Neuros - Portable MP3 player, FM radio, Digital Recorder 189
KenMaier writes "Interesting new product in the portable MP3 player space -- this portable 'Neuros' from Digital Innovations comes with either 128MB or 20GB storage, built-in FM radio and a built-in digital recorder. Two interesting features -- you can record 30 seconds of music you hear and it will 'fingerprint' the song and tell you the title and artist. Also, a built-in wireless feature lets you beam music from one Neuros to another. Not really clear on the speed, but transferring 20 GB sounds like it might take a while. If anyone owns one of these care to post a review?"
Neuros? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Neuros? (Score:1)
Re:Neuros? (Score:1)
Re:Neuros? (Score:4, Funny)
neuros - neurosen
Re:Neuros? (Score:1)
From dictionary.com [dictionary.com]... "Any of various mental or emotional disorders, such as hypochondria or neurasthenia, arising from no apparent organic lesion or change and involving symptoms such as insecurity, anxiety, depression, and irrational fears, but without psychotic symptoms such as delusions or hallucinations."
Did they think of that?
(Boxes, dammit!)
Phil, just me
Re:Neuros? (Score:1, Funny)
box - boxen
child - children
mouse - mousen
fish - fishen
Re:Neuros? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Neuros? (Score:1)
Trademark adjective (Score:4, Informative)
It's like moose The plural is Neuros.
Correct. Trademarks don't pluralize because they're adjectives. The plural of "Xerox copier" is "Xerox copiers", and the plural of "Neuros player" is "Neuros players".
Re:Neuros? (Score:2)
Beautiful... (Score:2)
Same for your UK mobile (Score:5, Informative)
You dial a number, play a bit of music down the phone and you get an SMS message back identifying the artist and title, pretty nifty. It costs about 50p though. They add the "tagged" tracks to a personalised list on their site where you can buy them online and other neat stuff.
Fingerprints (Score:2, Informative)
It seems that they are either using freedb [freedb.org] or something similar. Here's a clip about what the freedb.org's database is:
What is CDDB? The original CDDB is a database to look up CD information using the internet. This is done by a client which calulates a (nearly) unique disc ID and then queries the database. As a result, the client displays the artist, CD-title, tracklist and some additional infos.
Take a look at this DVD artist/title programmer [openchallenge.org] submitted to Openchallenge to see how else you can utilize freedb.org.
Re:Fingerprints (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Fingerprints (Score:1)
Ohh. I have posted so many misguided comments lately that maybe I should just shut up. :) Would not it make the submission of new entries to freedb.org more easier if there was some utility program which would make an md5sum (or something similar) of the first 30 seconds of each audio piece. Or maybe there already is on online database like this too? That way, you could recognize individual songs more easier. Naturally, there would be the problem that the checksum might differ a bit case by case depending of audio quality, etc.
Re:Fingerprints (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Fingerprints (Score:1)
If your CD-ROM drive is producing single bit differences, then you need a new drive. Yes, my comment was badly phrased as I only mentioned the differences in audio quality in the last sentence. Maybe I should have said that it would work only before you rip the original CD (or DVD) . Here's a related story [codebunny.org], where the guys produced md5sums playing the same stuff using different drives. So, yes, from original media it would be possible to produce matching md5sums - even when played using different drives.
Re:Fingerprints (Score:2)
Ohh, and if you are talking about ripped media, such as MP3, you naturally should not create a checksum about the audio piece as is. You should maybe first make a profile of it, to kill the differences, and then make the md5sum. But I think you really need something exact like md5 - if that information is going to be provided through a publicly accessed database to reduce the load caused to the server.
Re:Fingerprints (Score:5, Informative)
This sounds much harder, but also more useful. I'd be very (pleasantly) surprised if it works well for anything other than Billboard hits and very popular oldies. Still, it could be nice.
Just for the record, the player can also record longer clips by pressing the record button twice.
Also, someone said something earlier about not knowing how long the wireless transfer would take. Well, from the site it seemed that it was transfer via FM radio at the speed you'd normally play it at. So, neat for wireless playing on a car audio system or the boombox at home/work, but not a major file-transfer tool. (You could still broadcast to another unit and record the FM broadcast on the other unit.)
The site said recording was to MP3, but didn't specify bit-rate. Anyone know? Other MP3 players that recorded have done so in such low rates that they would only be useful for recording speech.
Also, they have a survey about what other audio formats you'd like to see supported. It wouldn't hurt for all you Ogg Vorbis devotees to go skew the results of the poll.
Re:Fingerprints (Score:2)
Well, be pleasantly surprised then :) Me and a friend were playing with Shazam (which i guess must be what it uses) and the accuracy was stunning. We tried it with pop hits, obscure jazz singles, trance and it got them all. I'd not heard of most of the jazz tracks for instance (though it's not saying much). It worked very well indeed.
Re:Fingerprints (Score:1)
Re:Fingerprints (Score:2, Informative)
The site said recording was to MP3, but didn't specify bit-rate. Anyone know? Other MP3 players that recorded have done so in such low rates that they would only be useful for recording speech.
[/snip]
From the site:
"
Recording
64-160 kbps
MP3 format
"
http://www.neurosaudio.com/store/prod_20gbspec.as
recording bitrate (Score:2)
http://www.neurosaudio.com/store/prod_20g
Recording
-64-160 kbps
-MP3 format
looks to me like you can pick a bitrate between those ranges
FM radio is a *transmitter* (Score:5, Informative)
Beats wires...
Re:FM radio is a *transmitter* (Score:3, Informative)
External FM transmitter adaptors are widely available from Radio Shack and the like.
A survey of reviews will inform you that most people are quite disappointed in their sound quality:
Basically, the impression I get from comments I've seen about these it that they work OK if you have no other option, but if you can at all manage a miniplug-to-RCA, or even a cassette adaptor, they'll sound better.
built-in is worth something (Score:2)
Not to mention you don't have to spend the extra $30 at radio shack.
Re:built-in is worth something (Score:2)
I used to have all sorts of weird set-ups in my car to accomodate different formats (cd when I had a tape deck, minidisc when I had a cd player etc...) but this would be cool if you wanted to share your collection on a road trip with someone else's car.
As long as the signal doesn't drift, tho. I've tinkered with the FM transmitters, and the only thing I've really liked about them was convenience. Speaking of which, rental cars these days should all come with CD players, standard.....
Re:FM radio is a *transmitter* (Score:3, Interesting)
I haven't seen much advancement in these devices, particularly since the FCC limits their broadcasting to a miserable 7-10 feet (clear).
So expect to be able to put your Nueros next to your home radio and get clear reception, but don't plan on starting a weekly neighborhood radio "Slashdot Talk" with your new toy.
Re:FM radio is a *transmitter* (Score:1)
http://www.yesterdayland.com/popopedia/shows/to
Re:FM radio is a *transmitter* (Score:2)
(And before you think "well, just mod the car stereo" realize that this isn't always practical in a lease vehicle.
Re:FM radio is a *transmitter* (Score:2, Interesting)
Don't expect a clear signal on your car stereo using Nueros. The Nueros unit has an FM transmitter, not digital radio. So you're still dealing with an analog signal and the sort of loss associated with that.
From my experience with cassette adaptors... some suck, others don't. But on average they do better than an FM wireless transmitter like Nueros's built-in feature.
Of course your best bet is simply to buy a car deck that comes with input jacks
Re:FM radio is a *transmitter* (Score:2)
(makes one wonder what are we going to do once everything we do is in binary)
Re:FM radio is a *transmitter* (Score:2, Interesting)
(makes one wonder what are we going to do once everything we do is in binary)
Interestingly enough; a digital signal is either there - in all of the orignal transmitted quality - or it's not. In TV it's called the Cliff Effect [atis.org] and is part of why digital is becoming popular. Ever have a radio or TV station where the signal was full of snow and static? That won't happen with digital signals.
So, once devices such as this transmit a digital signal; it may be poorer quality ( = lesser bandwidth, say 64kHz compared to 128) than a "real" FM transmission station, but you'll recieve the signal in as high of quality as it sent out, thanks to the Cliff effect.
Re:FM radio is a *transmitter* (Score:2, Interesting)
I've seen digital tv, and the clif effect makes part of the picture totally unviewable, instead of a light snow effect.
I think I've become cynical in my old age, people still think CD's are the end all for music reproduction (Simply because they are digital), and I see it happening to more and more mediums.
Re:FM radio is a *transmitter* (Score:2)
Not that you asked me, but vinyl is. Sure, it's not portable, and not permanent, but it's still the best-sounding format availible. Not everyone can find words for the difference, but almost anyone can hear it. Most people say CDs sound "flat" next to vinyl records. I've also found that vinyl has better low-end response. Plus, when you buy an album, you're really buying something real, not just a container for data. Not to mention the "cool factor". Oh, and records tend to be about %20-%50 less than a comparable CD.
Re:FM radio is a *transmitter* (Score:2)
>using Nueros. The Nueros unit has an FM
>transmitter, not digital radio. So you're still
>dealing with an analog signal and the sort of loss
>associated with that.
I don't know about your car, but when I'm driving down the highway at 120 km/h, there's enough engine noise/road noise that I've never really felt the need to spend more $$$ on higher fidelity audio.
Can anyone really hear the difference in sound quality when they're actually driving the car?
My car didn't even have a tape deck when we bought it, so the cheapest way to get a CD player into it was
Fortunately, my truck has a tape deck, so I've got my old discman plugged in with a cassette adapter. Again, quality is "good enough" for me, and the price is right.
Re:FM radio is a *transmitter* (Score:2)
Yeah, this is great. I'm going to pick this up and tell my friends it has next generation bluetooth that works with virtually any car stereo.
Re:FM radio is a *transmitter* (Score:2)
Sounds pretty much like a normal FM broadcast to me!
Re:FM radio is a *transmitter* (Score:2, Informative)
However, that's consistent with what he said. Note that he said "only as an analogue [spelling? - analog?] FM broadcast" not "only other Neuros can tune into." The previous poster is noting the limitation on the desired ability to transfer songs between units. As mentioned in the site The text on the site that was more confusing was probably, "You can beam music to another Neuros tuned to the same frequency. This and lots more Neuros features here."
I don't mean to be harsh about it, but don't claim people are wrong unless you are sure they are. It's rude.
Also note that while they are plugging the 30-second sample capability, they claim you can record songs from the radio, and not just clips. The emphasis on clips is probably to avoid the wrath of the RIAA.
Re:FM radio is a *transmitter* (Score:2, Informative)
Re:FM radio is a *transmitter* (Score:2)
Oops. Ah well, panic over for a while.
Re:FM radio is a *transmitter* (Score:1)
FM Broadcasting (Score:1)
Linux? (Score:2)
Re:Linux? (Score:2, Informative)
the slashdot insanity filter makes it hard to properly format this data so use the link above
Display 2-inch (diagonal) liquid crystal display with orange LED backlight 128 by 128 pixel resolution
Re:Linux? (Score:2)
Re:Linux? (Score:1)
Re:Linux? (Score:2)
Re:Linux? (Score:2)
It's a little pricey... (Score:2)
I don't know how fast it is in beaming from one unit to another, but as the article mentions I wouldn't assume it's that fast -- just guessing, but maybe on the order of swapping one or two songs rather than several CDs within a reasonable amount of time? Much faster, and I imagine we'll be seeing the Napster debacle all over again...
Re:It's a little pricey... (Score:1)
You own one, then?
By fidelity, I assume you mean that of the built-in
headphone amplifier? Or do you mean the fm xmitter?
Re:It's a little pricey... (Score:1)
Make sure to vote! (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Make sure to vote! (Score:2, Funny)
The entire muffin? That sounds like a lawsuit just waiting to happen...
Re:Make sure to vote! (Score:1)
Radio, wall of sound (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Radio, wall of sound (Score:3, Insightful)
why? because it's a transmitter capable of transmitting on fm frequencies you need a license for.. how unused frequencies or not they may be. and just being capable of doing this might be enough for getting ban on sale..
FCC part 15: Don't always need a license (Score:3, Interesting)
it's a transmitter capable of transmitting on fm frequencies you need a license for
Part 15 of FCC rules states that some low-power unlicensed intentional transmissions in the 88-108 MHz band are permitted. For instance, in the NES days, there was a peripheral called "GameSounds" that plugged into a game console's audio output and transmitted the sound over the FM band so that anybody with an FM radio within 20 feet could pick it up.
Re:FCC part 15: Don't always need a license (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Radio, wall of sound (Score:2)
though probably they would be able to sell a kit to make one(fm transmitter) for education/whateverfreaky purposes.
kinda like how you can't buy receivers for police bands& etc, but it's (very) easy to convert one to receive in that band, and the same place can sell the necessary things to 'mod' it..
Shipping Date (Score:5, Informative)
Oh boy... (Score:1)
Stop it! (Score:3, Funny)
Some people would like to be able to decide which one to buy, open Mozilla to order the one they chose and when
usb (Score:1)
Re:usb (Score:2, Informative)
Design and size... (Score:2, Informative)
How in the name of the lord.... (Score:5, Insightful)
Until I can buy it, it is vaporware.
Fingerprinting (Score:1)
Transfer speed not an issue (Score:3, Insightful)
Why does this really matter? So it might take a while to transfer the music, but it'll take significantly longer to listen to it. Your average user will probably transer music as necessary -- no need to shoot the entire collection over in one shot.
System requirements (Score:5, Insightful)
OS: Microsoft® Windows 98SE/Me/2000/XP
This really annoys the h#!! out of me... Most mp3-player manufacturers do this. What is the problem with just making a player that acts as an USB hard drive? Why do we need Windows to transfer files through USB?
Re:System requirements (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:System requirements (Score:5, Informative)
Relax! Then go read this [neurosaudio.com]. The Neuros is based on (in their words) "an open platform". Unlike the iPod, their database and menu systems are open and based on XML (schemas coming in a few weeks apparently), so even though their synchro software is currently Windows only, making a Linux version should be a snap.
This is a pretty cool MP3 player. It looks good, has some nify features, and is open. Sounds like a serious contender to the iPod to me (at least for anybody semi-geeky).
Re:System requirements (Score:2)
For example, I recently purchase the 128MB Nike mp3 player (best form factor for exercising...the new philips one, not the sonicblue model). They claim that it is only compatible with Windows/Mac. However, all it does is represent itself as a Windows drive (haven't tried it on the mac). When I boot into linux, I just mount it the same way I'd mount a USB HD. Then you just copy the mp3s to it like you would any FS. You can't copy files off it (DRM, I guess), but otherwise it's a fully compliant external USB HD.
Operating temperature (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Operating temperature (Score:1)
Re:Operating temperature (Score:2)
Something like this would be a sweet car MP3 player, and I for one would never remember to take it inside on winter nights. In
The old discman in my truck sometimes doesn't like cold mornings, i.e. it skips a lot. The discman is OK after warming up for 5-10 minutes, but I don't know if I'd abuse a player with an internal HD like that
fingerprinting! (Score:4, Insightful)
USB 1.1 (Score:3, Insightful)
gameboy?? (Score:1)
where did they get their product designers?? NINTENDO?
The thing looks like an old gameboy...
128mb version? (Score:1)
Re:128mb version? (Score:1)
Re:128mb version? (Score:1)
From the neurosaudio.com store [neurosaudio.com] - "Easily upgrade your Neuros by exchanging the backpack that comes attached to your Neuros 128MB for the 20GB HD backpack. Now you will have 2 units - super portable and huge capacity."
Do any of the new hd players have a compact flash slot too? would like to use one as an image bank sometimes.
Re:128mb version? (Score:2)
Anyway, transferring 20gig over USB1 would take a while, but very few people have FireWire or USB2 enabled machines, so it's kind of a moot point anyway.
pirating (Score:2)
1) You can mp3 your CD collection legally and have way more than that 20gig.
2) Now, if you want to stay on the safe and conservative side of the law just in case congress outlaws the backup of our CD's, you can go to www.emusic.com and legally download all the music they have for a small fee. I've paid $30 and have downloaded 4gigs of mp3's... and I'm slow about downloading stuff from them. You can easily download over a gig per day. Not only is it legal, but it compensates the artist and the label and the creator of the website.
The last thing is that just because you have all of your CD collection on your portable player doesn't mean you have to "listen to it all at once." I always have my full collection with me so I always have a full choice of what I listen to. If I'm in the mood for something in particular, it's there.
The new frontier of spyware (Score:2)
Do you have ANY control over what kind of information this device shares with its real masters (remember, you are not its master, merely its owner)?
The fingerprint feature comes in handy in this scenario. Now the **AA knows exactly what music you are stealing
Wait till the RIAA hears about this (Score:2, Funny)
you can record 30 seconds of music you hear
Oh my god! With that kind of technology, and 6 of these things, you can copy a whole SONG without paying! It'll have to be outlawed immediately!
Re:Wait till the RIAA hears about this (Score:2)
But but but... (Score:4, Insightful)
My question (that's actually related to this topic) is, "What should I use the portable mp3-player for?".
Since all record companies are doing their best to prevent me from transfering my legally purchased music to this player, what is it good for?
Won't the mp3-players be as useless as a betamax-player for the general public, as the copy-controlled cd's becomes more and more common?
That raises another interesting question. How long will Sony or any other large company that makes mp3-players stand for this? If people can't use the players then they won't buy it, which would hurt Sony's sales.
I'm sure someone can write some insightful comments about this.
Oh, and I returned the CD. I'm not buying broken products. And I made sure that the store understood that the failed sale was due to the record companies bad customer policy.
I play Hattrick [hattrick.org]
Not all of the record companies (Score:2)
If the people who allegedly want to sell you the music that you currently like are trying to make it as difficult as possible for you to enjoy said music, maybe it's time to go somewhere else.
You see, smaller bands and record labels can't afford to intentionally alienate listeners. They're trying as hard as they can to get their music heard, and they don't have a mighty fortress of cash to sustain them through the sort of foolishness in which companies such as BMG are engaging.
Check out http://www.cmj.com for what's current in college radio. Listen to a non-mainstream station. Listen to MY station
For the record, I get 10-15 or so CDs a week from various small labels (and distributors who work with labels too small to distribute their own stuff). I've NEVER had a problem with copy protection. I'ver certainly never gotten a copy protected CD from an unsigned band that I saw at a tiny bar.
Re:Oh, and (Score:2)
You should probably change your taste in music anyway, just because most major label acts are pretty terrible. Besides, what's the point in buying music you can hear 10X daily on the radio anyway? There are other reasons to like indie bands:
Re:Oh, and (Score:2)
No need to change your taste in music. If you name some popular bands that you like, I'm sure I can supply a nice list of smaller acts to get you started (if the popular acts are very recent, I might need to do some listening, as my "regular" radio has been broken for about four years).
I'm a music director at a small radio station. Suggesting music that people would like is one of the things that I do
pixo os? (Score:1, Informative)
The RIAA will love this! (Score:1)
You can then "beam" an mp3 to anyone else who has one of these cute little boxes.
Oh yeah! This is gonna be on the RIAA's list.
On the other hand, I'm still scratching my head that they haven't made a fuss about the Archos player/recorder.
Nice looking but... (Score:1)
1st, as mentioned already, the device is USB1.1. Can you imagine synching your 20GB of music? Ooof.
2nd, you cannot transfer music from one neuros to another, but you can broadcast using FM, music from one Neuros to another. The receiving neuros then has the ability to record a 30 second snippet of that music. This isn't WiFi or Bluetooth, this is pure analog FM.
Beyond that, the built-in FM broadcaster is quite a convenient feature. As is the ability to create playlists right there on the device.
USB 1? (Score:1)
I had an Archos Jukebox 20, which was very cool. Nice form factor, good controls, very friendly. It even hooked up to my RedHat 7 box with only a kernel recompile.
But transferring 20 Gigs over USB 1 was an all night affair.
This thing SERIOUSLY needs USB2 and/or Firewire.
My question is... (Score:3, Funny)
(it would be nice the answer was "NoEuros")
missed xmas? (Score:3, Insightful)
I hate how every time I go in to EB, they try to push a "game doctor" on me. Like I'm going to Pay $30 for a device to clean CD's when I can do it myself for little or no cost.
Almost sounds good. (Score:2, Insightful)
Looks like this doesn't do that. Also looks like they totally stole the UI of the iPod (okay, it's a good UI, now come up with another good one). It's also damn ugly.
And why do I want to take my high-quality digital MP3s and send them over the comparatively crappy-sounding FM band to listen to them? If they really wanted to make this a home stereo component, there would be a digital out. For the car, just use a tape adapter or a line-in.
Plus the whole Windows-only thing is silly. Why do I want "synchronization software," especially from a company I've never heard of? Keep it simple.
This thing *almost* sounds really good. Almost.
Some Flaws... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Radically OPEN! (Score:2, Informative)