.
Re:No, I think I liked it better the first time. (Score:1)
Re:No, I think I liked it better the first time. (Score:1)
Re:No, I think I liked it better the first time. (Score:1)
Re:Does anyone know... (Score:1)
RC code name (Score:5, Informative)
Re:RC code name (Score:2)
Yupp, I'm still having a hangover..
Re:RC code name (Score:2)
Re:RC code name (Score:3, Informative)
I know the perfect hangover cure. When I have a hangover, I can't sleep... so, oddly enough, after a heavy night of drinking, I'm up early, curled up in the fetal position on a couch cursing my own existance. (At least, when I used to drink a lot thats what I did... but that was 10 years ago).
OK, here's the cure:
1) 2 or more excederin (with both asprin and tylenol as pain releivers, it is always good at taking the edge off - and it has caffeine - a plus for this crowd)
2) a multivitamin, like centrum.
3) a b-complex vitamin suppliment(a lot of drug stores sell this as something like B-100). Alcohol flushes b complex vitamins from your system, which is one of the reasons you will feel like crap.
4) Gatorade. Swallow all of those pills with a big jug of gatorade... it contains a lot of the electrolytes you need, but pissed out because your kidneys were dumping all the alcohol.
5) a high-carbohydrate breakfast. Something like pancakes.
finally, after doing all of that, melt yourself in a warm shower.
Seriously... Do all this, and you will feel a LOT better.
Hangover Prevention (Score:2)
A hangover is caused by dehydration. To prevent a hangover, you should drink AT LEAST as much water as alcohol before you go to sleep. If you alternate alcohol and water drinks as you are partying, even better. Good luck!
Re:RC code name (Score:2)
Re:RC code name (Score:1, Informative)
We should all party together.
Re:RC code name (Score:1)
"I applaud the wise anti-"multicultural" policies"
"I'm white, thus I'm discriminated against"
How does that go together?
You applaud discrimination of black people and then you bitch about being discriminated because you're white?
I always wondered how a racists mind work. Does it make sence to you or do you have a big internal conflict going on?
Strange how you trolls always get your disgusting views into every thread.
fertility rite (Score:1)
hmmm... wonder what that stands for..?!!
;)
Re:RC code name (Score:1)
Mirrors (Score:4, Informative)
ftp.twoguys.org (US or Canada) [twoguys.org]
ftp3.sourceforge.net (US or Canada) [sourceforge.net]
ftp.rpmfind.net (US or Canada) [rpmfind.net]
ftp.sourceforge.net (US or Canada) [sourceforge.net]
ftp.cse.buffalo.edu (US or Canada) [buffalo.edu]
ftp.yggdrasil.com (US or Canada) [yggdrasil.com]
planetmirror.com (Australia) [planetmirror.com]
ftp.sunet.se (Europe) [sunet.se]
ftp.dataplus.se (Europe) [dataplus.se]
ftp.easynet.nl (Europe) [easynet.nl]
ftp.unina.it (Europe) [unina.it]
ftp.belnet.be (Europe) [belnet.be]
ftp.codefactory.se (Europe) [codefactory.se]
ftp.tr.gnome.org (Europe) [gnome.org]
fr.rpmfind.net (Europe) [rpmfind.net]
ftp.acc.umu.se (Europe) [acc.umu.se]
ftp.no.gnome.org (Europe) [gnome.org]
ftp.dit.upm.es (Europe) [dit.upm.es]
fr2.rpmfind.net (Europe) [rpmfind.net]
linux.cem.itesm.mx (South America) [itesm.mx]
abuse! (Score:5, Funny)
maybe i'm just being stupid, but trolling seems a very appropriate reply to such an ill-formulated headline
have a nice day!
Garnome (Score:5, Informative)
It takes a while to build (about an hour on my 1.0 GHz PIII), but it doesn't touch your existing install - everything goes into ~/garnome.
Re:Garnome (Score:1)
Re:Garnome (Score:1)
Re:Garnome (Score:2)
However, Gnome 2.0 gave me mixed reactions. First off, the speed is unbelievable. Nautilus is actually a USABLE utility now (550mhz Athlon, 288ram), and everything runs SO much faster!
On the other hand, I just didn't like the fact that I had to re-do all of my config, and wasn't in the mood to toy with it. So i'll keep testing a bit, but I'll be more excited when mandrake does all their pretty menus for me and I don't have to worry about it :)
Another problem was the fact that I didn't know how to rebuild gaim applet and xmms-gnome for my garnome, and Evolution didn't work. Maybe I needed to re-specify my paths when compiling. I can't live without those 3 applets/programs.
Re:Garnome (Score:2)
Thanks..
Re:Garnome (Score:2)
Another *MAJOR* point that will prevent me from 'upgrading' to 2.0 is that there doesn't seem to be any way to have my favorite focus mode: sloppy with 200ms autoraise: there is 'focus follows mouse' but I wasn't able to get autoraise to work (and anyways having half the focus prefs under the gnome config, and half under the sawfish config is kind of lame).
I also had several other problems with RC1 (preferences not saving, gconfd not being stopped when logging out (maybe related to the first)) but they might be related to my config.
Personally these RC1 and RC2 felt more like an alpha than an RC, so if the above are fixed (moveable top panel, sloppy+autoraise) I will probably try gnome 2.2 (or whatever the name of the 'bugfix' release is).
BTW, if there IS a way in RC1/RC2 to get the focus behaviour and to move the panel from the top to the left, I'm all ears!
Re:Garnome (Score:2)
Re:Garnome (Score:1)
Re:Garnome (Score:2)
Gnome2 problems (Score:2, Informative)
Things I hope they can change in by release day.
Japanese Input is broken in gnome2 applications.
File Chooser is not improved.( I know this is planned for the 2.2 release)
I was expecting a lot more from gnome control center.
Default configurations are bad.
Re:Gnome2 problems (Score:1)
Have you filed a bug report on this? There was a mention of this on the GNOME lists recently, and others have had Japanese input working. The only way to track down an apparently isolated set of cases is to file a bug report and work with the developers.
Re:Gnome2 problems (Score:2)
Woah, hold on a bit. That is nonsense. This is desktop enviroment. Doesn't matter if you can grow flowers from the command line, the GUI and specially the control center is really important (though i use the command line for a lot of thing, and specially when the GUI lacks. ex: file manager. I can't use Nautilus).
Missing info at Released note (Score:3, Funny)
"Can we have a special TELSABUG category, and everything gets dropped
to fix them first?" - Telsa Gwynne
Looking forward with mixed feelings (Score:5, Interesting)
I've been playing with Gnome 2 for a while now, and I must admit it is starting to feel like a stable release.
There are a few things that I have mixed feelings about though. The default WM is switching to Metacity, which doesn't have the power and configurability of Sawfish, and that is symptomatic of the general reduction in configurability.
Someone, somewhere has decided that configurability === complexity, and that a bewildering array of choices is too many for a newbie. This appears to have been translated into a general 'dumbing down' of the interface.
I can no longer tell Sawfish to remember my window sizes. The Gnome Panel can no longer swallow applications, so all of those WM applets are now useless to me. I can't run the Afterstep clock applet!
I guess it is the applications job to remember what window size I last used, and to remember it without me telling the WM to do so, but they don't - not even Nautilus2 remembers it's window sizes - every time it opens a new window which is slightly less than 1/4 of my screen size.
Overall, this is probably a good thing. People should be writing their applications to remember UI things, and having the WM remember those probably makes them lazy, but I can see a bit of pain in my future with Gnome 2, until these issues are solved and Gnome 3 is released, perhaps.
At least Gnome 2 does seem somewhat snappier than Gnome 1.4, and the styling is better, especially with anti-aliasing available throughout.
Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't think you have to wait for Gnome 3.0 for this stuff to be fixed. The improvements between 1.0 and 1.4.x were amazing and I would expect the same kind of thing here.
Also, it'll take a while for most applications to be ported over to Gnome 2.0. In that respect I think a lot of users might be disappointed since most of what people think of as "Gnome" is really applications. The release of Gnome 2.0 means the new API and a few basic tools are ready, but the real benefits won't be apparent until Gnumeric, Evolution, and other big apps are ported over.
Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings (Score:1)
Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings (Score:2)
Are you saying that under Qt you can change a text box into an oval or something like that? Is this at the application development level or at the theme level?
Agreement, but reserved. (Score:4, Insightful)
For those apps which are "special," they could simply send a "NON_STATEFUL" token to the WM when dealing with that window.
Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings (Score:2)
NOOOoooooooo!!!
Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings (Score:5, Insightful)
All the apps I use regularly, Galeon, Nautilus, gnome-terminal etc.. does remember window size.
GNOME 2.0 has tried to decrease the amount of options. This is a Good Thing [tm], because it means that the options that are still there are useful, easy to find and intuitive.
Metacity is NOT the default WM for GNOME 2.0, it is just an option. It will probably be the default WM some day, but it is still not completely ready for that.
Swallowing other applets than GNOME-applets is hardly useful for anyone but a very few. It was a great source of bugs, and nobody really wanted to fix it. It was decided that unless someone really wanted it badly enough to fix it, then it would be dropped. Nobody wanted it badly enough.
The strange thing is that the people that scream about lack of options, are mostly the same that scream about bloat. This is ironic because the huge amount of options it would take to satisfy everyone would lead to an extremely bloated interface both UI-wise, bugwise and probably also memory-wise.
If someone wants an option or a feature this is the way to do it:
- Open up a bug report in bugzilla, and argue carefully for your feature or option request.
There are three issues that need to be addressed before they are accepted:
The swallowed applet was probably ok for point 1, a little on the edge for point 2, and definitely a miss for point 3. If someone does care enough to code, then state your interest on desktop-devel-list@gnome.org, and it might be in GNOME 2.2 or something like that.
Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings (Score:1)
It's not very strange. It just means that options should be organized/categorized/foldered better.
It might be useful to combine the best experience from M$ Win2k Administrator's console and IBM AIX Smith.
Also, it would be nice to have typical profiles. Hide some (or lot) of options in "non-super-user" profiles.
I hope GNOME 2.1 options will be more smart organized than now. It may take knowledge management patterns but it will worth.
Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings (Score:1)
And this is what people are trying to do. However, it still doesn't make sense to keep every option ever invented in any operating system in, no matter how well organized they are. If hardly noone uses an option or if noone is prepared to maintain it, it's usually just unmaintained code that may have been broken for years and a source for bug reports. Preferences have a cost. Better organization and careful decisions on what to have and what to keep is what's needed, and that's what people are trying to do.
Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings (Score:2)
What about those who wanted it but can't code? Personally the one feature that I wanted it for was for gabber's swallowed applet. This works perfectly in kde3, even though gabber is a gnome app. As I use jabber for all my communication (icq, msn, etc) I really need a decent jabber client that will work in gnome2. If there is one out there, great, but the best I've seen are either PSI (swallowed into the kde dock, as it's a kde app) and gabber (swallowed into the gnome or kde dock, and a gnome app), and it seems that neither of them will work now
</bitch>
Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings (Score:1)
Regardless of the default, they're going to have to pry enlightenment from my cold, dead fingers.
And that's all I have to say about that.
Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings (Score:2)
Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings (Score:2)
This question deserves its own story.
Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings (Score:1)
Lack of remember settings in Sawfish is a major hit toward my willingness to use it. Metacity is dumbdowncity. All the window managers that only have Send window left or right royally suck. I want to Send to X not repeatedly Send to Left/Right/Up/Down.
Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings (Score:1)
Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings (Score:3, Informative)
Gnome2 will hit Debian unstable fairly soon. In fact it is mostly in there already - there are just a few things in experimental really.
I would say that in your case you probably will be better off with Gnome2, because it does seem snappier than 1.4.
Debian... (Score:2)
Re:Debian... (Score:1, Insightful)
Why use either? (Score:2, Informative)
Seriously, I run straight WindowMaker even on newer hardware, sure on a fast machine I bring up a gnome panel occassionally to mess around with, but I honestly never really understood why people seem to think they have to have KDE or GNOME on a machine - particularly an older one of course. Install the libs, and whatever applications you have to have, and they'll run just fine without any panels or the like...
"Gnome 2.0 RC2 Asks For Abuse" (Score:4, Funny)
Re:"Gnome 2.0 RC2 Asks For Abuse" (Score:2, Funny)
A Haiku for you! (Score:1)
Re:A Haiku for you! (Score:1)
Somebody please kill me now.
I was running Gnome.
I should've hit 'Preview', shouldn't I? I'm such a n00b!
Jesse
haiku12.20.beamsplat@spamgourmet.com
Re:A Haiku for you! (Score:2)
where did he go?
Not a haiku. (Score:2)
Pedantry for the day.
Re:Not a haiku. (Score:2)
Serves me right for being bleeding edge and all.
Re:Not a haiku. (Score:2)
who's with me?!
Where's the ChangeLog ? (Score:1)
Where is the ChangeLog between RC1 and RC2 ? All the release notes say is that "some bugs were fixed", which isn't really interesting.
Re:Where's the ChangeLog ? (Score:1)
Re:Where's the ChangeLog ? (Score:2, Informative)
You can use bugzilla [gnome.org] to find this information.
As an example, here [gnome.org] is a list of all bugs with the GNOME2 keyword that are in the RESOLVED, VERIFIED or CLOSED state that changed state between the RC1 and RC2 releases. It is not complete, and probably isn't fully accurate (some changes may have been fixed but no new tarball is available yet), but it gives you an idea of what has changed.
No Launch-Feedback and Menu-Editor in Gnome 2.0 (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:No Launch-Feedback and Menu-Editor in Gnome 2.0 (Score:1)
Re:No Launch-Feedback and Menu-Editor in Gnome 2.0 (Score:1)
How can I enable anti-aliasing? (Score:1)
However, I can't seem to find where the preference to enable anti-alias fonts is... I've tried selecting largish fonts, but all the rendering is clearly bitmapped.
Anyone else using the Ximian snapshot having this problem? Are they compiling w/ anti-aliasing off?
Re:How can I enable anti-aliasing? (Score:1)
I've still had no definitive answer.
Some have said to set an environment variable, but I don't know which file to put this in. It really should be a standard thing and have a GUI configuration program.
How to enable anti-aliasing? (Score:5, Informative)
First of all, you must enable Xft support (the new font system for X). This is done by defining the GDK_USE_XFT environment variable before running a program. The best way to turn this on for the entire desktop is by defining it in the X startup script (probably ~/.gnomerc, ~/.Xclients or ~/.xinitrc):
After doing this, you may still not see antialiased fonts. For instance, on Red Hat systems, the default /etc/X11/XftConfig file has the following lines:
which turns off antialiasing for fonts with sizes between 8 and 14. By commenting out these lines, AA will be enabled for all fonts. If you have an LCD panel, add a line like the following to /etx/X11/XftConfig or ~/.xftconfig:
This will turn on ClearType style subpixel antialiasing.
Re:How to enable anti-aliasing? (Score:2)
Man might be nice to have an entire document, for whatever distro, with rpm levels on how to get AA setup. There is too much "turn this on" and it works mumbo-jumbo.
Back to the real world...
Re:How to enable anti-aliasing? (Score:2)
Re:How to enable anti-aliasing? (Score:1)
Xft can handle Type1, TTF and OpenType fonts (and in the version included in CVS XFree86, bitmap PCF fonts as well). Simply add a "dir" line to the XftConfig file for each font directory. No need to create fonts.dir files or anything -- Xft will discover the fonts in that directory itself. One of the nice things you can do is to add ~/fonts to the Xft font path in your local ~/.xftconfig file. Then you can drop fonts in that folder and they become usable to all your Xft using applications.
You should probably still run XFS, so that older applications (such as gtk 1.2 based ones, and most Xt ones) that use core X font rendering still work. Note that the reason most distros are set up to use a font server rather than leaving the X server to render the fonts is that it adds a level of parallelism. If the X server was rendering fonts, it would block while doing so. With the font server rendering fonts, the X server is free to do other stuff while waiting for the fonts to be rendered, which can take a while for CJK fonts, for instance.
Re:How to enable anti-aliasing? (Score:1)
Can't they just put a button somewhere that you click and it automagically works?
I mean ximian's whole point is trying to sell a usable open source desktop that anybody can use...
Sorry but if that's the best they can do, or they think that is "usable by the masses" then ximian has some issues...
Font blurring has nothing to do with usability. Actually it makes stuff even harder to see. So, how does this make "using" Gnome hard? If you want to play with stuff prepare for some challenges.
"I don't see how anyone can claim that windows is easy to use.. I mean, I can't even get it to do virtual desktops and I have to edit the friggin' registry to turn on focus-follows-mouse mode! Windows won't be "ready for the desktop" until there's a simple check box somewhere to turn these on.. how hard could it be? Gnome has had them for YEARS."
Silly, isn't it.
Gnome2 since beta5 (Score:1)
Gnome is Dead (Score:3, Funny)
Or is it... (Score:4, Funny)
WindowMaker compatibility? (Score:1)
Isn't running linux abuse enough? (Score:1)
late? (Score:1)
http://developer.gnome.org/dotplan/schedule/
Re:late? (Score:1)
Report of Abuse (Score:2)
I installed redhat 7.3 cleanly. Then I installed all the updates as provided by the redhat tool that comes with it.
When I heard about the Gnome abuse request, I decided to download the RC2. Well, I downloaded the ximian redcarpet utility and told it to upgrade everything using the Gnome2 development channel.
At first everything seemed to go well except that my desktop settings weren't preserved. Now too many things are breaking to keep track of. The screen saver doesn't work either. I think I'll wait a bit longer... 'til like Gnome 2.1.
Re:Report of Abuse (Score:2)
if everyone had your attitude, we sure would have some shitty software!
Major problem (Score:2)
Re:Just anti-aliasing? (Score:1)
Also, if you want "ClearType" (technically known as sub-pixel antialiasing) you will have to do a bit of XftConfig`ing.
Re:Just anti-aliasing? (Score:3, Informative)
Xft.rgba: rgb
Or equivalently, in your ~/.xftconfig file:
match edit rgba=rgb;
Re:What about KDE? (Score:1, Troll)
Both Gnome and KDE are good, and Linux is far stronger for having two lively projects (and a lot of small or special-purpose projects as well) in this area.
/Janne
speed? (Score:2)
What about speed? I lost interest in Gnome because the version I tried was so insanely slow. Actually it probably wasn't so much Gnome itself that was slow, but Nautilus and Evolution. Anyhow, what is happening on the speed front? In principle, I like the idea that all this stuff is tightly integrated, and I like the Bonobo concept. It all sounds great, but for example, Evolution 1.0 takes 16 seconds to load, which is just way too long. (This is on a brand-spanking-new machine, too!)
I guess I'm just inclined to cynicism because I see how commercial software gets slower and slower with every release -- hope the reverse is happening with Gnome & co. For now, I'm sticking with KDE.
Re:speed? (Score:1)
You won't get disappointed. A lot of people (me included) can testify that it is a lot faster [slashdot.org].
Re:speed? (Score:1)
Indeed, most of the "useability" stuff that's been going on in Gnome is either:
a) Changes to make it more like Windows, or
b) Removal of useful features that could confuse first time users.
It appears Gnome is increasignly aimed at people with limited short-term memory who have recently changed from Windows.
Sad really, it could have been good.
Re:What about KDE? (Score:2, Informative)
Hey! (Score:1)
Re:hi mom! (Score:1)
Joke? (Score:1)
Re:Gnome vs. KDE (Score:1)
Re:New Button Order (Score:1)
And no, it's never caused me much confusion.
Re:gnome-panel (Score:1)