Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Courts Government Technology News

Australian IT Minister Alston Replaced 122

srouvray writes "The Australian is reporting: In a re-shuffle of the Australian Federal Cabinet, current Communications Minister Richard Alston will be replaced (Alston is going to retire) with Attorney General Darryl Williams. Alston is 'credited' for introducing tough anti-spam laws into parliament... Although it will be interesting to see if Williams will be branded a 'Luddite' as well!"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Australian IT Minister Alston Replaced

Comments Filter:
  • hallelujah (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Unominous Coward ( 651680 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @06:09AM (#7083311)
    Let's not forget that this is the minister who said that broadband was only for games and porn.

    I for one welcome his replacement.
  • by switched4OSX ( 668686 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @06:16AM (#7083340)
    their penises are already big enough (or so I'm told)
  • by lks_aus ( 700083 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @06:17AM (#7083342) Homepage
    • Initially dismissing broadband as a gaming platform [slashdot.org]
    • Calling a country-wide broadband rollout a "costly waste of time" [theregister.co.uk]
    • Decreeing that consumers should be kept in the dark [slashdot.org] about their phone line
    • Linking the takeup of broadband to pornography [slashdot.org]
    • Allowing his department to spend $4,000,000 [slashdot.org] on a small and poorly developed website
  • Hoo-fucking-ray (Score:4, Insightful)

    by The Fanta Menace ( 607612 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @06:19AM (#7083352) Homepage

    At last, the cretin has gone. And despite the media claiming he left of his own accord, everyone in politics knows that he was pushed, due to his own ineptitude.

    Of course, Williams is just as much of a wanker, and probably won't fix anything.

    • by austwireless ( 699723 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @06:40AM (#7083428)
      His replacement, who was recently awarded the Australian Privacy Foundation's Australian Big Brother Award for Lifetime Menace to Privacy [privacy.org.au], is currently in Geneva attending a series of meetings. However, a statement released by his office said he was "pleased to have been Attorney-General for the last seven and a half years, and was looking forward to the challenge of a new portfolio". --- Another 7 poor years?
    • Re:Hoo-fucking-ray (Score:3, Informative)

      by TekPolitik ( 147802 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @07:14PM (#7090244) Journal
      despite the media claiming he left of his own accord, everyone in politics knows that he was pushed, due to his own ineptitude.

      Not true. Check his bio [aph.gov.au]. He's 61 now. It's not surprising he didn't want to stay in Parliament much longer. Australian politicians (unlike their American counterparts) tend to retire close to the community retirement age, if not earlier.

      Often a retiring politician will find outside employment in areas such as public speaking, non-executive board membership, diplomacy, or in the case of Alston he may want to return to the Bar.

  • by Agent R ( 684654 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @06:29AM (#7083386)
    .. you insensitive clod!
  • Be thankful (Score:2, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 29, 2003 @06:32AM (#7083395)
    After all, the job could of been given to Amanda Vanstone ;)
    • Re:Be thankful (Score:1, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 29, 2003 @06:41AM (#7083439)
      Who?

      For those of you who are off-shore, Amanda is a happy-go-lucky ignoramus who has not got a single clue about any of the ministries we have had the misfortune of her heading up.

      Of course - I believe in fairness and equality, so my opinions are somewhat 'lefty'... 8-)
      • by BrokenHalo ( 565198 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @09:57AM (#7084783)
        Amanda is a happy-go-lucky ignoramus who has not got a single clue about any of the ministries we have had the misfortune of her heading up

        That is probably the most charitable description of her that I would come up with.

        The present Cabinet might be best characterised as a bunch of malicious headkickers, and Vanstone is no exception. She is several stages more cretinous than her cronies, though.

    • Re:Be thankful (Score:2, Interesting)

      by bcg ( 322392 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @07:03AM (#7083520)
      I would have gladly laid down the Australian IT industry as a sacrifice rather than see her back in immigration.
  • by ewe2 ( 47163 ) <ewetoo@g[ ]l.com ['mai' in gap]> on Monday September 29, 2003 @06:32AM (#7083396) Homepage Journal

    Alston was a communications disaster, presiding over failed Telstra rollouts/privatizations, 3G rollouts, HDTV rollouts; if it rolled, he screwed it up.

    OTOH, Williams has possibly been the worst Attorney-General in living memory, and he's being replaced by the most embarrassing Immigration Minister of all time so he can replace Alston! This I gotta see.

    Yup, it's the good ol' Disaster Shuffle. Take yer partners for a foot-stomping good time :)

  • by nathanh ( 1214 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @06:36AM (#7083411) Homepage
    I literally cheered when I read the /. headline. Alston is a drongo and we're happy to see the back of him.
  • I just submitted this most excellent news item to /., but spent so much time digging up links to his inglorious past that someone beat me to it.

    However, I found the original Register article that named Alston as "The World's Biggest Luddite" [theregister.co.uk].

  • by bcg ( 322392 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @06:41AM (#7083438)
    As mentioned in the article, it was only a few days ago that he was reported here [slashdot.org] as being a "pin-up" boy for anti-spam. Perhaps this was a final good deed to make up for his many earlier sins? Or was it so that the new luddite-in-chief wasn't instantly lynched?
  • by Goonie ( 8651 ) * <robert,merkel&benambra,org> on Monday September 29, 2003 @06:51AM (#7083469) Homepage
    I hereby propose a new award be named in honor of the retiring Alston - "The Richard Alston Trophy for the most boneheaded government IT policy decision". Any suggestions for the trophy design?
  • by used_rugs ( 709991 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @07:09AM (#7083560) Homepage Journal
    Don't forget about the arts. Alston was more than a luddite.. he was also a cultural retard.

    As an Australian, I am thoroughly embarrased. I'm sure Americans and Britons who don't agree with their elected leaders and associated parties can sympathise.
  • by hate_this_nick ( 699884 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @07:14AM (#7083588)
    While I am glad to see he has finally gone I'm not sure what real effect it will have. Alston was by far the worst ever Alston communications minister Australia has ever had but his party did not seem to care. As long as they can sell Telstra off they will remain happy. Assuming that the lib's do lose the next election it would take the new government some years to fix the damage caused by Alston.
  • by bushboy ( 112290 ) <lttc@lefthandedmonkeys.org> on Monday September 29, 2003 @07:15AM (#7083593) Homepage
    Dear Mr. Alston,

    I head up a medium sized Web Development company that specialises in Govermental website makeovers.

    Attached, please find quotation for website that includes :-

    * 45 Graphics
    * 73 Scans
    * A search function
    * 144 html pages
    * 666 animated gifs
    * Hyperlinks
    * A site map
    * Lots of Pornography & Games to make use of that Broadband we all love !

    I hope you'll agree that the $1,000,000 development costs are very reasonable for such advanced technology.

    We can also offer you a RedHat Linux server at a paltry $500,000

    Your sincerly,

    Mr. Alstons Back Pocket.
  • Not a good thing. (Score:5, Informative)

    by Marlor ( 643698 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @07:16AM (#7083595)
    Oh dear. This is bad news.

    The worst thing you could say about Richard Alston is that he is an incompetent luddite.

    Darryl Williams is much worse. He is cunning and intelligent, but with some truly awful political views.

    He is well-known for:

    trying to destroy [onlineopinion.com.au] the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission

    Being the force behind Australia's equivalent of the Patriot Act [theage.com.au]

    Refusing to defend a homosexual judge [smh.com.au], despite being bound by his position as Attorney General to act as an advocate and protector for the judiciary

    Refusing [bbc.co.uk] to accept UN reports on racism in Australia

    Lobbying for increased intellectual property rights [murdoch.edu.au]

    Lobbying [zdnet.com.au] for laws allowing Australia's spy agency, ASIO, to read domestic emails

    Supporting the increase [news.com.au] in the rate of phone tapping

    And generally trampling on human rights and civil liberties wherever possible.

    This is definately not good news.

    • by used_rugs ( 709991 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @07:22AM (#7083619) Homepage Journal
      Thanks for posting .. I don't know much about Williams.
    • by Disevidence ( 576586 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @07:29AM (#7083641) Homepage Journal
      So the economic and technology of the IT industry in Australia, at the cost of privacy. Yikes.

      Thanks for those links. Very very interesting.
    • Re:Not a good thing. (Score:3, Informative)

      by mister_tim ( 653773 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @07:32AM (#7083654)

      Agreed.

      While Alston may not be as much of a Luddite in his attitudes towards technology, he certinaly appears to present more of a 'danger' to Australian's rights, given his views on censorship and privacy. Only this year, the Australian Privacy Foundation [privacy.org.au] gave him their Big Brother Award for Lifetime Menace to Privacy [privacy.org.au].

      While this award wasn't linked to Williams' views or actions in relation to technology it still doesn't bode well for us Aussies given his new role.

    • by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 29, 2003 @07:40AM (#7083702)
      I can tell you now, he couldnt have done much worse than Alston... And as igorant as this may seem, let me address each issue.

      * trying to destroy the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission

      The first step to having equal rights is non discrimination, being a certain race in Australia can make your life easier, dont belive me, go to your local "dole" queue, and tick the box -i do not wish to disclose my race-

      # Being the force behind Australia's equivalent of the Patriot Act

      Well, we do have to catch up on 1984, but seriously, who watches the watches.. lets wake up.

      Refusing to defend a homosexual judge, despite being bound by his position as Attorney General to act as an advocate and protector for the judiciary

      If you wathced the news, you would see that there is more to this, than i can explain here.

      Refusing to accept UN reports on racism in Australia

      Yes, the UN over sensationalised the reports. Dont believe me, live here for 10 years, read it, then make your decision

      Lobbying for increased intellectual property rights

      I think that was his party decision, and not just his.

      Lobbying for laws allowing Australia's spy agency, ASIO, to read domestic emails

      No, what he lobbied for was access to eschelon.

      Supporting the increase in the rate of phone tapping

      I agree with this one, AU has the best phone network in the world, and yet we dont use it for high tech crime fighting, what gives ?

      And generally trampling on human rights and civil liberties wherever possible.

      Not everything is as simple as it seems.
      • by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 29, 2003 @07:43AM (#7083720)
        >Not everything is as simple as it seems.

        You're talking to an australian. THE dumbest brand to human to ever exist.
      • Re:Not a good thing. (Score:2, Informative)

        by Marlor ( 643698 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @08:33AM (#7084027)
        I really can't fathom how you could defend Williams for the actions in my post above. I'll respond, even though I have a feeling you are just trolling.
        trying to destroy the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission
        The first step to having equal rights is non discrimination, being a certain race in Australia can make your life easier, dont belive me, go to your local "dole" queue, and tick the box -i do not wish to disclose my race

        The HREOC is in charge of stopping people from being sacked because a boss does not agree with their political views or sexual preference. It is responsible for stopping sexual harassment in the workplace. Most importantly, it is in charge of protecting free speech.
        Being the force behind Australia's equivalent of the Patriot Act
        Well, we do have to catch up on 1984, but seriously, who watches the watches.. lets wake up.
        So, you support a totalitarian state, do you? The ASIO Bill gives unparallelled rights to Australia's spy agency to detain anyone for questioning without having to lay charges (and with no right to having a lawyer present). I hope it isn't abused - but it is certainly a worrying prospect.
        Refusing to defend a homosexual judge, despite being bound by his position as Attorney General to act as an advocate and protector for the judiciary
        If you wathced the news, you would see that there is more to this, than i can explain here.
        What happened is that Justice Kirby was accused of picking up male prostitutes in his Government-supplied car. It was Darryl Williams' job to stand up for him in his duty as Attorney General. He did not. Darryl Williams was criticised on all sides for this. People are now calling for the role of Attorney General to be redefined, since Williams let politics get in the way of his duty. Justice Kirby is still practicing.
        Refusing to accept UN reports on racism in Australia
        Yes, the UN over sensationalised the reports. Dont believe me, live here for 10 years, read it, then make your decision
        I've lived in Australia for 24 years, read the report, and decided that it made some good points. The Australian Government has breached several international agreements in their detention of asylum seekers. Williams refused to answer these specific allegations, instead he dismissed the report entirely.
        Lobbying for increased intellectual property rights
        I think that was his party decision, and not just his.
        No, it was his. If you read the link I point to, it contains a speech by Darryl Williams stating how he feels intellectual property laws have to be tightened.
        Lobbying for laws allowing Australia's spy agency, ASIO, to read domestic emails
        No, what he lobbied for was access to eschelon.
        He attempted to get ASIO's powers increased to allow them to "read unopened domestic emails". Civil liberties groups were up in arms about this at the time.
        Supporting the increase in the rate of phone tapping
        I agree with this one, AU has the best phone network in the world, and yet we dont use it for high tech crime fighting, what gives ?
        What gives is that the rate of phone tapping has been dramatically increasing under Williams' reign as Attorney General. While it would be nice to think that this is all for crime-fighting, the past actions of Australia's surveillance organisations make this seem a little fanciful.
        Not everything is as simple as it seems
        No, it never is. Your unwavering trust that the Government will only ever use it's increased powers to fight crime and help others is truly simple indeed. Personally, whenever I see any government get increased powers of surveillance, or the ability to detain people without charges, I get a chill up my spine. It would be simple to think that these laws are there to protect us, but what happens when they are abused? If Williams had his way, the Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission (or the UN) would not be there to stand up for us.
      • by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 29, 2003 @08:55AM (#7084199)

        Refusing to accept UN reports on racism in Australia

        Yes, the UN over sensationalised the reports. Dont believe me, live here for 10 years, read it, then make your decision


        I've lived here for thirty years, and I've witnessed a once thriving multicultural society returning to the days of the White Australia Policy. It's fucking scary.
    • Re:Not a good thing. (Score:5, Informative)

      by thirdrock ( 460992 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @08:15AM (#7083897)
      Being the force behind Australia's equivalent of the Patriot Act

      The ASIO bill was much worse than the Patriot Act. Among other things it
      1. Removed habeus corpus from common law.
      2. Made refusal to give testimony a crime (5 years)
      3. Denial of legal counsel
      4. Denial of ANY counsel (incommunicado)
      5. Strip search without justification
      6. Only avenue of complaint via letter, which you have to give to your interrogators, who will pass it on to the ombudsman (without 'misplacing' it, yeah right ...)

      The press goes on about Guantanomo bay, but at least the Americans had to invent a term 'illegal combatant', and it is still being challenged. With the ASIO bill, we signed 'Guantanomo Bay' into law!

      Now the Govt. can pick you up off the street hold you incommunicado, without counsel, without any rights under common law, and then imprison you for 5 years even if you don't know anything.

      And now we want this nazi motherfucker to be overlording our communications as well, reading our e-mails and listening to our phone calls.Sheesh .... we are so fucked.
      • by kubrick ( 27291 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @08:51AM (#7084166)

        1a) Allowed for indefinite detention without charges being laid.

        I know that's sort of implied, just wanted to make it more explicit. (Of course, the Americans seem to have introduced that ploicy too...)
        • by thirdrock ( 460992 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @09:12AM (#7084324)
          1a) Allowed for indefinite detention without charges being laid.

          I know that's sort of implied, just wanted to make it more explicit. (Of course, the Americans seem to have introduced that ploicy too...)


          Yes, but the Americans have had to use dubious loopholes like 'material witness', which was used to hold Jose Padilla and Maher Hawash, and 'illegal combantant' which I mentioned before.
          Interestingly, Maher(Mike) was threatened with indefinite detention in a military brig if he didn't confess to his 'crimes'. So while the policy is similar, the Americans have had to jump through some hoops.

          Us suckers in the Land of OZ don't have a pesky Bill of Rights in our Constitution, so Williams and Co just trampled them by signing into law the demolition of common law (and who knows, maybe democracy?).

          Ah well, New Zealand is looking really nice. The Warriors made it to the quarter finals, the All Blacks will probably win the world cup, their Prime Minister doesn't have her tongue in GWB's arse, real estate is cheap and the air is clean. I wonder if they'll have me?
          • by kubrick ( 27291 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @09:57AM (#7084778)
            I think the ASIO indefinite detention was actually some sort of eternally renewable 1-month period, but given that they didn't actually have to inform anyone about the person being detained, it's indefinite by any real definition. That part might not have survived the Senate, though...

            The American loopholes do stand a chance of being punished in their courts (if not now, then maybe in the future) as they are clearly designed as Constitutional dodges.

            New Zealand could be good... might end up that there are more of us over there than Kiwis over here, if Howard stays in much longer :/
    • by tehanu ( 682528 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @08:18AM (#7083919)
      Phillip Ruddock is the new Attorney-General. As recent news articles state, the reason is to "strengthen the security aspects" of the job. Phillip Ruddock is firstly a favourite of Howard, and once is given a task he will pursue it to the letter no matter who gets hurt in the way, even if they are innocent kids (look at his actions as immigration minister). To say he is dedicated is an understatement. And to wrap up the package he truely absolutely believes that what he is doing is the "good" thing eg. he refuses to take off his Amnesty International Badge even though Amnesty has asked him to. With him as Attorney-General, any innocents who get harmed will be like the kids in detention, collateral damage in an ideological crusade in which to bend or to show any sort of sympathy or humanity is a sign of weakness and a failure. He has the fervour of a Crusader riding into Jerusalem. And the worse thing is, he is actually a very talented adminstrator. Once he sets out to do something, it'd probably get done and he has the favour of Howard to push through th e laws he wants. Basically think of how he runs immigration in Australia. Think of him running national security in the same way. If he can treat little kids the wa he does because he believes it is the right thing to do and he can't show any weakness, imagine how he's going to treat a "terrorist suspect". I'm sure we're going to end up safer from terrorists. But the collateral damage is likely to be huge.
      • by Sajarak ( 556353 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @11:02AM (#7085403) Homepage

        And, what's more, he is extremely popular with most Australians because of the the way he does his job. He was extremely successful at playing to Australian mainstream opinion which says that that refugees claiming to be fleeing from persecution are really scheming "queue-jumpers" who just want to take advantage of us.

        As far as privacy goes, your average Australian seems to think that if you don't have anything to hide, you don't have anything to be worried about, mate! No doubt Ruddock will be managing his new portfolio with these people in mind.

      • by Yoda's Mum ( 608299 ) on Tuesday September 30, 2003 @12:54AM (#7091497)
        If he can treat little kids the wa he does because he believes it is the right thing to do and he can't show any weakness, imagine how he's going to treat a "terrorist suspect". I'm sure we're going to end up safer from terrorists. But the collateral damage is likely to be huge.

        The thing is, Australia has never had a terrorist problem. The only Australians killed by acts of terrorism were as targets outside our borders, or as 'collateral damage' in attacks directed against Americans, also outside of our borders. I felt perfectly safe from terrorists after the attacks on 11/09/2001, and continue to do so. A far more effective strategy against terrorism would probably have been to distance ourselves from American & British imperialism and align ourselves with the more neutral policies of mainland Europe and the United Nations.
    • by Flingles ( 698457 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @08:22AM (#7083941) Journal
      The problem with democracy - sometimes, you can't vote for a GOOD party.
    • by pimpinmonk ( 238443 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @10:00AM (#7084802)
      That's what you get for having a country full of convicts...
  • by 0x00 ( 224127 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @07:35AM (#7083670)
    I'm sure the new guy will need his website redesigned. I am going to offer to do it for 50% of what it cost Alston. At $2 million that is a bargain.

    --

    0x00
  • by thogard ( 43403 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @08:16AM (#7083904) Homepage
    I've currently got enough gear to start a wireless broadband ISP sitting here in my house in Melbourne. I've got two high spots with access points that are installed and ready to go as well as a 10mb uplink.

    I don't have a telecommunications license.
    Thats going to require setting up the right type of company and then paying the 1st $10,000 application fee. Rumors from someone thats just started the 1st years paper work is saying its going to cost $50,000 just to get to the second year.

    Damn cuting into Ziggys gravy train is a hard game to play.

    Lucky for me I can ship all this gear over the Tasman sea where the political situation is so messed up.
  • by adam872 ( 652411 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @08:20AM (#7083934)
    Finally this pratt is no longer in a position to do any more damage to his portfolio. IMHO he has done more to damage telecoms and tech in Australia than any other communications minister in recent history. Good riddance Richard. Get rid of Tony Abbott while you are at it, John.
  • "I tell you now, there is no Linux in Australia! Let them come! We will wash our hands in the blood of the infidel."


    I had to do it...
    • by Azahar ( 113797 ) on Tuesday September 30, 2003 @02:46AM (#7091827)
      Well done and very funny but sadly the wrong joke. How about:

      We welcome our new IT OverLord!

      The buffoon is gone and now we will see what someone with malice aforethought can do, no more crazy ball, this is going to be knives in the night from here on.

  • I sent in this story a lot earlier than this version, and mine was "rejected". We are told not to get upset when stories are "rejected" but there seems to be an issue here, CmdrTaco! Editorial policy should be consistent! (Okay, I'm not really upset, really, really I'm not... :-)
  • by KeensMustard ( 655606 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @08:31AM (#7084018)
    I notice that when a story relating to the US (eg a new policy or achievement ) is posted here, it is accompanied by the US flag. Why no Aussie flag? Couldn't find the graphic?
  • Oh God! (Score:1, Offtopic)

    by pimpinmonk ( 238443 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @10:02AM (#7084830)
    Attorney General Darryl...
    As I was reading this I thought the next word would be McBride, and I almost fainted. Imagine that man in any sort of political office? "Uh, guys, I got this great plan. Instead of trying to hunt down Saddam, why don't we just sue him unless he pays us $6,999,999.00 for every weapon of mass destruction he has? Yes!!! Brilliant!!!"
  • by jyg1234 ( 309917 ) on Monday September 29, 2003 @09:01PM (#7091012)
    What is this!? I submitted this story 24 hours ago and it was rejected and now someone else posts it and it's put up?! What my post wasn't good enough was it?!

    btw as I wrote in my post, Daryl Williams isn't exactly the best guy for the job, he wasn't a very good A-G and I don't think he knows anything about Communications and IT.
  • by chendo ( 678767 ) on Thursday October 02, 2003 @05:14AM (#7112049)
    Senator Eggleston described Senator Alston as the
    greatest communications minister Australia had ever had, saying that during his term as communications minister the nation had seen great improvement in telecommunications services, particularly in rural Australia.

    WTF?

"Being against torture ought to be sort of a multipartisan thing." -- Karl Lehenbauer, as amended by Jeff Daiell, a Libertarian

Working...