Mozilla Firebird Soars Into View 514
About a zillion people wrote to announce Mozilla 0.6, but asa was the first: "Mozilla Firebird 0.6 (formerly Phoenix) is available for download. This release features a fresh new look, a redesigned preferences window, preliminary support for Mac OS X and much more.
Read why you should be using Mozilla Firebird and get the latest release." I'm not exactly clamoring for a new web browser, but it looks worth checking out.
Opera (Score:4, Interesting)
Anyone wanna point out to me some features that firebird has/plans on having? Most of the ones on the list look pretty basic...
Re:Opera (Score:5, Interesting)
I tried previous releases of Phoenix and while I thought it promising it always has seemed very rough around the edges understandably but this seems to be getting close. Allied with Thunderbird this could be a good mix...
Worth trying for a while at least.
Re:Opera (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.tcbmi.com/strokeit/
StrokeIt? (Score:5, Funny)
Well, if you want mouse gestures, you can always get StrokeIt. It adds mouse gestures to Windows as a whole. Essentially, it recognizes a gesture and performs a macro based on which gesture it was and which application is active. It can even do global gestures like close, minimize all, and restore all.
StrokeIt? StrokeIt?!! I would never EVER buy anything called StrokeIt, if there is even the slightest chance of my wife finding out I bought something called that.
Pie Menus (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Pie Menus (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Opera (Score:3, Interesting)
Standards support is virtually identical in Gecko and Presto -- Presto does certain things a little better, Gecko has support for SVG and some other things Presto does not yet support. Unless you for some reason need SVG and MathML support, I do no
Re:Opera (Score:3, Interesting)
You haven't used Opera 7, obviously. DOM support is rock solid, and it supports most non-standard javascript as well.
Read the Standard support page [opera.com] to get an idea of Opera's standards support. It's pretty darn great.
Add to that all the neat, neat features (besides mouse gestures and excellent keyboard navigation, they also make the best use of stylesheets and page relations (link rel=next, etc) I've ever seen.) and you got a great goodness.
Re:Opera (Score:5, Informative)
I used the Opera 7.1 beta for GNU/Linux for a couple of weeks and find that it loses out to Firebird in the following areas:
The first 3 points are the major reason I chose to stick with Mozilla Firebird. Plus, you get a number of cool extensions for Firebird which you can install at a click of a button.
I found that the Tab management in Opera 7.1 was superior that Firebird's out of the box. But there is an extension called "Tabbrowser extensions" which make Firebird Tabs behave as well as Opera.
I for one don't see a reason to spend good money on Opera given that Firebird exists.
Re:Opera (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Opera (Score:4, Interesting)
Opera started losing favor when the Daily Python site kept coming up in Greek (not that there's anything wrong with that, I just can't read Greek) and their tech support was completely unhelpful.
Mozilla Firebird is close to everything a browser should be. And nothing more, which is at least as important.
-- Bander
Re:Opera (Score:5, Insightful)
The whole point of firebird is that different people want different things from their browsers. A web neophyte and a web developer will have different requirements. With the extension mechanism, the needs of both can be satisfied.
For example, my setup looks like this [nique.net]. The features shown there are a mix between built in mozilla features and extensions, several of which I've either created or tweaked.
The features they list are pretty pedestrian, but since it's pretty easy to create extensions, a lot of interesting functionality is being created. I believe that the creativity of extension makers will be a key source of innovation for web browsers and the ideas that are currently in development will be listed as key features of mozilla in the future.
Finally, I personally would keep using firebird even if IE or Opera duplicated the functionality of everything in Fb including the extensions. Why? If I want to have a new feature in Fb, I sit down and hack it out. If a feature is almost right, I dive into the source and tweak it. Mozilla interface code is really easy to hack and that is very valuable to me and something that Opera lacks.
I love this! (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Opera (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Opera (Score:4, Interesting)
Great Work (Score:4, Interesting)
I use it Phoenix (ermmm I mean Firebird) now on every platform at work and at home. Love it.
Never have any popup problems, very quick and couldn't do without opening links in the background under a new tab as I browse the web then go to them when I am done reading what I am currently on.
Re:Great Work (Score:5, Interesting)
Here are the main things:
The customization is tremendous. I managed to shave off a couple of toolbars from the screen -- only one toolbar with more buttons and options than what I put with Mozilla 1.4b.
The extensions are wonderful too. Simple things like NukeImage, Tabbrowser extensions, Adblock, and a tonne of other extensions.
So, right now I use both Mozilla and Mozilla Firebird, and I see the little Mozilla offsprings dethroning parent Mozilla very soon.
Soon it will be the time to say, "The king is dead, long live the king."
S
Re:Great Work (Score:3, Informative)
The Developers have stated this will happen [mozilla.org]
Re:Great Work (Score:3, Interesting)
I used Phoenix off and on since it came out, but when I started using Mozilla, there was just no comparison. Phoenix feels like a toy next to it, but apparently that's what makes it so popular.
I'm utterly bewildered as to why they intend to effectively kill Mozilla in favor of this. I can understand (in reading the new roadmap), focusing on a common runtime, but why must they kill off Mozilla to do so?
I wouldn't mind
It's great. (Score:3, Interesting)
It's fast, zippy and speedy too!
If you haven't been using the Nightlies lately, the new default theme will seem to you as a breath of fresh air.
It's hands down the best browser for Linux.
Difference between Firebird and Mozilla? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Difference between Firebird and Mozilla? (Score:2, Flamebait)
If you are asking about the difference between the current Mozilla Browser and Mozilla Firebird Browser then it's basically a directional change.
Read the Mozilla Road Map [mozilla.org] to see why this is being done.
The difference between Mozilla, in gerneral, and Firebird is that one is a web browser and one is a RDBMS.
And the Mozilla crowd said people wouldn't confuse the two....
Re:Difference between Firebird and Mozilla? (Score:3, Informative)
Phoenix (now Firebird, still not sure I like that myself) is stripped down lean mean browser city, plus it allows you to install "extensions" that modify how it works. You can "put back" things you like about mozilla that were taken out in a couple of cases, plus there are lots of other nifty things. Download a copy, go to "find extensions" under the preferences panel for extensions
Re:Difference between Firebird and Mozilla? (Score:3, Funny)
But... but... emacs is a browser :-)
man emacs if you don't believe me. I've found it quite handy from time to time when I've had to ssh to a host from a dumb terminal after a failed X11 session. While I mostly use Gnome nowadays, it is perfectly possible to use emacs as a complete desktop environment.
Font Magnification (Score:5, Insightful)
There are tons of web pages whose text can't be magnified in Internet Explorer without first turning on the accessibility options, and doing that is very annoying.
-Teckla
Re:Font Magnification (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Font Magnification (Score:4, Informative)
Alternatively, you can specify the minimum size of font you will accept (in pixels) which means you never need to magnify text as anything specified above the size will stay as the author intended, yet small text won't drop below your specified limit.
Yes, I know you need to pay for Opera and not Phoenix/Firebird, but that's fine. No need to start a holy war, just passing on the information
Goblin
minimum font size (Score:5, Insightful)
Annoyingly, this often throws off the layout of some websites, but that's pretty stupid design if a minor font-size adjustment throws it off... *cough gamespot cough* :)
Re:Font Magnification (Score:5, Funny)
Man, you Opera guys are getting to be as annoying as the Mac users.
A browser that puts the user's interests first (Score:5, Insightful)
(One more thing I wish they would fix, however, and that is links that open in a new window. It shouldn't be up to the web site to control opening new windows in the user's browser, it's confusing to the novice (as Nielsen points out) and annoying to many experienced users. The default browser settings, IMHO, ought to open all links in the same window and let the user choose whether to do something different by middle-clicking instead of left-clicking. I hope the Firebird people can fix this one remaining annoyance in a future release.)
Re:A browser that puts the user's interests first (Score:5, Informative)
You can fix it by yourself [texturizer.net]:
user_pref("browser.block.target_new_win
Check this page [texturize.net] for more interesting tweaks.
Re:A browser that puts the user's interests first (Score:2, Informative)
That second link should be this [texturizer.net].
Re:A browser that puts the user's interests first (Score:2)
Web panels? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Web panels? (Score:3, Informative)
How about XUL? (Score:2)
Re:How about XUL? (Score:4, Informative)
Why do /.'ers think people should switch? (Score:2)
Re:Why do /.'ers think people should switch? (Score:3, Insightful)
BTW I tried
Re:Why do /.'ers think people should switch? (Score:3, Interesting)
Personally I just take the hit on startup for Mozilla since I have it running all day so a few seconds startup makes no odds. I also reckon that aside from a few annoyances the mail/news component is second to non
Firbird or Camino? Make up my mind! (Score:2, Interesting)
Different widget sets (Score:5, Informative)
Camino is Mac OS X's answer to K-Meleon [sourceforge.net] for Windows and Galeon [sourceforge.net] for GNOME.
Native UI versus write once, compile anywhere.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Firbird or Camino? Make up my mind! (Score:3, Funny)
Building from source (Score:5, Informative)
The reason I wanted to build from source is that I wanted nifty anti aliased fonts which the nightly builds doesn't offer.
So...
wget http://64.12.168.21/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest/mo
tar -xjf mozilla-source.tar.bz2
cvs -d
Now we are ready to choose build options.
cd mozilla
vi
here is what my
export MOZ_PHOENIX=1
mk_add_options MOZ_PHOENIX=1
ac_add_options --with-pthreads
ac_add_options --disable-mailnews
ac_add_options --disable-ldap
ac_add_options --enable-xft
ac_add_options --disable-jsd
ac_add_options --enable-crypto
ac_add_options --disable-accessibility
ac_add_options --disable-composer
ac_add_options --disable-tests
ac_add_options --disable-debug
ac_add_options --enable-optimize="-O3 -march=pentium3 -mfpmath=sse,387"
ac_add_options --enable-strip
All the --disable- options are beause I only want Firebird and not the composer, mail, news etc
the --enable-xft is the important one if you want nice anti aliased fonts.
My --enable-optimize is just some optimizations for my p4 (-march=pentium4 was buggy last time I tried). If you have an or lower than pentium3 then choose diffrent options (man gcc) or use the more standard "-O2"
The MOZ_PHOENIX=1 is what tells the build process to build Phoenix (well Firebird its called now but the option is still MOZ_PHOENIX) and not the standard mozilla browser.
To start building:
make -f client.mk build
This will take a really long time. Also the configure process might complain that you are missing some library like Xft or libIDL, in that case you will have to install it (apt-get install libidl0 libidl-dev)
After the build is complete all the necessary stuff is in dist/bin/ so I copy that to
cp -r -L dist/bin/
(the -L option because the dir contains a lot of symlinks that will break if you don't use -L)
Now you can run firebird with
I don't know if this is exactly the official way to do it but that's how I did it.
Good luck
Mozilla Firebird Help (Score:2, Interesting)
For more information about Mozilla Firebird and how to customize it, change themes and install extensions, visit Mozilla Firebird Help [texturizer.net]
Among other things, you'll find instructions on how to disable two of the new features: smooth scrolling and automatic image resizing.
Tab behavior (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Tab behavior (Score:3, Informative)
should do the trick
Re:Tab behavior (Score:2)
That aggravated me, but I think there was an option. Doesn't really matter though since I use Galeon fo now.
Re:Tab behavior (Score:2)
What's annoying me is that the middle-click on empty area and move the mouse up/down to scroll in the page doesn't work.
I know there's a Moz
Re:Tab behavior (Score:2)
I really like this build. It's stable, fast, and I simply don't see a reason to upgrade yet.
Re:Tab behavior (Score:3, Informative)
Edit-> Preferences-> Navigator-> Tabbed Browsing-> Tab Display-> Load links in the background
The pref has been in mozilla almost since tabs were implemented. Sorry you weren't able to find it. That's one of Mozilla Firebird's clear advantages: a vastly simplified and improved preference panel.
Re:Tab behavior (Score:2)
Mozilla has had it as an option for quite a while, just turned off by default.
Galeon [sourceforge.net], using the mozilla browser, has had it on by default for a long time.
On a slightly related note, I've heard they've fixed up the problem with slow tabs in Konqueror in CVS - I'm looking forward to that.
Mac OS X version is pretty zippy (Score:5, Informative)
I've tried:
IE just rots. Safari, in its most recent incarnation, works well standards-wise, but one can really feel how different it and the Mozilla code really are (and I do like Moz better). It's also "slow". Camino is coming along well, but it too is "slow". SSL is painful on both of them (I tend to use IE on a PC to hit SSL sites).
Firebird is just plain cool. A bit rough around the Mac edges, but it's *fast*. Did I mention that it's fast?
The Camino team and these guys should team up. The combined browser would be unmatched.
Re:Mac OS X version is pretty zippy (Score:2)
Re:Mac OS X version is pretty zippy (Score:3, Funny)
Usually when people put words in inverted commas it means the words are being used in a different way than is usual. So, by "slow," I assume you mean "fast."
Re:Mac OS X version is pretty zippy (Score:4, Informative)
My config (far from state of the art):
2 x 867MHz G4
133MHz bus
256K L2 cache per processor
1MB L3 cache per processor
1.5GB RAM DDR SDRAM (2100)
NVIDIA GeForce4MX (standard one with the Mac)
OS X 10.2.6
I just re-tried a bunch of SSL sites and the the sites I usually hit. I did a side-by-side comparison between it and Safari and Firebird beat it every time.
They may just be managing user perception well (i.e. making it seem like it's faster).
If someone can point me to a benchmarking tool that can measure browser stuff, I'll be glad to run tests on all of the available Mac browsers and post them somewhere (since we're sliding down the slippery slope of being off topic a bit). I'll google for it as well.
MacOS X comments from release notes (Score:2)
Also, several annoying features (such as auto image resizing) require user.js hacks, which is a minor hassle. I already have Mozilla 1.3.1, Safari (v.74), and Camino 0.7. I switched to Camino from Mozilla, and Safari is starting to catch up. I m
Re:MacOS X comments from release notes (Score:2)
Two Things I Would Like to See (Score:2, Interesting)
2. The best feature I ever saw in any browser, was in the older Galeon builds. In the preferences, there was a checkbox, which allowed you to select a preferred download manager, such as Pro
The Win32 binary is a 6.66 MB Download (Score:5, Funny)
Man. that's evil!
Re:The Win32 binary is a 6.66 MB Download (Score:4, Funny)
number-of-the-beast
--------------------
100
Which is the number of the micro-beast, IIRC.
Seriously, though, some people take that number *way* too seriously. When I worked in retail in my youth, I came across more than one customer who would actually purchase something else to change their total. I always wanted to say to them:
"It's not the total of your video and candy that's going to send you to hell, I promise."
But I never really had the balls to say it
Re:The Win32 binary is a 6.66 MB Download (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Size of the browser... (Score:3, Interesting)
Although I honestly don't know whether it'll ever reach the size of Opera without Java; that's elegantly crafted. In theory they could, since they could pull the Java console out of the app and put it into an extension; but I don't know whether that'll ever be a priority.
-Billy
No down arrow searches? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:No down arrow searches? (Score:3, Interesting)
That way I can just type slashdot, or any of a thousand other websites I might visit commonly, and it will go there automatically. Also good for when I'm looking for something new and feel confident of my googling skills
This result could also be achieved by setting shortcuts, but doesn't seem as
Keywords, people, keywords! (Score:5, Informative)
I have a bunch of these. Now I can type "search terms" to search on Google, "nodesearch terms" to search on Everything2, "bug number" to go straight to that bug in BugZilla, and so forth. Flexible, powerful, and damn cool.
I use Safari a lot nowadays, and keyword searching is the one feature I really miss. Well, that and a decent JavaScript console. I hope these things get added soon.
Re:Keywords, people, keywords! (Score:2)
Re:No down arrow searches? (Score:4, Informative)
And what's so crazy about using the search field and saving that extra down arrow keystroke? In addition to the default Google, the search field can have literally hundreds [mozdev.org] of search engines available with a single click (including google images, groups, and news). Why would you want to use the very limited search option of Mozilla's addressfield whe you can use a powertool like Mozilla Firebird's search field? It's faster, more flexible andd requires one less keystroke.
--Asa
Re:No down arrow searches? (Score:3, Insightful)
I think just the opposite. Newbies may be happy with a limited single search engine for all searches in the Mozilla urlbar but power users like me want the flexibility different searches in their search field. I have google, google groups, google news, google images, dmoz, bbc news, salon and NASA searches all available in my search field. I can't get that power-functionality in my Mozilla urlbar.
--Asa
Re:No down arrow searches? (Score:3, Insightful)
Glendale!? (Score:4, Funny)
Glendale is making progress towards a trashy cityname, but for true consistency with Camino I suggest the code name for the final release of Bakersfield, or perhaps Fresno.
Re:Glendale!? (Score:3, Funny)
Uh.. crap (Score:5, Funny)
- Form auto-complete is still an unstable feature and may lead to crashes.
- Disabling of form auto-completion is not working.
Sweet.
There is something to be said for Mozilla (Score:5, Insightful)
Firebird obviously is useful if you want to use some other mail application but I think it is unwise to split the apps out without good reason, especially for the large number of people who love the integration of Mozilla.
I would much prefer this - design the apps so they can run seperately if desired, but also allow them to run in the same address space using chrome overlays. That is pretty much all Moz is doing right now, but it could be done much more cleanly so that you could mix and match the bits. This is quite feasible to do and it means the best of both worlds for everyone.
Re:There is something to be said for Mozilla (Score:5, Informative)
"Don't Ask At Startup" Broken? (Score:2)
PS: I like the new "Back" and "Forward" buttons. I'll probably still download a new skin for them, but they are much better than the defaults for Phoenix (which always had my clicking on the mini-arrows that drop down
Re:"Don't Ask At Startup" Broken? (Score:3, Informative)
Hopefully they'll fix that problem quickly - it's sure any annoying bug.
Nasty Flash-related bug in Mozilla Firebird 0.6 (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Nasty Flash-related bug in Mozilla Firebird 0.6 (Score:5, Informative)
Everyone (Score:3, Informative)
The people who use Opera or Moz or Konqueror or something else aren't going to be taken in. Mainly because they've already seen most of the features before. But I assure you, Firebird is better. You just need to go get the extensions. Without the Tabbed Browsing Extension you lose a lot of tab functionality. Without the Mycroft search additions the search bar in the top right is only half as useful.
Go to www.texturizer.net/firebird/
get the extensions that you want and need.
The themes are also there, I prefer phusion
There are more at www.mozdev.org
Do that before you judge this software. A raw install is awesome compared to IE and stuff, but the extensions are what really make Firebird the best browser.
Re:Everyone (Score:3, Insightful)
Work on IE users, they are the ones that make up 95% of the Net. If Mozilla is to ever make any impact(doubtful without desktop bundling) than you need to beat Redmonites first.
First Impressions. (Score:3, Interesting)
But I am still impressed for a version designed to be ran primarly on Windows and Linux platforms. Firebird runs quite well. With a little work and some healthy competition from both Mozilla and Safari. I think there is a chance of getting 2 really good browsers.
Close all tabs (Score:3, Interesting)
Why hasnt this been included, or am i just missing a way to turn it on?
Windows Installer (Score:5, Informative)
A Little /. History (Score:3, Funny)
i guess that was, what, 2-3 years ago? i wonder how many people submitted the story about Firebird 0.6...
Coming Soon! (Score:5, Funny)
Sorry... Firebird takes me back to my gearhead days...
The last things stopping me from switching: (Score:3, Interesting)
Maybe someone can point out how to change these by editing config files so that I can send IE away for good:
Until then, I'm still using NetCaptor [netcaptor.com], in which the tabbed interface is much more intuitive and under my control. IMHO, of course.
Re:The last things stopping me from switching: (Score:3, Interesting)
Folders are first by default. You can also move them around any way you want with the bookmark manager.
"I always want the tab bar displayed."
Get Tabbrowser Extension
"I want bookmarks (clicked in both the sidebar and in the Bookmarks Toolbar) to always open on a new tab."
Get Tabbrowser Extension
http://white.sakura.ne.jp/~piro/xul/_tabextensi o ns
Mozilla has 99% of the features most people want either by default or through extensions all it takes is a
Re:The last things stopping me from switching: (Score:4, Insightful)
The whole point of Phoenix is that only the essentials will be built in. If it's not something that 99% of the population wants, then it's an extension. That way people can build the Phoenix that they want.
I use the tabbed browser extensions myself and it would, indeed, be very useful to not have to add them in my hand. But it's a 2 minute job whenever I upgrade and I appreciate the design philosophy that means I don't have 30 things built in that I don't use.
Prefs still need major work (Score:4, Informative)
That said, I've had one major peeve ever since I first tried it: the preferences control is a joke. While this new version (I've just tried it out) is better in some respects, they've got a loooong way to go.
Some specific points:
Which brings me to the "about:config" screen. It shows you a list of all the prefs you can control, including things like gif animation. In principle this is a great idea -- the ultimate "advanced" tab that allows power-users to tweak to their heart's content.
In practice, it's horrible. It just prints out a list of every preference there is, in alphabetical order. There are over five hundred of them. You have to wade through hundreds of lines to find the one you want. What's more, there's no indication what they do beyond the names of the prefs. Some of the time that makes it clear -- but lots of the time it doesn't. For example, "browser.related.enabled". That's set to "true" by default. I wonder what it controls?
Then, once you've found what you want -- in my case "image.animation_mode" to control gif animations -- you have to figure out what value to set it to. Altering values in about:config is basically identical to altering values with the registry editor in Windows, and we all know how easily that can screw something up. If a value is boolean, that's fairly easy to figure out. In the case of "image.animation_mode", however, you have to guess what string the developer picked to signify the behaviors. At least right-clicking an option lets you reset it to default if you screw up.
Basically, about:config needs some major work. For one thing, there are about a zillion options in there that no longer apply to Firebird -- editor.* and mail.* for example. Those should be removed. The ones that are left should be put in expandable trees by their first word so you don't have to wade through dozens of options you're not interested in -- eg browser.* would have (+) next to it and expand to show all options beginning with "browser.". There should also be something explaining what all these options do and what their values are. Ideally that'd be a little ? next to each option that would pop up a box explaining the term, but a monolithic document somewhere on the web would work just as well.
Anyway, I've groused long enough. It's a great browser, I just think it should be easier to control all those options. Splitting it into a "basic" and "advanced" config panels is a fine idea, but it needs a lot more work!
Re:Prefs still need major work (Score:3, Informative)
> control
Actually, it shows a list of all the prefs that have a value set. Which is not the same thing at all -- there are a lot more prefs that you can control than there are prefs that have a value set by default.
Want the old prefs back? (Score:4, Informative)
Wow, this version feels fast. I've never felt that in all the Phoenix's or Mozilla's or even a nightly from a couple weeks ago, but this 0.6 screams!
User Certificates (Score:3, Interesting)
The one feature that Firebird is lacking that keeps me from using it as my primary browser is the lack of support for certificates. I have several websites that I support at work where I must use certificates because the websites are set up to both require user certs and perform checking of a CRL.
I can still use the full Mozilla for this as it has the ability to import certificates, but I've yet to be able to locate a method for doing this in Phoenix/Firebird.
If someone out there knows how it might be done, I'd appreciate either a reply here or a mail to [z e u g m a at p o b o x dot c o m]
Re:FreeBSD (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I'll switch from mozilla (Score:2)
But if you stay with Mozilla, and keep upgrading, you'll be switched to Firebird/Phoenix/whatever anyway.
Re:Fix the installers first (Score:4, Funny)
"Call me crazy if you want. I'm using a pre-alpha snapshot from 6 months ago and I'm not about to upgrade to another pre-alpha testing build until these pre-alpha test builds are bug-free and release quality. What are those crazy open source developers smoking? "
--Asa
Re:Fix the installers first (Score:4, Informative)
Another thing, if it's so "pre-alpha", why does almost everything else work so well?
Lots works and lots doesn't. That's what you get with an 0.6
(And thanks for taking the time to download and test 0.5. If you actually use that as your regular browser then I strongly recommend that you get 0.6 because it really is much better.)
--Asa
Re:Well, i just did it... (Score:4, Informative)
i've been meaning to wean myself off ms for a long time, so going to give this a real try.
suggestions for best non-outlook email program?
Yes, the Mozilla Thunderbird [mozilla.org] email client which has powerful junk-mail controls and all kinds of great privacy features.
--Asa
Re:What is happenning to mozilla Composer? (Score:3, Informative)
http://daniel.glazman.free.fr/weblog/newarchive/20 03_05_04_glazblogarc.html#s93853368 [glazman.free.fr]
http://daniel.glazman.free.fr/composer/composer++. html [glazman.free.fr]
--Asa