What Is The Most Popular OS in the World? 215
Roland Piquepaille writes "If your answer is Windows, you're plain wrong. It's ITRON, a Japanese real-time OS kernel that can be customized for any small-scale embedded systems. According to LinuxInsider.com, it is used by more than 3 billion microprocessors found in mobile phones, digital cameras, CD players and many other electronic devices including even satellites. The article looks at the competition in this market, notably RTLinux, the real-time version of Linux, and T-Linux, an environment for running middleware. This last effort could lead to the eTRON chip, an encryption device that offers secure data transfer across wireless networks and the Internet. One thing is sure for this market: the future is definitively open-source. This overview contains more details and external references."
Featured on SlashDot before (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Featured on SlashDot before (Score:1, Flamebait)
Anybody want to know what the perfect solution for dupes is (since my suggestion for re-categorizing outed dupes has not been considered)? Just filter all of Timothy's stories [slashdot.org]. I don't think he actually reads Slashdot.
That second link shoudl read (Score:2)
Message for the OSS afficiondos out there:
If it's "open-sourced", where's the source-code ? (Score:2)
Despite being publicly termed "open-sourced", the sourcecode of TRON is actually very hard to find.
Can anyone here please point out to us where we can get the source code of TRON, so at least we can see how they achieve their "small footprint" and their "real" RTOS position, versus somebody's claim that RTLinux isn't a "real" RTOS.
Thank you !
Re:MOD PARENT DOWN (Score:1)
Cute. (Score:5, Insightful)
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Know about it? (Score:3)
Not sure that I agree: consider Xerox (Score:2)
Really, the word is being used as a synonym for OS, much like Xerox is used as a synonym for photocopier (and photocopying, if you're into verbing as much as the USA is), or Biro a synonym for ball-point pen (typically consistent for English, nobody says "biroing" to indicate writing with a ball-point pen).
You have to ask given this how many really mean "Windows" and how many mean "OS" or even "software" in general.
Imagine roads where 95% of a
Re:Not sure that I agree: consider Xerox (Score:2)
You made me consider the origin of words, and whether "car" came from a shortened version of "carriage", i.e., the horseless kind. (Also I saw Seabiscuit last night, it wasn't as bad as we thought it would be. ;-)
A search [krysstal.com] on the origin of the word shows it came from the Welsh "caer" meani
Re:Cute. (Score:1)
Re:Cute. (Score:2)
Funny this should come up.
In regard to Linux popularity. Even if it were the most used operating system in the world, how would we know? It's not like we can get an accurate count of how many Linux boxes there are. Attempting to count the number of downloads doesn't work because one download can run on a thousand machines. The number of linux boxes shipped is tiny compared
Re:Cute. (Score:2)
When people interact with a computer, they're interacting with the OS. In fact, it's the single most distinguishing feature to most users.
When people interact with a microwave or iPod, they're interacting with the device. They don't care about its software; they just wanna nuke their burrito and play Britney Spears. They don't much care about the embedded software - if you swapped out the OS and added another, they'd might notice that somethi
Re:Cute. (Score:3, Interesting)
Actually the OS interacts with the programs; the programs interact then with people. People never interact with the OS.
Which lead us to: the OS with W is not really "popular" (in the sense of "Accepted by or prevalent among the people in general"), but user level applications built upon it are; with your "they just wanna nuke their burrito" you're completely right just in the same sense. ITRON can then be the "most popular" for the peop
Re:Cute. (Score:4, Informative)
From a CS perspective, you're correct - the OS is designed to manage resources and send program requests down to the microkernel/ISA level.
But from the contemporary perspective, the OS is a much richer bundle. Technically, using the Start Menu, manipulating files and folders on your desktop, and navigating folders in Explorer = interactions with a "program"; so are printer daemons/print queues, network interfaces, and the Control Panel. Even cutting-and-pasting is technically interacting with the clipboard "program". But these programs are so tightly bound to the OS that it's difficult to imagine a workable modern OS without them. Ask any user on the street, even sophisticated ones, what "program" they're using in these cases, and they'll all say "Windows" (or OS/X, or whatever OS they're running.)
If by "popular" you mean prolific, as does the author, then sure, ITRON and other embedded OS's are clear winners. But if by "popular" you mean user-recognizable - even software to which users may have developed an affinity - then I think Windows is still the OS of choice worldwide.
(Note: I'm clearly not a Microsoft shill - a search on my username will reveal posts/responses uniformly bashing Microsoft for a dozen justified reasons.)
- David Stein
But don't you have to *like* it too? (Score:2)
Lots of people use windows and hate it. From memories of constant crashes in the 3.11/98 days to the constant security holes today windows users have lots of reasons to lothe the OS.
I use windows because I'm a lazy bastard. I Recently switched to Mozilla when some Spyware got installed on my machine during a normal web-surfing session. I don't know if I accidentally clicked "yes" on something I should have, but who knows.
prolific (Score:2)
Re:Cute. (Score:1)
Re:Cute. (Score:2)
Right. Let's hope that by the time all our devices are linked together transparently we are no longer using operating systems that will accidentally play their burrito and nuke Britney Spears.
Re:Cute. (Score:1)
Uh, it looks like you said this in reply to the original post and I feel to see the propoganda either for or against any of the OS developers. Neither the slashdot or the articles promote ITRON or bash Windows.
I for one, had not knowledge of what is running on thes
Re:Cute. (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:The future. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:The future. (Score:5, Funny)
Blasphemy! Say 5 Hail Linus' and kiss the holy penguin!
Re:The future. (Score:2)
hoped for that will have to wait for the first real release (1.0)" - Linus Torvalds, in his readme for the very first Linux kernel
'most popular'? (Score:3, Insightful)
It's like saying water is the 'most popular soft-drink' in the world..
Re:'most popular'? (Score:2)
ITRON belief (Score:3, Funny)
And now there is eTRON is coming... Looks like he has been incorporated in the MCP!
Re:ITRON belief (Score:1)
Re:ITRON belief (Score:1)
Re:ITRON belief (Score:2)
He must, because:
Most used DOES NOT equate to most popular here (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Most used DOES NOT equate to most popular here (Score:2)
Most popular for computer equipment manufacturers...
Re:Most used DOES NOT equate to most popular here (Score:2)
eTRON in French... (Score:2, Funny)
etron in French means shit.
reading the article is more funny now, isn't it ?
Beat a dead horse (Score:2)
Ya..its the most common.. ya.. its opensource.. ya he got screwd my microsoft... bla bla bla
But we have heard this before, many times...
Re:Beat a dead horse (Score:2)
RTLinux limitations (Score:4, Interesting)
"RTLinux switches tasks in milliseconds, while ITRON switches tasks in microseconds," he said. "RTLinux' footprint is measured in megabytes; ITRON is measured in kilobytes."
Funny to see someone call a Linux version bloated and slow...
Re:RTLinux limitations (Score:2)
You've never used Red Hat, then...
Re:RTLinux limitations (Score:1)
Or KDE
Geez, not even Windows Media Player...
Re:RTLinux limitations (Score:3, Informative)
Re:RTLinux limitations (Score:2)
Fast context switches in Linux would be nice, but without knowing much about it (and that's never stopped anyone here), I'd be surprised if there was no trade-off required to get that kind of speed.
misleading (?) (Score:1)
Confusing popular with install base... (Score:2)
Just trying to keep it clear.
Popular, is when people choose the OS.... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Popular, is when people choose the OS.... (Score:2)
And yes, Linux is too confusing and difficult - most people want to start the car and go, they don't want to be forced to be able to take the car apart and put it back together again, which seems to be pretty much the case with Linux (just you try asking for help
Re:Popular, is when people choose the OS.... (Score:2)
Re:Popular, is when people choose the OS.... (Score:2)
Re:Popular, is when people choose the OS.... (Score:2)
First up, what makes a girl "popular". Love does not even make the top ten! Easy, available and one-beer-woman. I don't get your point.
Tron is popular in Japan because: 1)All the universities train up them puppies to use it. 2)All the microprocessor vendors sell/give away a TRON library (try sell a micro in Japan that is not TRON-capable).. 3) A rich library of TRON services. 4) It is a specif
Re:Popular, is when people choose the OS.... (Score:2)
Re:Popular, is when people choose the OS.... (Score:2)
Popular is a misleading word... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Popular is a misleading word... (Score:1)
Apparently (at least) thousands of (huge) companies have chosen TRON as their OS of choice. Populous and popular are essentially the same thing. I mean, how does something get to be populous -- generally by being the popular choice or prefence.
If Linux is truly more popular, wouldn't it stand that 5 or so years down the road that Linux will have replaced TRON in these applications?
Re:Popular is a misleading word... (Score:2)
The majority of Windows users may be nontechnical, but there are plenty who do care about their OS. No way is Linux more "popular," except maybe among a specifically selected crowd.
Re:Popular is a misleading word... (Score:1)
Re:Popular is a misleading word... (Score:2)
Re:Popular is a misleading word... (Score:1)
You bet, that same search with Linux substituted for Windows gets 130,000 hits, compared to 3,000.
Re:Popular is a misleading word... (Score:2)
Bedlam?? If I recall, you put the pill in the meat and gave it to the dogs, who then fell asleep and you could get out of the room.
Re:Popular is a misleading word... (Score:2)
Re:Popular is a misleading word... (Score:2)
Says who?
Is it an OS? (Score:5, Informative)
That would make it a competitor of Posix, instead of Linux.
Re:Is it an OS? (Score:1)
So it includes its OS as well as its related specification.
Re:Is it an OS? (Score:2)
"The ITRON Project creates standards for real-time operating systems used in embedded systems and for related specifications."
All that says is that the project 'creates standards for real-time operating systems' not that it creates operating systems.
Re:Is it an OS? (Score:1)
What you are saying is like Windows is not yet an OS, since it's not customise in a way I like.
Re:Is it an OS? (Score:2)
I'm saying it makes standards. Like ISO makes standards. That's all that it says.
Maybe it does make an OS, but that's not what that quote says.
Re:Is it an OS? (Score:1)
An open-source ITRON system does not exist (Score:2)
At best, there is an open specification of ITRON whereas all implementations are proprietary. Furthermore, even that "open" specification appears to be tied in with privileged access if you want to see anything resembling actual code APIs or architectural details at a finer level than boxes, lines and clouds. I guess that that stems from
Re:An open-source ITRON system does not exist (Score:2)
Re:An open-source ITRON system does not exist (Score:2)
eCos [redhat.com] and RTEMS [rtems.com] both claim to support uITRON 3.0.
Furthermore, even that "open" specification appears to be tied in with privileged access if you want to see anything resembling actual code APIs or architectural details at a finer level than boxes, lines and clouds.
You mean this [www.ertl.jp]? The English version of the spec seems to adequately document the system; it's at least on par with your typically set of manpages. Considering that there's no actual system
boycott :) (Score:1)
More importantly (Score:1)
The article is misguided (Score:2)
Popular != total number deployed... (Score:1, Interesting)
So, ITRON, the OS with the biggest market share (based on device numbers not revenue) in the world.
Not a fair comparison (Score:1)
Linux and TRON don't really play in the same space. You can embed Linux only so far...
It'd be much more interesting if they'd brought in a comparison with eCos which is the natural alternative to TRON at a deeply embedded level.
http://sources.redhat.com/ecos/
Interestingly enough eCos has a TRON API implementation too.
Is this a shock to anyone? (Score:2)
Of course I think this is all moot. It isn't like anyone is going to stick ITRON on their x86 and word process.
Re:Is this a shock to anyone? (Score:2)
My Comp Architecture prof came up with some numbers, and 8 bit CPUs have almost 90% of the market (or something insanely high, anyway). IIRC, 32 bit processors are well under 1%.
Of course, when you consider that for every (pentium/athlon/whatever) CPU sold, a typical PC comes with sometimes dozens of other CPUs these days, and that's just the PC market... add in a few billion embedded devices and it all adds up
And if it Were Windows, (Score:1, Flamebait)
Umm, doubtful.
Re:And if it Were Windows, (Score:2)
Microsoft and TRON..... (Score:2)
And I believe I read a slashdot posted article where the US suppressed the evolution of TRON...... I'm sure MS is very grateful....
Re: (Score:1)
more info (Score:2, Troll)
I've followed TRON since I was a kid hacker in the early 80's, and have watched its use in the industry with eager anticipation of the day it becomes more widely known about in the tech sector.
When Linux came into existence (I've been a Linux user since *day one* of its existence
FUD. (Score:2)
2. iTRON is not free or open source. It's derivative JSP/TOPPERS Kernel is.
Dear oh dear. Is it really this easy to get mod points on
prolific and popular are not equal... (Score:1)
most used os, perhaps, popular, no.
popular denotes that the end user might have some choice in the matter, as far as deciding the OS to be used. prolific because a manufacturer predetermined for the end user.
windows might be a pretty popular, but that's mostly because OEM's don't always have a choice of which operating system they can bundle... 90% of the worlds computers are using some redmond derivative operating system, but once again, probably not always by end user choice...
"Popular" (Score:1, Informative)
adj.
1. Widely liked or appreciated: a popular resort.
2. Liked by acquaintances; sought after for company: "Beware of over-great pleasure in being popular or even beloved" (Margaret Fuller).
3. Of, representing, or carried on by the people at large: the popular vote.
4. Fit for, adapted to, or reflecting the taste of the people at large: popular entertainment; popular science.
5. Accepted by or prevalent among the people in general: a popular mis
3 billion is chump change (Score:2)
Screen shot? (Score:1)
What is the most popular post on Slashdot? (Score:3, Informative)
eCos and RTEMS (Score:2)
According to the stats.. (Score:2)
http://www.muttsnutts.com/html/stats.php
I'd be using it myself, but I'm waiting for Unknown 2 which has working USB support
How about "none of the above?" (Score:2)
Sure there are a lot of phones, but there are a lot more VCRs, microwave ovens, toasters, printers, fax machines, street lights...
The majority of the worlds electronic equipment runs on an embedded PC and has custom designed software written in the worlds most popular computer language - assembly.
-- this is not a
Windows. Pah. (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re:What Is The Most Popular OS in the World? (Score:5, Insightful)
You've probably never heard of every amino acid you need either while picking up that two litre bottle of Mountain Dew.
You'd still regret their absence.
KFG
Re:What Is The Most Popular OS in the World? (Score:1)
Re:500 Internal Server Error (Score:2)
Re:500 Internal Server Error (Score:1)
Go on and give yourself a big pat on the back.
Re:WHO CARES WHO PAYS LINUS SALARY (Score:1)
But why would communists dirty their hands funding anyone? All good commies do it solely for the glorious revolution. They don't believe in the capitalist system!
Now we have the filthy capitalist swine making an imoral profit from Free Stuff!
Just look at Redhat, making a profit. Look at Suse, look at Mandrake... ok Scratch Mandrake they may have to learn what a the profit model looks like.
I guess you think that we should have the filthy capitalist swine making an
It isn't even an OS (singular) (Score:3, Informative)
In this sense, *TRON is best described as a family of operating systems, more like Unix, which also has a published specification to which implementations must conform in order to earn the name.
That having been said, it's also not really fair to call (GNU/)Linux 'an OS' - it's reall