Morpheus Infiltrates Other P2P Networks 300
An anonymous reader writes "Morpheus was the number one post-Napster P2P app until Sharman Networks took over KaZaa and got them bumped off the FastTrack network. Now Morpheus is back on FastTrack, according to MP3NewsWire, tapping into it and the other leading networks through a beta of the NEOnet technology in the just-released version 4. Thomas Mennecke over at Slyck speaks more about it with Michael Weiss, CEO of StreamCast Networks." prostoalex also points to a ZDNet article discussing this new version of Morpheus, and notes the Download.com warning that: "Third-party applications bundled with this download may record your surfing habits, deliver advertising, collect private information, or modify your system settings."
good... (Score:5, Funny)
Morpheus always seemed to look a bit dated aswell..
So.... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:So.... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:So.... (Score:4, Funny)
Two keys for any successful new P2P client (Score:5, Interesting)
A successful 3rd generation P2P program should;
a) Either have no spy-ware or, if necessary, do it out in the open. List each program that is in use, what it is recording, and remove it on an uninstall. It's one thing to have advertising and tracking information: its another to pull a Sherman and hide it all (and then !deny all when they get caught)
b) Have some sort of way to filter out the fake files put out by record companies and the RIAA. Check files, particularly MP3s, for filler, or repetitions of strings (the usual cause of noise on fake MP3s). Make users able to chose the actual content that they are after. Perhaps also blacklisting of unreliable users from a user level?
Put in these two features and your program can be competitive on any server (particularly ALL servers)
Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client (Score:4, Insightful)
In other words, make it as simple as possible for you to infringe on someone else's copyright.
I tell you what, why don't you write such an app with such a filter and see how long it takes for RIAA and the courts to come down on you like a ton of bricks for deliberately designing a tool that a) stops them from posting their own material, whilst, b) helping people infringe on their copyrights as easily as possible.
Writing a P2P application isn't against the law, but I bet designing a P2P application that uses such measures to intentionally block RIAA (or any other copyright holder) from trying to track down individuals that are wantonly infringing on their copyrights will be severely frowned upon by the courts.
Contrary to what you might believe, you don't have a right to infringe on copyrights. And the Napster, etc court decisions decided you can't use the "unlimited friends" defence to protect your ass. If you want the latest Britney Spears/Eminem/Outkast/whoever CD then you can pay for it.
Now watch me get flamed to hell and back by half of Slashdot nation. Like I care about karma: if I did I wouldn't be writing this post, would I?
Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client (Score:4, Insightful)
Actually, no. This makes it even easier to prevent copyright infringement, its all about who controls the blacklists. Really though, these features are just useful, just like a gun is useful. Whether its used for 'good' or for 'bad' is all perspective, but either way its got use.
"Like I care about karma: if I did I wouldn't be writing this post, would I?" As someone who hit the karma cap with 'goatse.cx' in their name, I can tell you this is the typical counterculture troll that gets modded insightful by the same people that listen to Limp Bizkit. (this now being the counter-counter-culture troll that gets +3 informative, but then -4 for this amendment.)
Re:Theft (Score:2)
It does, depending on the overpricing. The levy on cd-rs enforced by the RIAA justifies music downloading ("If I have to pay for it anyways, I'm getting screwed if I don't do it" logic).
Personally, I'm not even for piracy on P2P, I'd love for P2P to either go away, or be filled with only rare/indy tracks that are hard to get elsewhere. When piracy was just a bunch of the smart people with exclusive access to FTPs and everyone else tradin
Re:Theft (Score:2)
Nobody is forcing you to buy the $10 audio CDR. Just buy the $1 data CDR. Then you're not paying the levy and thus aren't being screwed.
Re:Theft (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Theft (Score:3, Insightful)
That isn't copyright violation in the U.S.. It's called Fair Use and is protected by law. It's why recordable [audio] CDs and tapes have a levy on them which goes to the R.I.A.A.. The difference between doing that and downloading over the internet is that there is a
Re:Theft (Score:3, Insightful)
Let me tell you what I believe. Firstly: I believe that the majority is not always right. They are living in a dreamworld so to speak. So you ca
Re:Theft (Score:2, Insightful)
Hey, this is an article about filesharing! Who do you think steals (=takes away, so someone does not have something he had before) what from whom and how does it relate to the article?
Re:Theft (Score:3, Insightful)
Moral rights are determined by self.
Re:Theft (Score:3, Insightful)
Then you'd better hope that you don't run into someone who thinks murder is ok...
--
Was it the sheep climbing onto the altar, or the cattle lowing to be slain,
or the Son of God hanging dead and bloodied on a cross that told me this was a world condemned, but loved and bought with blood.
Re:Theft (Score:3, Insightful)
Fear of punishment should keep them in line. That's separate from morality.
Re:Theft (Score:3, Insightful)
Indeed, but the grandparent poster is still correct. We are socialized into certain morals. Some morals, such as murder being wrong, are held almost universally. Yet, there have been cultures such as the Romans with their gladiators that have somewhat trumped this moral law. Morals help glue society together, but they are never absolute, and are ultimately determined by the individual.
Re:Theft (Score:2)
I'm glad the Canadian govmnt made it clear that downloading an MP3 or burning a CD for personal use was NOT copyright infringement...so if I have to pay anyway...I'm going to make it worth my while. Not that I want any of the commercial crap that
Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client (Score:3, Interesting)
So you want to be flamed to hell? Well, I wont bite.
Ill just rip your argument to bits.
You are basically saying it is legal for a "copyright holder" to null the privacy of "non copyright holders".
Im glad
Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client (Score:2)
I've not suggested for a second that copyright holders have the automatic right to null the privacy of non-copyright holders; that's something for the courts to decide.
What I have said, is that if you were to write a P2P application that bent over backwards to thwart any and every effort made by RIAA (and others) to limit the infringement of
The right to infringe exists (Score:2)
Framed in a sheerly legal way, the above statement is correct. Framed in a moral/ethical way, the above statement has as many differing opinions as slavery and women's rights had in their heyday.
Re:Integrity checking is needed. :-) (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Integrity checking is needed. :-) (Score:2, Informative)
If you have the md5 or sha1 hash of the file/iso from the original source (validated by a gpg signature) that's perfectly save and helpes saving bandwidth on the original servers.
Re:Integrity checking is needed. :-) (Score:2)
Re:Integrity checking is needed. :-) (Score:3, Informative)
But if you check ftp.kernel.org -- or any mirror you happen to trust -- you will find .sign files corresponding to each tarball. If you want to pull a tarball from a potentially untrusted source one needs to simply get that .sign file, and then run
gpg --verify [signature] [tarball]
Re:Integrity checking is needed. :-) (Score:2)
Re:Integrity checking is needed. :-) (Score:2)
Re:Integrity checking is needed. :-) (Score:2)
Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client (Score:2)
Cutting out the labels should mean you just don't buy music produced and/or distributed by them. If there is an artist you like who is on such a label, go to their concert and buy a CD there. Buy a used copy of their CD (although that doesn't get money to the artist). Try to contact the artist to find out if they have any suggestions for how you can support them and not the label.
Re: Two keys for any successful new P2P client (Score:5, Funny)
> Have some sort of way to filter out the fake files put out by record companies and the RIAA.
You mean, the stuff they try to pass off as music these days?
Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client (Score:2, Insightful)
a) it's opensource.
b) it generates checksums for files, making it easy for sites such as sharereactor.com and shareconnector.com to offer quality-assured releases.
Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client (Score:2)
Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client (Score:2)
You can use www.sharereactor.com to search for known good (and probably widely shared) files and check for fakes.
Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client (Score:3, Funny)
(how many these confessions does slashdot have logged...jesus people...)
Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client (Score:5, Funny)
...or does
Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client (Score:2)
yes, and it doesn't matter if you post as AC or not.
then again, i guess the average
Hrmm (Score:5, Interesting)
"Third-party applications bundled with this download may record your eating habits, deliver doomsday predictions, collect the neighbours paper, or may leave an unpleasant taste in your mouth."
Unsafe Client? (Score:2, Interesting)
Doesn't Kazaa do these things anyway?
Morpheus Lite? (Score:2, Interesting)
"Third-party applications" my ass... (Score:5, Insightful)
Why would anybody ever download something bundled with the crap referred to here, much less install it? Such "third-party applications" make the main product worse than useless.
I'm surprised there isn't a completely open-source, distributed P2P filesharing application widely available to people. Such a thing, when advertised as been spyware/adware-free, would likely be a huge hit. But I guess the "distributed" problem is a tough one, and it's the only way to avoid having to host some sort of master server (which would be expensive).
BitTorrent is probably the closest thing we have so far, but it doesn't provide an index or anything along those lines...
Re:"Third-party applications" my ass... (Score:2)
Re:"Third-party applications" my ass... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:"Third-party applications" my ass... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:"Third-party applications" my ass... (Score:2)
Re:"Third-party applications" my ass... (Score:2)
Seems they needed some revenue huh? Nice mail list sales?
Direct Connect (Score:2)
Re:Direct Connect (Score:2)
As if DC is more used for "software piracy" than any other P2P network... DC can be used for the exact same legitimate things as all other ways to transfer files. And like all other ways to transfer files, it can be used for illegal activities as well.
So your point is moot.
Hmmhmm... (Score:5, Informative)
Who [lavasoftusa.com] cares [kolla.de]?
Re:Hmmhmm... (Score:2)
Re:Hmmhmm... (Score:2)
What spyware ? (Score:5, Interesting)
The answer to spyware ? Two words: "Reverse Snapshot".
Long live VMWare.
DZM
legal? (Score:5, Informative)
Morpheus 4 is Here and Legal
Morpheus 4 is here and legal - "the only American file-sharing software ruled legal by a U.S. federal court," its owner StreamCast Networks boasts.
But never says why and how, further more, how is it legal and supports FastTrack network at the same time?
Anyway, FastTrack isn't the network it used to be, the quality of its files is getting worse and worse, many times you'll download something to find out that it was something else but renamed, I've switched to eDonkey long time ago, much better file quality, yes it's slower, but that is just fine with me as long as the file quality is OK.
It's much harder to share fake files in eDonkey anyway, because of the file hashing and voting system.
Re:legal? (Score:2)
I've always felt that this has very little to do with the FastTrack network it self but rather companies who work under the authorization of the MPAA to try to make the n
Re:legal? (Score:2, Informative)
In eDonkey clients, your vote for the file is based on the hash value, so when you download a file flagged as non-fake, you can be sure that it's not fake, otherwise you can simply vo
Re:legal? (Score:5, Insightful)
It is perfectly legal to use the FastTrack network without authorisation from Sharman... they don't own the computers that constitute the network, they just own the software that is usually used to run it.
If you write your own re-implementation by reverse engineering KaZaA to determine how it works, that is perfectly legal. For the same reason that, for instance, Wine is a perfectly legal piece of software.
So, basically, Morpheus has a re-implementation of FastTrack from scratch.
What is possibly a little concerning is that it appears to be a download-only implementation...
Re:legal? (Score:2)
There are also other good clients for POSIX-like systems running X, but gtk-gnutella is the one I've been using and the last few versions are great. I pulled down the isos for Fedora Core 1.0 in a fraction of the time the ftp servers were choking it up to me....
Re:legal? (Score:2)
The plus side is that as Morpheus leeches all these files from FT, they'll become available to those of us who do use gnutella.
Re:legal? (Score:2)
Re:legal? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:legal? (Score:2)
And all that's happened there anyway is that somebody has violated the EULA to do the reverse engineering. If Sharman could prove (a) who had done it, (b) that that person actually agreed to the EULA in the first place, and (c) it happened in a jurisdiction where reverse engineering is not legally protected, they might have a case to sue that per
Increased network traffic? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Increased network traffic? (Score:3, Funny)
MUTE 0.2.1 (Score:5, Informative)
http://mute-net.sourceforge.net/ [sourceforge.net]
Jan 7 slashdot posting about MUTE 0.2 [slashdot.org]
Changes includes mention of a time out problem in win32 version fixed. I hope that also reduces the tendency for MUTE to abort downloads.
It may be a bit wobbley in these early stages, but it's anonymous and doesn't install spyware and crap. Worth supporting if only by running it so there are more active nodes.
it's not spyware, honest guv! (Score:4, Informative)
The user comments [com.com] at download.com have more mention of the apparent spyware - to quote one comment:'The claim by the program vendor that this software is free of Spyware is utterly ridiculus. I installed it on a fresh install of Windows XP Pro. It installed "Websavings by Ebates" without the option to opt out.' But then, maybe that's just intrusive adware and not technically spyware - not being familiar with this ebates doobrey I wouldn't know.
On the RIAA comment, the download.com blurb states that 'Morpheus protects your privacy with integrated access to public proxy networks.' But I'm a bit skeptical about that myself.
Please spy on me... (Score:4, Interesting)
I for one would be perfectly willing to submit what I watched in the hopes that it would improve its ratings, so long as the process didn't lag down my system. I would also be perfectly willing to live with comercial content if it paid for the media.
Re:Please spy on me... (Score:2)
Spyware companies take money from one company and use their spy system to redirect your web surfing to that company's content rather than their competitors. For (completely fictitious) example, Sony pays Gator a lot of money, and when you go shopping online for an X-Box, you are bombarded with popups for Sony Playstations. Your email account will also be plagued with advertisements for Sony products. You might think, "Hey, I was just thinking about buying a game console,
Re:Please spy on me... (Score:2)
"You don't call us, we'll call you." (Insert soviet Russia Nielsen joke here...)
Last year, I got an envelope in the mail. Inside the envelope was a booklet with 24 hours worth of time slots for a week's worth of days. The envelope also contained 5 crisp $1 bills, along with a request that I write down what I was watching on TV in the appropriate time slots, and send the booklet back in the enclosed pre-paid
RIAA (Score:3, Insightful)
So, RIAA, do like the government strategy : If you can't beat 'em, join 'em.
I'm waiting for the RIAA 'official' P2P network that allows record labels to profit from the spyware ads on a user's machine. Not like I'd use it, but... it's a better (and more profitable) idea than suing 15-year-olds. And it makes the RIAA look like the good guy!
P2P App recommendations? (Score:3, Insightful)
so what? (Score:5, Informative)
MLdonkey [beam.to] connects to all kinds of Networks, as Edonkey, Overnet , Bittorrent , Gnutella, Gnutella2 and Fasttrack and that seems where the Morpheus NEOWhateverTech (insert your favourite marketing-droid-speak here) code comes from.
BTW, apart from being GPL and from being written for linux originally, MLdonkey gives you a nifty web-interface which lets you search and download (at home) all sorts of stuff while hanging out at the office
Re:so what? (Score:2)
Besides, many programs are doing the multi-network thing lately. Shareaza pops to mind as well.
Re:so what? (Score:2)
Some of the fasttrack code in mldonkey is originally from GiFT, written in C and is GPL'd.
From the FAQ [morpheus.com]
Re:so what? (Score:2)
Re:so what? (Score:2)
Re:so what? (Score:2)
there is no emoticon for what i'm feeling! (Score:2, Informative)
Living amongst the pirates... (Score:5, Interesting)
And Next on Slashdot, 3l3T3_h4k3r_20x6 releases his newest P2P app: Trinity.</kidding>
P2P was a neat concept way back when it was called a bulletin board. I guess it still is a neat concept, now that we have IM for sharing snapshots and web-camera streams. The truth, however, is that it isn't nearly as effective in pushing around bits as administering a cheap Linux box with 200GB of HD off a cable modem with a bunch of college frat buddies.
Moreover, it isn't nearly as good as having a private server with 500+GB of storage on a college LAN... I lost count after the 5th HD was added to my frat's file server. Dues in a frat house go to the 60"HDTV, game systems, parties (It's all about the Super Bowl), and the file server "as needed". As long as you meter/throttle the bandwidth so that the file sharing outbound network doesn't spike the University's network admin's attention (or better yet, have a student network admin in your frat), bandwidth consumption looks just like a massive Quake (or other FPS) game. Match that to the right port for Quake, etc, and even the best sysadmins are fooled.
Lest you think that this is too paranoid, I have a colleague who only traded audio or video on his private 10/100 ethernet switch which was behind a Linksys NAT/firewall from his dorm room's connection (he graduated recently). In these days of IPods and USB2 devices, a portable 200GB HD can be filled up pretty quick. They cost less than $200 for a USB2 200GB drive.
Another friend started using NetFlix recently, and copying the DVDs to DVD-Rs (they are even cheaper at $1 per 4.5GB in bulk).
A recent alum halfway around the world shares popular series like Farscape or Carnivale in DivX. One of our friends likes to encode the director's comments and such when he rips DVDs. Others go for the make-it-fit-in-700MB VCD. These are all private networks with strong encryption. Having a "P2P network" of geeky college aged friends with a central file store provides orders and orders of magnitude the bandwidth and security from being caught.
I'm not saying that I don't purchase media (now that I live on my own, I do have a cable subscription). But when I go back to the house on the weekend, there's a good selection of media.
Let me just say that DRM doesn't work, and neither does software activation. People don't rip crappy stuff. All my friends buy content (CDs, MP3s, DVDs, etc) when it suits them. Busting all my friends would be nice for the MPAA, RIAA, or BSA, but lets just face it, that's not going to happen, because this content is on private devices. The wire taps required to even discover the shared content aren't legal, and aren't practical (go ahead and try to wire tap my dorm's P2P WEP protected 802.11g WiFi network). The answer is to provide the content at high quality on demand over that broadband channel. TV does this, with the exception of the on-demand part. At 3AM, though, if I want to watch Farscape season 2 episode 4, that's what I want to watch with no commercials at DVD or DivX quality.
It's a good thing we live next to a guy with an open WiFi network. I might be afraid to post something like this from my home network logged in with my user name... You can trace this message off a few bounces into some poor guy's closet, and if you get the IP address, then it may or may not have been changed since his network seems to be going down regularly (see related thread on RIAA lawsuits).
Re:Living amongst the pirates... (Score:2)
You do know that WEP can be easily cracked [shmoo.com], right? I realize that some access point vendors have tweaked their firmware to not send weak IVs, but as I understand it the attack is still possible (especially if you have a way of injecting extra traffic into the network).
Re:Living amongst the pirates... (Score:2)
No shit? So much for the notions that fraternities promote public service and academic excellence...
This is good... (Score:2)
Command line (Score:3, Interesting)
I can't run a windows or a Linux GUI application, hence the question.
Can anyone suggest anything?
Many thanks
Re:Command line (Score:2)
You can use it on a console and has a web interface and a GTK interface.
Re:Command line (Score:2)
Really cool. The problem I have now is that the code runs on a port and my firewall won't allow access to it.
Is there any way you can have a port 80 based script that will act as a proxy so that requests are passed from my browser to it and then onto the program?
Re:Command line (Score:2, Informative)
giFT [giftproject.org], I think. Consists of a server (can connect to OpenFT, Gnutella, Fasttrack, Soulseek, etc, at varying success rate) that does the downloading, and a client that can be on remote host as well if desired. The best client for it just happens to be giFTcurs, a console app...
Illegal item breaks in illegally (Score:3, Insightful)
Uhm, so? (Score:2)
and
Third-party applications bundled with this download may record your surfing habits, deliver advertising, collect private information, or modify your system settings.
Which is why I'm glad I still have a copy of KazaaLite. Sure, it's been shut down but you can still download the client via FileMirrors.com [filemirrors.com], and it doesn't have any of spyware/malware shit.
Morpheus was great before it got kicked off FastTrack, then it changed and sucked.
Re:Uhm, so? (Score:3, Insightful)
These things go in fashions - Napster lost it and Kazaa probably will too. People will use whatever is easiest, safest and has the most files, and if the major pirates^H^H^H^H^H^H^H sharers hated spyware and were using KL, they'll up sticks and move to eDonkey or whatever when KL gets switched off. The effort of doing so is negligible.
People still use P2P? (Score:3, Insightful)
poisoned (Score:2)
I used to love Morpheus until... (Score:4, Insightful)
Now this?
"Third-party applications bundled with this download may record your surfing habits, deliver advertising, collect private information, or modify your system settings."
When the average person ELECTS to use something even after reading this warning, you can be assured that the Internet has really and truly become McNet. (McDonald's reference for those of you unfamiliar with it) Hmmm... now that I think about it, it sounds like the Microsoft EULA, and plenty of people accept that every day. ;P
A sad day indeed. A sad, sad day...
Re:I used to love Morpheus until... (Score:3, Informative)
IRC has been around much longer than any modern p2p network. IRC was ancient when I started using it in 1999, when napster came out. IRC was what people used to suppliment their ftp downloading.
Of course now that many of the IRC operators have banned file xfers, it's a lot harder to find the things I liked
IRC ops can't ban file transfers, as far as I know. File transfers with clients such as mirc are direct client to client (DCC, also could be called p2p). That's why all the kiddie
Re:I used to love Morpheus until... (Score:2)
As far as the banning of file transfers, it's pretty much policy everywhere now. Before they just used to have a "don't ask, don't tell" policy. Personally, I abide by policy, laws, rules, etc... That's why I don't pirate software, music or movies. I buy everything
Impressions.. (Score:3, Informative)
What about OpenFT (Score:3, Informative)
Vmware. hehe. woot! (Score:3, Funny)
And my third party software (VMWare) inside which I run your little programs on a dedicated image with nothing on it but P2P programs doesn't really care. Spy away.
Open source alternative KCeasy (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: Virtual machine (Score:2)
> It really is time to just run *everything* inside a virtual machine. Got a virus? Who cares. It's just a virtual virus - all your data is backed up to a safe, real partition which you don't boot from.
What if you need to transfer your data one way or the nother over the internet?
Re:Virtual machine (Score:3, Funny)
Dude, it's now 2004 not 1994. Where have you been all these years?
Re:Is FastTrack network same as the old Linux KaZa (Score:2, Informative)