EU Hi-Tech Crime Agency Created 88
Gori writes "The European Union is setting up an agency to co-ordinate work to combat the rising tide of cybercrime. The European Network and Information Security Agency will help educate the public about viruses, hacker attacks and other security problems. It will also act as a co-ordinator for Europe-wide investigations into virus outbreaks or electronic attacks. ENISA has a budget of 24.3m euros (17m), will start work in 2004 and will initially be based in Brussels."
I hear (Score:2, Funny)
Re:I hear (Score:2, Funny)
No let-up for MS within the EU (Score:4, Interesting)
Perhaps the EU can hold seminars, teaching MS employees what's good and bad about virus protection. Hint: the 'execute' bit has a fair old say in the matter
Simon
Re:No let-up for MS within the EU (Score:1)
What execute bit? There's no such thing on windows. :-)
And MS haven't made any l?[iu]n[ui]x software that I can recall.
I think suggesting that the EU execute MS employees is a bit extreme - I'm as anti-MS as most reasonable people but that's a bit extreme. If you'd said stocks, pillories, that sort of thing then well, that's a different matter.
Re:No let-up for MS within the EU (Score:2)
Oh all right, but I think viruses would be somewhat more prevalent if something got chopped off for every 1 million infections
Simon
Teach me to 'preview'... (Score:2)
Simon.
Re:No let-up for MS within the EU (Score:1)
Well, I guess you haven't been around long enough... remember Microsoft Xenix [sourcemagazine.com]? Microsoft was actually one of the largest UNIX vendors in the early eighties.
Re:No let-up for MS within the EU (Score:3, Informative)
Re:No let-up for MS within the EU (Score:1)
Quite functional, and do everything permissions do, plus some more.
If you bother to learn it. Which most normal users and all too many Unix and Linux users don't(And then whine about how Windows doesn't have permissions)
Re:No let-up for MS within the EU (Score:1)
I know that Linux will be getting official support for it in ext3 etc, and I've been trying out the posix-acl's on my box here. I've been using ACL's with XFS on Irix a lot, and some with XFS for Linux.
Re:No let-up for MS within the EU (Score:2)
ACLs are a finer-grained solution than the unix permissions, but ideally I'd have a combination the two.
Education is key... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Education is key... (Score:3, Funny)
Thank you for your consideration.
T.
Only partly (Score:5, Insightful)
Law enforcement does need to deal with this situation. It also needs a body that understands it clearly and doesn't view anyone proficient with a computer as a "mysterious hacker/cracker capable of being a threat."
br Even with education, you'll only reduce dumb slip-ups, not totally remove them. For the rest, we need an easier way of dealing with crackers. When it gets to the point of threats such as "pay us $50000 or we'll see your servers DDOS'ed into hell," I'd say that technical crime is just as bad as physical, and it does need to be dealt with.
Re:Only partly (Score:2)
Well, the latest RPC outbreak could be prevent if Windows users was aware of the risks of not keeping their operating systems up to date by applying critical updates from Windows Update, preferrably through the service you can activate that auto-downloads critical fixes and alerts you when some patch should be applied.
I agree about D
Re:Education is key... (Score:1)
Because they are multinational, they will have no power whatsoever within any single country.
for slow US readers like myself... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:for slow US readers like myself... (Score:1)
24m Euros is actually close to U$28.5m
What kind of "hackers" will they catch? (Score:5, Interesting)
So I'm wondering what kind of "hackers" this agency is going to go after, the people behind virus attacks, DDoS attacks, spammers, etc., or are they just going to nab a few filesharing teenagers to make the headlines?
Re:What kind of "hackers" will they catch? (Score:2, Informative)
The article says:
Seems clear enough to me: virus writers, denial of service attackers, but not spammers.High tech Bobbies to nab cyber hooligans! (Score:4, Funny)
And the headline will be... (Score:1)
"John Plod's Boffins Nab Daft Hackers' Kit - Wary Punters Shed Crap OS, Naff Situ Goes All Pear-Shaped"
This has been an excerpt from the new book "All I Needed to Know about English I learned from The Register [theregister.co.uk]".
PS Not Brit-bashing at all. I find the UK historically and linguistically fascinating.
Yeah, tell me about it... (Score:5, Interesting)
The EU has had a cybercrime convention that was passed into law in Belgium in 2000, three years ago. The very first case is currently appearing in court. Until today, cybercrimes have mostly been classified under random sections of the criminal act such as "theft of electricity", "abuse of confidential information", and so on.
Belgium actually has a specialized cybercrime cell in the prosecutor's office. But it's still a very new area and could do with some better coverage. Few people know, for instance, that hacking one's own company is actually considered much more serious than hacking from "the outside", in the case of our departed hacker, worth between 18 months and 3 years in prison.
No-one really knows what counts as "evidence" either, and since laws in most European countries are not based on court cases but on statutory definitions, we don't even know if emails and expert's reports count as evidence.
I think cybercrime will be very important in the years ahead, as more and more business-critical information is stored in databases that can be accessed from the other side of the world if one knows the correct passwords.
Kind CEO. (Score:1)
My reserch has proved you to be a persons of trust on whome we can trust.
I represent the offices of Jhon Ashcroft. A recent internet sting operation was over funded by $37,600,000 (Thirty seven point 6 missions USD). You may have read about this. This was deliberate. We now seek a persons of trust for whome we can reliy. We need a persons to set up a zero balance offshor account whos name we can put the money in. And for this service we are willing to pay 20% of the $37,6000,000.
Please God willi
Re:Yeah, tell me about it... (Score:1)
Re:Yeah, tell me about it... (Score:2)
Reply to my latest journal posting, we will continue the discussion there.
This smells fishy ! (Score:5, Interesting)
Check it here [ffii.org]...
Re:This smells fishy ! (Score:3, Informative)
Re:cybercrime.. (Score:1)
exchange rate is wrong (Score:1, Redundant)
Re:exchange rate is wrong (Score:4, Informative)
read the article on BBC and noticed they quoted it as 17 million POUNDS.
why was the pound symbol left out of the slashdot posting? weird..
Re:exchange rate is wrong (Score:2)
Re:exchange rate is wrong (Score:1)
Amusing tale about currency conversion (Score:3, Funny)
As most people are aware, newspapers have a house style which dictates such matters as how dates are shown, whether to have a full stop after "Mr", and such-like details.
The Daily Telegraph [telegraph.co.uk] house style dictates that, when an amount is given in a foreign currency, it should be followed by the equivalent in GBP, in brackets.
Sometime in the '70s, this led to a front-page photograph appearing with the caption:
Re:Amusing tale about currency conversion (Score:2)
Slashdot doesnt allow anything unamerican in its posts. Try to write foreign names for example, or anything using letters other than a-z.
Re:exchange rate is wrong (Score:1)
As in British Broadcasting Corporation - it's fairly normal for a site to give local equivalents for amounts in foreign currencies.
Re:exchange rate is wrong (Score:2)
Re:exchange rate is wrong (Score:1)
Also, probably Gori is british, so pounds make perfect sense to him too!
Re:exchange rate is wrong (Score:4, Funny)
Want to ask a better question? Why was the word "anti" left out of the headline "EU Hi-Tech Crime Agency Created"? It makes it sound like a new criminal organization has been spun up by the government (well, that's the way it works here in the US, I can't imagine the UK who we learned all our behavior from is any different.)
European Security Agency? (Score:3, Informative)
I'll put my tinfoil hat back in the cupboard for another day.
Re:European Security Agency? (Score:1)
Agents' ID to be glowing wrist-lens (Score:2)
Stefan
Re:Agents' ID to be glowing wrist-lens (Score:1)
Is this agency going after real crime? (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Is this agency going after real crime? (Score:2)
P,ENISA (Score:2, Funny)
Only 17m? (Score:1)
Brussels, Brussels (Score:5, Interesting)
EU Agenciencies are quite distributed... (Score:3, Informative)
THESSALONIKI, Greece
DUBLIN, Ireland
COPENHAGEN, Danemark
TORINO, Italy
LISBON, Portugal
LONDON, UK
ALICANTE, Spain
BILBAO, Spain
ANGERS, France
LUXEMBOURG, Luxembourg
VIENNA, Austria
THESSALONIKI, Greece (again!)
The last three are new and do not have fixed locations yet. So it looks like the EU agencies are in fact concentrated in... THESSALONIKI, Greece! At least one of the new agencies
Enisa is a trap (Score:4, Interesting)
Association Electronic Libre (Belgium) has monitored the ENISA situation
It is probably initiated by Business Software Alliance. Many observers regard the EIF as a parliaments prostitution camp. This may be a strong comment. However, I guess ENISA will promote Digital Rights Magemenent, Palladium and so on. It will not compare to well respected security institutions like German BSI.
I know the key persons and we knwo the aganda.
This bears watching (Score:2, Insightful)
Cooperation between the US and EU instead of what happened with Data Privacy and Safe Harbor [ftc.gov].
See if they advocate education route with security or regulation route with licensing users for access to the public arena
I see a Scott Bakula show in the works (Score:2)
A veteran American police detective, forced out of his New York job by a scandal he didn't cause, moves to Brussels to head up a special, babe-filled division of ENISA that tackles the cases the rest of the agency can't crack.
Re:oh.. (Score:2)
Killing people is ok, as long as its not in your country. Its easy to turn a blind eye.
But HACKING? It crosses borders!
One American losing 20$ == 10,000 foreigners killed in political eyes
It's funny.... (Score:2, Funny)