100th Anniversary of Air Conditioning 409
RealPerseus writes "The Buffalo News reports today in this article that the 100th annivsary of air conditioning is upon us. Who would have thought that air conditioning was invented in Buffalo?"
now I know how to really cool my PC.... (Score:3, Interesting)
Carrier (Score:5, Funny)
NO CARRIER
Re:now I know how to really cool my PC.... (Score:2, Funny)
Most of us descended from amoeba too so maybe they should get the credit. And I don't think they originated in the UK ;-)
Re:now I know how to really cool my PC.... (Score:2, Insightful)
Was it? I think the airplane was invented long before there was a germany. People have been trying to fly since they first saw birds. The Greeks were obviously thinking about it a long time ago (ever here of Icarus?).
I guess it all depends on how you define an airplane. But if you define it as a self propelled flying contraption, well then, you gotta go with the Wrights.
Why is everyone pounding their damn chests over who invented what anyway? Most (if not all) inventions always build on the ideas of others.
Carrier was an engineer for a company that build air handlers. All he did was cool the damn air as it went through the vents. So you could say lots of things about how he didn't invent anything. But yet, there it was, an air conditioner. He thought of a new way to do something.
No since getting your pantties in a wad over who invented what.
Re:now I know how to really cool my PC.... (Score:2)
Almost every pilot since then has had the advantage of learning from an experienced pilot. But someone had to be first, and it was the Wright's motorized box kite, and their extremely systematic step-by-step approach, that made do-it-yourself pilot training possible.
What more can I say but... (Score:4, Funny)
This has to be cheating. (Score:4, Funny)
And, here, a story about air conditioning. That I don't have. Meanies.
Re:This has to be cheating. (Score:2)
Graduate of two high schools? (Score:3, Interesting)
"Carrier graduated from both Angola High School and the old Hutchinson-Central High School in Buffalo."
How do you graduate from two high schools?
Re:Graduate of two high schools? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Graduate of two high schools? (Score:2)
Not much there. (Score:5, Informative)
read this the other day... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:read this the other day... (Score:4, Interesting)
important in submarines -now- (Score:3, Interesting)
AC was also an important feature of the U.S. Navy's fleet submarines in World War II
I was a crew member of one a few years ago. We could stay submerged for weeks or months. Air conditioning was pretty vital. We had two huge R-114 units. Man, it got hot during drills involving loss of non-vital electrical loads ...
Re:read this the other day... (Score:2)
U.S. subs in the WWII era had to patrol the Pacific - which meant big boats capable of very long cruises, and the crew had to be kept healthy. So they had showers, and air-conditioning for the tropical areas, as good a food service as could be fitted in, and a reasonable amount of room to live in.
Most U-boats were designed for short cruises out into the North Sea and around the British isles. So they were as small as possible (which helps evade detection, too), and if that meant cramped quarters and no showers, the crew could just bear it for a few weeks. After all, they could have joined the infantry instead and lived in muddy foxholes for _months_ at a time with no chance to clean up.
Of course, as the war went on and the sub defenses multiplied close in to Britain, and on the approaches to the ports used to replenish the U-boats, the U-boats had to lengthen their cruises, and so things could get pretty uncomfortable. Furthermore, originally the boats would surface every night to run the diesels and recharge the batteries - crewmen could lollygag on deck during this, the hatches could be opened and some of the smell blown out, and if it wasn't too cold they could take seawater baths. But then someone (a Brit, I think?) invented radar small enough to mount in an airplane, the Americans manufactured thousands of large long-range airplanes, and once enough radar equipped bombers were on patrol, surfacing anywhere near the shipping lanes came to carry a high risk of being bombed. So the Germans invented the snorkel; now the U-boats could run the diesels while submerged, with only a periscope and air intake pipe exposed. These were undetectable to radar, but the crews suffered... For safer areas, the Germans also provided radar detectors, so the subs could surface as long as they could dive quickly when the detector pinged. But staying ready for a fast dive = keep most of the crew below...
lower temperature inside - what about outside? (Score:4, Interesting)
Anybody knows whether there are studies about the impact that air conditioning may have on the climate? expecially in cities/towns.
At least the microclimate near air conditioned buildings is influenced: sometimes you can't just pass near them because of hot air.
I know that there are some places around the world where you couldn't live without AC, and that there are places where you need it for computers and other sensible stuff, but I feel that in most places it is abused. (Things like 18C inside when outside there is only a perfectly tolerable 25C)
In Tokyo they reckon it's a bad thing (Score:2)
Re:In Tokyo they reckon it's a bad thing (Score:2, Interesting)
The Japanese are always doing crazy, innovative things to solve problems, though, so more power to them if they want to use water pipes to cool the city. But it's not just a problem in Tokyo - it's just as much a problem in New York and elsewhere (and it's not just because of A/C).
Re:lower temperature inside - what about outside? (Score:2)
Considering the system as a whole (and disregarding inefficiencies of the A/C system), the average heat energy of the system including both the inside and outside the house is going to be the same. Thus, if you keep running the A/C, your house either has to keep getting colder (and the outside hotter), or there has to be some loss of heat difference somewhere. This loss, obviously, is the outside heat seeping back into the house, weather it be via air every time you open a door, or conduction through the walls. This cools off the outside. In the end, it's all equal.
Now it's also true, as thermodynamics second law tells us, that our AC system cannot be perfectly efficient, and the energy loss will be in the form of an overall heat increase. However, I don't believe this, even if used by everyone in a city, is going to be enough to noticably affect the climate.
Re:lower temperature inside - what about outside? (Score:3, Insightful)
One thing that really pisses me off is the total misunderstanding of the thermostat. How often have you seen someone on a hot day throw the thermostat down to 65? Obviously, most people think the number on the thermostat is the temperature of the air that comes out of the vent.
I once went into a grocery store in the middle of summer, and it was COLD in the store. I asked the cashier: "Aren't you cold?" She replied: "Yeah, but we don't mind, since it's so hot outside." ??
I think a series of public service ads featuring a brief explanation of the thermostat, plus a recommended temperature, would go a long way toward reducing abuse.
Re:lower temperature inside - what about outside? (Score:3, Interesting)
1) The "perfect" temperature to aim for is 17 C, as both humans and electrical equipment will heat up the air to up around 20 C.
2) If your building is affected by solar heating, you cannot simply use passive cooling/convection to cool it down, and the temperature will rise quite quickly to intolerable levels (more than 25 C)
3) If it's sunny and 25 C outside, and your building is slightly succeptible to solar heating, it will rather quickly become REALLY hot inside if you don't use airconditioning. I know this myself, as we DON'T have any kind of AC in our building (even though that's what we do for a living), and if it's 20 C+ outside and sunny, it will rise to an abyssmal 5 C hotter than that inside; I guess it's because we don't have movement of air inside, as opening windows usually results in too powerfull drafts throwing papers all over the office and leaving me to find them and sort them out again - yes, I'm speaking from experience
Anyway, modern air conditioning can recycle up to 95% of the heat you suck out of a building, so in the winter time hardly any heat is wasted, but in the summertime there's really no need to recycle it.
Re:lower temperature inside - what about outside? (Score:2)
Perfect temperature 17 C (that's 62.6 F)? Do you want me wearing a sweater year round?
Intolerable is >25 C (77 F)? Uh... I keep my house above that in the summer. In fact, I find considerably warmer temperatures perfectly fine if the humidity is low enough. The power companies generally recommend keeping your house no cooler than about 25 C (76-78 F) because when you cool below that you start burning energy fast and 25 C is very well within most people's comfort zones.
All I can think is that you're from a country with a much colder climate than most of the US.
Air conditioning has destroyed architecture (Score:5, Insightful)
I love air conditioning, but I want to hate it. . .
Re:Air conditioning has destroyed architecture (Score:2)
Methinks Television had more to do with that than AC.
Re:Air conditioning has destroyed architecture (Score:2)
didn't work anyways (Score:3, Funny)
Re:didn't work anyways (Score:2)
Hey prisoner, is the insidespaces website your work? If so, very nice, good design. Email me, I want to talk.
But now you can live in certain places.... (Score:2)
However, modern air conditioning has made it possible to do two things:
1. Live in desert environments. You wouldn't want to live in Phoenix, AZ without air conditioning, especially with temperatures in the daytime hitting 45 degrees C. and higher during the summer.
2. Live in warm, high-humidity environments. Try living in the southeastern USA with temperatures in the high 30's C. and 75-plus percent humidity during the summer without air conditioning.
A big benefit of air conditioning is a huge boon to museums. Works of art and historical items are much more easily preserved in temperature/humidity controlled environments that air conditioning systems provide.
Re:But now you can live in certain places.... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:But now you can live in certain places.... (Score:3, Insightful)
And indeed, it has led to its own boom in housing prices in the South of the US. If it wasn't for AC who would live in Texas or Florida ?
This isn't to say AC is all good, as other posters point out it is over used in the US, but that doesn't reduce its importance.
But not at MFA Boston? (Score:2)
We went to the MFA in Boston 2-3 years ago in the summer and I was kind of appalled at the lack of A/C in vast stretches of the museum, including the furniture and decorative arts wings. I'm sure paintings benefit greatly from stable environments, but the wood furniture REALLY benefits from not constantly warping the summer and contracting in the winter.
Although one could reason that most of the furniture made prior to the invention of A/C had been naturally subject to that and the woodworkers of the era built a lot of floating joints that could tolerate it, but its got to be hard on the laminates and inlays.
Re:Air conditioning has destroyed architecture (Score:2, Insightful)
So if your going to blame something for the decline of architecture, start with building materials being similar to legos, and not AC.
And don't forget the Congress (Score:2)
And think of the poor Brits at their embassy in D.C.--they used to get topical duty pay!
Re:Air conditioning has destroyed architecture (Score:3, Insightful)
Once A/C become common, the need to build houses so that they stay cool naturally went away - and it's much cheaper to just use AC, too.
Hence, ceilings didn't need to be as high, and one didn't need to put as much thought into the placement of windows, because with A/C there was no need for a good breeze to keep the houe cool.
It's cheaper to cut down the trees when building the building, yes. With A/C, those trees (and the shade they provide) lost much of their importance for keeping the house cool.
It's not that I think that there's an A/C conspiracy, it's just that A/C made it more feasible to cut a few corners when building a house. Personally, I'd like to have a house that has all of the stuff I'm lamenting the loss of
Intersting (Score:2)
Then we drop a note to... point out that it's the anniversary of airconditioning.
Thanks? (Score:5, Insightful)
What amazes me most is how Americans have begun to view air conditioning as a "necessity". Are we insane? The necessities in life are food, oxygen, and heat in climates with extreme cold. Nevertheless, the petroleum supplies are depleted at an increasing rate so that people can be more comfortable as they sit in traffic with the A/C on full blast.
Yes, it's a nice invention. Hospitals can benefit tremendously from it. But it's nowhere near a necessity and if humans would tolerate a little discomfort, the Earth might be in much better shape.
Re:Thanks? (Score:2)
If you get cold, you put on more clothes and cover yourself in a blanket. If you get hot, you either find shade, cover yourself in water and sit in front of a fan, live underground or thank god you have an A/C.
Re:Thanks? (Score:2, Insightful)
Here in Chicago, it was mostly elderly people living alone who left their windows closed that one summer in 94 when 400 people died from a heat wave.
But when I go visit my relatives in rural Philippines, I see people toughing it out in just-as-humid heat. Even The difference is their homes are better ventilated and they make do with electric fans and a shade (or a swim in the sea).
The guy has a point. It's not a necessity. There is an alternative to air conditioning. Whereas there isn't an alternative to food, oxygen, and heat in extreme cold climates.
Re:Thanks? (Score:4, Insightful)
Compare housing in america to housing in, say italy or greece. (or mexico for that matter.)
My feeling is that the widespread use of AC has made architects forget how you build a house for a hot climate. You don't have large south-facing windows. You have wooden or even stone floors and not a carpet. (Carpets are germ infested discusting things anyway) You have proper insulation and ventilation. You make sure that you get some freaking shade.
Or,... you just put in some AC, and hope that power will never be a problem.
Re:Thanks? (Score:2)
Absolutely. I recently brought an old (1860's) flat in Spain, and those architects sure did know how to make a nice space to live in. High ceilings, light, easy to clean, good distribution and cool without air-conditioning. Having lived only in modern flats before, I could never go back.
Carpets are germ infested discusting things anyway
Absolutely! I didn't realise how horrible carpets where until I lived in a place with tile floors. The combination of carpets, strip lighting and air-conditioning - what an unhealthy environment to live in.
Re:Thanks? (Score:2)
As a result, this puts a lot less strain on air conditioners since they don't have to be run so often.
Also, careful placement of circulating fans around the house really helps things, too.
Re:Thanks? (Score:2)
Re:Thanks? (Score:2)
I highly doubt that you spend your days sitting on your front stoop with a wet towel wrapped around your neck. Until you do, don't lecture people about the nobility of the good old days when people sat in puddles of their own sweat.
Re:Thanks? (Score:2)
Re:Thanks? (Score:2)
Good question. The answer may be yes, but not if by "make humans more comfortable" you really mean "make me more comfortable right now." How does the technology that makes you cooler affect everyone else on the planet? How 'bout future residents? Do non-human residents not matter at all?
The long-term indirect consequences of AC are huge. To pick just two things, think how population distribution has changed due to AC and they resulting change in energy use and land use. And consider the ability to move perishable goods around the world and what happens when native agriculture for local consumption is replaced with mono-cultured goodies to ship the rich countries.
I'm not saying these things are good or bad, but if we're considering what is the proper end of technological advancement, I really don't give a damn if you or I feel a little uncomfortable when the temperature gets a bit high.
Re:Thanks? (Score:2)
A flat out lie. If you don't feel more comfortable in an air conditioned building, you have some kind of temperature regulation problem, or a problem with dealing with humidity. See a doctor immediately.
>and quite a bit to degrade it.
I'm not even going to mention the huge conspiracy theory that is Freon, but I will ask why you think it degrades life? What, other than Freon, which modern air conditioners no longer use, about air conditioning is inherently bad? That it uses power? Well, BFD! Build a nuclear power plant and all the problems are solved.
>I am by no means an avid environmentalist
In that case, you should have no problem with nuclear power plants -- otherwise you are an environmentalist nutcase and just haven't come out of the closet yet.
>But it's nowhere near a necessity and if humans would tolerate a little discomfort, the Earth might be in much better shape.
Exactly how is getting rid of all air conditioning today going to benefit the earth? Considering how long an air conditioner lasts, I doubt its going to do much to landfills. Most parts of an air conditioner are recyclable anyways.
Two, why be in discomfort when it causes little to no environmental harm? You just haven't backed up your theory that well...
>Nevertheless, the petroleum supplies are depleted at an increasing rate so that people can be more comfortable as they sit in traffic with the A/C on full blast.
The majority of time the majority of people sit in air conditioning (by majority I mean 90% or more) is in an air conditioned building. If your local power comes from coal or gas, I feel for you. Not just your environment, but you must be writing some fat checks to the local power authorities!
Re:Thanks? (Score:5, Funny)
I'd much prefer to waste the earths resources than see the sweaty hairy hacker next to me's ballbag attempting to escape from his shorts, believe me...
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Is this anyway related to... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Is this anyway related to... (Score:2)
Re:Is this anyway related to... (Score:2)
Slashmaths: 3 + 10 + 17 + 13 + 6 + 7 < 36
God help us all.
WRONG (Score:2)
Geothermal Heat Exchange (Score:2, Interesting)
Personally, I am looking forward to more widespread use of geothermal heat exchange systems (see this document [doe.gov] and a few links at the bottom of that page for more info) to gain efficiency and save energy (and money). As every VW Bug owner knows, air is okay as a heat exchange medium, but it is not the best. Using the ground to move the energy around makes a whole lot of sense, and can be tacked on to an existing A/C setup (with a whole lot of digging, of course).
Living in Phoenix as I do, I can definitely appeciate this invention, and let's not forget Carnot.
Re:Geothermal Heat Exchange (Score:2)
Build it into new developments (Score:2)
But what about *new* construction of subdivisions? This crossed my mind the last time I went to suburbia -- the development I was in had for every group of houses a pond/wetland pretty much in the center around them. What if you made this water feature a part of the geothermal cooling process when you built everything?
The return water from the houses could be pumped into a fountain (gaining evaporative cooling) and the supply water could be taken from the cooler water at the bottom; presumably a non-trivial amount of cooling would be done on the buried portions running to/from the houses.
This would in effect be not much different from the huge evaporative cooling towers that supply chilled water to the downtown buildings around me. It would add a "pretty" water feature to the homes around it and it wouldn't be astronomical to build since there'd already be tons of digging going on.
The downside would be that it wouldn't do anything for heat in the winter and the water would presumably require some serious filtration to keep the water systems functioning. I'm not terribly clear on the amount of water it would take to keep such a system for 10, 2500 sq ft houses cool in 90+ degree weather. It'd be a drag if the pond was too small and the water got too warm; perhaps burying a large loop beneath the pond for the supply side would add some cooling to it.
Refrigerator? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Refrigerator? (Score:2)
Yes. Furthermore, according to the article, "Carrier borrowed on the heater principle, but instead of sending air through hot coils, he sent it through coils chilled with cold water." This sounds like he didn't even use a compression - expansion heat pump/refrigeration principle, but just piped in cool water from the lake.
Talk about obvious! If you count that as "air conditioning", you ought to credit it to the unkown architect that first designed a building that kept itself cool. Except that was just an artificial cave...
Related Movie quote (Score:2)
Dogma
New slashdot poll... (Score:2)
Simply not true (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Simply not true (Score:2)
This is not something to be happy about (Score:3, Interesting)
As has been noted in articles a few weeks ago on the greenhouse effect and enviromentalism, americans use about twice the amount of energy per head of the population as Europeans do, as a manifold of other world-inhabitants. Apart from your gas guzzling auto obsession I wouldn't be surprised to find that air-conditioning is the next most energy-intensive hobby you guys have. I know you all live in a very different climate, have a different stance to nature ( partly because we Europeans already fucked up everything in Europe that conceivably can be called nature centuries ago ) but get real.
I've been to the states many times, have even lived there, and each time the temperature rises beyond 25 degrees celsius (that's 75~80 fahrenheit) I get a cold from walking in the heat, then coming into 18 degree offices and stores, then walking in the heat again, etc. It's just rediculous the way you guys refuse to adapt to your enviroment -- if you take a couple of days to let your body adjust, you'll be able to function perfectly at 30 degrees celsius, I know I can.
So, no, I'm not particularly happy about Mr. Carrier, god bless his soul, invented this machine 100 years ago, and I don't think you should be any more happier than me.
Re:This is not something to be happy about (Score:3, Insightful)
OTOH, when I was in the service near Clovis, New Mexico with low humidity, 40C (104F) was no particular problem as long as you had wind and shade. But the sun on the Llano Estacado is a real killer...
Re:This is not something to be happy about (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:This is not something to be happy about (Score:2)
When the temperature index is 110 F in the shade then you can happily whine that AC isn't necessary and you'll adapt "in a few days".
It's a cold wind that blows no good (Score:2, Interesting)
Outdoors the sky would be turning darker as a shadowy purple became the predominant tint to the surroundings. The most prevalent sound was the synchronoized chatter of cicadas (locusts) with their bizarre rhythm of cyclic rattling. Oh, and of course their were the silent fireworks of the fireflies.
Now when you walk the street at dusk, you see no one, not even someone washing dishes, thanks to the ubiquitous dishwasher. Kids are nowhere to be seen. The steady drone of each and every house's air conditioning compressor fills the air, drowning out even the cicadas. You might as well be walking through a 24 hour per day widget factory. It is an industrial noise which blocks out all sounds of nature.
Sky watchers complain of light pollution; I would like to add to their complaint, the noise pollution of air conditioners which have helped to destroy the summer night.
Re:It's a cold wind that blows no good (Score:2)
"Who would have thought... (Score:2)
The "Armpit of America"? Have you ever smelled that city?
I rest my case...
American air conditioner craze (Score:3, Interesting)
I mean, last time I was in Florida, I was shivering all the time I was indoors. Being indoors with shorts and a T-shirt was very unconfortable. In my hotel, the entire room was filled with a freezing gale from an enormous air conditioner. I tried to find some controls or a switch to turn it off, but couldn't. Luckily the beds had enough blankets to sleep in Siberian winter, so I didn't have to sleep outside.
After a few days, I got a bad cold, and had to end my conference&vacation trip early. I wasn't in a condition to be able to go to the Space Center, Epcot, or other sights in Orlando. Some other Finnish people I know tell that they get a cold every time they visit US.
What's the problem with you? Is it that the businessmen and others have to be able to wear a suit in hotels all the time, or what?
Re:American air conditioner craze (Score:2)
Re:American air conditioner craze (Score:2)
The biggest problem I have with AC is that in order to make homes "more energy efficient" you have to make them as airtight as possible, which means that you get no exchange of outside (fresh) air. We're in the process of putting in a fresh air exchanger (actually, its a full heat exchanger, too, to improve on the efficiency) for our office now, because the air quality indoors royally sucks.
Re:American air conditioner craze (Score:2)
Cold itself may not make you sick, but it can make you more susceptible, and drastic changes in environment in short periods of time (hot + humid -> cold + dry) and back and forth a few times can really mess you up quick.
Re:American air conditioner craze (Score:2)
And it is bad for your health. People step outdoors on a moderate winter day and they're badly chilled almost immediately. Their body hasn't adapted to winter. Also, it's too hot indoors to wear warm clothes - so for one thing, they might put a two inch thick down jacket over their chest, but they are leaking heat through thin trousers. Keep the heat at 65 to 68, and (1) you can be comfortable indoors while dressed appropriately for the season, and (2) you'll adapt to cooler temperatures.
Sounds like rubbish to me (Score:2, Interesting)
It's in the hotel's best interest to have you use as little air conditioning as possible. I have stayed lots of places around here, and NEVER found one that doesn't allow you to turn off the AC. Not to mention that if you open the windows/doors in most of them, a switch will turn off the AC. This is law (or at least some sort of regulation) in some counties in Florida.
So, the "I couldn't turn off the AC in my room" argument sounds a little bogus.
The reason that large conference rooms in hotels during conferences are often too cold has more to dealing with large numbers of people than a desire to have a room be too cold.
If you've ever set up at one of these shows you will know that it's freezing when there only a few people in the stadium-sized room, but still can get pretty hot when there are thousands in there. You must pre-cool the room for the max crowd well beforehand, due to the size of the room.
It's a limitation of the technology (and thermodynamics to some extent) that no number of windows being open or insulation will cure. Sorry...
Again, it's to the economic advantage of the bill-payers of the gigantic room, to keep it as warm as possible. They aren't trying to freeze you out.
Finally, who would be more used to the extremely warm temperatures here in the summer, residents or northern tourists? It's you lot that demand the "ideal" temperatures inside every building that relate to northern European climes. Don't piss on us for giving you what you want, unfortunately it's our job as a tourist mecca.
And coming from someplace like Finland (apparently) to the tropics and then blaming the AC being too cold (compared to Finland?) as the cause of your illness, shows a fair ignorance of Biology and international travel.
Speaking as someone who apparently has a brain the size of a walnut, I'm disappointed that you "large brained" foreigners couldn't whine better than that. You do it with olympic caliber when you come over here, that's for sure.
Ok Finland, we'll turn off the AC in the summer, you turn off the heat in winter!
(cultural bigots come from all over, not just the USA)
Washington Post Story (Score:2)
Cities are hotter because of AC.... (Score:2, Interesting)
In summer, all that extra heat - as much as 25 times more than in suburbs - tends to get trapped close to the ground by high-pressure systems. The result can be a vicious cycle.
"It's hotter, so we use air-conditioning, which makes it hotter, so we use more air-conditioning," said J. Scott Greene, director of the environmental and verification analysis center at the University of Oklahoma.
A great read for anyone who's interested...
Re:Cities are hotter because of AC.... (Score:2, Interesting)
Here's the link to the article: http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/3686038.htm
Re:Cities are hotter because of AC.... (Score:2)
Of course, dropping things off the roof can be fun too, but won't cool the building off. Who knew that a frozen banana hitting pavement would splatter into tiny bits. *sigh* if only we had access to liquid nitrogen.
Is it really *that* suprising... (Score:2)
Matt
John Gorrie and Apalachicola- the REAL inventor (Score:3, Informative)
He had rooms cooled by mechanical refrigeration 50 years before the usurpers in Buffalo! Let the revisionist history be cast down!
Big deal for the south (Score:2)
Before AC the only people who could tolerate southern weather were those unfortunate enough to have been born there. It's only after AC that you see the large migrations from the north that enabled large cities such as Atlanta to develop. Only after AC does the south start to economically resemble the rest of the country.
In turn, AC also helped destroy the south as a region. That migration of money and people from other places fueled the suburbanization of the region, all but wiping out its regional identity in a sea of highways and Burger Kings.
Just reflecting on this as I sit in a 65 degree room in the middle of a 95 degree summer.
It made living in the US Southwest possible, too (Score:2)
Can you imagine large scale cities in Arizona, New Mexico, Nevada, and the interior of California without air conditioning? I didn't think so. Especially in the summer these parts of the US can zoom well over 40 degrees C. easily.
Re:It made living in the US Southwest possible, to (Score:2, Interesting)
And so, by following a regimen that involves never being outside in the summer for more than a couple of minutes, driving from your airconditioned house with its irrigated lawn, to your airconditioned office park over by the golfcourse, or to the restaurant in the mall, you can move straight to Phoenix from Kansas and never realize you're in the desert at all. Whether that's a good or bad thing I'll leave up to someone less cranky than I feel at the moment.
Re:It made living in the US Southwest possible, to (Score:2)
I grew up in Louisiana, it's nightmareish.
Dry heat isn't too much of a problem as long as you keep drinking water. When the humidity approaches saturation, you can't sweat, and your body creates an insulating film of perspiration. It's much easier to have a heat related health crises in 90 degree weather in the swamp than in 105 degree weather in the desert.
Re:Big deal for the south (Score:2)
Prior to the influx of new people, businesses, and capital, the south was completely unfit for any sort of post-agrarian economy.
Wrong (Score:2)
A pre-air conditioning cooling idea (Score:2)
This is how author John R. Signor described the original submarine building design in his book Beaumont Hill (Copyright 1990 Golden West Books, ISBN 0-87095-105-X):
This unusual contraption was roughly man-sized. It had a hood of galvanized steel that rolled back over a bed, similar to a rolltop desk. It contained a built-in trough that held 20 gallons of water with a blanket covering the hood. A sleeper would get inside and pull the hood down over the bed. Then he opened a valve that allowed water to drop from perforated pipes, which would saturate the blanket. The evaporation cooled the steel hood and the inside of the chamber. The outside temperature might register 130 degrees, but inside [Bob] Richardson's bed, the air was a comfortable 70 degrees.
Developed by Southern Pacific railroad engineer Bob Richardson 1906, submarines became an extremely popular way to keep cool in the summer, especially in the Mojave Desert. Richardson in 1922 developed a larger version that could hold larger beds and a even a small desk or nightstand.
Submarines, however, had one big downside: they didn't work well in high humidity environments. That mean these structures weren't so useful during the later summer when rains coming from the Pacific Ocean southwest of the Mojave Desert were common (usually the remanants of hurricanes that spawn off the Pacific coast of Mexico).
The development of modern air conditioning essentially ended the age of submarines, mostly because air conditioners continued to cool even in higher humidity conditions of later summer desert monsoon rains that occurred in the Mojave Desert.
Slashdot can to better than this... (Score:2)
~Sigh~ Imagine a beowolf cluster of those. 9_9
Another Media cockup... (Score:2, Informative)
"I used to have a problem with multiple personalities, but now we're fine."
Largest AC ever built? (Score:2)
A/C in cars (Score:4, Interesting)
Maybe all of us in the states like our A/C so much because most of us came from parts of Europe where it is a bit cooler most of the year than it is here.
I live in Houston, TX (Score:2)
In the past when I didn't have AC, my pc died regularly due to over heating and I didn't have many people over (there is a limit to how little clothing you can wear!)
Now that I live in AC, I've gained 35 pounds (155 lbs.) Friends visit my house. I can't tolerate sever heat any more. I can still tolerate temps higher than my friends (I like it in the 80s,) but I can't tolerate temps in the 90s.
Not 100 Years, more like 150 years. (Score:3, Interesting)
It was invented by Dr. John Gorrie in about 1850. You see he had many malaira patients. At the time, it was thought that malaria was caused by bad air. mal-aria is litteraly translated to bad air. John invented steam engine powered refigeration units to cool the ward he kept his patients in, thinking that it would aid in curing malaria.
Look here for a snippet of "connetions by James Burke" Connections the video programme is where I learned about this when I was a kid.
http://216.239.35.100/search?q=cache:fH0DRd
(sorry its in the cache, the origonal article has gone missing)
or here for short pdf's about Dr John Gorrie who actually invented air conditioning.
http://www.ashrae.org/ABOUT/gladst
Thank google here is the pdf as html
http://216.239.35.100/search?q=cache:YXwB1E
<rant>And now lets all rally against people claiming "invention" for things they didn't do, or things that are discovers of mathematical and natural phenomenon.</rant>
air conditioning is ancient. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:I live in Amherst Buffalo (Score:2)
You're thinking East Amherst (West Egg, Nouveau Riche). West Amherst isn't all that rich.
The nice thing about Buffalo is that the temperature has never been recorded at 100 degrees or higher.
On the other hand, it's not the heat, it's the humidity that will kill you.
All things considered in Buffalo, you don't get hurricanes, you don't get mudslides, you don't get forest fires, you don't have all these things to worry about. You just have to worry about snowfall and the impossible Canadian invasion force
Re:I live in Amherst Buffalo (Score:3, Funny)
Re:I live in Amherst Buffalo (Score:2)
Re:I live in Amherst Buffalo (Score:2)
"How many UB students does it take to change a light bulb? 25,000. 20 to write a grant to get money to study the effects of earthquakes on light bulbs, 1 to change the light bulb, and 24,979 more to complain about how much the light bulbs suck compared to those back home on Long Island"
Re:I live in Amherst Buffalo (Score:2)